Should Pathologists be Reporting Forensic CT Scans?

The Victorian Institute of Forensic Medicine in Australia annually processes in excess of 4,000 bodies as per the Coroners Act of 2008. Routinely these admissions undergo a full body postmortem computed tomography (PMCT) scan with the imaging being primarily analyzed by forensic pathologists rather...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Academic forensic pathology 2012-06, Vol.2 (2), p.198-201
1. Verfasser: Bedford, Paul J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 201
container_issue 2
container_start_page 198
container_title Academic forensic pathology
container_volume 2
creator Bedford, Paul J.
description The Victorian Institute of Forensic Medicine in Australia annually processes in excess of 4,000 bodies as per the Coroners Act of 2008. Routinely these admissions undergo a full body postmortem computed tomography (PMCT) scan with the imaging being primarily analyzed by forensic pathologists rather than radiologists. This is largely due to the lack of appropriately experienced radiologists. In practical terms reporting of images by pathologists is another example of “crossover” between disciplines in medicine. This manuscript proposes a model for how this crossover might be managed, especially in relation to quality control, education, review procedures and the potential for formal credentialing of medical staff.
doi_str_mv 10.23907/2012.028
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_23907_2012_028</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_23907_2012_028</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c144t-a1b91b5635eb9e8a52b6a83d857abe55686f9ab2c42e6f1518ad08570a7036ba3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNj01LAzEURYMoWGoX_oNsXUx9SSaZZCUyWBUKlrauw0sm046Mk5KMC_-948fCu7kXDlw4hFwzWHJhoLrlwPgSuD4jM2a4LITi7PzfviSLnN9gigZQRs6I2B3jR9_QDY7H2MdDl8dMXaDbcIpp7IYDXcUUhtx5Wu_pzuOQ767IRYt9Dou_npPX1cO-firWL4_P9f268KwsxwKZM8xJJWRwJmiU3CnUotGyQhekVFq1Bh33JQ-qZZJpbGCCgBUI5VDMyc3vr08x5xRae0rdO6ZPy8D-CNtvYTsJiy_hjkYY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Should Pathologists be Reporting Forensic CT Scans?</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><creator>Bedford, Paul J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bedford, Paul J.</creatorcontrib><description>The Victorian Institute of Forensic Medicine in Australia annually processes in excess of 4,000 bodies as per the Coroners Act of 2008. Routinely these admissions undergo a full body postmortem computed tomography (PMCT) scan with the imaging being primarily analyzed by forensic pathologists rather than radiologists. This is largely due to the lack of appropriately experienced radiologists. In practical terms reporting of images by pathologists is another example of “crossover” between disciplines in medicine. This manuscript proposes a model for how this crossover might be managed, especially in relation to quality control, education, review procedures and the potential for formal credentialing of medical staff.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1925-3621</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1925-3621</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.23907/2012.028</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Academic forensic pathology, 2012-06, Vol.2 (2), p.198-201</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c144t-a1b91b5635eb9e8a52b6a83d857abe55686f9ab2c42e6f1518ad08570a7036ba3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c144t-a1b91b5635eb9e8a52b6a83d857abe55686f9ab2c42e6f1518ad08570a7036ba3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bedford, Paul J.</creatorcontrib><title>Should Pathologists be Reporting Forensic CT Scans?</title><title>Academic forensic pathology</title><description>The Victorian Institute of Forensic Medicine in Australia annually processes in excess of 4,000 bodies as per the Coroners Act of 2008. Routinely these admissions undergo a full body postmortem computed tomography (PMCT) scan with the imaging being primarily analyzed by forensic pathologists rather than radiologists. This is largely due to the lack of appropriately experienced radiologists. In practical terms reporting of images by pathologists is another example of “crossover” between disciplines in medicine. This manuscript proposes a model for how this crossover might be managed, especially in relation to quality control, education, review procedures and the potential for formal credentialing of medical staff.</description><issn>1925-3621</issn><issn>1925-3621</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNj01LAzEURYMoWGoX_oNsXUx9SSaZZCUyWBUKlrauw0sm046Mk5KMC_-948fCu7kXDlw4hFwzWHJhoLrlwPgSuD4jM2a4LITi7PzfviSLnN9gigZQRs6I2B3jR9_QDY7H2MdDl8dMXaDbcIpp7IYDXcUUhtx5Wu_pzuOQ767IRYt9Dou_npPX1cO-firWL4_P9f268KwsxwKZM8xJJWRwJmiU3CnUotGyQhekVFq1Bh33JQ-qZZJpbGCCgBUI5VDMyc3vr08x5xRae0rdO6ZPy8D-CNtvYTsJiy_hjkYY</recordid><startdate>201206</startdate><enddate>201206</enddate><creator>Bedford, Paul J.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201206</creationdate><title>Should Pathologists be Reporting Forensic CT Scans?</title><author>Bedford, Paul J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c144t-a1b91b5635eb9e8a52b6a83d857abe55686f9ab2c42e6f1518ad08570a7036ba3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bedford, Paul J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Academic forensic pathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bedford, Paul J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Should Pathologists be Reporting Forensic CT Scans?</atitle><jtitle>Academic forensic pathology</jtitle><date>2012-06</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>198</spage><epage>201</epage><pages>198-201</pages><issn>1925-3621</issn><eissn>1925-3621</eissn><abstract>The Victorian Institute of Forensic Medicine in Australia annually processes in excess of 4,000 bodies as per the Coroners Act of 2008. Routinely these admissions undergo a full body postmortem computed tomography (PMCT) scan with the imaging being primarily analyzed by forensic pathologists rather than radiologists. This is largely due to the lack of appropriately experienced radiologists. In practical terms reporting of images by pathologists is another example of “crossover” between disciplines in medicine. This manuscript proposes a model for how this crossover might be managed, especially in relation to quality control, education, review procedures and the potential for formal credentialing of medical staff.</abstract><doi>10.23907/2012.028</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1925-3621
ispartof Academic forensic pathology, 2012-06, Vol.2 (2), p.198-201
issn 1925-3621
1925-3621
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_23907_2012_028
source Access via SAGE
title Should Pathologists be Reporting Forensic CT Scans?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T13%3A12%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Should%20Pathologists%20be%20Reporting%20Forensic%20CT%20Scans?&rft.jtitle=Academic%20forensic%20pathology&rft.au=Bedford,%20Paul%20J.&rft.date=2012-06&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=198&rft.epage=201&rft.pages=198-201&rft.issn=1925-3621&rft.eissn=1925-3621&rft_id=info:doi/10.23907/2012.028&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_23907_2012_028%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true