Dumitru Chioaru, Avatarurile Lui Orfeu, Editura Univers, Bucureşti, 2021
In his book entitled Avatarurile lui Orfeu (Orpheus’s Avatars), Dumitru Chioaru presents the two hypostases of the Orphism, the orphic and anti or post(orphic). Beginning his line of argument from the myth of Orpheus and crystallising his critical options with a hermeneutic perspective on the proble...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Acta Marisiensis. Seria Philologia (Online) 2022-09, Vol.4 (1), p.1-3 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Acta Marisiensis. Seria Philologia (Online) |
container_volume | 4 |
creator | Boldea, Iulian |
description | In his book entitled Avatarurile lui Orfeu (Orpheus’s Avatars), Dumitru Chioaru presents the two hypostases of the Orphism, the orphic and anti or post(orphic). Beginning his line of argument from the myth of Orpheus and crystallising his critical options with a hermeneutic perspective on the problem in question, Dumitru Chioaru manages to achieve a larger picture of the lyricism related to the orphic myth, by analysing the poetic works of thirty poets.
The Orphism’s hypostases are depicted by means of two exegetic methods, both used in an irreproachable manner (mythological criticism and hermeneutics). Dumitru Chioaru’s endeavour in the history of the universal lyricism and in everything which lyricism represents, in its multiple hypostases, proves the presence of a fine hermeneutist, attentive to everything which the paradigm of Orphism implies, a paradigm he manages to define by capturing it in some ample sentences, both clarifying and expressive. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2478/amph-2022-0078 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_2478_amph_2022_0078</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_2478_amph_2022_0078</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1291-2bb056b389d564cbea99fcc7805082d4fdb844333e5fcbfe0acaaf51b618dc413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkDFOwzAYhS0EElXpyuwDJOW3Yzv2WEqBSpG60DmyHVs1amhlx5U4DafhXiSCgel9esN70ofQPYElZbV80P35UFKgtASo5RWaUSFkqbgS1__4Fi1SegcAqgSnIGZo-5T7MMSM14dw0jEXeHXRwwgxHB1ucsC76N1Yb7ow5Kjx_iNcXEwFfsw2R_f9NYQCj8fkDt14fUxu8ZdztH_evK1fy2b3sl2vmtISqkhJjQEuTCVVxwWzxmmlvLW1BA6Sdsx3RjJWVZXj3hrvQFutPSdGENlZRqo5Wv7u2nhKKTrfnmPodfxsCbSTi3Zy0U4u2slF9QMS9VJw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dumitru Chioaru, Avatarurile Lui Orfeu, Editura Univers, Bucureşti, 2021</title><source>De Gruyter Open Access Journals</source><source>Central and Eastern European Online Library</source><creator>Boldea, Iulian</creator><creatorcontrib>Boldea, Iulian</creatorcontrib><description>In his book entitled Avatarurile lui Orfeu (Orpheus’s Avatars), Dumitru Chioaru presents the two hypostases of the Orphism, the orphic and anti or post(orphic). Beginning his line of argument from the myth of Orpheus and crystallising his critical options with a hermeneutic perspective on the problem in question, Dumitru Chioaru manages to achieve a larger picture of the lyricism related to the orphic myth, by analysing the poetic works of thirty poets.
The Orphism’s hypostases are depicted by means of two exegetic methods, both used in an irreproachable manner (mythological criticism and hermeneutics). Dumitru Chioaru’s endeavour in the history of the universal lyricism and in everything which lyricism represents, in its multiple hypostases, proves the presence of a fine hermeneutist, attentive to everything which the paradigm of Orphism implies, a paradigm he manages to define by capturing it in some ample sentences, both clarifying and expressive.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2668-9596</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2668-9596</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2478/amph-2022-0078</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Acta Marisiensis. Seria Philologia (Online), 2022-09, Vol.4 (1), p.1-3</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1291-2bb056b389d564cbea99fcc7805082d4fdb844333e5fcbfe0acaaf51b618dc413</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27907,27908</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Boldea, Iulian</creatorcontrib><title>Dumitru Chioaru, Avatarurile Lui Orfeu, Editura Univers, Bucureşti, 2021</title><title>Acta Marisiensis. Seria Philologia (Online)</title><description>In his book entitled Avatarurile lui Orfeu (Orpheus’s Avatars), Dumitru Chioaru presents the two hypostases of the Orphism, the orphic and anti or post(orphic). Beginning his line of argument from the myth of Orpheus and crystallising his critical options with a hermeneutic perspective on the problem in question, Dumitru Chioaru manages to achieve a larger picture of the lyricism related to the orphic myth, by analysing the poetic works of thirty poets.
The Orphism’s hypostases are depicted by means of two exegetic methods, both used in an irreproachable manner (mythological criticism and hermeneutics). Dumitru Chioaru’s endeavour in the history of the universal lyricism and in everything which lyricism represents, in its multiple hypostases, proves the presence of a fine hermeneutist, attentive to everything which the paradigm of Orphism implies, a paradigm he manages to define by capturing it in some ample sentences, both clarifying and expressive.</description><issn>2668-9596</issn><issn>2668-9596</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkDFOwzAYhS0EElXpyuwDJOW3Yzv2WEqBSpG60DmyHVs1amhlx5U4DafhXiSCgel9esN70ofQPYElZbV80P35UFKgtASo5RWaUSFkqbgS1__4Fi1SegcAqgSnIGZo-5T7MMSM14dw0jEXeHXRwwgxHB1ucsC76N1Yb7ow5Kjx_iNcXEwFfsw2R_f9NYQCj8fkDt14fUxu8ZdztH_evK1fy2b3sl2vmtISqkhJjQEuTCVVxwWzxmmlvLW1BA6Sdsx3RjJWVZXj3hrvQFutPSdGENlZRqo5Wv7u2nhKKTrfnmPodfxsCbSTi3Zy0U4u2slF9QMS9VJw</recordid><startdate>20220901</startdate><enddate>20220901</enddate><creator>Boldea, Iulian</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220901</creationdate><title>Dumitru Chioaru, Avatarurile Lui Orfeu, Editura Univers, Bucureşti, 2021</title><author>Boldea, Iulian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1291-2bb056b389d564cbea99fcc7805082d4fdb844333e5fcbfe0acaaf51b618dc413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Boldea, Iulian</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Acta Marisiensis. Seria Philologia (Online)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Boldea, Iulian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dumitru Chioaru, Avatarurile Lui Orfeu, Editura Univers, Bucureşti, 2021</atitle><jtitle>Acta Marisiensis. Seria Philologia (Online)</jtitle><date>2022-09-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>3</epage><pages>1-3</pages><issn>2668-9596</issn><eissn>2668-9596</eissn><abstract>In his book entitled Avatarurile lui Orfeu (Orpheus’s Avatars), Dumitru Chioaru presents the two hypostases of the Orphism, the orphic and anti or post(orphic). Beginning his line of argument from the myth of Orpheus and crystallising his critical options with a hermeneutic perspective on the problem in question, Dumitru Chioaru manages to achieve a larger picture of the lyricism related to the orphic myth, by analysing the poetic works of thirty poets.
The Orphism’s hypostases are depicted by means of two exegetic methods, both used in an irreproachable manner (mythological criticism and hermeneutics). Dumitru Chioaru’s endeavour in the history of the universal lyricism and in everything which lyricism represents, in its multiple hypostases, proves the presence of a fine hermeneutist, attentive to everything which the paradigm of Orphism implies, a paradigm he manages to define by capturing it in some ample sentences, both clarifying and expressive.</abstract><doi>10.2478/amph-2022-0078</doi><tpages>3</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2668-9596 |
ispartof | Acta Marisiensis. Seria Philologia (Online), 2022-09, Vol.4 (1), p.1-3 |
issn | 2668-9596 2668-9596 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_2478_amph_2022_0078 |
source | De Gruyter Open Access Journals; Central and Eastern European Online Library |
title | Dumitru Chioaru, Avatarurile Lui Orfeu, Editura Univers, Bucureşti, 2021 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T17%3A09%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dumitru%20Chioaru,%20Avatarurile%20Lui%20Orfeu,%20Editura%20Univers,%20Bucure%C5%9Fti,%202021&rft.jtitle=Acta%20Marisiensis.%20Seria%20Philologia%20(Online)&rft.au=Boldea,%20Iulian&rft.date=2022-09-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=3&rft.pages=1-3&rft.issn=2668-9596&rft.eissn=2668-9596&rft_id=info:doi/10.2478/amph-2022-0078&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_2478_amph_2022_0078%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |