Global Austerity and Local Democracy: The Case of Participatory Budgeting in Guelph, ON
This paper examines the role of participatory budgeting in policy-making at the municipal level, through a case study of the longest experiment with participatory budgeting in Canada, the Neighbourhood Support Coalition (NSC) in Guelph, ON. While existing scholarship tends to view participatory budg...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Canadian political science review 2017-01, Vol.10 (1), p.72-108 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 108 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 72 |
container_title | Canadian political science review |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Pin, Laura Grace |
description | This paper examines the role of participatory budgeting in policy-making at the municipal level, through a case study of the longest experiment with participatory budgeting in Canada, the Neighbourhood Support Coalition (NSC) in Guelph, ON. While existing scholarship tends to view participatory budgeting largely as oppositional to neoliberalism, I argue that participatory budgeting in Guelph is better understood as an adaptation of community groups to a neoliberal political context, rather than a direct challenge to neoliberal policies. When participatory budgeting began to be perceived as contravening neoliberal rationalities of autonomy, self-sufficiency, and marketization, the grassroots democratic elements of the practice were ultimately sacrificed in favour of a process that fit better with these logics. This work builds on previous research on participatory budgeting in Guelph by both bringing participatory budgeting in explicit dialogue with neoliberalism, and temporally extending the narrative of Guelph’s experience with participatory budgeting beyond 2009. |
doi_str_mv | 10.24124/c677/20161222 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_24124_c677_20161222</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_24124_c677_20161222</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c842-a26ee8fe136f7478170983664a7158a056813758902b4864aecdb852f59db3603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkL1OwzAYRS0EEqWwMvsBSOvPTmyHrYQSkCLKEIkxchy7NUqTyE6HvD3hT2K6V-dKdzgI3QJZ0RhovNZciDUlwIFSeoYWkAJE85Kc_-uX6CqED0I4SMkW6D1v-1q1eHMKo_FunLDqGlz0emaP5thrr_R0j8uDwZkKBvcWvyk_Ou0GNfZ-wg-nZm9G1-2x63B-Mu1wuMO712t0YVUbzM1vLlH5tC2z56jY5S_Zpoi0jGmkKDdGWgOMWxELCYKkknEeKwGJVCThEphIZEpoHcsZG93UMqE2SZuaccKWaPVzq30fgje2Grw7Kj9VQKpvK9WXlerPCvsEk65Ssw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Global Austerity and Local Democracy: The Case of Participatory Budgeting in Guelph, ON</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Political Science Complete</source><creator>Pin, Laura Grace</creator><creatorcontrib>Pin, Laura Grace</creatorcontrib><description>This paper examines the role of participatory budgeting in policy-making at the municipal level, through a case study of the longest experiment with participatory budgeting in Canada, the Neighbourhood Support Coalition (NSC) in Guelph, ON. While existing scholarship tends to view participatory budgeting largely as oppositional to neoliberalism, I argue that participatory budgeting in Guelph is better understood as an adaptation of community groups to a neoliberal political context, rather than a direct challenge to neoliberal policies. When participatory budgeting began to be perceived as contravening neoliberal rationalities of autonomy, self-sufficiency, and marketization, the grassroots democratic elements of the practice were ultimately sacrificed in favour of a process that fit better with these logics. This work builds on previous research on participatory budgeting in Guelph by both bringing participatory budgeting in explicit dialogue with neoliberalism, and temporally extending the narrative of Guelph’s experience with participatory budgeting beyond 2009.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1911-4125</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1911-4125</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.24124/c677/20161222</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Canadian political science review, 2017-01, Vol.10 (1), p.72-108</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c842-a26ee8fe136f7478170983664a7158a056813758902b4864aecdb852f59db3603</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pin, Laura Grace</creatorcontrib><title>Global Austerity and Local Democracy: The Case of Participatory Budgeting in Guelph, ON</title><title>Canadian political science review</title><description>This paper examines the role of participatory budgeting in policy-making at the municipal level, through a case study of the longest experiment with participatory budgeting in Canada, the Neighbourhood Support Coalition (NSC) in Guelph, ON. While existing scholarship tends to view participatory budgeting largely as oppositional to neoliberalism, I argue that participatory budgeting in Guelph is better understood as an adaptation of community groups to a neoliberal political context, rather than a direct challenge to neoliberal policies. When participatory budgeting began to be perceived as contravening neoliberal rationalities of autonomy, self-sufficiency, and marketization, the grassroots democratic elements of the practice were ultimately sacrificed in favour of a process that fit better with these logics. This work builds on previous research on participatory budgeting in Guelph by both bringing participatory budgeting in explicit dialogue with neoliberalism, and temporally extending the narrative of Guelph’s experience with participatory budgeting beyond 2009.</description><issn>1911-4125</issn><issn>1911-4125</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkL1OwzAYRS0EEqWwMvsBSOvPTmyHrYQSkCLKEIkxchy7NUqTyE6HvD3hT2K6V-dKdzgI3QJZ0RhovNZciDUlwIFSeoYWkAJE85Kc_-uX6CqED0I4SMkW6D1v-1q1eHMKo_FunLDqGlz0emaP5thrr_R0j8uDwZkKBvcWvyk_Ou0GNfZ-wg-nZm9G1-2x63B-Mu1wuMO712t0YVUbzM1vLlH5tC2z56jY5S_Zpoi0jGmkKDdGWgOMWxELCYKkknEeKwGJVCThEphIZEpoHcsZG93UMqE2SZuaccKWaPVzq30fgje2Grw7Kj9VQKpvK9WXlerPCvsEk65Ssw</recordid><startdate>20170115</startdate><enddate>20170115</enddate><creator>Pin, Laura Grace</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170115</creationdate><title>Global Austerity and Local Democracy: The Case of Participatory Budgeting in Guelph, ON</title><author>Pin, Laura Grace</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c842-a26ee8fe136f7478170983664a7158a056813758902b4864aecdb852f59db3603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pin, Laura Grace</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Canadian political science review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pin, Laura Grace</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Global Austerity and Local Democracy: The Case of Participatory Budgeting in Guelph, ON</atitle><jtitle>Canadian political science review</jtitle><date>2017-01-15</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>72</spage><epage>108</epage><pages>72-108</pages><issn>1911-4125</issn><eissn>1911-4125</eissn><abstract>This paper examines the role of participatory budgeting in policy-making at the municipal level, through a case study of the longest experiment with participatory budgeting in Canada, the Neighbourhood Support Coalition (NSC) in Guelph, ON. While existing scholarship tends to view participatory budgeting largely as oppositional to neoliberalism, I argue that participatory budgeting in Guelph is better understood as an adaptation of community groups to a neoliberal political context, rather than a direct challenge to neoliberal policies. When participatory budgeting began to be perceived as contravening neoliberal rationalities of autonomy, self-sufficiency, and marketization, the grassroots democratic elements of the practice were ultimately sacrificed in favour of a process that fit better with these logics. This work builds on previous research on participatory budgeting in Guelph by both bringing participatory budgeting in explicit dialogue with neoliberalism, and temporally extending the narrative of Guelph’s experience with participatory budgeting beyond 2009.</abstract><doi>10.24124/c677/20161222</doi><tpages>37</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1911-4125 |
ispartof | Canadian political science review, 2017-01, Vol.10 (1), p.72-108 |
issn | 1911-4125 1911-4125 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_24124_c677_20161222 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Political Science Complete |
title | Global Austerity and Local Democracy: The Case of Participatory Budgeting in Guelph, ON |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T05%3A00%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Global%20Austerity%20and%20Local%20Democracy:%20The%20Case%20of%20Participatory%20Budgeting%20in%20Guelph,%20ON&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20political%20science%20review&rft.au=Pin,%20Laura%20Grace&rft.date=2017-01-15&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=72&rft.epage=108&rft.pages=72-108&rft.issn=1911-4125&rft.eissn=1911-4125&rft_id=info:doi/10.24124/c677/20161222&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_24124_c677_20161222%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |