Locking or Non-locking Hook Plate in Treatment of Unstable Lateral Clavicle Fracture

The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes and complications of locking or nonlocking clavicular hook plate for fixation of unstable lateral clavicle fractures. All patients with unstable Neer type II lateral clavicle fractures were operated in our hospital from January 2011 to December 2...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ars medica tomitana 2015-01, Vol.20 (3), p.150-152
Hauptverfasser: Al. O., Şerban, B., Obadâ
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 152
container_issue 3
container_start_page 150
container_title Ars medica tomitana
container_volume 20
creator Al. O., Şerban
B., Obadâ
description The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes and complications of locking or nonlocking clavicular hook plate for fixation of unstable lateral clavicle fractures. All patients with unstable Neer type II lateral clavicle fractures were operated in our hospital from January 2011 to December 2012. The included participants received either locking or nonlocking clavicular hook plate operations. Demographic data, medical records and radiographs were reviewed retrospectively. At the last follow-up, shoulder function was evaluated with Constant-Murley scoring system. Our findings suggest that locking clavicular hook plates are equally useful for treating unstable lateral clavicular fractures, but in face of complicated ones, the locking hook plate would not get more benefits than nonlocking hook plate.
doi_str_mv 10.2478/arsm-2014-0027
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>walterdegruyter_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_2478_arsm_2014_0027</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_2478_arsm_2014_0027203150</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1770-ec5080c991e069243e30e11cff4f568d0d64d0ce77711280f8dd311e3f4aae443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kDFPwzAQhS0EElXpyuw_kHIXu7EjsaCKUqQIGNLZMs65SpvGyElB_fckagcWpnv3Tu_09DF2jzBPpdIPNnaHJAWUCUCqrtgEtcREgsiu_-hbNuu6HQCgEhrTfMLKIrh93W55iPwttElzWdch7PlHY3vidcvLSLY_UNvz4Pmm7Xr72RAvhmu0DV829rt2g7GK1vXHSHfsxtumo9llTtlm9Vwu10nx_vK6fCoSh0pBQm4BGlyeI0GWp1KQAEJ03ku_yHQFVSYrcKSUQkw1eF1VApGEl9aSlGLK5ue_Loaui-TNV6wPNp4MghmxmBGLGbGYEcsQeDwHfmwzdK9oG4-nQZhdOMZ2qPpPMAWBCxC_nMZpYA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Locking or Non-locking Hook Plate in Treatment of Unstable Lateral Clavicle Fracture</title><source>De Gruyter Open Access Journals</source><creator>Al. O., Şerban ; B., Obadâ</creator><creatorcontrib>Al. O., Şerban ; B., Obadâ</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes and complications of locking or nonlocking clavicular hook plate for fixation of unstable lateral clavicle fractures. All patients with unstable Neer type II lateral clavicle fractures were operated in our hospital from January 2011 to December 2012. The included participants received either locking or nonlocking clavicular hook plate operations. Demographic data, medical records and radiographs were reviewed retrospectively. At the last follow-up, shoulder function was evaluated with Constant-Murley scoring system. Our findings suggest that locking clavicular hook plates are equally useful for treating unstable lateral clavicular fractures, but in face of complicated ones, the locking hook plate would not get more benefits than nonlocking hook plate.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1841-4036</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1841-4036</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2478/arsm-2014-0027</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>De Gruyter Open</publisher><ispartof>Ars medica tomitana, 2015-01, Vol.20 (3), p.150-152</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1770-ec5080c991e069243e30e11cff4f568d0d64d0ce77711280f8dd311e3f4aae443</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.2478/arsm-2014-0027/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwalterdegruyter$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.2478/arsm-2014-0027/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwalterdegruyter$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923,66928,68712</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Al. O., Şerban</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>B., Obadâ</creatorcontrib><title>Locking or Non-locking Hook Plate in Treatment of Unstable Lateral Clavicle Fracture</title><title>Ars medica tomitana</title><description>The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes and complications of locking or nonlocking clavicular hook plate for fixation of unstable lateral clavicle fractures. All patients with unstable Neer type II lateral clavicle fractures were operated in our hospital from January 2011 to December 2012. The included participants received either locking or nonlocking clavicular hook plate operations. Demographic data, medical records and radiographs were reviewed retrospectively. At the last follow-up, shoulder function was evaluated with Constant-Murley scoring system. Our findings suggest that locking clavicular hook plates are equally useful for treating unstable lateral clavicular fractures, but in face of complicated ones, the locking hook plate would not get more benefits than nonlocking hook plate.</description><issn>1841-4036</issn><issn>1841-4036</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kDFPwzAQhS0EElXpyuw_kHIXu7EjsaCKUqQIGNLZMs65SpvGyElB_fckagcWpnv3Tu_09DF2jzBPpdIPNnaHJAWUCUCqrtgEtcREgsiu_-hbNuu6HQCgEhrTfMLKIrh93W55iPwttElzWdch7PlHY3vidcvLSLY_UNvz4Pmm7Xr72RAvhmu0DV829rt2g7GK1vXHSHfsxtumo9llTtlm9Vwu10nx_vK6fCoSh0pBQm4BGlyeI0GWp1KQAEJ03ku_yHQFVSYrcKSUQkw1eF1VApGEl9aSlGLK5ue_Loaui-TNV6wPNp4MghmxmBGLGbGYEcsQeDwHfmwzdK9oG4-nQZhdOMZ2qPpPMAWBCxC_nMZpYA</recordid><startdate>20150131</startdate><enddate>20150131</enddate><creator>Al. O., Şerban</creator><creator>B., Obadâ</creator><general>De Gruyter Open</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150131</creationdate><title>Locking or Non-locking Hook Plate in Treatment of Unstable Lateral Clavicle Fracture</title><author>Al. O., Şerban ; B., Obadâ</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1770-ec5080c991e069243e30e11cff4f568d0d64d0ce77711280f8dd311e3f4aae443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Al. O., Şerban</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>B., Obadâ</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Ars medica tomitana</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Al. O., Şerban</au><au>B., Obadâ</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Locking or Non-locking Hook Plate in Treatment of Unstable Lateral Clavicle Fracture</atitle><jtitle>Ars medica tomitana</jtitle><date>2015-01-31</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>150</spage><epage>152</epage><pages>150-152</pages><issn>1841-4036</issn><eissn>1841-4036</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes and complications of locking or nonlocking clavicular hook plate for fixation of unstable lateral clavicle fractures. All patients with unstable Neer type II lateral clavicle fractures were operated in our hospital from January 2011 to December 2012. The included participants received either locking or nonlocking clavicular hook plate operations. Demographic data, medical records and radiographs were reviewed retrospectively. At the last follow-up, shoulder function was evaluated with Constant-Murley scoring system. Our findings suggest that locking clavicular hook plates are equally useful for treating unstable lateral clavicular fractures, but in face of complicated ones, the locking hook plate would not get more benefits than nonlocking hook plate.</abstract><pub>De Gruyter Open</pub><doi>10.2478/arsm-2014-0027</doi><tpages>3</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1841-4036
ispartof Ars medica tomitana, 2015-01, Vol.20 (3), p.150-152
issn 1841-4036
1841-4036
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_2478_arsm_2014_0027
source De Gruyter Open Access Journals
title Locking or Non-locking Hook Plate in Treatment of Unstable Lateral Clavicle Fracture
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T22%3A04%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-walterdegruyter_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Locking%20or%20Non-locking%20Hook%20Plate%20in%20Treatment%20of%20Unstable%20Lateral%20Clavicle%20Fracture&rft.jtitle=Ars%20medica%20tomitana&rft.au=Al.%20O.,%20%C5%9Eerban&rft.date=2015-01-31&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=150&rft.epage=152&rft.pages=150-152&rft.issn=1841-4036&rft.eissn=1841-4036&rft_id=info:doi/10.2478/arsm-2014-0027&rft_dat=%3Cwalterdegruyter_cross%3E10_2478_arsm_2014_0027203150%3C/walterdegruyter_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true