Social and Environmental Conflicts: Conservation Units as an Element Generating Conflicts Involving Traditional Peoples and Communities
Purpose: The Study aims to conceptualize what Conservation Units are within a look at the way they are constituted; also bringing the concept of Traditional Peoples and Communities, how they recognize themselves as culturally differentiated peoples. The Study is based on Conservation Units and susta...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | RGSA : Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental 2024, Vol.18 (3), p.e04442 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | e04442 |
container_title | RGSA : Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Anaisse, Clarissa Campos Ribeiro Henrique, Gustavo de Queiroz Puget, Lucas França Ribeiro, Hebe Morganne Campos |
description | Purpose: The Study aims to conceptualize what Conservation Units are within a look at the way they are constituted; also bringing the concept of Traditional Peoples and Communities, how they recognize themselves as culturally differentiated peoples. The Study is based on Conservation Units and sustainable development, with an analysis of territorial and social conflicts.
Method: Methodologically, we analyze the relationship and the related conflicts, analyzing their legal structures and scientific articles. Such as the Federal Constitution, Scientific Studies of the Federal Public Ministry, Ongoing Federal Court Processes.
Results and conclusion: The State and Society have the duty to raise awareness in a more emphatic and effective way by being a defender and propagator of knowledge among traditional peoples and communities, the importance of environmental preservation and sustainable development. Participatory management to bring balance between Traditionalists, the State, Large Companies, Investors, Loggers, Garimpeiros and Farmers so that the interests of the different branches of our society can be made compatible. The lack of resolution would imply an agreement to minimize the negative impacts on Traditional Peoples and Communities.
Research implications: The proposed research has significant implications and offers substantial value for several reasons:
Conceptualization and In-depth Analysis: Understanding Conservation Units: Detailed exploration of the formation and constitution of Conservation Units, offering a broad and conceptual view. Identification of Traditional Peoples: Addresses the identity and recognition of Traditional Peoples and Communities, highlighting their distinct cultural characteristics.
Analysis of Relationships and Conflicts: Examination of the Relationship between Traditional Peoples and Conservation Units: Offers a critical analysis of the conflicts emerging from the overlap between the territories of Traditional Peoples and the areas of Conservation Units. Legal and Scientific Base: Solid foundation through the analysis of legal structures and review of scientific articles, offering a robust theoretical basis.
Search for Solutions and Resolution of Conflicts: Focus on Conflict Resolution: Proposes the search for solutions that can harmonize the interests of Traditional Peoples and Conservation Units, aiming for peaceful coexistence and mutual respect. Emphasis on Dialogue and Harmonious Coexistence:
Originali |
doi_str_mv | 10.24857/rgsa.v18n3-034 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_24857_rgsa_v18n3_034</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_24857_rgsa_v18n3_034</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1974-b5b514892ac2dec215c10dc30f59da7edac939dbffdb7898da59710e3ca32b183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUF1LwzAUDaLgmHv2NX-gWz4amvgmpc7BQMENfCtpko5Im4ykFvwF_m3TTtDLhXs4955z4QBwj9Ga5JwVm3CKcj1i7miGaH4FFlhwnAlO3q__4VuwivEDpeIIMYIX4PvNKys7KJ2GlRtt8K43bkhM6V3bWTXEhwlGE0Y5WO_g0dkhQpnawaoz0zXcGmdCWrvTnwzu3Oi7ceIOQWo7iZPtq_HnzsT5Yen7_jPZWRPvwE0ru2hWv3MJjk_VoXzO9i_bXfm4zxQWRZ41rGE454JIRbRRBDOFkVYUtUxoWRgtlaBCN22rm4ILriUTBUaGKklJgzldgs3FVwUfYzBtfQ62l-Grxqieo6ynKOs5yjpFSX8APbFsyw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Social and Environmental Conflicts: Conservation Units as an Element Generating Conflicts Involving Traditional Peoples and Communities</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Anaisse, Clarissa Campos Ribeiro ; Henrique, Gustavo de Queiroz ; Puget, Lucas França ; Ribeiro, Hebe Morganne Campos</creator><creatorcontrib>Anaisse, Clarissa Campos Ribeiro ; Henrique, Gustavo de Queiroz ; Puget, Lucas França ; Ribeiro, Hebe Morganne Campos</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: The Study aims to conceptualize what Conservation Units are within a look at the way they are constituted; also bringing the concept of Traditional Peoples and Communities, how they recognize themselves as culturally differentiated peoples. The Study is based on Conservation Units and sustainable development, with an analysis of territorial and social conflicts.
