The Cognitive Style of Information Professionals
This paper reports the results of research which tested the applicability of the two-dimensional McKenney-Keen Model of Cognitive Style to information professionals. A battery of nine standardized tests from the Kit of Factor-Referenced Cognitive Tests was administered to students at the University...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of education for librarianship 1982-01, Vol.22 (3), p.127-142 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 142 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 127 |
container_title | Journal of education for librarianship |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Johnson, Kerry A. White, Marilyn Domas |
description | This paper reports the results of research which tested the applicability of the two-dimensional McKenney-Keen Model of Cognitive Style to information professionals. A battery of nine standardized tests from the Kit of Factor-Referenced Cognitive Tests was administered to students at the University of Maryland (N=57). Factor analysis was used to explore patterns among test results and supported the hypthesized four-factor model. The four factors are: preceptive and receptive, identifying the poles of the information-gathering dimension; and systematic and intuitive factors, identifying the poles of the information-evaluation dimension. A method of graphically displaying an individual's cognitive style is described and the distribution of cognitive style scores of information students is compared with that of business students in Keen's study. Seventy-two percent of the subject information professionals demonstrate a dominant cognitive style in at least one dimension; while 33 percent have dominant styles in both dimensions. The latter group were dispersed across the four combinations, unlike graduate business students. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2307/40322704 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_2307_40322704</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>40322704</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>40322704</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c187t-de4a6d4a52b0fee95045e86d6fb7e1ce2bab73f8b4f8c12635e6725e73a21b8d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1j0tLAzEURrNQsFbBn5CN4Gb05uY1LmXwUSgotF0PycyNTmknkgSh_96R6tLV-RaHDw5jVwJuUYK9UyARLagTNgNArMCAOmPnOW8BtDRCzxisP4g38X0cyvBFfFUOO-Ix8MUYYtq7MsSRv6UYKOdpul2-YKdhAl3-cs42T4_r5qVavj4vmodl1Ynalqon5UyvnEYPgeheg9JUm94Eb0l0hN55K0PtVag7gUZqMhY1WelQ-LqXc3Zz_O1SzDlRaD_TsHfp0Apof-rav7pJvT6q21xi-t_7BhFNTsI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Cognitive Style of Information Professionals</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Johnson, Kerry A. ; White, Marilyn Domas</creator><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Kerry A. ; White, Marilyn Domas</creatorcontrib><description>This paper reports the results of research which tested the applicability of the two-dimensional McKenney-Keen Model of Cognitive Style to information professionals. A battery of nine standardized tests from the Kit of Factor-Referenced Cognitive Tests was administered to students at the University of Maryland (N=57). Factor analysis was used to explore patterns among test results and supported the hypthesized four-factor model. The four factors are: preceptive and receptive, identifying the poles of the information-gathering dimension; and systematic and intuitive factors, identifying the poles of the information-evaluation dimension. A method of graphically displaying an individual's cognitive style is described and the distribution of cognitive style scores of information students is compared with that of business students in Keen's study. Seventy-two percent of the subject information professionals demonstrate a dominant cognitive style in at least one dimension; while 33 percent have dominant styles in both dimensions. The latter group were dispersed across the four combinations, unlike graduate business students.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0604</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/40322704</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Association of American Library Schools</publisher><subject>Cognitive models ; Cognitive style ; Factor analysis ; Information professionals ; Librarianship ; Linguistic scrambling ; Modeling ; Paper folding ; Two dimensional modeling ; Words</subject><ispartof>Journal of education for librarianship, 1982-01, Vol.22 (3), p.127-142</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1982 Association of American Library Schools</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c187t-de4a6d4a52b0fee95045e86d6fb7e1ce2bab73f8b4f8c12635e6725e73a21b8d3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40322704$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40322704$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,804,4025,27928,27929,27930,58022,58255</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Kerry A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Marilyn Domas</creatorcontrib><title>The Cognitive Style of Information Professionals</title><title>Journal of education for librarianship</title><description>This paper reports the results of research which tested the applicability of the two-dimensional McKenney-Keen Model of Cognitive Style to information professionals. A battery of nine standardized tests from the Kit of Factor-Referenced Cognitive Tests was administered to students at the University of Maryland (N=57). Factor analysis was used to explore patterns among test results and supported the hypthesized four-factor model. The four factors are: preceptive and receptive, identifying the poles of the information-gathering dimension; and systematic and intuitive factors, identifying the poles of the information-evaluation dimension. A method of graphically displaying an individual's cognitive style is described and the distribution of cognitive style scores of information students is compared with that of business students in Keen's study. Seventy-two percent of the subject information professionals demonstrate a dominant cognitive style in at least one dimension; while 33 percent have dominant styles in both dimensions. The latter group were dispersed across the four combinations, unlike graduate business students.</description><subject>Cognitive models</subject><subject>Cognitive style</subject><subject>Factor analysis</subject><subject>Information professionals</subject><subject>Librarianship</subject><subject>Linguistic scrambling</subject><subject>Modeling</subject><subject>Paper folding</subject><subject>Two dimensional modeling</subject><subject>Words</subject><issn>0022-0604</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1982</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1j0tLAzEURrNQsFbBn5CN4Gb05uY1LmXwUSgotF0PycyNTmknkgSh_96R6tLV-RaHDw5jVwJuUYK9UyARLagTNgNArMCAOmPnOW8BtDRCzxisP4g38X0cyvBFfFUOO-Ix8MUYYtq7MsSRv6UYKOdpul2-YKdhAl3-cs42T4_r5qVavj4vmodl1Ynalqon5UyvnEYPgeheg9JUm94Eb0l0hN55K0PtVag7gUZqMhY1WelQ-LqXc3Zz_O1SzDlRaD_TsHfp0Apof-rav7pJvT6q21xi-t_7BhFNTsI</recordid><startdate>19820101</startdate><enddate>19820101</enddate><creator>Johnson, Kerry A.</creator><creator>White, Marilyn Domas</creator><general>Association of American Library Schools</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19820101</creationdate><title>The Cognitive Style of Information Professionals</title><author>Johnson, Kerry A. ; White, Marilyn Domas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c187t-de4a6d4a52b0fee95045e86d6fb7e1ce2bab73f8b4f8c12635e6725e73a21b8d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1982</creationdate><topic>Cognitive models</topic><topic>Cognitive style</topic><topic>Factor analysis</topic><topic>Information professionals</topic><topic>Librarianship</topic><topic>Linguistic scrambling</topic><topic>Modeling</topic><topic>Paper folding</topic><topic>Two dimensional modeling</topic><topic>Words</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Kerry A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Marilyn Domas</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of education for librarianship</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Johnson, Kerry A.</au><au>White, Marilyn Domas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Cognitive Style of Information Professionals</atitle><jtitle>Journal of education for librarianship</jtitle><date>1982-01-01</date><risdate>1982</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>127</spage><epage>142</epage><pages>127-142</pages><issn>0022-0604</issn><abstract>This paper reports the results of research which tested the applicability of the two-dimensional McKenney-Keen Model of Cognitive Style to information professionals. A battery of nine standardized tests from the Kit of Factor-Referenced Cognitive Tests was administered to students at the University of Maryland (N=57). Factor analysis was used to explore patterns among test results and supported the hypthesized four-factor model. The four factors are: preceptive and receptive, identifying the poles of the information-gathering dimension; and systematic and intuitive factors, identifying the poles of the information-evaluation dimension. A method of graphically displaying an individual's cognitive style is described and the distribution of cognitive style scores of information students is compared with that of business students in Keen's study. Seventy-two percent of the subject information professionals demonstrate a dominant cognitive style in at least one dimension; while 33 percent have dominant styles in both dimensions. The latter group were dispersed across the four combinations, unlike graduate business students.</abstract><pub>Association of American Library Schools</pub><doi>10.2307/40322704</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-0604 |
ispartof | Journal of education for librarianship, 1982-01, Vol.22 (3), p.127-142 |
issn | 0022-0604 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_2307_40322704 |
source | JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | Cognitive models Cognitive style Factor analysis Information professionals Librarianship Linguistic scrambling Modeling Paper folding Two dimensional modeling Words |
title | The Cognitive Style of Information Professionals |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T04%3A43%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Cognitive%20Style%20of%20Information%20Professionals&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20education%20for%20librarianship&rft.au=Johnson,%20Kerry%20A.&rft.date=1982-01-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=127&rft.epage=142&rft.pages=127-142&rft.issn=0022-0604&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/40322704&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E40322704%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=40322704&rfr_iscdi=true |