Determining Flow Propagation Direction from In-Flight Array Surface Pressure Fluctuation Data

When characterizing spatial coherence properties of turbulent boundary-layer surface pressure fluctuation data, it is important to determine the local flow direction first. Without flow direction, it is very easy to introduce errors due to misalignment between sensors and the flow. For cases with tw...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:AIAA journal 2022-10, Vol.60 (10), p.5868-5879
Hauptverfasser: Haxter, Stefan, Raumer, Hans-Georg, Berkefeld, Tobias, Spehr, Carsten
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 5879
container_issue 10
container_start_page 5868
container_title AIAA journal
container_volume 60
creator Haxter, Stefan
Raumer, Hans-Georg
Berkefeld, Tobias
Spehr, Carsten
description When characterizing spatial coherence properties of turbulent boundary-layer surface pressure fluctuation data, it is important to determine the local flow direction first. Without flow direction, it is very easy to introduce errors due to misalignment between sensors and the flow. For cases with two-dimensional microphone distributions, a method of determining flow direction from the orientation of the coherent pressure in spatial domain was introduced recently. If the data are analyzed in wavenumber domain, flow information can be obtained by the position and orientation of the convective ridge. In this publication, flow directions determined from a revised spatial domain approach and from two wavenumber domain approaches are considered. It was found that the result from the spatial domain approach and the result from the orientation of the convective ridge are similar for most frequencies, while the result based on the position of the convective ridge differs in the lower frequency range. Tilted convection of coherent structures in the turbulent boundary layer is discussed as a possible cause of these observations. A modification of the analytical model for surface pressure coherence is derived that takes the findings into account.
doi_str_mv 10.2514/1.J061711
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_2514_1_J061711</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2716600190</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a213t-21920b79a11dc147d6344409be69f26386d6082c2bca8cf89fe81818f99b28073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkE9LAzEQxYMoWKsHv8GCIHjYmkl2s8mx9I9WCgoqeJGQTZO6pd3UJIv02xttwYPMYWbg994wD6FLwANSQnELgwfMoAI4Qj0oKc0pL9-OUQ9jDDkUJTlFZyGs0kYqDj30PjbR-E3TNu0ym67dV_bk3VYtVWxcm40bb_TvZL3bZLM2n66b5UfMht6rXfbceau0SRITQudNMuh07A5aFdU5OrFqHczFoffR63TyMrrP5493s9FwnisCNOYEBMF1JRTAQkNRLRgtigKL2jBhCaOcLRjmRJNaK64tF9ZwSGWFqAnHFe2jq73v1rvPzoQoV67zbTopSQWMpXcFTtTNntLeheCNlVvfbJTfScDyJz0J8pBeYq_3rGqU-nP7D34DhPdsMQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2716600190</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Determining Flow Propagation Direction from In-Flight Array Surface Pressure Fluctuation Data</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Haxter, Stefan ; Raumer, Hans-Georg ; Berkefeld, Tobias ; Spehr, Carsten</creator><creatorcontrib>Haxter, Stefan ; Raumer, Hans-Georg ; Berkefeld, Tobias ; Spehr, Carsten</creatorcontrib><description>When characterizing spatial coherence properties of turbulent boundary-layer surface pressure fluctuation data, it is important to determine the local flow direction first. Without flow direction, it is very easy to introduce errors due to misalignment between sensors and the flow. For cases with two-dimensional microphone distributions, a method of determining flow direction from the orientation of the coherent pressure in spatial domain was introduced recently. If the data are analyzed in wavenumber domain, flow information can be obtained by the position and orientation of the convective ridge. In this publication, flow directions determined from a revised spatial domain approach and from two wavenumber domain approaches are considered. It was found that the result from the spatial domain approach and the result from the orientation of the convective ridge are similar for most frequencies, while the result based on the position of the convective ridge differs in the lower frequency range. Tilted convection of coherent structures in the turbulent boundary layer is discussed as a possible cause of these observations. A modification of the analytical model for surface pressure coherence is derived that takes the findings into account.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-1452</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-385X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2514/1.J061711</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Virginia: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</publisher><subject>Coherence ; Domains ; Flow control ; Frequency ranges ; Local flow ; Misalignment ; Orientation ; Pressure ; Spatial data ; Turbulent boundary layer ; Two dimensional flow ; Wavelengths</subject><ispartof>AIAA journal, 2022-10, Vol.60 (10), p.5868-5879</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2022 by The Authors. Published by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., with permission. All requests for copying and permission to reprint should be submitted to CCC at ; employ the eISSN to initiate your request. See also AIAA Rights and Permissions .</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 by The Authors. Published by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., with permission. All requests for copying and permission to reprint should be submitted to CCC at www.copyright.com; employ the eISSN 1533-385X to initiate your request. See also AIAA Rights and Permissions www.aiaa.org/randp.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a213t-21920b79a11dc147d6344409be69f26386d6082c2bca8cf89fe81818f99b28073</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6727-6819 ; 0000-0002-9232-2802 ; 0000-0002-2744-3675</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Haxter, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raumer, Hans-Georg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berkefeld, Tobias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spehr, Carsten</creatorcontrib><title>Determining Flow Propagation Direction from In-Flight Array Surface Pressure Fluctuation Data</title><title>AIAA journal</title><description>When characterizing spatial coherence properties of turbulent boundary-layer surface pressure fluctuation data, it is important to determine the local flow direction first. Without flow direction, it is very easy to introduce errors due to misalignment between sensors and the flow. For cases with two-dimensional microphone distributions, a method of determining flow direction from the orientation of the coherent pressure in spatial domain was introduced recently. If the data are analyzed in wavenumber domain, flow information can be obtained by the position and orientation of the convective ridge. In this publication, flow directions determined from a revised spatial domain approach and from two wavenumber domain approaches are considered. It was found that the result from the spatial domain approach and the result from the orientation of the convective ridge are similar for most frequencies, while the result based on the position of the convective ridge differs in the lower frequency range. Tilted convection of coherent structures in the turbulent boundary layer is discussed as a possible cause of these observations. A modification of the analytical model for surface pressure coherence is derived that takes the findings into account.</description><subject>Coherence</subject><subject>Domains</subject><subject>Flow control</subject><subject>Frequency ranges</subject><subject>Local flow</subject><subject>Misalignment</subject><subject>Orientation</subject><subject>Pressure</subject><subject>Spatial data</subject><subject>Turbulent boundary layer</subject><subject>Two dimensional flow</subject><subject>Wavelengths</subject><issn>0001-1452</issn><issn>1533-385X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplkE9LAzEQxYMoWKsHv8GCIHjYmkl2s8mx9I9WCgoqeJGQTZO6pd3UJIv02xttwYPMYWbg994wD6FLwANSQnELgwfMoAI4Qj0oKc0pL9-OUQ9jDDkUJTlFZyGs0kYqDj30PjbR-E3TNu0ym67dV_bk3VYtVWxcm40bb_TvZL3bZLM2n66b5UfMht6rXfbceau0SRITQudNMuh07A5aFdU5OrFqHczFoffR63TyMrrP5493s9FwnisCNOYEBMF1JRTAQkNRLRgtigKL2jBhCaOcLRjmRJNaK64tF9ZwSGWFqAnHFe2jq73v1rvPzoQoV67zbTopSQWMpXcFTtTNntLeheCNlVvfbJTfScDyJz0J8pBeYq_3rGqU-nP7D34DhPdsMQ</recordid><startdate>202210</startdate><enddate>202210</enddate><creator>Haxter, Stefan</creator><creator>Raumer, Hans-Georg</creator><creator>Berkefeld, Tobias</creator><creator>Spehr, Carsten</creator><general>American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6727-6819</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9232-2802</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2744-3675</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202210</creationdate><title>Determining Flow Propagation Direction from In-Flight Array Surface Pressure Fluctuation Data</title><author>Haxter, Stefan ; Raumer, Hans-Georg ; Berkefeld, Tobias ; Spehr, Carsten</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a213t-21920b79a11dc147d6344409be69f26386d6082c2bca8cf89fe81818f99b28073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Coherence</topic><topic>Domains</topic><topic>Flow control</topic><topic>Frequency ranges</topic><topic>Local flow</topic><topic>Misalignment</topic><topic>Orientation</topic><topic>Pressure</topic><topic>Spatial data</topic><topic>Turbulent boundary layer</topic><topic>Two dimensional flow</topic><topic>Wavelengths</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Haxter, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raumer, Hans-Georg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berkefeld, Tobias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spehr, Carsten</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>AIAA journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Haxter, Stefan</au><au>Raumer, Hans-Georg</au><au>Berkefeld, Tobias</au><au>Spehr, Carsten</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Determining Flow Propagation Direction from In-Flight Array Surface Pressure Fluctuation Data</atitle><jtitle>AIAA journal</jtitle><date>2022-10</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>5868</spage><epage>5879</epage><pages>5868-5879</pages><issn>0001-1452</issn><eissn>1533-385X</eissn><abstract>When characterizing spatial coherence properties of turbulent boundary-layer surface pressure fluctuation data, it is important to determine the local flow direction first. Without flow direction, it is very easy to introduce errors due to misalignment between sensors and the flow. For cases with two-dimensional microphone distributions, a method of determining flow direction from the orientation of the coherent pressure in spatial domain was introduced recently. If the data are analyzed in wavenumber domain, flow information can be obtained by the position and orientation of the convective ridge. In this publication, flow directions determined from a revised spatial domain approach and from two wavenumber domain approaches are considered. It was found that the result from the spatial domain approach and the result from the orientation of the convective ridge are similar for most frequencies, while the result based on the position of the convective ridge differs in the lower frequency range. Tilted convection of coherent structures in the turbulent boundary layer is discussed as a possible cause of these observations. A modification of the analytical model for surface pressure coherence is derived that takes the findings into account.</abstract><cop>Virginia</cop><pub>American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</pub><doi>10.2514/1.J061711</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6727-6819</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9232-2802</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2744-3675</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-1452
ispartof AIAA journal, 2022-10, Vol.60 (10), p.5868-5879
issn 0001-1452
1533-385X
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_2514_1_J061711
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Coherence
Domains
Flow control
Frequency ranges
Local flow
Misalignment
Orientation
Pressure
Spatial data
Turbulent boundary layer
Two dimensional flow
Wavelengths
title Determining Flow Propagation Direction from In-Flight Array Surface Pressure Fluctuation Data
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T08%3A58%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Determining%20Flow%20Propagation%20Direction%20from%20In-Flight%20Array%20Surface%20Pressure%20Fluctuation%20Data&rft.jtitle=AIAA%20journal&rft.au=Haxter,%20Stefan&rft.date=2022-10&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=5868&rft.epage=5879&rft.pages=5868-5879&rft.issn=0001-1452&rft.eissn=1533-385X&rft_id=info:doi/10.2514/1.J061711&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2716600190%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2716600190&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true