Stationkeeping of Geosynchronous Spacecraft Using a Hybrid Orbit Propagator and Optimization Technique

WITH advances in space technology, current-generation geostationary spacecraft are often designed to operate for at least 10 years and are driven by multiple-mission scenarios. The ideal geostationary orbit has a constant sernimajor axis, zero eccentricity, and zero inclination. These orbital elemen...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of spacecraft and rockets 2009-05, Vol.46 (3), p.719-724
Hauptverfasser: No, Tae Soo, Jung, Ok-Chul, Lee, Sang-Cherl
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 724
container_issue 3
container_start_page 719
container_title Journal of spacecraft and rockets
container_volume 46
creator No, Tae Soo
Jung, Ok-Chul
Lee, Sang-Cherl
description WITH advances in space technology, current-generation geostationary spacecraft are often designed to operate for at least 10 years and are driven by multiple-mission scenarios. The ideal geostationary orbit has a constant sernimajor axis, zero eccentricity, and zero inclination. These orbital elements, however, tend to deviate from the ideal values because of various perturbing forces, including the Earth's oblateness, the gravitational forces exerted by the sun and moon, the solar-wind pressure, etc. Therefore, stationkeeping (i.e., maintaining the position of a geostationary spacecraft within a designated longitude slot) becomes necessary, and the requirements for stationkeeping are becoming more stringent, not only because of the limited longitudinal resource, but also because of the real possibility of signal-frequency interference with neighboring spacecraft. The objective of stationkeeping is to maintain the satellite within certain allowed limits for a given period of time. The classical strategy for stationkeeping is to separately control its position and velocity in two directions: that is, along the longitudinal and latitudinal directions (east-west and north-south stationkeeping, respectively). For example, drift-rate compensation targeting and the perigee sun-tracking method are used for east-west stationkeeping, whereas the inclination-vector drift is controlled for north-south stationkeeping [1,2]. Precise orbit propagation based on high-fidelity orbit models and accurate numerical integrators is used to plan an orbit-maneuver schedule in both directions within the constraints of the operator's work schedule. This classical method is indirect in the sense that the values of the orbital elements are controlled based on predictions of the expected future trend of their variation rather than by directly controlling the spacecraft position. Therefore, the aim of this Note is to propose a method of directly controlling the position of a geostationary spacecraft for stationkeeping purposes. The advantages of highly precise numerical orbit propagation and the computational simplicity of an approximate closed-form analytical solution to the perturbed-geostationary-orbit problem are effectively combined to yield a so-called hybrid orbit propagator, which is used to predict spacecraft drift with respect to a reference position. We then proceed to plan stationkeeping such that a given cost function (e.g., fuel usage) is minimized while the spacecraft is
doi_str_mv 10.2514/1.40784
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_2514_1_40784</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2954945511</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a375t-33845bd94b40d7370342f7930c5bffa20adbd242209ea9c95c607b16e55c77ad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90V1LHTEQBuAgFjza4l8IKEov1uY7m0sRqwXBgnodZrOJRvds1iQHPP76rh4vipReBSYP78wwCO1TcsIkFT_oiSC6FVtoQSXnjdJGbKMFIYw1Qkmyg3ZLeSSEqlaZBQo3FWpM45P3UxzvcQr4wqeyHt1DTmNaFXwzgfMuQ6j4rrwRwJfrLsceX-cuVvw7pwnuoaaMYZyLU43L-Poeim-9exjj88p_RV8CDMV_-3j30N3P89uzy-bq-uLX2elVA1zL2nDeCtn1RnSC9JprwgUL2nDiZBcCMAJ91zPBGDEejDPSKaI7qryUTmvo-R462uROOc1tS7XLWJwfBhj9vIzloqWtJHqGB5_gY1rlcZ7NMqqoFkZz8z9FuVBUKUrUrI43yuVUSvbBTjkuIa8tJfbtJpba95vM8vtGQgT4K2vzbac-2LAahupf6mwP_2k_Rf4B65yXUg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1346166106</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Stationkeeping of Geosynchronous Spacecraft Using a Hybrid Orbit Propagator and Optimization Technique</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>No, Tae Soo ; Jung, Ok-Chul ; Lee, Sang-Cherl</creator><creatorcontrib>No, Tae Soo ; Jung, Ok-Chul ; Lee, Sang-Cherl</creatorcontrib><description>WITH advances in space technology, current-generation geostationary spacecraft are often designed to operate for at least 10 years and are driven by multiple-mission scenarios. The ideal geostationary orbit has a constant sernimajor axis, zero eccentricity, and zero inclination. These orbital elements, however, tend to deviate from the ideal values because of various perturbing forces, including the Earth's oblateness, the gravitational forces exerted by the sun and moon, the solar-wind pressure, etc. Therefore, stationkeeping (i.e., maintaining the position of a geostationary spacecraft within a designated longitude slot) becomes necessary, and the requirements for stationkeeping are becoming more stringent, not only because of the limited longitudinal resource, but also because of the real possibility of signal-frequency interference with neighboring spacecraft. The objective of stationkeeping is to maintain the satellite within certain allowed limits for a given period of time. The classical strategy for stationkeeping is to separately control its position and velocity in two directions: that is, along the longitudinal and latitudinal directions (east-west and north-south stationkeeping, respectively). For example, drift-rate compensation targeting and the perigee sun-tracking method are used for east-west stationkeeping, whereas the inclination-vector drift is controlled for north-south stationkeeping [1,2]. Precise orbit propagation based on high-fidelity orbit models and accurate numerical integrators is used to plan an orbit-maneuver schedule in both directions within the constraints of the operator's work schedule. This classical method is indirect in the sense that the values of the orbital elements are controlled based on predictions of the expected future trend of their variation rather than by directly controlling the spacecraft position. Therefore, the aim of this Note is to propose a method of directly controlling the position of a geostationary spacecraft for stationkeeping purposes. The advantages of highly precise numerical orbit propagation and the computational simplicity of an approximate closed-form analytical solution to the perturbed-geostationary-orbit problem are effectively combined to yield a so-called hybrid orbit propagator, which is used to predict spacecraft drift with respect to a reference position. We then proceed to plan stationkeeping such that a given cost function (e.g., fuel usage) is minimized while the spacecraft is maintained within the required stationkeeping limits. Highly nonlinear numerical simulation results are presented to illustrate the feasibility of the proposed method.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-4650</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-6794</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2514/1.40784</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Reston: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</publisher><subject>Stationkeeping</subject><ispartof>Journal of spacecraft and rockets, 2009-05, Vol.46 (3), p.719-724</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics May-Jun 2009</rights><rights>Copyright American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics May/Jun 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a375t-33845bd94b40d7370342f7930c5bffa20adbd242209ea9c95c607b16e55c77ad3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a375t-33845bd94b40d7370342f7930c5bffa20adbd242209ea9c95c607b16e55c77ad3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>No, Tae Soo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Ok-Chul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sang-Cherl</creatorcontrib><title>Stationkeeping of Geosynchronous Spacecraft Using a Hybrid Orbit Propagator and Optimization Technique</title><title>Journal of spacecraft and rockets</title><description>WITH advances in space technology, current-generation geostationary spacecraft are often designed to operate for at least 10 years and are driven by multiple-mission scenarios. The ideal geostationary orbit has a constant sernimajor axis, zero eccentricity, and zero inclination. These orbital elements, however, tend to deviate from the ideal values because of various perturbing forces, including the Earth's oblateness, the gravitational forces exerted by the sun and moon, the solar-wind pressure, etc. Therefore, stationkeeping (i.e., maintaining the position of a geostationary spacecraft within a designated longitude slot) becomes necessary, and the requirements for stationkeeping are becoming more stringent, not only because of the limited longitudinal resource, but also because of the real possibility of signal-frequency interference with neighboring spacecraft. The objective of stationkeeping is to maintain the satellite within certain allowed limits for a given period of time. The classical strategy for stationkeeping is to separately control its position and velocity in two directions: that is, along the longitudinal and latitudinal directions (east-west and north-south stationkeeping, respectively). For example, drift-rate compensation targeting and the perigee sun-tracking method are used for east-west stationkeeping, whereas the inclination-vector drift is controlled for north-south stationkeeping [1,2]. Precise orbit propagation based on high-fidelity orbit models and accurate numerical integrators is used to plan an orbit-maneuver schedule in both directions within the constraints of the operator's work schedule. This classical method is indirect in the sense that the values of the orbital elements are controlled based on predictions of the expected future trend of their variation rather than by directly controlling the spacecraft position. Therefore, the aim of this Note is to propose a method of directly controlling the position of a geostationary spacecraft for stationkeeping purposes. The advantages of highly precise numerical orbit propagation and the computational simplicity of an approximate closed-form analytical solution to the perturbed-geostationary-orbit problem are effectively combined to yield a so-called hybrid orbit propagator, which is used to predict spacecraft drift with respect to a reference position. We then proceed to plan stationkeeping such that a given cost function (e.g., fuel usage) is minimized while the spacecraft is maintained within the required stationkeeping limits. Highly nonlinear numerical simulation results are presented to illustrate the feasibility of the proposed method.</description><subject>Stationkeeping</subject><issn>0022-4650</issn><issn>1533-6794</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90V1LHTEQBuAgFjza4l8IKEov1uY7m0sRqwXBgnodZrOJRvds1iQHPP76rh4vipReBSYP78wwCO1TcsIkFT_oiSC6FVtoQSXnjdJGbKMFIYw1Qkmyg3ZLeSSEqlaZBQo3FWpM45P3UxzvcQr4wqeyHt1DTmNaFXwzgfMuQ6j4rrwRwJfrLsceX-cuVvw7pwnuoaaMYZyLU43L-Poeim-9exjj88p_RV8CDMV_-3j30N3P89uzy-bq-uLX2elVA1zL2nDeCtn1RnSC9JprwgUL2nDiZBcCMAJ91zPBGDEejDPSKaI7qryUTmvo-R462uROOc1tS7XLWJwfBhj9vIzloqWtJHqGB5_gY1rlcZ7NMqqoFkZz8z9FuVBUKUrUrI43yuVUSvbBTjkuIa8tJfbtJpba95vM8vtGQgT4K2vzbac-2LAahupf6mwP_2k_Rf4B65yXUg</recordid><startdate>20090501</startdate><enddate>20090501</enddate><creator>No, Tae Soo</creator><creator>Jung, Ok-Chul</creator><creator>Lee, Sang-Cherl</creator><general>American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090501</creationdate><title>Stationkeeping of Geosynchronous Spacecraft Using a Hybrid Orbit Propagator and Optimization Technique</title><author>No, Tae Soo ; Jung, Ok-Chul ; Lee, Sang-Cherl</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a375t-33845bd94b40d7370342f7930c5bffa20adbd242209ea9c95c607b16e55c77ad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Stationkeeping</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>No, Tae Soo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Ok-Chul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sang-Cherl</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of spacecraft and rockets</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>No, Tae Soo</au><au>Jung, Ok-Chul</au><au>Lee, Sang-Cherl</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Stationkeeping of Geosynchronous Spacecraft Using a Hybrid Orbit Propagator and Optimization Technique</atitle><jtitle>Journal of spacecraft and rockets</jtitle><date>2009-05-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>719</spage><epage>724</epage><pages>719-724</pages><issn>0022-4650</issn><eissn>1533-6794</eissn><abstract>WITH advances in space technology, current-generation geostationary spacecraft are often designed to operate for at least 10 years and are driven by multiple-mission scenarios. The ideal geostationary orbit has a constant sernimajor axis, zero eccentricity, and zero inclination. These orbital elements, however, tend to deviate from the ideal values because of various perturbing forces, including the Earth's oblateness, the gravitational forces exerted by the sun and moon, the solar-wind pressure, etc. Therefore, stationkeeping (i.e., maintaining the position of a geostationary spacecraft within a designated longitude slot) becomes necessary, and the requirements for stationkeeping are becoming more stringent, not only because of the limited longitudinal resource, but also because of the real possibility of signal-frequency interference with neighboring spacecraft. The objective of stationkeeping is to maintain the satellite within certain allowed limits for a given period of time. The classical strategy for stationkeeping is to separately control its position and velocity in two directions: that is, along the longitudinal and latitudinal directions (east-west and north-south stationkeeping, respectively). For example, drift-rate compensation targeting and the perigee sun-tracking method are used for east-west stationkeeping, whereas the inclination-vector drift is controlled for north-south stationkeeping [1,2]. Precise orbit propagation based on high-fidelity orbit models and accurate numerical integrators is used to plan an orbit-maneuver schedule in both directions within the constraints of the operator's work schedule. This classical method is indirect in the sense that the values of the orbital elements are controlled based on predictions of the expected future trend of their variation rather than by directly controlling the spacecraft position. Therefore, the aim of this Note is to propose a method of directly controlling the position of a geostationary spacecraft for stationkeeping purposes. The advantages of highly precise numerical orbit propagation and the computational simplicity of an approximate closed-form analytical solution to the perturbed-geostationary-orbit problem are effectively combined to yield a so-called hybrid orbit propagator, which is used to predict spacecraft drift with respect to a reference position. We then proceed to plan stationkeeping such that a given cost function (e.g., fuel usage) is minimized while the spacecraft is maintained within the required stationkeeping limits. Highly nonlinear numerical simulation results are presented to illustrate the feasibility of the proposed method.</abstract><cop>Reston</cop><pub>American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</pub><doi>10.2514/1.40784</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-4650
ispartof Journal of spacecraft and rockets, 2009-05, Vol.46 (3), p.719-724
issn 0022-4650
1533-6794
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_2514_1_40784
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Stationkeeping
title Stationkeeping of Geosynchronous Spacecraft Using a Hybrid Orbit Propagator and Optimization Technique
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T06%3A53%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Stationkeeping%20of%20Geosynchronous%20Spacecraft%20Using%20a%20Hybrid%20Orbit%20Propagator%20and%20Optimization%20Technique&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20spacecraft%20and%20rockets&rft.au=No,%20Tae%20Soo&rft.date=2009-05-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=719&rft.epage=724&rft.pages=719-724&rft.issn=0022-4650&rft.eissn=1533-6794&rft_id=info:doi/10.2514/1.40784&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2954945511%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1346166106&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true