Method: Methodologically, we analyze the relationship and the related conflicts, analyzing their legal structures and scientific articles. Such as the Federal Constitution, Scientific Studies of the Federal Public Ministry, Ongoing Federal Court Processes.
Results and conclusion: The State and Society have the duty to raise awareness in a more emphatic and effective way by being a defender and propagator of knowledge among traditional peoples and communities, the importance of environmental preservation and sustainable development. Participatory management to bring balance between Traditionalists, the State, Large Companies, Investors, Loggers, Garimpeiros and Farmers so that the interests of the different branches of our society can be made compatible. The lack of resolution would imply an agreement to minimize the negative impacts on Traditional Peoples and Communities.
Research implications: The proposed research has significant implications and offers substantial value for several reasons:
Conceptualization and In-depth Analysis: Understanding Conservation Units: Detailed exploration of the formation and constitution of Conservation Units, offering a broad and conceptual view. Identification of Traditional Peoples: Addresses the identity and recognition of Traditional Peoples and Communities, highlighting their distinct cultural characteristics.
Analysis of Relationships and Conflicts: Examination of the Relationship between Traditional Peoples and Conservation Units: Offers a critical analysis of the conflicts emerging from the overlap between the territories of Traditional Peoples and the areas of Conservation Units. Legal and Scientific Base: Solid foundation through the analysis of legal structures and review of scientific articles, offering a robust theoretical basis.
Search for Solutions and Resolution of Conflicts: Focus on Conflict Resolution: Proposes the search for solutions that can harmonize the interests of Traditional Peoples and Conservation Units, aiming for peaceful coexistence and mutual respect. Emphasis on Dialogue and Harmonious Coexistence:
Originality/value: Interdisciplinary Approach: The intersection between legal, environmental and social issues offers a unique perspective, adding value to the scientific field. Contribution to Public Policies: The results can guide more inclusive and sustainable policies, seeking to balance environmental conservation and the rights of traditional communities. The research seeks to transcend the simple description of conflicts, aiming to contribute to the resolution of these complex impasses, promoting harmonious and sustainable coexistence between Traditional Peoples and Conservation Units. Its originality and conceptual and practical breadth are key factors that add value and relevance to the study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1981-982X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1981-982X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.24857/rgsa.v18n3-034</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>RGSA : Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental, 2024, Vol.18 (3), p.e04442</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1974-b5b514892ac2dec215c10dc30f59da7edac939dbffdb7898da59710e3ca32b183</citedby><orcidid>0009-0005-8153-7794 ; 0009-0005-6110-2021 ; 0000-0001-7154-9947 ; 0009-0002-3198-6311</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Anaisse, Clarissa Campos Ribeiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henrique, Gustavo de Queiroz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puget, Lucas França</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ribeiro, Hebe Morganne Campos</creatorcontrib><title>Social and Environmental Conflicts: Conservation Units as an Element Generating Conflicts Involving Traditional Peoples and Communities</title><title>RGSA : Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental</title><description>Purpose: The Study aims to conceptualize what Conservation Units are within a look at the way they are constituted; also bringing the concept of Traditional Peoples and Communities, how they recognize themselves as culturally differentiated peoples. The Study is based on Conservation Units and sustainable development, with an analysis of territorial and social conflicts.
Method: Methodologically, we analyze the relationship and the related conflicts, analyzing their legal structures and scientific articles. Such as the Federal Constitution, Scientific Studies of the Federal Public Ministry, Ongoing Federal Court Processes.
Results and conclusion: The State and Society have the duty to raise awareness in a more emphatic and effective way by being a defender and propagator of knowledge among traditional peoples and communities, the importance of environmental preservation and sustainable development. Participatory management to bring balance between Traditionalists, the State, Large Companies, Investors, Loggers, Garimpeiros and Farmers so that the interests of the different branches of our society can be made compatible. The lack of resolution would imply an agreement to minimize the negative impacts on Traditional Peoples and Communities.
Research implications: The proposed research has significant implications and offers substantial value for several reasons:
Conceptualization and In-depth Analysis: Understanding Conservation Units: Detailed exploration of the formation and constitution of Conservation Units, offering a broad and conceptual view. Identification of Traditional Peoples: Addresses the identity and recognition of Traditional Peoples and Communities, highlighting their distinct cultural characteristics.
Analysis of Relationships and Conflicts: Examination of the Relationship between Traditional Peoples and Conservation Units: Offers a critical analysis of the conflicts emerging from the overlap between the territories of Traditional Peoples and the areas of Conservation Units. Legal and Scientific Base: Solid foundation through the analysis of legal structures and review of scientific articles, offering a robust theoretical basis.
Search for Solutions and Resolution of Conflicts: Focus on Conflict Resolution: Proposes the search for solutions that can harmonize the interests of Traditional Peoples and Conservation Units, aiming for peaceful coexistence and mutual respect. Emphasis on Dialogue and Harmonious Coexistence:
Originality/value: Interdisciplinary Approach: The intersection between legal, environmental and social issues offers a unique perspective, adding value to the scientific field. Contribution to Public Policies: The results can guide more inclusive and sustainable policies, seeking to balance environmental conservation and the rights of traditional communities. The research seeks to transcend the simple description of conflicts, aiming to contribute to the resolution of these complex impasses, promoting harmonious and sustainable coexistence between Traditional Peoples and Conservation Units. Its originality and conceptual and practical breadth are key factors that add value and relevance to the study.</description><issn>1981-982X</issn><issn>1981-982X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNUF1LwzAUDaLgmHv2NX-gWz4amvgmpc7BQMENfCtpko5Im4ykFvwF_m3TTtDLhXs4955z4QBwj9Ga5JwVm3CKcj1i7miGaH4FFlhwnAlO3q__4VuwivEDpeIIMYIX4PvNKys7KJ2GlRtt8K43bkhM6V3bWTXEhwlGE0Y5WO_g0dkhQpnawaoz0zXcGmdCWrvTnwzu3Oi7ceIOQWo7iZPtq_HnzsT5Yen7_jPZWRPvwE0ru2hWv3MJjk_VoXzO9i_bXfm4zxQWRZ41rGE454JIRbRRBDOFkVYUtUxoWRgtlaBCN22rm4ILriUTBUaGKklJgzldgs3FVwUfYzBtfQ62l-Grxqieo6ynKOs5yjpFSX8APbFsyw</recordid><startdate>2024</startdate><enddate>2024</enddate><creator>Anaisse, Clarissa Campos Ribeiro</creator><creator>Henrique, Gustavo de Queiroz</creator><creator>Puget, Lucas França</creator><creator>Ribeiro, Hebe Morganne Campos</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0005-8153-7794</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6110-2021</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7154-9947</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3198-6311</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2024</creationdate><title>Social and Environmental Conflicts: Conservation Units as an Element Generating Conflicts Involving Traditional Peoples and Communities</title><author>Anaisse, Clarissa Campos Ribeiro ; Henrique, Gustavo de Queiroz ; Puget, Lucas França ; Ribeiro, Hebe Morganne Campos</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1974-b5b514892ac2dec215c10dc30f59da7edac939dbffdb7898da59710e3ca32b183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Anaisse, Clarissa Campos Ribeiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henrique, Gustavo de Queiroz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puget, Lucas França</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ribeiro, Hebe Morganne Campos</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>RGSA : Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Anaisse, Clarissa Campos Ribeiro</au><au>Henrique, Gustavo de Queiroz</au><au>Puget, Lucas França</au><au>Ribeiro, Hebe Morganne Campos</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Social and Environmental Conflicts: Conservation Units as an Element Generating Conflicts Involving Traditional Peoples and Communities</atitle><jtitle>RGSA : Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental</jtitle><date>2024</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>e04442</spage><pages>e04442-</pages><issn>1981-982X</issn><eissn>1981-982X</eissn><abstract>Purpose: The Study aims to conceptualize what Conservation Units are within a look at the way they are constituted; also bringing the concept of Traditional Peoples and Communities, how they recognize themselves as culturally differentiated peoples. The Study is based on Conservation Units and sustainable development, with an analysis of territorial and social conflicts.
Method: Methodologically, we analyze the relationship and the related conflicts, analyzing their legal structures and scientific articles. Such as the Federal Constitution, Scientific Studies of the Federal Public Ministry, Ongoing Federal Court Processes.
Results and conclusion: The State and Society have the duty to raise awareness in a more emphatic and effective way by being a defender and propagator of knowledge among traditional peoples and communities, the importance of environmental preservation and sustainable development. Participatory management to bring balance between Traditionalists, the State, Large Companies, Investors, Loggers, Garimpeiros and Farmers so that the interests of the different branches of our society can be made compatible. The lack of resolution would imply an agreement to minimize the negative impacts on Traditional Peoples and Communities.
Research implications: The proposed research has significant implications and offers substantial value for several reasons:
Conceptualization and In-depth Analysis: Understanding Conservation Units: Detailed exploration of the formation and constitution of Conservation Units, offering a broad and conceptual view. Identification of Traditional Peoples: Addresses the identity and recognition of Traditional Peoples and Communities, highlighting their distinct cultural characteristics.
Analysis of Relationships and Conflicts: Examination of the Relationship between Traditional Peoples and Conservation Units: Offers a critical analysis of the conflicts emerging from the overlap between the territories of Traditional Peoples and the areas of Conservation Units. Legal and Scientific Base: Solid foundation through the analysis of legal structures and review of scientific articles, offering a robust theoretical basis.
Search for Solutions and Resolution of Conflicts: Focus on Conflict Resolution: Proposes the search for solutions that can harmonize the interests of Traditional Peoples and Conservation Units, aiming for peaceful coexistence and mutual respect. Emphasis on Dialogue and Harmonious Coexistence:
Originality/value: Interdisciplinary Approach: The intersection between legal, environmental and social issues offers a unique perspective, adding value to the scientific field. Contribution to Public Policies: The results can guide more inclusive and sustainable policies, seeking to balance environmental conservation and the rights of traditional communities. The research seeks to transcend the simple description of conflicts, aiming to contribute to the resolution of these complex impasses, promoting harmonious and sustainable coexistence between Traditional Peoples and Conservation Units. Its originality and conceptual and practical breadth are key factors that add value and relevance to the study.</abstract><doi>10.24857/rgsa.v18n3-034</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0005-8153-7794</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6110-2021</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7154-9947</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3198-6311</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1981-982X |
ispartof | RGSA : Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental, 2024, Vol.18 (3), p.e04442 |
issn | 1981-982X 1981-982X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_24857_rgsa_v18n3_034 |
source | EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
title | Social and Environmental Conflicts: Conservation Units as an Element Generating Conflicts Involving Traditional Peoples and Communities |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T19%3A46%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Social%20and%20Environmental%20Conflicts:%20Conservation%20Units%20as%20an%20Element%20Generating%20Conflicts%20Involving%20Traditional%20Peoples%20and%20Communities&rft.jtitle=RGSA%20:%20Revista%20de%20Gest%C3%A3o%20Social%20e%20Ambiental&rft.au=Anaisse,%20Clarissa%20Campos%20Ribeiro&rft.date=2024&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e04442&rft.pages=e04442-&rft.issn=1981-982X&rft.eissn=1981-982X&rft_id=info:doi/10.24857/rgsa.v18n3-034&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_24857_rgsa_v18n3_034%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |