Innocence is Not Enough: The Public Life of Death Row Exonerations
Miscarriages of justice and wrongful convictions are a pervasive reality in America's criminal justice system. In this paper we examine news coverage of miscarriages of justice in the death penalty system and the release of death row inmates to understand what we call the public life of exonera...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of American legal studies 2020-08, Vol.9 (2), p.209-232 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 232 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 209 |
container_title | British journal of American legal studies |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Sarat, Austin Morgan, Natalie Grimes, Willa Narcisse, Obed Thomas, Jeremy |
description | Miscarriages of justice and wrongful convictions are a pervasive reality in America's criminal justice system. In this paper we examine news coverage of miscarriages of justice in the death penalty system and the release of death row inmates to understand what we call the public life of exonerations. We examine the way newspapers tell the story of exonerations and the various tilts and tendencies that characterize their presentations. We focus on the five states which, from 1972–2019, had ten or more exonerations. During that period, they were Florida, Illinois, Texas, Louisiana, and Oklahoma. We conclude that the public discourse surrounding exoneration, while providing evidence of the death penalty system's most consequential flaws, serves as much to preserve that system as to challenge it. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2478/bjals-2020-0016 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>walterdegruyter_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_2478_bjals_2020_0016</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_2478_bjals_2020_001692209</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-55156819a867e9ffb4354b2d9e299ee68776aed73a8682de554642cfc0fdd45f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kLFOwzAURS0EElXpzOofCHUc24kRC5QAlSpAqMyW4zw3qYqN7ESlf09CGViY3h3uuU86CF2m5IqyvJhXW72LCSWUJISk4gRNKGEyYUTS0z_5HM1i3JKhkhImMjlBd0vnvAFnALcRP_sOl873m-YarxvAr321aw1etRawt_gedNfgN7_H5Zd3EHTXehcv0JkdvsPs907R-0O5Xjwlq5fH5eJ2lRhayC7hPOWiSKUuRA7S2oplnFW0lkClBBBFngsNdZ4NhYLWwDkTjBpriK1rxm02RfPjrgk-xgBWfYb2Q4eDSokaLagfC2q0oEYLA3FzJPZ610GoYRP6wxDU1vfBjd1_SEkpkdk3weFjig</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Innocence is Not Enough: The Public Life of Death Row Exonerations</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Sarat, Austin ; Morgan, Natalie ; Grimes, Willa ; Narcisse, Obed ; Thomas, Jeremy</creator><creatorcontrib>Sarat, Austin ; Morgan, Natalie ; Grimes, Willa ; Narcisse, Obed ; Thomas, Jeremy</creatorcontrib><description>Miscarriages of justice and wrongful convictions are a pervasive reality in America's criminal justice system. In this paper we examine news coverage of miscarriages of justice in the death penalty system and the release of death row inmates to understand what we call the public life of exonerations. We examine the way newspapers tell the story of exonerations and the various tilts and tendencies that characterize their presentations. We focus on the five states which, from 1972–2019, had ten or more exonerations. During that period, they were Florida, Illinois, Texas, Louisiana, and Oklahoma. We conclude that the public discourse surrounding exoneration, while providing evidence of the death penalty system's most consequential flaws, serves as much to preserve that system as to challenge it.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2049-4092</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2049-4092</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2478/bjals-2020-0016</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Sciendo</publisher><subject>Death Penalty ; Exonerations ; Miscarriages of Justice ; News Coverage</subject><ispartof>British journal of American legal studies, 2020-08, Vol.9 (2), p.209-232</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sarat, Austin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgan, Natalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grimes, Willa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Narcisse, Obed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Jeremy</creatorcontrib><title>Innocence is Not Enough: The Public Life of Death Row Exonerations</title><title>British journal of American legal studies</title><description>Miscarriages of justice and wrongful convictions are a pervasive reality in America's criminal justice system. In this paper we examine news coverage of miscarriages of justice in the death penalty system and the release of death row inmates to understand what we call the public life of exonerations. We examine the way newspapers tell the story of exonerations and the various tilts and tendencies that characterize their presentations. We focus on the five states which, from 1972–2019, had ten or more exonerations. During that period, they were Florida, Illinois, Texas, Louisiana, and Oklahoma. We conclude that the public discourse surrounding exoneration, while providing evidence of the death penalty system's most consequential flaws, serves as much to preserve that system as to challenge it.</description><subject>Death Penalty</subject><subject>Exonerations</subject><subject>Miscarriages of Justice</subject><subject>News Coverage</subject><issn>2049-4092</issn><issn>2049-4092</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kLFOwzAURS0EElXpzOofCHUc24kRC5QAlSpAqMyW4zw3qYqN7ESlf09CGViY3h3uuU86CF2m5IqyvJhXW72LCSWUJISk4gRNKGEyYUTS0z_5HM1i3JKhkhImMjlBd0vnvAFnALcRP_sOl873m-YarxvAr321aw1etRawt_gedNfgN7_H5Zd3EHTXehcv0JkdvsPs907R-0O5Xjwlq5fH5eJ2lRhayC7hPOWiSKUuRA7S2oplnFW0lkClBBBFngsNdZ4NhYLWwDkTjBpriK1rxm02RfPjrgk-xgBWfYb2Q4eDSokaLagfC2q0oEYLA3FzJPZ610GoYRP6wxDU1vfBjd1_SEkpkdk3weFjig</recordid><startdate>20200801</startdate><enddate>20200801</enddate><creator>Sarat, Austin</creator><creator>Morgan, Natalie</creator><creator>Grimes, Willa</creator><creator>Narcisse, Obed</creator><creator>Thomas, Jeremy</creator><general>Sciendo</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200801</creationdate><title>Innocence is Not Enough: The Public Life of Death Row Exonerations</title><author>Sarat, Austin ; Morgan, Natalie ; Grimes, Willa ; Narcisse, Obed ; Thomas, Jeremy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-55156819a867e9ffb4354b2d9e299ee68776aed73a8682de554642cfc0fdd45f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Death Penalty</topic><topic>Exonerations</topic><topic>Miscarriages of Justice</topic><topic>News Coverage</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sarat, Austin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgan, Natalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grimes, Willa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Narcisse, Obed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Jeremy</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>British journal of American legal studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sarat, Austin</au><au>Morgan, Natalie</au><au>Grimes, Willa</au><au>Narcisse, Obed</au><au>Thomas, Jeremy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Innocence is Not Enough: The Public Life of Death Row Exonerations</atitle><jtitle>British journal of American legal studies</jtitle><date>2020-08-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>209</spage><epage>232</epage><pages>209-232</pages><issn>2049-4092</issn><eissn>2049-4092</eissn><abstract>Miscarriages of justice and wrongful convictions are a pervasive reality in America's criminal justice system. In this paper we examine news coverage of miscarriages of justice in the death penalty system and the release of death row inmates to understand what we call the public life of exonerations. We examine the way newspapers tell the story of exonerations and the various tilts and tendencies that characterize their presentations. We focus on the five states which, from 1972–2019, had ten or more exonerations. During that period, they were Florida, Illinois, Texas, Louisiana, and Oklahoma. We conclude that the public discourse surrounding exoneration, while providing evidence of the death penalty system's most consequential flaws, serves as much to preserve that system as to challenge it.</abstract><pub>Sciendo</pub><doi>10.2478/bjals-2020-0016</doi><tpages>24</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2049-4092 |
ispartof | British journal of American legal studies, 2020-08, Vol.9 (2), p.209-232 |
issn | 2049-4092 2049-4092 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_2478_bjals_2020_0016 |
source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Death Penalty Exonerations Miscarriages of Justice News Coverage |
title | Innocence is Not Enough: The Public Life of Death Row Exonerations |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T22%3A44%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-walterdegruyter_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Innocence%20is%20Not%20Enough:%20The%20Public%20Life%20of%20Death%20Row%20Exonerations&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20American%20legal%20studies&rft.au=Sarat,%20Austin&rft.date=2020-08-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=209&rft.epage=232&rft.pages=209-232&rft.issn=2049-4092&rft.eissn=2049-4092&rft_id=info:doi/10.2478/bjals-2020-0016&rft_dat=%3Cwalterdegruyter_cross%3E10_2478_bjals_2020_001692209%3C/walterdegruyter_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |