Global Austerity and Local Democracy: The Case of Participatory Budgeting in Guelph, ON

This paper examines the role of participatory budgeting in policy-making at the municipal level, through a case study of the longest experiment with participatory budgeting in Canada, the Neighbourhood Support Coalition (NSC) in Guelph, ON. While existing scholarship tends to view participatory budg...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Canadian political science review 2017-01, Vol.10 (1), p.72-108
1. Verfasser: Pin, Laura Grace
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 108
container_issue 1
container_start_page 72
container_title Canadian political science review
container_volume 10
creator Pin, Laura Grace
description This paper examines the role of participatory budgeting in policy-making at the municipal level, through a case study of the longest experiment with participatory budgeting in Canada, the Neighbourhood Support Coalition (NSC) in Guelph, ON. While existing scholarship tends to view participatory budgeting largely as oppositional to neoliberalism, I argue that participatory budgeting in Guelph is better understood as an adaptation of community groups to a neoliberal political context, rather than a direct challenge to neoliberal policies. When participatory budgeting began to be perceived as contravening neoliberal rationalities of autonomy, self-sufficiency, and marketization, the grassroots democratic elements of the practice were ultimately sacrificed in favour of a process that fit better with these logics. This work builds on previous research on participatory budgeting in Guelph by both bringing participatory budgeting in explicit dialogue with neoliberalism, and temporally extending the narrative of Guelph’s experience with participatory budgeting beyond 2009.
doi_str_mv 10.24124/c677/20161222
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_24124_c677_20161222</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_24124_c677_20161222</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c842-a26ee8fe136f7478170983664a7158a056813758902b4864aecdb852f59db3603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkL1OwzAYRS0EEqWwMvsBSOvPTmyHrYQSkCLKEIkxchy7NUqTyE6HvD3hT2K6V-dKdzgI3QJZ0RhovNZciDUlwIFSeoYWkAJE85Kc_-uX6CqED0I4SMkW6D1v-1q1eHMKo_FunLDqGlz0emaP5thrr_R0j8uDwZkKBvcWvyk_Ou0GNfZ-wg-nZm9G1-2x63B-Mu1wuMO712t0YVUbzM1vLlH5tC2z56jY5S_Zpoi0jGmkKDdGWgOMWxELCYKkknEeKwGJVCThEphIZEpoHcsZG93UMqE2SZuaccKWaPVzq30fgje2Grw7Kj9VQKpvK9WXlerPCvsEk65Ssw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Global Austerity and Local Democracy: The Case of Participatory Budgeting in Guelph, ON</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Political Science Complete</source><creator>Pin, Laura Grace</creator><creatorcontrib>Pin, Laura Grace</creatorcontrib><description>This paper examines the role of participatory budgeting in policy-making at the municipal level, through a case study of the longest experiment with participatory budgeting in Canada, the Neighbourhood Support Coalition (NSC) in Guelph, ON. While existing scholarship tends to view participatory budgeting largely as oppositional to neoliberalism, I argue that participatory budgeting in Guelph is better understood as an adaptation of community groups to a neoliberal political context, rather than a direct challenge to neoliberal policies. When participatory budgeting began to be perceived as contravening neoliberal rationalities of autonomy, self-sufficiency, and marketization, the grassroots democratic elements of the practice were ultimately sacrificed in favour of a process that fit better with these logics. This work builds on previous research on participatory budgeting in Guelph by both bringing participatory budgeting in explicit dialogue with neoliberalism, and temporally extending the narrative of Guelph’s experience with participatory budgeting beyond 2009.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1911-4125</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1911-4125</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.24124/c677/20161222</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Canadian political science review, 2017-01, Vol.10 (1), p.72-108</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c842-a26ee8fe136f7478170983664a7158a056813758902b4864aecdb852f59db3603</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pin, Laura Grace</creatorcontrib><title>Global Austerity and Local Democracy: The Case of Participatory Budgeting in Guelph, ON</title><title>Canadian political science review</title><description>This paper examines the role of participatory budgeting in policy-making at the municipal level, through a case study of the longest experiment with participatory budgeting in Canada, the Neighbourhood Support Coalition (NSC) in Guelph, ON. While existing scholarship tends to view participatory budgeting largely as oppositional to neoliberalism, I argue that participatory budgeting in Guelph is better understood as an adaptation of community groups to a neoliberal political context, rather than a direct challenge to neoliberal policies. When participatory budgeting began to be perceived as contravening neoliberal rationalities of autonomy, self-sufficiency, and marketization, the grassroots democratic elements of the practice were ultimately sacrificed in favour of a process that fit better with these logics. This work builds on previous research on participatory budgeting in Guelph by both bringing participatory budgeting in explicit dialogue with neoliberalism, and temporally extending the narrative of Guelph’s experience with participatory budgeting beyond 2009.</description><issn>1911-4125</issn><issn>1911-4125</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkL1OwzAYRS0EEqWwMvsBSOvPTmyHrYQSkCLKEIkxchy7NUqTyE6HvD3hT2K6V-dKdzgI3QJZ0RhovNZciDUlwIFSeoYWkAJE85Kc_-uX6CqED0I4SMkW6D1v-1q1eHMKo_FunLDqGlz0emaP5thrr_R0j8uDwZkKBvcWvyk_Ou0GNfZ-wg-nZm9G1-2x63B-Mu1wuMO712t0YVUbzM1vLlH5tC2z56jY5S_Zpoi0jGmkKDdGWgOMWxELCYKkknEeKwGJVCThEphIZEpoHcsZG93UMqE2SZuaccKWaPVzq30fgje2Grw7Kj9VQKpvK9WXlerPCvsEk65Ssw</recordid><startdate>20170115</startdate><enddate>20170115</enddate><creator>Pin, Laura Grace</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170115</creationdate><title>Global Austerity and Local Democracy: The Case of Participatory Budgeting in Guelph, ON</title><author>Pin, Laura Grace</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c842-a26ee8fe136f7478170983664a7158a056813758902b4864aecdb852f59db3603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pin, Laura Grace</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Canadian political science review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pin, Laura Grace</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Global Austerity and Local Democracy: The Case of Participatory Budgeting in Guelph, ON</atitle><jtitle>Canadian political science review</jtitle><date>2017-01-15</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>72</spage><epage>108</epage><pages>72-108</pages><issn>1911-4125</issn><eissn>1911-4125</eissn><abstract>This paper examines the role of participatory budgeting in policy-making at the municipal level, through a case study of the longest experiment with participatory budgeting in Canada, the Neighbourhood Support Coalition (NSC) in Guelph, ON. While existing scholarship tends to view participatory budgeting largely as oppositional to neoliberalism, I argue that participatory budgeting in Guelph is better understood as an adaptation of community groups to a neoliberal political context, rather than a direct challenge to neoliberal policies. When participatory budgeting began to be perceived as contravening neoliberal rationalities of autonomy, self-sufficiency, and marketization, the grassroots democratic elements of the practice were ultimately sacrificed in favour of a process that fit better with these logics. This work builds on previous research on participatory budgeting in Guelph by both bringing participatory budgeting in explicit dialogue with neoliberalism, and temporally extending the narrative of Guelph’s experience with participatory budgeting beyond 2009.</abstract><doi>10.24124/c677/20161222</doi><tpages>37</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1911-4125
ispartof Canadian political science review, 2017-01, Vol.10 (1), p.72-108
issn 1911-4125
1911-4125
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_24124_c677_20161222
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Political Science Complete
title Global Austerity and Local Democracy: The Case of Participatory Budgeting in Guelph, ON
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T05%3A00%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Global%20Austerity%20and%20Local%20Democracy:%20The%20Case%20of%20Participatory%20Budgeting%20in%20Guelph,%20ON&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20political%20science%20review&rft.au=Pin,%20Laura%20Grace&rft.date=2017-01-15&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=72&rft.epage=108&rft.pages=72-108&rft.issn=1911-4125&rft.eissn=1911-4125&rft_id=info:doi/10.24124/c677/20161222&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_24124_c677_20161222%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true