Determining Flow Propagation Direction from In-Flight Array Surface Pressure Fluctuation Data
When characterizing spatial coherence properties of turbulent boundary-layer surface pressure fluctuation data, it is important to determine the local flow direction first. Without flow direction, it is very easy to introduce errors due to misalignment between sensors and the flow. For cases with tw...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | AIAA journal 2022-10, Vol.60 (10), p.5868-5879 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 5879 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 5868 |
container_title | AIAA journal |
container_volume | 60 |
creator | Haxter, Stefan Raumer, Hans-Georg Berkefeld, Tobias Spehr, Carsten |
description | When characterizing spatial coherence properties of turbulent boundary-layer surface pressure fluctuation data, it is important to determine the local flow direction first. Without flow direction, it is very easy to introduce errors due to misalignment between sensors and the flow. For cases with two-dimensional microphone distributions, a method of determining flow direction from the orientation of the coherent pressure in spatial domain was introduced recently. If the data are analyzed in wavenumber domain, flow information can be obtained by the position and orientation of the convective ridge. In this publication, flow directions determined from a revised spatial domain approach and from two wavenumber domain approaches are considered. It was found that the result from the spatial domain approach and the result from the orientation of the convective ridge are similar for most frequencies, while the result based on the position of the convective ridge differs in the lower frequency range. Tilted convection of coherent structures in the turbulent boundary layer is discussed as a possible cause of these observations. A modification of the analytical model for surface pressure coherence is derived that takes the findings into account. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2514/1.J061711 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_2514_1_J061711</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2716600190</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a213t-21920b79a11dc147d6344409be69f26386d6082c2bca8cf89fe81818f99b28073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkE9LAzEQxYMoWKsHv8GCIHjYmkl2s8mx9I9WCgoqeJGQTZO6pd3UJIv02xttwYPMYWbg994wD6FLwANSQnELgwfMoAI4Qj0oKc0pL9-OUQ9jDDkUJTlFZyGs0kYqDj30PjbR-E3TNu0ym67dV_bk3VYtVWxcm40bb_TvZL3bZLM2n66b5UfMht6rXfbceau0SRITQudNMuh07A5aFdU5OrFqHczFoffR63TyMrrP5493s9FwnisCNOYEBMF1JRTAQkNRLRgtigKL2jBhCaOcLRjmRJNaK64tF9ZwSGWFqAnHFe2jq73v1rvPzoQoV67zbTopSQWMpXcFTtTNntLeheCNlVvfbJTfScDyJz0J8pBeYq_3rGqU-nP7D34DhPdsMQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2716600190</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Determining Flow Propagation Direction from In-Flight Array Surface Pressure Fluctuation Data</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Haxter, Stefan ; Raumer, Hans-Georg ; Berkefeld, Tobias ; Spehr, Carsten</creator><creatorcontrib>Haxter, Stefan ; Raumer, Hans-Georg ; Berkefeld, Tobias ; Spehr, Carsten</creatorcontrib><description>When characterizing spatial coherence properties of turbulent boundary-layer surface pressure fluctuation data, it is important to determine the local flow direction first. Without flow direction, it is very easy to introduce errors due to misalignment between sensors and the flow. For cases with two-dimensional microphone distributions, a method of determining flow direction from the orientation of the coherent pressure in spatial domain was introduced recently. If the data are analyzed in wavenumber domain, flow information can be obtained by the position and orientation of the convective ridge. In this publication, flow directions determined from a revised spatial domain approach and from two wavenumber domain approaches are considered. It was found that the result from the spatial domain approach and the result from the orientation of the convective ridge are similar for most frequencies, while the result based on the position of the convective ridge differs in the lower frequency range. Tilted convection of coherent structures in the turbulent boundary layer is discussed as a possible cause of these observations. A modification of the analytical model for surface pressure coherence is derived that takes the findings into account.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-1452</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-385X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2514/1.J061711</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Virginia: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</publisher><subject>Coherence ; Domains ; Flow control ; Frequency ranges ; Local flow ; Misalignment ; Orientation ; Pressure ; Spatial data ; Turbulent boundary layer ; Two dimensional flow ; Wavelengths</subject><ispartof>AIAA journal, 2022-10, Vol.60 (10), p.5868-5879</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2022 by The Authors. Published by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., with permission. All requests for copying and permission to reprint should be submitted to CCC at ; employ the eISSN to initiate your request. See also AIAA Rights and Permissions .</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 by The Authors. Published by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., with permission. All requests for copying and permission to reprint should be submitted to CCC at www.copyright.com; employ the eISSN 1533-385X to initiate your request. See also AIAA Rights and Permissions www.aiaa.org/randp.