Innocence is Not Enough: The Public Life of Death Row Exonerations

Miscarriages of justice and wrongful convictions are a pervasive reality in America's criminal justice system. In this paper we examine news coverage of miscarriages of justice in the death penalty system and the release of death row inmates to understand what we call the public life of exonera...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of American legal studies 2020-08, Vol.9 (2), p.209-232
Hauptverfasser: Sarat, Austin, Morgan, Natalie, Grimes, Willa, Narcisse, Obed, Thomas, Jeremy
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 232
container_issue 2
container_start_page 209
container_title British journal of American legal studies
container_volume 9
creator Sarat, Austin
Morgan, Natalie
Grimes, Willa
Narcisse, Obed
Thomas, Jeremy
description Miscarriages of justice and wrongful convictions are a pervasive reality in America's criminal justice system. In this paper we examine news coverage of miscarriages of justice in the death penalty system and the release of death row inmates to understand what we call the public life of exonerations. We examine the way newspapers tell the story of exonerations and the various tilts and tendencies that characterize their presentations. We focus on the five states which, from 1972–2019, had ten or more exonerations. During that period, they were Florida, Illinois, Texas, Louisiana, and Oklahoma. We conclude that the public discourse surrounding exoneration, while providing evidence of the death penalty system's most consequential flaws, serves as much to preserve that system as to challenge it.
doi_str_mv 10.2478/bjals-2020-0016
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>walterdegruyter_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_2478_bjals_2020_0016</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_2478_bjals_2020_001692209</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-55156819a867e9ffb4354b2d9e299ee68776aed73a8682de554642cfc0fdd45f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kLFOwzAURS0EElXpzOofCHUc24kRC5QAlSpAqMyW4zw3qYqN7ESlf09CGViY3h3uuU86CF2m5IqyvJhXW72LCSWUJISk4gRNKGEyYUTS0z_5HM1i3JKhkhImMjlBd0vnvAFnALcRP_sOl873m-YarxvAr321aw1etRawt_gedNfgN7_H5Zd3EHTXehcv0JkdvsPs907R-0O5Xjwlq5fH5eJ2lRhayC7hPOWiSKUuRA7S2oplnFW0lkClBBBFngsNdZ4NhYLWwDkTjBpriK1rxm02RfPjrgk-xgBWfYb2Q4eDSokaLagfC2q0oEYLA3FzJPZ610GoYRP6wxDU1vfBjd1_SEkpkdk3weFjig</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Innocence is Not Enough: The Public Life of Death Row Exonerations</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Sarat, Austin ; Morgan, Natalie ; Grimes, Willa ; Narcisse, Obed ; Thomas, Jeremy</creator><creatorcontrib>Sarat, Austin ; Morgan, Natalie ; Grimes, Willa ; Narcisse, Obed ; Thomas, Jeremy</creatorcontrib><description>Miscarriages of justice and wrongful convictions are a pervasive reality in America's criminal justice system. In this paper we examine news coverage of miscarriages of justice in the death penalty system and the release of death row inmates to understand what we call the public life of exonerations. We examine the way newspapers tell the story of exonerations and the various tilts and tendencies that characterize their presentations. We focus on the five states which, from 1972–2019, had ten or more exonerations. During that period, they were Florida, Illinois, Texas, Louisiana, and Oklahoma. We conclude that the public discourse surrounding exoneration, while providing evidence of the death penalty system's most consequential flaws, serves as much to preserve that system as to challenge it.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2049-4092</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2049-4092</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2478/bjals-2020-0016</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Sciendo</publisher><subject>Death Penalty ; Exonerations ; Miscarriages of Justice ; News Coverage</subject><ispartof>British journal of American legal studies, 2020-08, Vol.9 (2), p.209-232</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sarat, Austin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgan, Natalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grimes, Willa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Narcisse, Obed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Jeremy</creatorcontrib><title>Innocence is Not Enough: The Public Life of Death Row Exonerations</title><title>British journal of American legal studies</title><description>Miscarriages of justice and wrongful convictions are a pervasive reality in America's criminal justice system. In this paper we examine news coverage of miscarriages of justice in the death penalty system and the release of death row inmates to understand what we call the public life of exonerations. We examine the way newspapers tell the story of exonerations and the various tilts and tendencies that characterize their presentations. We focus on the five states which, from 1972–2019, had ten or more exonerations. During that period, they were Florida, Illinois, Texas, Louisiana, and Oklahoma. We conclude that the public discourse surrounding exoneration, while providing evidence of the death penalty system's most consequential flaws, serves as much to preserve that system as to challenge it.</description><subject>Death Penalty</subject><subject>Exonerations</subject><subject>Miscarriages of Justice</subject><subject>News Coverage</subject><issn>2049-4092</issn><issn>2049-4092</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kLFOwzAURS0EElXpzOofCHUc24kRC5QAlSpAqMyW4zw3qYqN7ESlf09CGViY3h3uuU86CF2m5IqyvJhXW72LCSWUJISk4gRNKGEyYUTS0z_5HM1i3JKhkhImMjlBd0vnvAFnALcRP_sOl873m-YarxvAr321aw1etRawt_gedNfgN7_H5Zd3EHTXehcv0JkdvsPs907R-0O5Xjwlq5fH5eJ2lRhayC7hPOWiSKUuRA7S2oplnFW0lkClBBBFngsNdZ4NhYLWwDkTjBpriK1rxm02RfPjrgk-xgBWfYb2Q4eDSokaLagfC2q0oEYLA3FzJPZ610GoYRP6wxDU1vfBjd1_SEkpkdk3weFjig</recordid><startdate>20200801</startdate><enddate>20200801</enddate><creator>Sarat, Austin</creator><creator>Morgan, Natalie</creator><creator>Grimes, Willa</creator><creator>Narcisse, Obed</creator><creator>Thomas, Jeremy</creator><general>Sciendo</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200801</creationdate><title>Innocence is Not Enough: The Public Life of Death Row Exonerations</title><author>Sarat, Austin ; Morgan, Natalie ; Grimes, Willa ; Narcisse, Obed ; Thomas, Jeremy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c289t-55156819a867e9ffb4354b2d9e299ee68776aed73a8682de554642cfc0fdd45f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Death Penalty</topic><topic>Exonerations</topic><topic>Miscarriages of Justice</topic><topic>News Coverage</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sarat, Austin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgan, Natalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grimes, Willa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Narcisse, Obed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Jeremy</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>British journal of American legal studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sarat, Austin</au><au>Morgan, Natalie</au><au>Grimes, Willa</au><au>Narcisse, Obed</au><au>Thomas, Jeremy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Innocence is Not Enough: The Public Life of Death Row Exonerations</atitle><jtitle>British journal of American legal studies</jtitle><date>2020-08-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>209</spage><epage>232</epage><pages>209-232</pages><issn>2049-4092</issn><eissn>2049-4092</eissn><abstract>Miscarriages of justice and wrongful convictions are a pervasive reality in America's criminal justice system. In this paper we examine news coverage of miscarriages of justice in the death penalty system and the release of death row inmates to understand what we call the public life of exonerations. We examine the way newspapers tell the story of exonerations and the various tilts and tendencies that characterize their presentations. We focus on the five states which, from 1972–2019, had ten or more exonerations. During that period, they were Florida, Illinois, Texas, Louisiana, and Oklahoma. We conclude that the public discourse surrounding exoneration, while providing evidence of the death penalty system's most consequential flaws, serves as much to preserve that system as to challenge it.</abstract><pub>Sciendo</pub><doi>10.2478/bjals-2020-0016</doi><tpages>24</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2049-4092
ispartof British journal of American legal studies, 2020-08, Vol.9 (2), p.209-232
issn 2049-4092
2049-4092
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_2478_bjals_2020_0016
source HeinOnline Law Journal Library; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Death Penalty
Exonerations
Miscarriages of Justice
News Coverage
title Innocence is Not Enough: The Public Life of Death Row Exonerations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T22%3A44%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-walterdegruyter_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Innocence%20is%20Not%20Enough:%20The%20Public%20Life%20of%20Death%20Row%20Exonerations&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20American%20legal%20studies&rft.au=Sarat,%20Austin&rft.date=2020-08-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=209&rft.epage=232&rft.pages=209-232&rft.issn=2049-4092&rft.eissn=2049-4092&rft_id=info:doi/10.2478/bjals-2020-0016&rft_dat=%3Cwalterdegruyter_cross%3E10_2478_bjals_2020_001692209%3C/walterdegruyter_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true