Improved Large-Eddy Simulation Validation Methodology: Application to Supersonic Inlet/Isolator Flow

A process was demonstrated that enables more meaningful comparisons of experimental and large-eddy simulation results of the same flowfield. This approach was motivated by recent studies, which show the importance of modeling the measurement device or process when making comparisons of this nature....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:AIAA journal 2015-04, Vol.53 (4), p.817-831
Hauptverfasser: Burns, Ross A, Koo, Heeseok, Raman, Venkatramanan, Clemens, Noel T
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 831
container_issue 4
container_start_page 817
container_title AIAA journal
container_volume 53
creator Burns, Ross A
Koo, Heeseok
Raman, Venkatramanan
Clemens, Noel T
description A process was demonstrated that enables more meaningful comparisons of experimental and large-eddy simulation results of the same flowfield. This approach was motivated by recent studies, which show the importance of modeling the measurement device or process when making comparisons of this nature. In the current case, a large-eddy simulation of a Mach 5 inlet/isolator flow is the subject of the validation process, a flow that was previously validated using particle image velocimetry measurements. In the present study, the particle image velocimetry measurement process is emulated by adding particles with inertia to the large-eddy simulation and using synthetic particle image velocimetry to mimic the process by which velocity data are extracted. Analysis of the particle response reveals modifications to the underlying flow consistent with the original particle image velocimetry measurements, including a drastic decrease in rms velocities in the vicinity of shockwaves and weaker velocity gradients throughout the flow. The synthetic particle image velocimetry is found to capture the sampled particle velocities quite well but does impart a significant bias error to the regions near the walls, also consistent with the experimental data. Furthermore, this process suggests improvements that could be made to any new experiment to achieve higher accuracy and thus improve the validation process.
doi_str_mv 10.2514/1.J053049
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_2514_1_J053049</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2491336501</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a288t-b62b2329e6e5ef9933f7d7225f8e7db87232cab8f545ca271976c33572b67e743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkF9LwzAUxYMoOKcPfoOCIPjQLX-aJvVtjE0rEx-m4ltIm3R2ZE1N2sm-vZEOfPDp3sv5cS7nAHCN4ARTlEzR5AlSApPsBIwQJSQmnH6cghGEEMUoofgcXHi_DRdmHI2Aynets3utopV0Gx0vlDpE63rXG9nVtonepanVsD7r7tMqa-zmcB_N2tbU5SB0Nlr3rXbeNnUZ5Y3R3TT3NjhYFy2N_b4EZ5U0Xl8d5xi8LRev88d49fKQz2erWGLOu7hIcYEJznSqqa6yjJCKKYYxrbhmquAsiKUseEUTWkrMUMbSkhDKcJEyzRIyBjeDb4j01Wvfia3tXRNeCpxkiJCUQhSou4EqnfXe6Uq0rt5JdxAIit8SBRLHEgN7O7CylvLP7T_4A-Q0b7c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2491336501</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Improved Large-Eddy Simulation Validation Methodology: Application to Supersonic Inlet/Isolator Flow</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Burns, Ross A ; Koo, Heeseok ; Raman, Venkatramanan ; Clemens, Noel T</creator><creatorcontrib>Burns, Ross A ; Koo, Heeseok ; Raman, Venkatramanan ; Clemens, Noel T</creatorcontrib><description>A process was demonstrated that enables more meaningful comparisons of experimental and large-eddy simulation results of the same flowfield. This approach was motivated by recent studies, which show the importance of modeling the measurement device or process when making comparisons of this nature. In the current case, a large-eddy simulation of a Mach 5 inlet/isolator flow is the subject of the validation process, a flow that was previously validated using particle image velocimetry measurements. In the present study, the particle image velocimetry measurement process is emulated by adding particles with inertia to the large-eddy simulation and using synthetic particle image velocimetry to mimic the process by which velocity data are extracted. Analysis of the particle response reveals modifications to the underlying flow consistent with the original particle image velocimetry measurements, including a drastic decrease in rms velocities in the vicinity of shockwaves and weaker velocity gradients throughout the flow. The synthetic particle image velocimetry is found to capture the sampled particle velocities quite well but does impart a significant bias error to the regions near the walls, also consistent with the experimental data. Furthermore, this process suggests improvements that could be made to any new experiment to achieve higher accuracy and thus improve the validation process.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-1452</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-385X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2514/1.J053049</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Virginia: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</publisher><subject>Eddy currents ; Large eddy simulation ; Particle image velocimetry ; Shock waves ; Simulation ; Velocity gradient</subject><ispartof>AIAA journal, 2015-04, Vol.53 (4), p.817-831</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2014 by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc. All rights reserved. Copies of this paper may be made for personal or internal use, on condition that the copier pay the $10.00 per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923; include the code and $10.00 in correspondence with the CCC.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc. All rights reserved. Copies of this paper may be made for personal or internal use, on condition that the copier pay the $10.00 per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923; include the code 1533-385X/15 and $10.00 in correspondence with the CCC.