Efficacy of Possum Score in Predicting the Outcome in Patients Undergoing Emergency Laparotomy

Monitoring of surgical outcome is increasingly important part of governance of surgical activity. The aim of the study. POSSUM scoring system was applied prospectively to determine how it performed in predicting morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy in our hospital, a g...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Polski przeglad chirurgiczny 2014-04, Vol.86 (4), p.159-165
Hauptverfasser: Sreeharsha, Harinatha, Sp, Rai, Sreekar, Harinatha, Reddy, Ravi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 165
container_issue 4
container_start_page 159
container_title Polski przeglad chirurgiczny
container_volume 86
creator Sreeharsha, Harinatha
Sp, Rai
Sreekar, Harinatha
Reddy, Ravi
description Monitoring of surgical outcome is increasingly important part of governance of surgical activity. The aim of the study. POSSUM scoring system was applied prospectively to determine how it performed in predicting morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy in our hospital, a group known to be at high risk of complications and death. Material and methods. A total of 100 cases of emergency laparotomies were studied in patients admitted in general surgery department during the period of May 2008 to August 2010. The study group consisted of the following cases. Duodenal perforation (37 cases), intestinal obstruction (27 cases), gastric perforation (8 cases), ileal perforation (8 cases), appendicular perforation (7 cases), blunt trauma (4 cases) and others (9 cases). They were scored using POSSUM scoring system. Physiological scoring was done at the time of admission and operative scoring was done intraoperatively. They were followed up for the first 30 day post operative period for any complications and the outcome was noted. The observed morbidity and mortality rates were compared with the POSSUM predicted morbidity and mortality rates. Results. 15 patients died (mortality rate of 15%). The POSSUM predicted mortality was 20 deaths. O:E ratio of 0.71 was obtained. There was no statistically significant difference between the observed and predicted mortality rates (χ2=1.72, p=0.974). 71 patients experienced complications. The POSSUM predicted morbidity was 61 patients. O:E ratio of 1.19 was obtained. There was no statistically significant difference between the observed and predicted morbidity rates (χ2=1.594, p=0.991). Conclusions. POSSUM scoring is an accurate predictor of mortality and morbidity following emergency laparotomy and is a valid means of assessing adequacy of care provided to the patient. POSSUM can be used for surgical audit to assess and improve the quality of surgical care and helps in better outcome to the patient
doi_str_mv 10.2478/pjs-2014-0029
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>walterdegruyter_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_2478_pjs_2014_0029</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_2478_pjs_2014_0029864159</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2609-866be05928cc69a276bc8ca4775f68407c2cbe77a8c43d132730e727a16722273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkF1LwzAUhoMobk4vvZX8gWp60uUDr2RsKgw20IFXljRNZ8falDRF-u9NqYoXXuUN5-HlnAeh65jcQsLFXXNoIyBxEhEC8gRNCaEQUU7fTv_kCbpo2wMhc0lBnqMJJFIIADlF78uiKLXSPbYF3tq27Sr8oq0zuKzx1pm81L6s99h_GLzpvLbVOFG-NLVv8a7OjdvbAVlWIZk6VK1Vo5z1tuov0Vmhjq25-n5naLdavi6eovXm8XnxsI40MCIjwVhmwnYgtGZSAWeZFlolnM8LJhLCNejMcK6ETmgeU-CUGA5cxYwDhN8MRWOvduEGZ4q0cWWlXJ_GJB08pcFTOnhKB0-Bvxn5pssqk__SP2ICcD8Cn-rojcvN3nV9COnBdq4Op_xfLFgSB8lfItp3QQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficacy of Possum Score in Predicting the Outcome in Patients Undergoing Emergency Laparotomy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Sreeharsha, Harinatha ; Sp, Rai ; Sreekar, Harinatha ; Reddy, Ravi</creator><creatorcontrib>Sreeharsha, Harinatha ; Sp, Rai ; Sreekar, Harinatha ; Reddy, Ravi</creatorcontrib><description>Monitoring of surgical outcome is increasingly important part of governance of surgical activity. The aim of the study. POSSUM scoring system was applied prospectively to determine how it performed in predicting morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy in our hospital, a group known to be at high risk of complications and death. Material and methods. A total of 100 cases of emergency laparotomies were studied in patients admitted in general surgery department during the period of May 2008 to August 2010. The study group consisted of the following cases. Duodenal perforation (37 cases), intestinal obstruction (27 cases), gastric perforation (8 cases), ileal perforation (8 cases), appendicular perforation (7 cases), blunt trauma (4 cases) and others (9 cases). They were scored using POSSUM scoring system. Physiological scoring was done at the time of admission and operative scoring was done intraoperatively. They were followed up for the first 30 day post operative period for any complications and the outcome was noted. The observed morbidity and mortality rates were compared with the POSSUM predicted morbidity and mortality rates. Results. 15 patients died (mortality rate of 15%). The POSSUM predicted mortality was 20 deaths. O:E ratio of 0.71 was obtained. There was no statistically significant difference between the observed and predicted mortality rates (χ2=1.72, p=0.974). 71 patients experienced complications. The POSSUM predicted morbidity was 61 patients. O:E ratio of 1.19 was obtained. There was no statistically significant difference between the observed and predicted morbidity rates (χ2=1.594, p=0.991). Conclusions. POSSUM scoring is an accurate predictor of mortality and morbidity following emergency laparotomy and is a valid means of assessing adequacy of care provided to the patient. POSSUM can be used for surgical audit to assess and improve the quality of surgical care and helps in better outcome to the patient</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-373X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0032-373X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2299-2847</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2478/pjs-2014-0029</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24988229</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Poland: De Gruyter Open</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Appendicitis - surgery ; Duodenal Diseases - surgery ; emergency laparotomy ; Emergency Medical Services - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Female ; Hospital Mortality ; Humans ; Ileal Diseases - surgery ; India ; Intestinal Obstruction - surgery ; Intestinal Perforation - surgery ; Laparotomy - mortality ; Laparotomy - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Morbidity ; POSSUM scoring ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Risk Assessment ; Risk Factors ; risk stratification ; Severity of Illness Index ; Stomach Diseases - surgery ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Polski przeglad chirurgiczny, 2014-04, Vol.86 (4), p.159-165</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2609-866be05928cc69a276bc8ca4775f68407c2cbe77a8c43d132730e727a16722273</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24988229$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sreeharsha, Harinatha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sp, Rai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sreekar, Harinatha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reddy, Ravi</creatorcontrib><title>Efficacy of Possum Score in Predicting the Outcome in Patients Undergoing Emergency Laparotomy</title><title>Polski przeglad chirurgiczny</title><addtitle>Pol Przegl Chir</addtitle><description>Monitoring of surgical outcome is increasingly important part of governance of surgical activity. The aim of the study. POSSUM scoring system was applied prospectively to determine how it performed in predicting morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy in our hospital, a group known to be at high risk of complications and death. Material and methods. A total of 100 cases of emergency laparotomies were studied in patients admitted in general surgery department during the period of May 2008 to August 2010. The study group consisted of the following cases. Duodenal perforation (37 cases), intestinal obstruction (27 cases), gastric perforation (8 cases), ileal perforation (8 cases), appendicular perforation (7 cases), blunt trauma (4 cases) and others (9 cases). They were scored using POSSUM scoring system. Physiological scoring was done at the time of admission and operative scoring was done intraoperatively. They were followed up for the first 30 day post operative period for any complications and the outcome was noted. The observed morbidity and mortality rates were compared with the POSSUM predicted morbidity and mortality rates. Results. 15 patients died (mortality rate of 15%). The POSSUM predicted mortality was 20 deaths. O:E ratio of 0.71 was obtained. There was no statistically significant difference between the observed and predicted mortality rates (χ2=1.72, p=0.974). 71 patients experienced complications. The POSSUM predicted morbidity was 61 patients. O:E ratio of 1.19 was obtained. There was no statistically significant difference between the observed and predicted morbidity rates (χ2=1.594, p=0.991). Conclusions. POSSUM scoring is an accurate predictor of mortality and morbidity following emergency laparotomy and is a valid means of assessing adequacy of care provided to the patient. POSSUM can be used for surgical audit to assess and improve the quality of surgical care and helps in better outcome to the patient</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Appendicitis - surgery</subject><subject>Duodenal Diseases - surgery</subject><subject>emergency laparotomy</subject><subject>Emergency Medical Services - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hospital Mortality</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Ileal Diseases - surgery</subject><subject>India</subject><subject>Intestinal Obstruction - surgery</subject><subject>Intestinal Perforation - surgery</subject><subject>Laparotomy - mortality</subject><subject>Laparotomy - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>POSSUM scoring</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>risk stratification</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Stomach Diseases - surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0032-373X</issn><issn>0032-373X</issn><issn>2299-2847</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNptkF1LwzAUhoMobk4vvZX8gWp60uUDr2RsKgw20IFXljRNZ8falDRF-u9NqYoXXuUN5-HlnAeh65jcQsLFXXNoIyBxEhEC8gRNCaEQUU7fTv_kCbpo2wMhc0lBnqMJJFIIADlF78uiKLXSPbYF3tq27Sr8oq0zuKzx1pm81L6s99h_GLzpvLbVOFG-NLVv8a7OjdvbAVlWIZk6VK1Vo5z1tuov0Vmhjq25-n5naLdavi6eovXm8XnxsI40MCIjwVhmwnYgtGZSAWeZFlolnM8LJhLCNejMcK6ETmgeU-CUGA5cxYwDhN8MRWOvduEGZ4q0cWWlXJ_GJB08pcFTOnhKB0-Bvxn5pssqk__SP2ICcD8Cn-rojcvN3nV9COnBdq4Op_xfLFgSB8lfItp3QQ</recordid><startdate>20140401</startdate><enddate>20140401</enddate><creator>Sreeharsha, Harinatha</creator><creator>Sp, Rai</creator><creator>Sreekar, Harinatha</creator><creator>Reddy, Ravi</creator><general>De Gruyter Open</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140401</creationdate><title>Efficacy of Possum Score in Predicting the Outcome in Patients Undergoing Emergency Laparotomy</title><author>Sreeharsha, Harinatha ; Sp, Rai ; Sreekar, Harinatha ; Reddy, Ravi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2609-866be05928cc69a276bc8ca4775f68407c2cbe77a8c43d132730e727a16722273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Appendicitis - surgery</topic><topic>Duodenal Diseases - surgery</topic><topic>emergency laparotomy</topic><topic>Emergency Medical Services - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hospital Mortality</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Ileal Diseases - surgery</topic><topic>India</topic><topic>Intestinal Obstruction - surgery</topic><topic>Intestinal Perforation - surgery</topic><topic>Laparotomy - mortality</topic><topic>Laparotomy - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>POSSUM scoring</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>risk stratification</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Stomach Diseases - surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sreeharsha, Harinatha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sp, Rai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sreekar, Harinatha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reddy, Ravi</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Polski przeglad chirurgiczny</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sreeharsha, Harinatha</au><au>Sp, Rai</au><au>Sreekar, Harinatha</au><au>Reddy, Ravi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficacy of Possum Score in Predicting the Outcome in Patients Undergoing Emergency Laparotomy</atitle><jtitle>Polski przeglad chirurgiczny</jtitle><addtitle>Pol Przegl Chir</addtitle><date>2014-04-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>86</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>159</spage><epage>165</epage><pages>159-165</pages><issn>0032-373X</issn><eissn>0032-373X</eissn><eissn>2299-2847</eissn><abstract>Monitoring of surgical outcome is increasingly important part of governance of surgical activity. The aim of the study. POSSUM scoring system was applied prospectively to determine how it performed in predicting morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy in our hospital, a group known to be at high risk of complications and death. Material and methods. A total of 100 cases of emergency laparotomies were studied in patients admitted in general surgery department during the period of May 2008 to August 2010. The study group consisted of the following cases. Duodenal perforation (37 cases), intestinal obstruction (27 cases), gastric perforation (8 cases), ileal perforation (8 cases), appendicular perforation (7 cases), blunt trauma (4 cases) and others (9 cases). They were scored using POSSUM scoring system. Physiological scoring was done at the time of admission and operative scoring was done intraoperatively. They were followed up for the first 30 day post operative period for any complications and the outcome was noted. The observed morbidity and mortality rates were compared with the POSSUM predicted morbidity and mortality rates. Results. 15 patients died (mortality rate of 15%). The POSSUM predicted mortality was 20 deaths. O:E ratio of 0.71 was obtained. There was no statistically significant difference between the observed and predicted mortality rates (χ2=1.72, p=0.974). 71 patients experienced complications. The POSSUM predicted morbidity was 61 patients. O:E ratio of 1.19 was obtained. There was no statistically significant difference between the observed and predicted morbidity rates (χ2=1.594, p=0.991). Conclusions. POSSUM scoring is an accurate predictor of mortality and morbidity following emergency laparotomy and is a valid means of assessing adequacy of care provided to the patient. POSSUM can be used for surgical audit to assess and improve the quality of surgical care and helps in better outcome to the patient</abstract><cop>Poland</cop><pub>De Gruyter Open</pub><pmid>24988229</pmid><doi>10.2478/pjs-2014-0029</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0032-373X
ispartof Polski przeglad chirurgiczny, 2014-04, Vol.86 (4), p.159-165
issn 0032-373X
0032-373X
2299-2847
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_2478_pjs_2014_0029
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Appendicitis - surgery
Duodenal Diseases - surgery
emergency laparotomy
Emergency Medical Services - statistics & numerical data
Female
Hospital Mortality
Humans
Ileal Diseases - surgery
India
Intestinal Obstruction - surgery
Intestinal Perforation - surgery
Laparotomy - mortality
Laparotomy - statistics & numerical data
Male
Middle Aged
Morbidity
POSSUM scoring
Predictive Value of Tests
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
risk stratification
Severity of Illness Index
Stomach Diseases - surgery
Treatment Outcome
title Efficacy of Possum Score in Predicting the Outcome in Patients Undergoing Emergency Laparotomy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T17%3A02%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-walterdegruyter_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy%20of%20Possum%20Score%20in%20Predicting%20the%20Outcome%20in%20Patients%20Undergoing%20Emergency%20Laparotomy&rft.jtitle=Polski%20przeglad%20chirurgiczny&rft.au=Sreeharsha,%20Harinatha&rft.date=2014-04-01&rft.volume=86&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=159&rft.epage=165&rft.pages=159-165&rft.issn=0032-373X&rft.eissn=0032-373X&rft_id=info:doi/10.2478/pjs-2014-0029&rft_dat=%3Cwalterdegruyter_cross%3E10_2478_pjs_2014_0029864159%3C/walterdegruyter_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/24988229&rfr_iscdi=true