Modern aneurysm surgery: a pro-open surgery view

Modern management of intracranial aneurysms is matter of great debate between supporters of “traditional” microsurgical treatment and those of relatively new endovascular management. This paper briefly reports the experience of two experienced microvascular “traditional” neurosurgeons who shares the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Bulletin of RSMU 2018-01 (6), p.162-167
Hauptverfasser: Dubovoy, A.V., Bervitskiy, A.V., Spallone, A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 167
container_issue 6
container_start_page 162
container_title Bulletin of RSMU
container_volume
creator Dubovoy, A.V.
Bervitskiy, A.V.
Spallone, A.
description Modern management of intracranial aneurysms is matter of great debate between supporters of “traditional” microsurgical treatment and those of relatively new endovascular management. This paper briefly reports the experience of two experienced microvascular “traditional” neurosurgeons who shares the same management philosophy favouring open microsurgery in the modern era in which endovascular management is becoming fashionable. Difficult posterior circulation aneurysms are nowadays as a rule managed endovascularly, whilst anterior circulation aneurysms can be treated with both techniques, and MCA as well as distal ACA aneurysms are better treated microsurgically. Technical refinement and — hopefully- lower cost of endovascular devices will favour a trend of prevailing use of endovascular method in the future. However the need for well-prepared microvascular surgeon will always be there, and proper training of future generations of microvascular surgeons in a setting of decreasing number of patients and open surgical casuistics represents a big challenge for the neurosurgical community, to which an answer should be given.
doi_str_mv 10.24075/brsmu.2018.093
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_24075_brsmu_2018_093</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_24075_brsmu_2018_093</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c236t-6aa545afa87ca2fa82733a654bc1edc7c7ac1c9f5025170186be9996c362e8ea3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1j0tLw0AUhQdRsNSu3eYPTHrnnXEnxUeh4kbXw830RirmwYxR8u9Nq66-w1kczsfYtYBSanBmXafcjqUEUZXg1RlbSKMlFxL0-TEDcAFeX7JVzu8AoJRQ1rgFg6d-T6krsKMxTbkt8pjeKE03BRZD6nk_UPffFV8H-r5iFw1-ZFr9ccle7-9eNo989_yw3dzueJTKfnKLaLTBBisXUc6QTim0RtdR0D666DCK6BsD0gg337Y1ee9tVFZSRaiWbP27G1Ofc6ImDOnQYpqCgHByDifncHQOs7P6AX_kSuc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Modern aneurysm surgery: a pro-open surgery view</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><creator>Dubovoy, A.V. ; Bervitskiy, A.V. ; Spallone, A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dubovoy, A.V. ; Bervitskiy, A.V. ; Spallone, A.</creatorcontrib><description>Modern management of intracranial aneurysms is matter of great debate between supporters of “traditional” microsurgical treatment and those of relatively new endovascular management. This paper briefly reports the experience of two experienced microvascular “traditional” neurosurgeons who shares the same management philosophy favouring open microsurgery in the modern era in which endovascular management is becoming fashionable. Difficult posterior circulation aneurysms are nowadays as a rule managed endovascularly, whilst anterior circulation aneurysms can be treated with both techniques, and MCA as well as distal ACA aneurysms are better treated microsurgically. Technical refinement and — hopefully- lower cost of endovascular devices will favour a trend of prevailing use of endovascular method in the future. However the need for well-prepared microvascular surgeon will always be there, and proper training of future generations of microvascular surgeons in a setting of decreasing number of patients and open surgical casuistics represents a big challenge for the neurosurgical community, to which an answer should be given.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2500-1094</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2542-1204</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.24075/brsmu.2018.093</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Bulletin of RSMU, 2018-01 (6), p.162-167</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0001-9034-2212 ; 0000-0002-7017-1513</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dubovoy, A.V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bervitskiy, A.V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spallone, A.</creatorcontrib><title>Modern aneurysm surgery: a pro-open surgery view</title><title>Bulletin of RSMU</title><description>Modern management of intracranial aneurysms is matter of great debate between supporters of “traditional” microsurgical treatment and those of relatively new endovascular management. This paper briefly reports the experience of two experienced microvascular “traditional” neurosurgeons who shares the same management philosophy favouring open microsurgery in the modern era in which endovascular management is becoming fashionable. Difficult posterior circulation aneurysms are nowadays as a rule managed endovascularly, whilst anterior circulation aneurysms can be treated with both techniques, and MCA as well as distal ACA aneurysms are better treated microsurgically. Technical refinement and — hopefully- lower cost of endovascular devices will favour a trend of prevailing use of endovascular method in the future. However the need for well-prepared microvascular surgeon will always be there, and proper training of future generations of microvascular surgeons in a setting of decreasing number of patients and open surgical casuistics represents a big challenge for the neurosurgical community, to which an answer should be given.</description><issn>2500-1094</issn><issn>2542-1204</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo1j0tLw0AUhQdRsNSu3eYPTHrnnXEnxUeh4kbXw830RirmwYxR8u9Nq66-w1kczsfYtYBSanBmXafcjqUEUZXg1RlbSKMlFxL0-TEDcAFeX7JVzu8AoJRQ1rgFg6d-T6krsKMxTbkt8pjeKE03BRZD6nk_UPffFV8H-r5iFw1-ZFr9ccle7-9eNo989_yw3dzueJTKfnKLaLTBBisXUc6QTim0RtdR0D666DCK6BsD0gg337Y1ee9tVFZSRaiWbP27G1Ofc6ImDOnQYpqCgHByDifncHQOs7P6AX_kSuc</recordid><startdate>20180101</startdate><enddate>20180101</enddate><creator>Dubovoy, A.V.</creator><creator>Bervitskiy, A.V.</creator><creator>Spallone, A.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9034-2212</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7017-1513</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180101</creationdate><title>Modern aneurysm surgery: a pro-open surgery view</title><author>Dubovoy, A.V. ; Bervitskiy, A.V. ; Spallone, A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c236t-6aa545afa87ca2fa82733a654bc1edc7c7ac1c9f5025170186be9996c362e8ea3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dubovoy, A.V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bervitskiy, A.V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spallone, A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Bulletin of RSMU</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dubovoy, A.V.</au><au>Bervitskiy, A.V.</au><au>Spallone, A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Modern aneurysm surgery: a pro-open surgery view</atitle><jtitle>Bulletin of RSMU</jtitle><date>2018-01-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><issue>6</issue><spage>162</spage><epage>167</epage><pages>162-167</pages><issn>2500-1094</issn><eissn>2542-1204</eissn><abstract>Modern management of intracranial aneurysms is matter of great debate between supporters of “traditional” microsurgical treatment and those of relatively new endovascular management. This paper briefly reports the experience of two experienced microvascular “traditional” neurosurgeons who shares the same management philosophy favouring open microsurgery in the modern era in which endovascular management is becoming fashionable. Difficult posterior circulation aneurysms are nowadays as a rule managed endovascularly, whilst anterior circulation aneurysms can be treated with both techniques, and MCA as well as distal ACA aneurysms are better treated microsurgically. Technical refinement and — hopefully- lower cost of endovascular devices will favour a trend of prevailing use of endovascular method in the future. However the need for well-prepared microvascular surgeon will always be there, and proper training of future generations of microvascular surgeons in a setting of decreasing number of patients and open surgical casuistics represents a big challenge for the neurosurgical community, to which an answer should be given.</abstract><doi>10.24075/brsmu.2018.093</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9034-2212</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7017-1513</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2500-1094
ispartof Bulletin of RSMU, 2018-01 (6), p.162-167
issn 2500-1094
2542-1204
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_24075_brsmu_2018_093
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
title Modern aneurysm surgery: a pro-open surgery view
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T19%3A39%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Modern%20aneurysm%20surgery:%20a%20pro-open%20surgery%20view&rft.jtitle=Bulletin%20of%20RSMU&rft.au=Dubovoy,%20A.V.&rft.date=2018-01-01&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=162&rft.epage=167&rft.pages=162-167&rft.issn=2500-1094&rft.eissn=2542-1204&rft_id=info:doi/10.24075/brsmu.2018.093&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_24075_brsmu_2018_093%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true