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a213t-21920b79a11dc147d6344409be69f26386d6082c2bca8cf89fe81818f99b28073</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6727-6819 ; 0000-0002-9232-2802 ; 0000-0002-2744-3675</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Haxter, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raumer, Hans-Georg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berkefeld, Tobias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spehr, Carsten</creatorcontrib><title>Determining Flow Propagation Direction from In-Flight Array Surface Pressure Fluctuation Data</title><title>AIAA journal</title><description>When characterizing spatial coherence properties of turbulent boundary-layer surface pressure fluctuation data, it is important to determine the local flow direction first. Without flow direction, it is very easy to introduce errors due to misalignment between sensors and the flow. For cases with two-dimensional microphone distributions, a method of determining flow direction from the orientation of the coherent pressure in spatial domain was introduced recently. If the data are analyzed in wavenumber domain, flow information can be obtained by the position and orientation of the convective ridge. In this publication, flow directions determined from a revised spatial domain approach and from two wavenumber domain approaches are considered. It was found that the result from the spatial domain approach and the result from the orientation of the convective ridge are similar for most frequencies, while the result based on the position of the convective ridge differs in the lower frequency range. Tilted convection of coherent structures in the turbulent boundary layer is discussed as a possible cause of these observations. A modification of the analytical model for surface pressure coherence is derived that takes the findings into account.</description><subject>Coherence</subject><subject>Domains</subject><subject>Flow control</subject><subject>Frequency ranges</subject><subject>Local flow</subject><subject>Misalignment</subject><subject>Orientation</subject><subject>Pressure</subject><subject>Spatial data</subject><subject>Turbulent boundary layer</subject><subject>Two dimensional flow</subject><subject>Wavelengths</subject><issn>0001-1452</issn><issn>1533-385X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplkE9LAzEQxYMoWKsHv8GCIHjYmkl2s8mx9I9WCgoqeJGQTZO6pd3UJIv02xttwYPMYWbg994wD6FLwANSQnELgwfMoAI4Qj0oKc0pL9-OUQ9jDDkUJTlFZyGs0kYqDj30PjbR-E3TNu0ym67dV_bk3VYtVWxcm40bb_TvZL3bZLM2n66b5UfMht6rXfbceau0SRITQudNMuh07A5aFdU5OrFqHczFoffR63TyMrrP5493s9FwnisCNOYEBMF1JRTAQkNRLRgtigKL2jBhCaOcLRjmRJNaK64tF9ZwSGWFqAnHFe2jq73v1rvPzoQoV67zbTopSQWMpXcFTtTNntLeheCNlVvfbJTfScDyJz0J8pBeYq_3rGqU-nP7D34DhPdsMQ</recordid><startdate>202210</startdate><enddate>202210</enddate><creator>Haxter, Stefan</creator><creator>Raumer, Hans-Georg</creator><creator>Berkefeld, Tobias</creator><creator>Spehr, Carsten</creator><general>American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6727-6819</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9232-2802</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2744-3675</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202210</creationdate><title>Determining Flow Propagation Direction from In-Flight Array Surface Pressure Fluctuation Data</title><author>Haxter, Stefan ; Raumer, Hans-Georg ; Berkefeld, Tobias ; Spehr, Carsten</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a213t-21920b79a11dc147d6344409be69f26386d6082c2bca8cf89fe81818f99b28073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Coherence</topic><topic>Domains</topic><topic>Flow control</topic><topic>Frequency ranges</topic><topic>Local flow</topic><topic>Misalignment</topic><topic>Orientation</topic><topic>Pressure</topic><topic>Spatial data</topic><topic>Turbulent boundary layer</topic><topic>Two dimensional flow</topic><topic>Wavelengths</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Haxter, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raumer, Hans-Georg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berkefeld, Tobias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spehr, Carsten</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>AIAA journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Haxter, Stefan</au><au>Raumer, Hans-Georg</au><au>Berkefeld, Tobias</au><au>Spehr, Carsten</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Determining Flow Propagation Direction from In-Flight Array Surface Pressure Fluctuation Data</atitle><jtitle>AIAA journal</jtitle><date>2022-10</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>5868</spage><epage>5879</epage><pages>5868-5879</pages><issn>0001-1452</issn><eissn>1533-385X</eissn><abstract>When characterizing spatial coherence properties of turbulent boundary-layer surface pressure fluctuation data, it is important to determine the local flow direction first. Without flow direction, it is very easy to introduce errors due to misalignment between sensors and the flow. For cases with two-dimensional microphone distributions, a method of determining flow direction from the orientation of the coherent pressure in spatial domain was introduced recently. If the data are analyzed in wavenumber domain, flow information can be obtained by the position and orientation of the convective ridge. In this publication, flow directions determined from a revised spatial domain approach and from two wavenumber domain approaches are considered. It was found that the result from the spatial domain approach and the result from the orientation of the convective ridge are similar for most frequencies, while the result based on the position of the convective ridge differs in the lower frequency range. Tilted convection of coherent structures in the turbulent boundary layer is discussed as a possible cause of these observations. A modification of the analytical model for surface pressure coherence is derived that takes the findings into account.</abstract><cop>Virginia</cop><pub>American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</pub><doi>10.2514/1.J061711</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6727-6819</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9232-2802</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2744-3675</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0001-1452 |
ispartof | AIAA journal, 2022-10, Vol.60 (10), p.5868-5879 |
issn | 0001-1452 1533-385X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_2514_1_J061711 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Coherence Domains Flow control Frequency ranges Local flow Misalignment Orientation Pressure Spatial data Turbulent boundary layer Two dimensional flow Wavelengths |
title | Determining Flow Propagation Direction from In-Flight Array Surface Pressure Fluctuation Data |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T08%3A58%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Determining%20Flow%20Propagation%20Direction%20from%20In-Flight%20Array%20Surface%20Pressure%20Fluctuation%20Data&rft.jtitle=AIAA%20journal&rft.au=Haxter,%20Stefan&rft.date=2022-10&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=5868&rft.epage=5879&rft.pages=5868-5879&rft.issn=0001-1452&rft.eissn=1533-385X&rft_id=info:doi/10.2514/1.J061711&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2716600190%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2716600190&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |