Rebonding of Orthodontic Brackets

Objective: The hypothesis of this two-part study is that adhesive systems for bonding orthodontic brackets (ie, two self-etch primers [Transbond and M-Bond] and a conventional phosphoric acid etch [Rely-a-Bond]) would show a difference with respect to rebonded enamel surface morphology and chemical...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Angle orthodontist 2008-05, Vol.78 (3), p.537-544
Hauptverfasser: Montasser, Mona A., Drummond, James L., Roth, John R., Al-Turki, Lulwa, Evans, Carla A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 544
container_issue 3
container_start_page 537
container_title The Angle orthodontist
container_volume 78
creator Montasser, Mona A.
Drummond, James L.
Roth, John R.
Al-Turki, Lulwa
Evans, Carla A.
description Objective: The hypothesis of this two-part study is that adhesive systems for bonding orthodontic brackets (ie, two self-etch primers [Transbond and M-Bond] and a conventional phosphoric acid etch [Rely-a-Bond]) would show a difference with respect to rebonded enamel surface morphology and chemical composition. Materials and Methods: This study examined the enamel surface before and after debonding with scanning electron microscopy and the enamel surface chemical composition for the elements Ca, P, O, F, Si, and C using x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Results: The etching of the two self-etch groups is less aggressive and less uniform than that of phosphoric acid. The change in the concentration of C indicated that the separation of the bracket from the enamel surface is at the resin-enamel interface for the phosphoric acid–etched adhesive and a mixed mode involving the enamel-resin-bracket interfaces for the self-etching systems. F release appears to occur for Transbond but not for M-Bond. Conclusions: The results confirm the original hypothesis that differences in adhesive systems are manifested in less aggressive etches and less adhesive left on the enamel surface for the self-etching adhesive systems.
doi_str_mv 10.2319/022707-102.1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_2319_022707_102_1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_2319_022707_102_1</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-de185ff39c25e146bad69729b3eae869ff24d8f89a5e3af64a749d8ae52d4ea3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj8tKxDAUQIMoWGfc-QF1b8b7SNpmqYOjwsDAMPuSNjdaH60k3fj3KuPqcDYHjlJXCCtidLdAVEOtEWiFJ6pAZ6yuEfhUFQDAmgndubrI-Q2ArDVUqOu9dNMYhvGlnGK5S_PrFKZxHvryPvn-Xea8VGfRf2S5_OdCHTYPh_WT3u4en9d3W90zu1kHwcbGyK4nK2iqzofK1eQ6Fi9N5WIkE5rYOG-FfayMr40LjRdLwYjnhbo5Zvs05Zwktl9p-PTpu0Vo_-7a492vUov8AxehQT0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rebonding of Orthodontic Brackets</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Montasser, Mona A. ; Drummond, James L. ; Roth, John R. ; Al-Turki, Lulwa ; Evans, Carla A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Montasser, Mona A. ; Drummond, James L. ; Roth, John R. ; Al-Turki, Lulwa ; Evans, Carla A.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: The hypothesis of this two-part study is that adhesive systems for bonding orthodontic brackets (ie, two self-etch primers [Transbond and M-Bond] and a conventional phosphoric acid etch [Rely-a-Bond]) would show a difference with respect to rebonded enamel surface morphology and chemical composition. Materials and Methods: This study examined the enamel surface before and after debonding with scanning electron microscopy and the enamel surface chemical composition for the elements Ca, P, O, F, Si, and C using x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Results: The etching of the two self-etch groups is less aggressive and less uniform than that of phosphoric acid. The change in the concentration of C indicated that the separation of the bracket from the enamel surface is at the resin-enamel interface for the phosphoric acid–etched adhesive and a mixed mode involving the enamel-resin-bracket interfaces for the self-etching systems. F release appears to occur for Transbond but not for M-Bond. Conclusions: The results confirm the original hypothesis that differences in adhesive systems are manifested in less aggressive etches and less adhesive left on the enamel surface for the self-etching adhesive systems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-3219</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1945-7103</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2319/022707-102.1</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>The Angle orthodontist, 2008-05, Vol.78 (3), p.537-544</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-de185ff39c25e146bad69729b3eae869ff24d8f89a5e3af64a749d8ae52d4ea3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-de185ff39c25e146bad69729b3eae869ff24d8f89a5e3af64a749d8ae52d4ea3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Montasser, Mona A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drummond, James L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roth, John R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Turki, Lulwa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, Carla A.</creatorcontrib><title>Rebonding of Orthodontic Brackets</title><title>The Angle orthodontist</title><description>Objective: The hypothesis of this two-part study is that adhesive systems for bonding orthodontic brackets (ie, two self-etch primers [Transbond and M-Bond] and a conventional phosphoric acid etch [Rely-a-Bond]) would show a difference with respect to rebonded enamel surface morphology and chemical composition. Materials and Methods: This study examined the enamel surface before and after debonding with scanning electron microscopy and the enamel surface chemical composition for the elements Ca, P, O, F, Si, and C using x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Results: The etching of the two self-etch groups is less aggressive and less uniform than that of phosphoric acid. The change in the concentration of C indicated that the separation of the bracket from the enamel surface is at the resin-enamel interface for the phosphoric acid–etched adhesive and a mixed mode involving the enamel-resin-bracket interfaces for the self-etching systems. F release appears to occur for Transbond but not for M-Bond. Conclusions: The results confirm the original hypothesis that differences in adhesive systems are manifested in less aggressive etches and less adhesive left on the enamel surface for the self-etching adhesive systems.</description><issn>0003-3219</issn><issn>1945-7103</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotj8tKxDAUQIMoWGfc-QF1b8b7SNpmqYOjwsDAMPuSNjdaH60k3fj3KuPqcDYHjlJXCCtidLdAVEOtEWiFJ6pAZ6yuEfhUFQDAmgndubrI-Q2ArDVUqOu9dNMYhvGlnGK5S_PrFKZxHvryPvn-Xea8VGfRf2S5_OdCHTYPh_WT3u4en9d3W90zu1kHwcbGyK4nK2iqzofK1eQ6Fi9N5WIkE5rYOG-FfayMr40LjRdLwYjnhbo5Zvs05Zwktl9p-PTpu0Vo_-7a492vUov8AxehQT0</recordid><startdate>20080501</startdate><enddate>20080501</enddate><creator>Montasser, Mona A.</creator><creator>Drummond, James L.</creator><creator>Roth, John R.</creator><creator>Al-Turki, Lulwa</creator><creator>Evans, Carla A.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080501</creationdate><title>Rebonding of Orthodontic Brackets</title><author>Montasser, Mona A. ; Drummond, James L. ; Roth, John R. ; Al-Turki, Lulwa ; Evans, Carla A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-de185ff39c25e146bad69729b3eae869ff24d8f89a5e3af64a749d8ae52d4ea3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Montasser, Mona A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drummond, James L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roth, John R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Turki, Lulwa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, Carla A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Angle orthodontist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Montasser, Mona A.</au><au>Drummond, James L.</au><au>Roth, John R.</au><au>Al-Turki, Lulwa</au><au>Evans, Carla A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rebonding of Orthodontic Brackets</atitle><jtitle>The Angle orthodontist</jtitle><date>2008-05-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>78</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>537</spage><epage>544</epage><pages>537-544</pages><issn>0003-3219</issn><eissn>1945-7103</eissn><abstract>Objective: The hypothesis of this two-part study is that adhesive systems for bonding orthodontic brackets (ie, two self-etch primers [Transbond and M-Bond] and a conventional phosphoric acid etch [Rely-a-Bond]) would show a difference with respect to rebonded enamel surface morphology and chemical composition. Materials and Methods: This study examined the enamel surface before and after debonding with scanning electron microscopy and the enamel surface chemical composition for the elements Ca, P, O, F, Si, and C using x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Results: The etching of the two self-etch groups is less aggressive and less uniform than that of phosphoric acid. The change in the concentration of C indicated that the separation of the bracket from the enamel surface is at the resin-enamel interface for the phosphoric acid–etched adhesive and a mixed mode involving the enamel-resin-bracket interfaces for the self-etching systems. F release appears to occur for Transbond but not for M-Bond. Conclusions: The results confirm the original hypothesis that differences in adhesive systems are manifested in less aggressive etches and less adhesive left on the enamel surface for the self-etching adhesive systems.</abstract><doi>10.2319/022707-102.1</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-3219
ispartof The Angle orthodontist, 2008-05, Vol.78 (3), p.537-544
issn 0003-3219
1945-7103
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_2319_022707_102_1
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
title Rebonding of Orthodontic Brackets
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T16%3A18%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rebonding%20of%20Orthodontic%20Brackets&rft.jtitle=The%20Angle%20orthodontist&rft.au=Montasser,%20Mona%20A.&rft.date=2008-05-01&rft.volume=78&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=537&rft.epage=544&rft.pages=537-544&rft.issn=0003-3219&rft.eissn=1945-7103&rft_id=info:doi/10.2319/022707-102.1&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_2319_022707_102_1%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true