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a288t-b62b2329e6e5ef9933f7d7225f8e7db87232cab8f545ca271976c33572b67e743</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a288t-b62b2329e6e5ef9933f7d7225f8e7db87232cab8f545ca271976c33572b67e743</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Burns, Ross A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koo, Heeseok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raman, Venkatramanan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clemens, Noel T</creatorcontrib><title>Improved Large-Eddy Simulation Validation Methodology: Application to Supersonic Inlet/Isolator Flow</title><title>AIAA journal</title><description>A process was demonstrated that enables more meaningful comparisons of experimental and large-eddy simulation results of the same flowfield. This approach was motivated by recent studies, which show the importance of modeling the measurement device or process when making comparisons of this nature. In the current case, a large-eddy simulation of a Mach 5 inlet/isolator flow is the subject of the validation process, a flow that was previously validated using particle image velocimetry measurements. In the present study, the particle image velocimetry measurement process is emulated by adding particles with inertia to the large-eddy simulation and using synthetic particle image velocimetry to mimic the process by which velocity data are extracted. Analysis of the particle response reveals modifications to the underlying flow consistent with the original particle image velocimetry measurements, including a drastic decrease in rms velocities in the vicinity of shockwaves and weaker velocity gradients throughout the flow. The synthetic particle image velocimetry is found to capture the sampled particle velocities quite well but does impart a significant bias error to the regions near the walls, also consistent with the experimental data. Furthermore, this process suggests improvements that could be made to any new experiment to achieve higher accuracy and thus improve the validation process.</description><subject>Eddy currents</subject><subject>Large eddy simulation</subject><subject>Particle image velocimetry</subject><subject>Shock waves</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Velocity gradient</subject><issn>0001-1452</issn><issn>1533-385X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplkF9LwzAUxYMoOKcPfoOCIPjQLX-aJvVtjE0rEx-m4ltIm3R2ZE1N2sm-vZEOfPDp3sv5cS7nAHCN4ARTlEzR5AlSApPsBIwQJSQmnH6cghGEEMUoofgcXHi_DRdmHI2Aynets3utopV0Gx0vlDpE63rXG9nVtonepanVsD7r7tMqa-zmcB_N2tbU5SB0Nlr3rXbeNnUZ5Y3R3TT3NjhYFy2N_b4EZ5U0Xl8d5xi8LRev88d49fKQz2erWGLOu7hIcYEJznSqqa6yjJCKKYYxrbhmquAsiKUseEUTWkrMUMbSkhDKcJEyzRIyBjeDb4j01Wvfia3tXRNeCpxkiJCUQhSou4EqnfXe6Uq0rt5JdxAIit8SBRLHEgN7O7CylvLP7T_4A-Q0b7c</recordid><startdate>20150401</startdate><enddate>20150401</enddate><creator>Burns, Ross A</creator><creator>Koo, Heeseok</creator><creator>Raman, Venkatramanan</creator><creator>Clemens, Noel T</creator><general>American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150401</creationdate><title>Improved Large-Eddy Simulation Validation Methodology: Application to Supersonic Inlet/Isolator Flow</title><author>Burns, Ross A ; Koo, Heeseok ; Raman, Venkatramanan ; Clemens, Noel T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a288t-b62b2329e6e5ef9933f7d7225f8e7db87232cab8f545ca271976c33572b67e743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Eddy currents</topic><topic>Large eddy simulation</topic><topic>Particle image velocimetry</topic><topic>Shock waves</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Velocity gradient</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Burns, Ross A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koo, Heeseok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raman, Venkatramanan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clemens, Noel T</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>AIAA journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Burns, Ross A</au><au>Koo, Heeseok</au><au>Raman, Venkatramanan</au><au>Clemens, Noel T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Improved Large-Eddy Simulation Validation Methodology: Application to Supersonic Inlet/Isolator Flow</atitle><jtitle>AIAA journal</jtitle><date>2015-04-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>817</spage><epage>831</epage><pages>817-831</pages><issn>0001-1452</issn><eissn>1533-385X</eissn><abstract>A process was demonstrated that enables more meaningful comparisons of experimental and large-eddy simulation results of the same flowfield. This approach was motivated by recent studies, which show the importance of modeling the measurement device or process when making comparisons of this nature. In the current case, a large-eddy simulation of a Mach 5 inlet/isolator flow is the subject of the validation process, a flow that was previously validated using particle image velocimetry measurements. In the present study, the particle image velocimetry measurement process is emulated by adding particles with inertia to the large-eddy simulation and using synthetic particle image velocimetry to mimic the process by which velocity data are extracted. Analysis of the particle response reveals modifications to the underlying flow consistent with the original particle image velocimetry measurements, including a drastic decrease in rms velocities in the vicinity of shockwaves and weaker velocity gradients throughout the flow. The synthetic particle image velocimetry is found to capture the sampled particle velocities quite well but does impart a significant bias error to the regions near the walls, also consistent with the experimental data. Furthermore, this process suggests improvements that could be made to any new experiment to achieve higher accuracy and thus improve the validation process.</abstract><cop>Virginia</cop><pub>American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</pub><doi>10.2514/1.J053049</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-1452
ispartof AIAA journal, 2015-04, Vol.53 (4), p.817-831
issn 0001-1452
1533-385X
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_2514_1_J053049
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Eddy currents
Large eddy simulation
Particle image velocimetry
Shock waves
Simulation
Velocity gradient
title Improved Large-Eddy Simulation Validation Methodology: Application to Supersonic Inlet/Isolator Flow
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T09%3A02%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Improved%20Large-Eddy%20Simulation%20Validation%20Methodology:%20Application%20to%20Supersonic%20Inlet/Isolator%20Flow&rft.jtitle=AIAA%20journal&rft.au=Burns,%20Ross%20A&rft.date=2015-04-01&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=817&rft.epage=831&rft.pages=817-831&rft.issn=0001-1452&rft.eissn=1533-385X&rft_id=info:doi/10.2514/1.J053049&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2491336501%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2491336501&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true