101 The Effects of Olive Pomace As a Wintering Supplement When Analyzing Weight Gain, Consumption Trends, and Costs in Capris Aegagrus Hircus

Abstract In the feeding industry, the cost of feed is one of the highest variables affecting production. A producer's goal is to find a least cost feedstuff that is effective in meeting nutrient requirements of livestock, especially during winter months. A by-product of the olive oil industry,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of animal science 2016-12, Vol.95 (suppl_1), p.50-50
Hauptverfasser: Urso, P., Beverly, M. M., Kelley, S. F., Anderson, M., Nair, S., Leatherwood, J., Stutts, K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 50
container_issue suppl_1
container_start_page 50
container_title Journal of animal science
container_volume 95
creator Urso, P.
Beverly, M. M.
Kelley, S. F.
Anderson, M.
Nair, S.
Leatherwood, J.
Stutts, K.
description Abstract In the feeding industry, the cost of feed is one of the highest variables affecting production. A producer's goal is to find a least cost feedstuff that is effective in meeting nutrient requirements of livestock, especially during winter months. A by-product of the olive oil industry, olive pomace, could be considered as a potential livestock feedstuff to be used as an energy supplement since it contains 15% fat, post oil extraction. The objective of this study was to determine at what levels the olive pomace is the most effective in maintaining a healthy weight as well as reducing the cost of feed per animal. Twenty-eight Spanish influence goats were fed (2% of body weight, BW) varying amounts of fermented pomace with a protein pellet to meet maintenance requirements. The four test groups (n = 7) consisted of a 3:1, 1:1, and 1:3 olive pomace to feed ratio (O:F) as well as a control containing no pomace. All groups received molasses at 0.5% BW to improve the palatability of the feed and to discourage selective eating of the mixture. The does were fed in herring bone style pens every morning for 49 d. By using ANOVA, a cost efficiency was established. The average daily gain (g/d) for the groups were: 0.0370, 0.0166, 0.0119, and 0.0262 kg/d for the 1:3, 1:1, 3:1 and control groups, respectively (P > 0.88). The lack of statistical difference suggests that pomace can be an effective feed additive to reduce feed costs. A significant difference (P < 0.0001) in consumption rate between treatments was observed with the 3:1 group consuming an average of 0.785 kg/d and the control 0.694 kg/d. Olive pomace can be considered as a cost effective supplement to reduce costs for maintenance rations. Ration costs were formulated at $0.153/kg (3:1 ration) and $0.6386/kg (pelleted control ration). On average, feeding olive pomace can reduce a producer's cost of feed by $13.53 over 49 d maintenance feeding period (P < 0.0001). Further research is needed to determine at what levels the pomace is most effective.
doi_str_mv 10.2527/ssasas2017.0101
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>oup_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_2527_ssasas2017_0101</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.2527/ssasas2017.0101</oup_id><sourcerecordid>10.2527/ssasas2017.0101</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c751-9827a71fa0f5c01eb2a81a6b5a4aba0ceb003257d5c10b8714294aeef391b5363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEFLw0AQhRdRsFbPXucsTbuz6TbJsRRthUIFCz2GSTppV5JN2E2E-h_8z6ZU8ChzGJh5b97wCfGIcqy0iibeU19KYjSWKPFKDFArHYQ4C6_FQEqFQRyjuhV33n9IiUoneiC-eylsjwzPRcF566EuYFOaT4a3uqKcYe6BYGdsy87YA7x3TVNyxbaF3ZEtzC2Vp6_zZsfmcGxhScaOYFFb31VNa2oLW8d270dAdt_PfZ9hLCyoccbDnA90cJ2HlXF55-_FTUGl54ffPhTbl-ftYhWsN8vXxXwd5JHGIIlVRBEWJAudS-RMUYw0yzRNKSOZcyZlqHS01znKLI5wqpIpMRdhgpkOZ-FQTC5nc1d777hI-2cqcqcUZXqGmf7BTM8we8fTxVF3zb_iHwM3dxw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>101 The Effects of Olive Pomace As a Wintering Supplement When Analyzing Weight Gain, Consumption Trends, and Costs in Capris Aegagrus Hircus</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Urso, P. ; Beverly, M. M. ; Kelley, S. F. ; Anderson, M. ; Nair, S. ; Leatherwood, J. ; Stutts, K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Urso, P. ; Beverly, M. M. ; Kelley, S. F. ; Anderson, M. ; Nair, S. ; Leatherwood, J. ; Stutts, K.</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract In the feeding industry, the cost of feed is one of the highest variables affecting production. A producer's goal is to find a least cost feedstuff that is effective in meeting nutrient requirements of livestock, especially during winter months. A by-product of the olive oil industry, olive pomace, could be considered as a potential livestock feedstuff to be used as an energy supplement since it contains 15% fat, post oil extraction. The objective of this study was to determine at what levels the olive pomace is the most effective in maintaining a healthy weight as well as reducing the cost of feed per animal. Twenty-eight Spanish influence goats were fed (2% of body weight, BW) varying amounts of fermented pomace with a protein pellet to meet maintenance requirements. The four test groups (n = 7) consisted of a 3:1, 1:1, and 1:3 olive pomace to feed ratio (O:F) as well as a control containing no pomace. All groups received molasses at 0.5% BW to improve the palatability of the feed and to discourage selective eating of the mixture. The does were fed in herring bone style pens every morning for 49 d. By using ANOVA, a cost efficiency was established. The average daily gain (g/d) for the groups were: 0.0370, 0.0166, 0.0119, and 0.0262 kg/d for the 1:3, 1:1, 3:1 and control groups, respectively (P &gt; 0.88). The lack of statistical difference suggests that pomace can be an effective feed additive to reduce feed costs. A significant difference (P &lt; 0.0001) in consumption rate between treatments was observed with the 3:1 group consuming an average of 0.785 kg/d and the control 0.694 kg/d. Olive pomace can be considered as a cost effective supplement to reduce costs for maintenance rations. Ration costs were formulated at $0.153/kg (3:1 ration) and $0.6386/kg (pelleted control ration). On average, feeding olive pomace can reduce a producer's cost of feed by $13.53 over 49 d maintenance feeding period (P &lt; 0.0001). Further research is needed to determine at what levels the pomace is most effective.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2527/ssasas2017.0101</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 2016-12, Vol.95 (suppl_1), p.50-50</ispartof><rights>American Society of Animal Science 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Urso, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beverly, M. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelley, S. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nair, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leatherwood, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stutts, K.</creatorcontrib><title>101 The Effects of Olive Pomace As a Wintering Supplement When Analyzing Weight Gain, Consumption Trends, and Costs in Capris Aegagrus Hircus</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><description>Abstract In the feeding industry, the cost of feed is one of the highest variables affecting production. A producer's goal is to find a least cost feedstuff that is effective in meeting nutrient requirements of livestock, especially during winter months. A by-product of the olive oil industry, olive pomace, could be considered as a potential livestock feedstuff to be used as an energy supplement since it contains 15% fat, post oil extraction. The objective of this study was to determine at what levels the olive pomace is the most effective in maintaining a healthy weight as well as reducing the cost of feed per animal. Twenty-eight Spanish influence goats were fed (2% of body weight, BW) varying amounts of fermented pomace with a protein pellet to meet maintenance requirements. The four test groups (n = 7) consisted of a 3:1, 1:1, and 1:3 olive pomace to feed ratio (O:F) as well as a control containing no pomace. All groups received molasses at 0.5% BW to improve the palatability of the feed and to discourage selective eating of the mixture. The does were fed in herring bone style pens every morning for 49 d. By using ANOVA, a cost efficiency was established. The average daily gain (g/d) for the groups were: 0.0370, 0.0166, 0.0119, and 0.0262 kg/d for the 1:3, 1:1, 3:1 and control groups, respectively (P &gt; 0.88). The lack of statistical difference suggests that pomace can be an effective feed additive to reduce feed costs. A significant difference (P &lt; 0.0001) in consumption rate between treatments was observed with the 3:1 group consuming an average of 0.785 kg/d and the control 0.694 kg/d. Olive pomace can be considered as a cost effective supplement to reduce costs for maintenance rations. Ration costs were formulated at $0.153/kg (3:1 ration) and $0.6386/kg (pelleted control ration). On average, feeding olive pomace can reduce a producer's cost of feed by $13.53 over 49 d maintenance feeding period (P &lt; 0.0001). Further research is needed to determine at what levels the pomace is most effective.</description><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEFLw0AQhRdRsFbPXucsTbuz6TbJsRRthUIFCz2GSTppV5JN2E2E-h_8z6ZU8ChzGJh5b97wCfGIcqy0iibeU19KYjSWKPFKDFArHYQ4C6_FQEqFQRyjuhV33n9IiUoneiC-eylsjwzPRcF566EuYFOaT4a3uqKcYe6BYGdsy87YA7x3TVNyxbaF3ZEtzC2Vp6_zZsfmcGxhScaOYFFb31VNa2oLW8d270dAdt_PfZ9hLCyoccbDnA90cJ2HlXF55-_FTUGl54ffPhTbl-ftYhWsN8vXxXwd5JHGIIlVRBEWJAudS-RMUYw0yzRNKSOZcyZlqHS01znKLI5wqpIpMRdhgpkOZ-FQTC5nc1d777hI-2cqcqcUZXqGmf7BTM8we8fTxVF3zb_iHwM3dxw</recordid><startdate>20161201</startdate><enddate>20161201</enddate><creator>Urso, P.</creator><creator>Beverly, M. M.</creator><creator>Kelley, S. F.</creator><creator>Anderson, M.</creator><creator>Nair, S.</creator><creator>Leatherwood, J.</creator><creator>Stutts, K.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161201</creationdate><title>101 The Effects of Olive Pomace As a Wintering Supplement When Analyzing Weight Gain, Consumption Trends, and Costs in Capris Aegagrus Hircus</title><author>Urso, P. ; Beverly, M. M. ; Kelley, S. F. ; Anderson, M. ; Nair, S. ; Leatherwood, J. ; Stutts, K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c751-9827a71fa0f5c01eb2a81a6b5a4aba0ceb003257d5c10b8714294aeef391b5363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Urso, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beverly, M. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelley, S. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nair, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leatherwood, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stutts, K.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Urso, P.</au><au>Beverly, M. M.</au><au>Kelley, S. F.</au><au>Anderson, M.</au><au>Nair, S.</au><au>Leatherwood, J.</au><au>Stutts, K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>101 The Effects of Olive Pomace As a Wintering Supplement When Analyzing Weight Gain, Consumption Trends, and Costs in Capris Aegagrus Hircus</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><date>2016-12-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>95</volume><issue>suppl_1</issue><spage>50</spage><epage>50</epage><pages>50-50</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract>Abstract In the feeding industry, the cost of feed is one of the highest variables affecting production. A producer's goal is to find a least cost feedstuff that is effective in meeting nutrient requirements of livestock, especially during winter months. A by-product of the olive oil industry, olive pomace, could be considered as a potential livestock feedstuff to be used as an energy supplement since it contains 15% fat, post oil extraction. The objective of this study was to determine at what levels the olive pomace is the most effective in maintaining a healthy weight as well as reducing the cost of feed per animal. Twenty-eight Spanish influence goats were fed (2% of body weight, BW) varying amounts of fermented pomace with a protein pellet to meet maintenance requirements. The four test groups (n = 7) consisted of a 3:1, 1:1, and 1:3 olive pomace to feed ratio (O:F) as well as a control containing no pomace. All groups received molasses at 0.5% BW to improve the palatability of the feed and to discourage selective eating of the mixture. The does were fed in herring bone style pens every morning for 49 d. By using ANOVA, a cost efficiency was established. The average daily gain (g/d) for the groups were: 0.0370, 0.0166, 0.0119, and 0.0262 kg/d for the 1:3, 1:1, 3:1 and control groups, respectively (P &gt; 0.88). The lack of statistical difference suggests that pomace can be an effective feed additive to reduce feed costs. A significant difference (P &lt; 0.0001) in consumption rate between treatments was observed with the 3:1 group consuming an average of 0.785 kg/d and the control 0.694 kg/d. Olive pomace can be considered as a cost effective supplement to reduce costs for maintenance rations. Ration costs were formulated at $0.153/kg (3:1 ration) and $0.6386/kg (pelleted control ration). On average, feeding olive pomace can reduce a producer's cost of feed by $13.53 over 49 d maintenance feeding period (P &lt; 0.0001). Further research is needed to determine at what levels the pomace is most effective.</abstract><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.2527/ssasas2017.0101</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8812
ispartof Journal of animal science, 2016-12, Vol.95 (suppl_1), p.50-50
issn 0021-8812
1525-3163
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_2527_ssasas2017_0101
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
title 101 The Effects of Olive Pomace As a Wintering Supplement When Analyzing Weight Gain, Consumption Trends, and Costs in Capris Aegagrus Hircus
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T06%3A36%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=101%20The%20Effects%20of%20Olive%20Pomace%20As%20a%20Wintering%20Supplement%20When%20Analyzing%20Weight%20Gain,%20Consumption%20Trends,%20and%20Costs%20in%20Capris%20Aegagrus%20Hircus&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Urso,%20P.&rft.date=2016-12-01&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=suppl_1&rft.spage=50&rft.epage=50&rft.pages=50-50&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/10.2527/ssasas2017.0101&rft_dat=%3Coup_cross%3E10.2527/ssasas2017.0101%3C/oup_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.2527/ssasas2017.0101&rfr_iscdi=true