Enamel Etching for Universal Adhesives: Examination of Enamel Etching Protocols for Optimization of Bonding Effectiveness
The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether different enamel etching methods with reduced etching times would improve the bonding effectiveness of universal adhesives. Three enamel etching methods, phosphoric acid ester monomer (PPM) etching, phosphoric acid (PPA) etching, and polyalkenoic aci...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Operative dentistry 2020-01, Vol.45 (1), p.80-91 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 91 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 80 |
container_title | Operative dentistry |
container_volume | 45 |
creator | Wong, J Tsujimoto, A Fischer, N G Baruth, A G Barkmeier, W W Johnson, E A Samuel, S M Takamizawa, T Latta, M A Miyazaki, M |
description | The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether different enamel etching methods with reduced etching times would improve the bonding effectiveness of universal adhesives.
Three enamel etching methods, phosphoric acid ester monomer (PPM) etching, phosphoric acid (PPA) etching, and polyalkenoic acid (PLA) etching, and three universal adhesives, G-Premio Bond (GP), Prime&Bond elect (PE), and Scotchbond Universal Adhesive (SU), were evaluated. Initial bond strengths and fatigue strengths of universal adhesives to ground enamel and ground enamel etched for less than one, five, 10, and 15 seconds using different etching methods were determined. The bonded fatigue specimens were loaded using a sine wave at a frequency of 20 Hz for 50,000 cycles or until failure occurred with a staircase method. Atomic force micrograph (AFM) observations along with measurements of surface Ra roughness and modified surface area of enamel with different etching protocols were also conducted.
The bond fatigue durability of universal adhesives to enamel with PPA etching from less than one to 15 seconds and PLA etching for 15 seconds was significantly higher than that to ground enamel. The bond fatigue durability to enamel with PPM etching was not increased compared with ground enamel. The surface Ra roughness and surface area obtained with AFM of enamel increased after PPA and PLA etching, and those values were significantly higher than those of ground enamel. Furthermore, surface Ra roughness and surface area with PPA etching were significantly higher than those with PLA etching. However, surface Ra roughness and surface area of enamel with PPM etching were similar to those of ground enamel regardless of etching time.
PPA etching for less than one to 15 seconds and PLA etching for 15 seconds improve universal adhesive bonding, surface Ra roughness, and surface area of enamel. However, PPM etching is not effective, regardless of etching time, in improving bonds strengths, increasing surface roughness, and increasing surface area. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2341/18-275-L |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_2341_18_275_L</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>31226005</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-d0eabe65cee5432807f81c0cf732b9a4c7237a131e586e43b6d2c50d3fcde5ad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkDtPwzAURi0EoqUg8QtQRpaAH3GcspUqPKRIZaBz5NjX1CixKzugll9PSqED09WVzneGg9AlwTeUZeSWFCkVPK2O0JhwPk1pkbNjNMYsJ6kQLBuhsxjfMc54xvkpGjFCaY4xH6Nt6WQHbVL2amXdW2J8SJbOfkKIsk1megVxeOJdUm5kZ53srXeJN8m_2UvwvVe-jT-Cxbq3nf06wPfe6R1VGgOqH3wOYjxHJ0a2ES5-7wQtH8rX-VNaLR6f57MqVYzkfaoxyAZyrgB4xmiBhSmIwsoIRpupzJSgTEjCCPAih4w1uaaKY82M0sClZhN0vfeq4GMMYOp1sJ0M25rgelevJkU91KurAb3ao-uPpgN9AP9ysW9ow2wy</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Enamel Etching for Universal Adhesives: Examination of Enamel Etching Protocols for Optimization of Bonding Effectiveness</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Allen Press Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Wong, J ; Tsujimoto, A ; Fischer, N G ; Baruth, A G ; Barkmeier, W W ; Johnson, E A ; Samuel, S M ; Takamizawa, T ; Latta, M A ; Miyazaki, M</creator><creatorcontrib>Wong, J ; Tsujimoto, A ; Fischer, N G ; Baruth, A G ; Barkmeier, W W ; Johnson, E A ; Samuel, S M ; Takamizawa, T ; Latta, M A ; Miyazaki, M</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether different enamel etching methods with reduced etching times would improve the bonding effectiveness of universal adhesives.
Three enamel etching methods, phosphoric acid ester monomer (PPM) etching, phosphoric acid (PPA) etching, and polyalkenoic acid (PLA) etching, and three universal adhesives, G-Premio Bond (GP), Prime&Bond elect (PE), and Scotchbond Universal Adhesive (SU), were evaluated. Initial bond strengths and fatigue strengths of universal adhesives to ground enamel and ground enamel etched for less than one, five, 10, and 15 seconds using different etching methods were determined. The bonded fatigue specimens were loaded using a sine wave at a frequency of 20 Hz for 50,000 cycles or until failure occurred with a staircase method. Atomic force micrograph (AFM) observations along with measurements of surface Ra roughness and modified surface area of enamel with different etching protocols were also conducted.
The bond fatigue durability of universal adhesives to enamel with PPA etching from less than one to 15 seconds and PLA etching for 15 seconds was significantly higher than that to ground enamel. The bond fatigue durability to enamel with PPM etching was not increased compared with ground enamel. The surface Ra roughness and surface area obtained with AFM of enamel increased after PPA and PLA etching, and those values were significantly higher than those of ground enamel. Furthermore, surface Ra roughness and surface area with PPA etching were significantly higher than those with PLA etching. However, surface Ra roughness and surface area of enamel with PPM etching were similar to those of ground enamel regardless of etching time.
PPA etching for less than one to 15 seconds and PLA etching for 15 seconds improve universal adhesive bonding, surface Ra roughness, and surface area of enamel. However, PPM etching is not effective, regardless of etching time, in improving bonds strengths, increasing surface roughness, and increasing surface area.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0361-7734</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1559-2863</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2341/18-275-L</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31226005</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Acid Etching, Dental ; Dental Bonding ; Dental Cements ; Dental Enamel ; Materials Testing ; Phosphoric Acids ; Resin Cements ; Shear Strength ; Surface Properties</subject><ispartof>Operative dentistry, 2020-01, Vol.45 (1), p.80-91</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-d0eabe65cee5432807f81c0cf732b9a4c7237a131e586e43b6d2c50d3fcde5ad3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-d0eabe65cee5432807f81c0cf732b9a4c7237a131e586e43b6d2c50d3fcde5ad3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31226005$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wong, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsujimoto, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer, N G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baruth, A G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barkmeier, W W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, E A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samuel, S M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takamizawa, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Latta, M A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miyazaki, M</creatorcontrib><title>Enamel Etching for Universal Adhesives: Examination of Enamel Etching Protocols for Optimization of Bonding Effectiveness</title><title>Operative dentistry</title><addtitle>Oper Dent</addtitle><description>The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether different enamel etching methods with reduced etching times would improve the bonding effectiveness of universal adhesives.
Three enamel etching methods, phosphoric acid ester monomer (PPM) etching, phosphoric acid (PPA) etching, and polyalkenoic acid (PLA) etching, and three universal adhesives, G-Premio Bond (GP), Prime&Bond elect (PE), and Scotchbond Universal Adhesive (SU), were evaluated. Initial bond strengths and fatigue strengths of universal adhesives to ground enamel and ground enamel etched for less than one, five, 10, and 15 seconds using different etching methods were determined. The bonded fatigue specimens were loaded using a sine wave at a frequency of 20 Hz for 50,000 cycles or until failure occurred with a staircase method. Atomic force micrograph (AFM) observations along with measurements of surface Ra roughness and modified surface area of enamel with different etching protocols were also conducted.
The bond fatigue durability of universal adhesives to enamel with PPA etching from less than one to 15 seconds and PLA etching for 15 seconds was significantly higher than that to ground enamel. The bond fatigue durability to enamel with PPM etching was not increased compared with ground enamel. The surface Ra roughness and surface area obtained with AFM of enamel increased after PPA and PLA etching, and those values were significantly higher than those of ground enamel. Furthermore, surface Ra roughness and surface area with PPA etching were significantly higher than those with PLA etching. However, surface Ra roughness and surface area of enamel with PPM etching were similar to those of ground enamel regardless of etching time.
PPA etching for less than one to 15 seconds and PLA etching for 15 seconds improve universal adhesive bonding, surface Ra roughness, and surface area of enamel. However, PPM etching is not effective, regardless of etching time, in improving bonds strengths, increasing surface roughness, and increasing surface area.</description><subject>Acid Etching, Dental</subject><subject>Dental Bonding</subject><subject>Dental Cements</subject><subject>Dental Enamel</subject><subject>Materials Testing</subject><subject>Phosphoric Acids</subject><subject>Resin Cements</subject><subject>Shear Strength</subject><subject>Surface Properties</subject><issn>0361-7734</issn><issn>1559-2863</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkDtPwzAURi0EoqUg8QtQRpaAH3GcspUqPKRIZaBz5NjX1CixKzugll9PSqED09WVzneGg9AlwTeUZeSWFCkVPK2O0JhwPk1pkbNjNMYsJ6kQLBuhsxjfMc54xvkpGjFCaY4xH6Nt6WQHbVL2amXdW2J8SJbOfkKIsk1megVxeOJdUm5kZ53srXeJN8m_2UvwvVe-jT-Cxbq3nf06wPfe6R1VGgOqH3wOYjxHJ0a2ES5-7wQtH8rX-VNaLR6f57MqVYzkfaoxyAZyrgB4xmiBhSmIwsoIRpupzJSgTEjCCPAih4w1uaaKY82M0sClZhN0vfeq4GMMYOp1sJ0M25rgelevJkU91KurAb3ao-uPpgN9AP9ysW9ow2wy</recordid><startdate>202001</startdate><enddate>202001</enddate><creator>Wong, J</creator><creator>Tsujimoto, A</creator><creator>Fischer, N G</creator><creator>Baruth, A G</creator><creator>Barkmeier, W W</creator><creator>Johnson, E A</creator><creator>Samuel, S M</creator><creator>Takamizawa, T</creator><creator>Latta, M A</creator><creator>Miyazaki, M</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202001</creationdate><title>Enamel Etching for Universal Adhesives: Examination of Enamel Etching Protocols for Optimization of Bonding Effectiveness</title><author>Wong, J ; Tsujimoto, A ; Fischer, N G ; Baruth, A G ; Barkmeier, W W ; Johnson, E A ; Samuel, S M ; Takamizawa, T ; Latta, M A ; Miyazaki, M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-d0eabe65cee5432807f81c0cf732b9a4c7237a131e586e43b6d2c50d3fcde5ad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Acid Etching, Dental</topic><topic>Dental Bonding</topic><topic>Dental Cements</topic><topic>Dental Enamel</topic><topic>Materials Testing</topic><topic>Phosphoric Acids</topic><topic>Resin Cements</topic><topic>Shear Strength</topic><topic>Surface Properties</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wong, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsujimoto, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer, N G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baruth, A G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barkmeier, W W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, E A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samuel, S M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takamizawa, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Latta, M A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miyazaki, M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Operative dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wong, J</au><au>Tsujimoto, A</au><au>Fischer, N G</au><au>Baruth, A G</au><au>Barkmeier, W W</au><au>Johnson, E A</au><au>Samuel, S M</au><au>Takamizawa, T</au><au>Latta, M A</au><au>Miyazaki, M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Enamel Etching for Universal Adhesives: Examination of Enamel Etching Protocols for Optimization of Bonding Effectiveness</atitle><jtitle>Operative dentistry</jtitle><addtitle>Oper Dent</addtitle><date>2020-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>80</spage><epage>91</epage><pages>80-91</pages><issn>0361-7734</issn><eissn>1559-2863</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether different enamel etching methods with reduced etching times would improve the bonding effectiveness of universal adhesives.
Three enamel etching methods, phosphoric acid ester monomer (PPM) etching, phosphoric acid (PPA) etching, and polyalkenoic acid (PLA) etching, and three universal adhesives, G-Premio Bond (GP), Prime&Bond elect (PE), and Scotchbond Universal Adhesive (SU), were evaluated. Initial bond strengths and fatigue strengths of universal adhesives to ground enamel and ground enamel etched for less than one, five, 10, and 15 seconds using different etching methods were determined. The bonded fatigue specimens were loaded using a sine wave at a frequency of 20 Hz for 50,000 cycles or until failure occurred with a staircase method. Atomic force micrograph (AFM) observations along with measurements of surface Ra roughness and modified surface area of enamel with different etching protocols were also conducted.
The bond fatigue durability of universal adhesives to enamel with PPA etching from less than one to 15 seconds and PLA etching for 15 seconds was significantly higher than that to ground enamel. The bond fatigue durability to enamel with PPM etching was not increased compared with ground enamel. The surface Ra roughness and surface area obtained with AFM of enamel increased after PPA and PLA etching, and those values were significantly higher than those of ground enamel. Furthermore, surface Ra roughness and surface area with PPA etching were significantly higher than those with PLA etching. However, surface Ra roughness and surface area of enamel with PPM etching were similar to those of ground enamel regardless of etching time.
PPA etching for less than one to 15 seconds and PLA etching for 15 seconds improve universal adhesive bonding, surface Ra roughness, and surface area of enamel. However, PPM etching is not effective, regardless of etching time, in improving bonds strengths, increasing surface roughness, and increasing surface area.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>31226005</pmid><doi>10.2341/18-275-L</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0361-7734 |
ispartof | Operative dentistry, 2020-01, Vol.45 (1), p.80-91 |
issn | 0361-7734 1559-2863 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_2341_18_275_L |
source | MEDLINE; Allen Press Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Acid Etching, Dental Dental Bonding Dental Cements Dental Enamel Materials Testing Phosphoric Acids Resin Cements Shear Strength Surface Properties |
title | Enamel Etching for Universal Adhesives: Examination of Enamel Etching Protocols for Optimization of Bonding Effectiveness |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T20%3A22%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Enamel%20Etching%20for%20Universal%20Adhesives:%20Examination%20of%20Enamel%20Etching%20Protocols%20for%20Optimization%20of%20Bonding%20Effectiveness&rft.jtitle=Operative%20dentistry&rft.au=Wong,%20J&rft.date=2020-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=80&rft.epage=91&rft.pages=80-91&rft.issn=0361-7734&rft.eissn=1559-2863&rft_id=info:doi/10.2341/18-275-L&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E31226005%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/31226005&rfr_iscdi=true |