Dumitru Chioaru, Avatarurile Lui Orfeu, Editura Univers, Bucureşti, 2021

In his book entitled Avatarurile lui Orfeu (Orpheus’s Avatars), Dumitru Chioaru presents the two hypostases of the Orphism, the orphic and anti or post(orphic). Beginning his line of argument from the myth of Orpheus and crystallising his critical options with a hermeneutic perspective on the proble...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Acta Marisiensis. Seria Philologia (Online) 2022-09, Vol.4 (1), p.1-3
1. Verfasser: Boldea, Iulian
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
container_title Acta Marisiensis. Seria Philologia (Online)
container_volume 4
creator Boldea, Iulian
description In his book entitled Avatarurile lui Orfeu (Orpheus’s Avatars), Dumitru Chioaru presents the two hypostases of the Orphism, the orphic and anti or post(orphic). Beginning his line of argument from the myth of Orpheus and crystallising his critical options with a hermeneutic perspective on the problem in question, Dumitru Chioaru manages to achieve a larger picture of the lyricism related to the orphic myth, by analysing the poetic works of thirty poets. The Orphism’s hypostases are depicted by means of two exegetic methods, both used in an irreproachable manner (mythological criticism and hermeneutics). Dumitru Chioaru’s endeavour in the history of the universal lyricism and in everything which lyricism represents, in its multiple hypostases, proves the presence of a fine hermeneutist, attentive to everything which the paradigm of Orphism implies, a paradigm he manages to define by capturing it in some ample sentences, both clarifying and expressive.
doi_str_mv 10.2478/amph-2022-0078
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_2478_amph_2022_0078</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_2478_amph_2022_0078</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1291-2bb056b389d564cbea99fcc7805082d4fdb844333e5fcbfe0acaaf51b618dc413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkDFOwzAYhS0EElXpyuwDJOW3Yzv2WEqBSpG60DmyHVs1amhlx5U4DafhXiSCgel9esN70ofQPYElZbV80P35UFKgtASo5RWaUSFkqbgS1__4Fi1SegcAqgSnIGZo-5T7MMSM14dw0jEXeHXRwwgxHB1ucsC76N1Yb7ow5Kjx_iNcXEwFfsw2R_f9NYQCj8fkDt14fUxu8ZdztH_evK1fy2b3sl2vmtISqkhJjQEuTCVVxwWzxmmlvLW1BA6Sdsx3RjJWVZXj3hrvQFutPSdGENlZRqo5Wv7u2nhKKTrfnmPodfxsCbSTi3Zy0U4u2slF9QMS9VJw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dumitru Chioaru, Avatarurile Lui Orfeu, Editura Univers, Bucureşti, 2021</title><source>De Gruyter Open Access Journals</source><source>Central and Eastern European Online Library</source><creator>Boldea, Iulian</creator><creatorcontrib>Boldea, Iulian</creatorcontrib><description>In his book entitled Avatarurile lui Orfeu (Orpheus’s Avatars), Dumitru Chioaru presents the two hypostases of the Orphism, the orphic and anti or post(orphic). Beginning his line of argument from the myth of Orpheus and crystallising his critical options with a hermeneutic perspective on the problem in question, Dumitru Chioaru manages to achieve a larger picture of the lyricism related to the orphic myth, by analysing the poetic works of thirty poets. The Orphism’s hypostases are depicted by means of two exegetic methods, both used in an irreproachable manner (mythological criticism and hermeneutics). Dumitru Chioaru’s endeavour in the history of the universal lyricism and in everything which lyricism represents, in its multiple hypostases, proves the presence of a fine hermeneutist, attentive to everything which the paradigm of Orphism implies, a paradigm he manages to define by capturing it in some ample sentences, both clarifying and expressive.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2668-9596</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2668-9596</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2478/amph-2022-0078</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Acta Marisiensis. Seria Philologia (Online), 2022-09, Vol.4 (1), p.1-3</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1291-2bb056b389d564cbea99fcc7805082d4fdb844333e5fcbfe0acaaf51b618dc413</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27907,27908</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Boldea, Iulian</creatorcontrib><title>Dumitru Chioaru, Avatarurile Lui Orfeu, Editura Univers, Bucureşti, 2021</title><title>Acta Marisiensis. Seria Philologia (Online)</title><description>In his book entitled Avatarurile lui Orfeu (Orpheus’s Avatars), Dumitru Chioaru presents the two hypostases of the Orphism, the orphic and anti or post(orphic). Beginning his line of argument from the myth of Orpheus and crystallising his critical options with a hermeneutic perspective on the problem in question, Dumitru Chioaru manages to achieve a larger picture of the lyricism related to the orphic myth, by analysing the poetic works of thirty poets. The Orphism’s hypostases are depicted by means of two exegetic methods, both used in an irreproachable manner (mythological criticism and hermeneutics). Dumitru Chioaru’s endeavour in the history of the universal lyricism and in everything which lyricism represents, in its multiple hypostases, proves the presence of a fine hermeneutist, attentive to everything which the paradigm of Orphism implies, a paradigm he manages to define by capturing it in some ample sentences, both clarifying and expressive.</description><issn>2668-9596</issn><issn>2668-9596</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkDFOwzAYhS0EElXpyuwDJOW3Yzv2WEqBSpG60DmyHVs1amhlx5U4DafhXiSCgel9esN70ofQPYElZbV80P35UFKgtASo5RWaUSFkqbgS1__4Fi1SegcAqgSnIGZo-5T7MMSM14dw0jEXeHXRwwgxHB1ucsC76N1Yb7ow5Kjx_iNcXEwFfsw2R_f9NYQCj8fkDt14fUxu8ZdztH_evK1fy2b3sl2vmtISqkhJjQEuTCVVxwWzxmmlvLW1BA6Sdsx3RjJWVZXj3hrvQFutPSdGENlZRqo5Wv7u2nhKKTrfnmPodfxsCbSTi3Zy0U4u2slF9QMS9VJw</recordid><startdate>20220901</startdate><enddate>20220901</enddate><creator>Boldea, Iulian</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220901</creationdate><title>Dumitru Chioaru, Avatarurile Lui Orfeu, Editura Univers, Bucureşti, 2021</title><author>Boldea, Iulian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1291-2bb056b389d564cbea99fcc7805082d4fdb844333e5fcbfe0acaaf51b618dc413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Boldea, Iulian</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Acta Marisiensis. Seria Philologia (Online)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Boldea, Iulian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dumitru Chioaru, Avatarurile Lui Orfeu, Editura Univers, Bucureşti, 2021</atitle><jtitle>Acta Marisiensis. Seria Philologia (Online)</jtitle><date>2022-09-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>3</epage><pages>1-3</pages><issn>2668-9596</issn><eissn>2668-9596</eissn><abstract>In his book entitled Avatarurile lui Orfeu (Orpheus’s Avatars), Dumitru Chioaru presents the two hypostases of the Orphism, the orphic and anti or post(orphic). Beginning his line of argument from the myth of Orpheus and crystallising his critical options with a hermeneutic perspective on the problem in question, Dumitru Chioaru manages to achieve a larger picture of the lyricism related to the orphic myth, by analysing the poetic works of thirty poets. The Orphism’s hypostases are depicted by means of two exegetic methods, both used in an irreproachable manner (mythological criticism and hermeneutics). Dumitru Chioaru’s endeavour in the history of the universal lyricism and in everything which lyricism represents, in its multiple hypostases, proves the presence of a fine hermeneutist, attentive to everything which the paradigm of Orphism implies, a paradigm he manages to define by capturing it in some ample sentences, both clarifying and expressive.</abstract><doi>10.2478/amph-2022-0078</doi><tpages>3</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2668-9596
ispartof Acta Marisiensis. Seria Philologia (Online), 2022-09, Vol.4 (1), p.1-3
issn 2668-9596
2668-9596
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_2478_amph_2022_0078
source De Gruyter Open Access Journals; Central and Eastern European Online Library
title Dumitru Chioaru, Avatarurile Lui Orfeu, Editura Univers, Bucureşti, 2021
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T17%3A09%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dumitru%20Chioaru,%20Avatarurile%20Lui%20Orfeu,%20Editura%20Univers,%20Bucure%C5%9Fti,%202021&rft.jtitle=Acta%20Marisiensis.%20Seria%20Philologia%20(Online)&rft.au=Boldea,%20Iulian&rft.date=2022-09-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=3&rft.pages=1-3&rft.issn=2668-9596&rft.eissn=2668-9596&rft_id=info:doi/10.2478/amph-2022-0078&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_2478_amph_2022_0078%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true