Results of Theodorsen and Garrick Revisited
Evidence is presented that some of the flutter boundaries (for the 2- and 3-DOF, 2D airfoil in incompressible, inviscid flow) found in the NACA reports by Theodorsen and Garrick are in error, and that many other might also be in error. It is suggested that the state of computational capabilities tha...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of aircraft 2000-09, Vol.37 (5), p.918-920 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 920 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 918 |
| container_title | Journal of aircraft |
| container_volume | 37 |
| creator | Zeiler, Thomas A |
| description | Evidence is presented that some of the flutter boundaries (for the 2- and 3-DOF, 2D airfoil in incompressible, inviscid flow) found in the NACA reports by Theodorsen and Garrick are in error, and that many other might also be in error. It is suggested that the state of computational capabilities that existed at the time the original NACA reports were prepared contributed in large measure to the errors. It is recommended that all of the plots in these classic and historically important NACA documents be recomputed and published. (CSA) |
| doi_str_mv | 10.2514/2.2691 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_2514_2_2691</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>27703488</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a342t-b876bbb7b957cfe8b9e073de7f16455da30919d29666a2546c9af478404af3893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0EtLw0AUBeBBFKxVf0NAEUFS5_1YStEqFIRS18NNMoOpaabOJKL_3pQWCuLqbj7O4R6ELgmeUEH4PZ1QacgRGhHBWM601MdohDEluZbSnKKzlFYYY42VGqG7hUt906Us-Gz57kIVYnJtBm2VzSDGuvzIFu6rTnXnqnN04qFJ7mJ_x-jt6XE5fc7nr7OX6cM8B8ZplxdayaIoVGGEKr3ThXFYscopTyQXogKGDTEVNVJKoILL0oDnSnPMwTNt2Bjd7HI3MXz2LnV2XafSNQ20LvTJUqUw41ofYBlDStF5u4n1GuKPJdhut7DUbrcY4PU-EVIJjY_QlnU6aEE5F9vi2x2DGsCuQh_b4c99iN1U3vq-aTr33Q306j_6p_cXV_t06g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>27703488</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Results of Theodorsen and Garrick Revisited</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Zeiler, Thomas A</creator><creatorcontrib>Zeiler, Thomas A</creatorcontrib><description>Evidence is presented that some of the flutter boundaries (for the 2- and 3-DOF, 2D airfoil in incompressible, inviscid flow) found in the NACA reports by Theodorsen and Garrick are in error, and that many other might also be in error. It is suggested that the state of computational capabilities that existed at the time the original NACA reports were prepared contributed in large measure to the errors. It is recommended that all of the plots in these classic and historically important NACA documents be recomputed and published. (CSA)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8669</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-3868</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2514/2.2691</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAIRAM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</publisher><subject>Exact sciences and technology ; Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications) ; Physics ; Solid mechanics ; Structural and continuum mechanics ; Vibration, mechanical wave, dynamic stability (aeroelasticity, vibration control...) ; Vibrations and mechanical waves</subject><ispartof>Journal of aircraft, 2000-09, Vol.37 (5), p.918-920</ispartof><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a342t-b876bbb7b957cfe8b9e073de7f16455da30919d29666a2546c9af478404af3893</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1524459$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zeiler, Thomas A</creatorcontrib><title>Results of Theodorsen and Garrick Revisited</title><title>Journal of aircraft</title><description>Evidence is presented that some of the flutter boundaries (for the 2- and 3-DOF, 2D airfoil in incompressible, inviscid flow) found in the NACA reports by Theodorsen and Garrick are in error, and that many other might also be in error. It is suggested that the state of computational capabilities that existed at the time the original NACA reports were prepared contributed in large measure to the errors. It is recommended that all of the plots in these classic and historically important NACA documents be recomputed and published. (CSA)</description><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications)</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Solid mechanics</subject><subject>Structural and continuum mechanics</subject><subject>Vibration, mechanical wave, dynamic stability (aeroelasticity, vibration control...)</subject><subject>Vibrations and mechanical waves</subject><issn>0021-8669</issn><issn>1533-3868</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpt0EtLw0AUBeBBFKxVf0NAEUFS5_1YStEqFIRS18NNMoOpaabOJKL_3pQWCuLqbj7O4R6ELgmeUEH4PZ1QacgRGhHBWM601MdohDEluZbSnKKzlFYYY42VGqG7hUt906Us-Gz57kIVYnJtBm2VzSDGuvzIFu6rTnXnqnN04qFJ7mJ_x-jt6XE5fc7nr7OX6cM8B8ZplxdayaIoVGGEKr3ThXFYscopTyQXogKGDTEVNVJKoILL0oDnSnPMwTNt2Bjd7HI3MXz2LnV2XafSNQ20LvTJUqUw41ofYBlDStF5u4n1GuKPJdhut7DUbrcY4PU-EVIJjY_QlnU6aEE5F9vi2x2DGsCuQh_b4c99iN1U3vq-aTr33Q306j_6p_cXV_t06g</recordid><startdate>20000901</startdate><enddate>20000901</enddate><creator>Zeiler, Thomas A</creator><general>American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000901</creationdate><title>Results of Theodorsen and Garrick Revisited</title><author>Zeiler, Thomas A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a342t-b876bbb7b957cfe8b9e073de7f16455da30919d29666a2546c9af478404af3893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications)</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Solid mechanics</topic><topic>Structural and continuum mechanics</topic><topic>Vibration, mechanical wave, dynamic stability (aeroelasticity, vibration control...)</topic><topic>Vibrations and mechanical waves</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zeiler, Thomas A</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of aircraft</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zeiler, Thomas A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Results of Theodorsen and Garrick Revisited</atitle><jtitle>Journal of aircraft</jtitle><date>2000-09-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>918</spage><epage>920</epage><pages>918-920</pages><issn>0021-8669</issn><eissn>1533-3868</eissn><coden>JAIRAM</coden><abstract>Evidence is presented that some of the flutter boundaries (for the 2- and 3-DOF, 2D airfoil in incompressible, inviscid flow) found in the NACA reports by Theodorsen and Garrick are in error, and that many other might also be in error. It is suggested that the state of computational capabilities that existed at the time the original NACA reports were prepared contributed in large measure to the errors. It is recommended that all of the plots in these classic and historically important NACA documents be recomputed and published. (CSA)</abstract><cop>Reston, VA</cop><pub>American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</pub><doi>10.2514/2.2691</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0021-8669 |
| ispartof | Journal of aircraft, 2000-09, Vol.37 (5), p.918-920 |
| issn | 0021-8669 1533-3868 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_2514_2_2691 |
| source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Exact sciences and technology Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications) Physics Solid mechanics Structural and continuum mechanics Vibration, mechanical wave, dynamic stability (aeroelasticity, vibration control...) Vibrations and mechanical waves |
| title | Results of Theodorsen and Garrick Revisited |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T03%3A38%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Results%20of%20Theodorsen%20and%20Garrick%20Revisited&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20aircraft&rft.au=Zeiler,%20Thomas%20A&rft.date=2000-09-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=918&rft.epage=920&rft.pages=918-920&rft.issn=0021-8669&rft.eissn=1533-3868&rft.coden=JAIRAM&rft_id=info:doi/10.2514/2.2691&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E27703488%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=27703488&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |