Should Pathologists be Reporting Forensic CT Scans?
The Victorian Institute of Forensic Medicine in Australia annually processes in excess of 4,000 bodies as per the Coroners Act of 2008. Routinely these admissions undergo a full body postmortem computed tomography (PMCT) scan with the imaging being primarily analyzed by forensic pathologists rather...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Academic forensic pathology 2012-06, Vol.2 (2), p.198-201 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 201 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 198 |
container_title | Academic forensic pathology |
container_volume | 2 |
creator | Bedford, Paul J. |
description | The Victorian Institute of Forensic Medicine in Australia annually processes in excess of 4,000 bodies as per the Coroners Act of 2008. Routinely these admissions undergo a full body postmortem computed tomography (PMCT) scan with the imaging being primarily analyzed by forensic pathologists rather than radiologists. This is largely due to the lack of appropriately experienced radiologists. In practical terms reporting of images by pathologists is another example of “crossover” between disciplines in medicine. This manuscript proposes a model for how this crossover might be managed, especially in relation to quality control, education, review procedures and the potential for formal credentialing of medical staff. |
doi_str_mv | 10.23907/2012.028 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_23907_2012_028</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_23907_2012_028</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c144t-a1b91b5635eb9e8a52b6a83d857abe55686f9ab2c42e6f1518ad08570a7036ba3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNj01LAzEURYMoWGoX_oNsXUx9SSaZZCUyWBUKlrauw0sm046Mk5KMC_-948fCu7kXDlw4hFwzWHJhoLrlwPgSuD4jM2a4LITi7PzfviSLnN9gigZQRs6I2B3jR9_QDY7H2MdDl8dMXaDbcIpp7IYDXcUUhtx5Wu_pzuOQ767IRYt9Dou_npPX1cO-firWL4_P9f268KwsxwKZM8xJJWRwJmiU3CnUotGyQhekVFq1Bh33JQ-qZZJpbGCCgBUI5VDMyc3vr08x5xRae0rdO6ZPy8D-CNtvYTsJiy_hjkYY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Should Pathologists be Reporting Forensic CT Scans?</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><creator>Bedford, Paul J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bedford, Paul J.</creatorcontrib><description>The Victorian Institute of Forensic Medicine in Australia annually processes in excess of 4,000 bodies as per the Coroners Act of 2008. Routinely these admissions undergo a full body postmortem computed tomography (PMCT) scan with the imaging being primarily analyzed by forensic pathologists rather than radiologists. This is largely due to the lack of appropriately experienced radiologists. In practical terms reporting of images by pathologists is another example of “crossover” between disciplines in medicine. This manuscript proposes a model for how this crossover might be managed, especially in relation to quality control, education, review procedures and the potential for formal credentialing of medical staff.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1925-3621</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1925-3621</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.23907/2012.028</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Academic forensic pathology, 2012-06, Vol.2 (2), p.198-201</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c144t-a1b91b5635eb9e8a52b6a83d857abe55686f9ab2c42e6f1518ad08570a7036ba3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c144t-a1b91b5635eb9e8a52b6a83d857abe55686f9ab2c42e6f1518ad08570a7036ba3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bedford, Paul J.</creatorcontrib><title>Should Pathologists be Reporting Forensic CT Scans?</title><title>Academic forensic pathology</title><description>The Victorian Institute of Forensic Medicine in Australia annually processes in excess of 4,000 bodies as per the Coroners Act of 2008. Routinely these admissions undergo a full body postmortem computed tomography (PMCT) scan with the imaging being primarily analyzed by forensic pathologists rather than radiologists. This is largely due to the lack of appropriately experienced radiologists. In practical terms reporting of images by pathologists is another example of “crossover” between disciplines in medicine. This manuscript proposes a model for how this crossover might be managed, especially in relation to quality control, education, review procedures and the potential for formal credentialing of medical staff.</description><issn>1925-3621</issn><issn>1925-3621</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNj01LAzEURYMoWGoX_oNsXUx9SSaZZCUyWBUKlrauw0sm046Mk5KMC_-948fCu7kXDlw4hFwzWHJhoLrlwPgSuD4jM2a4LITi7PzfviSLnN9gigZQRs6I2B3jR9_QDY7H2MdDl8dMXaDbcIpp7IYDXcUUhtx5Wu_pzuOQ767IRYt9Dou_npPX1cO-firWL4_P9f268KwsxwKZM8xJJWRwJmiU3CnUotGyQhekVFq1Bh33JQ-qZZJpbGCCgBUI5VDMyc3vr08x5xRae0rdO6ZPy8D-CNtvYTsJiy_hjkYY</recordid><startdate>201206</startdate><enddate>201206</enddate><creator>Bedford, Paul J.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201206</creationdate><title>Should Pathologists be Reporting Forensic CT Scans?</title><author>Bedford, Paul J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c144t-a1b91b5635eb9e8a52b6a83d857abe55686f9ab2c42e6f1518ad08570a7036ba3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bedford, Paul J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Academic forensic pathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bedford, Paul J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Should Pathologists be Reporting Forensic CT Scans?</atitle><jtitle>Academic forensic pathology</jtitle><date>2012-06</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>198</spage><epage>201</epage><pages>198-201</pages><issn>1925-3621</issn><eissn>1925-3621</eissn><abstract>The Victorian Institute of Forensic Medicine in Australia annually processes in excess of 4,000 bodies as per the Coroners Act of 2008. Routinely these admissions undergo a full body postmortem computed tomography (PMCT) scan with the imaging being primarily analyzed by forensic pathologists rather than radiologists. This is largely due to the lack of appropriately experienced radiologists. In practical terms reporting of images by pathologists is another example of “crossover” between disciplines in medicine. This manuscript proposes a model for how this crossover might be managed, especially in relation to quality control, education, review procedures and the potential for formal credentialing of medical staff.</abstract><doi>10.23907/2012.028</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1925-3621 |
ispartof | Academic forensic pathology, 2012-06, Vol.2 (2), p.198-201 |
issn | 1925-3621 1925-3621 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_23907_2012_028 |
source | Access via SAGE |
title | Should Pathologists be Reporting Forensic CT Scans? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T13%3A12%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Should%20Pathologists%20be%20Reporting%20Forensic%20CT%20Scans?&rft.jtitle=Academic%20forensic%20pathology&rft.au=Bedford,%20Paul%20J.&rft.date=2012-06&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=198&rft.epage=201&rft.pages=198-201&rft.issn=1925-3621&rft.eissn=1925-3621&rft_id=info:doi/10.23907/2012.028&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_23907_2012_028%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |