The Cognitive Style of Information Professionals

This paper reports the results of research which tested the applicability of the two-dimensional McKenney-Keen Model of Cognitive Style to information professionals. A battery of nine standardized tests from the Kit of Factor-Referenced Cognitive Tests was administered to students at the University...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of education for librarianship 1982-01, Vol.22 (3), p.127-142
Hauptverfasser: Johnson, Kerry A., White, Marilyn Domas
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 142
container_issue 3
container_start_page 127
container_title Journal of education for librarianship
container_volume 22
creator Johnson, Kerry A.
White, Marilyn Domas
description This paper reports the results of research which tested the applicability of the two-dimensional McKenney-Keen Model of Cognitive Style to information professionals. A battery of nine standardized tests from the Kit of Factor-Referenced Cognitive Tests was administered to students at the University of Maryland (N=57). Factor analysis was used to explore patterns among test results and supported the hypthesized four-factor model. The four factors are: preceptive and receptive, identifying the poles of the information-gathering dimension; and systematic and intuitive factors, identifying the poles of the information-evaluation dimension. A method of graphically displaying an individual's cognitive style is described and the distribution of cognitive style scores of information students is compared with that of business students in Keen's study. Seventy-two percent of the subject information professionals demonstrate a dominant cognitive style in at least one dimension; while 33 percent have dominant styles in both dimensions. The latter group were dispersed across the four combinations, unlike graduate business students.
doi_str_mv 10.2307/40322704
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_2307_40322704</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>40322704</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>40322704</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c187t-de4a6d4a52b0fee95045e86d6fb7e1ce2bab73f8b4f8c12635e6725e73a21b8d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1j0tLAzEURrNQsFbBn5CN4Gb05uY1LmXwUSgotF0PycyNTmknkgSh_96R6tLV-RaHDw5jVwJuUYK9UyARLagTNgNArMCAOmPnOW8BtDRCzxisP4g38X0cyvBFfFUOO-Ix8MUYYtq7MsSRv6UYKOdpul2-YKdhAl3-cs42T4_r5qVavj4vmodl1Ynalqon5UyvnEYPgeheg9JUm94Eb0l0hN55K0PtVag7gUZqMhY1WelQ-LqXc3Zz_O1SzDlRaD_TsHfp0Apof-rav7pJvT6q21xi-t_7BhFNTsI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Cognitive Style of Information Professionals</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Johnson, Kerry A. ; White, Marilyn Domas</creator><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Kerry A. ; White, Marilyn Domas</creatorcontrib><description>This paper reports the results of research which tested the applicability of the two-dimensional McKenney-Keen Model of Cognitive Style to information professionals. A battery of nine standardized tests from the Kit of Factor-Referenced Cognitive Tests was administered to students at the University of Maryland (N=57). Factor analysis was used to explore patterns among test results and supported the hypthesized four-factor model. The four factors are: preceptive and receptive, identifying the poles of the information-gathering dimension; and systematic and intuitive factors, identifying the poles of the information-evaluation dimension. A method of graphically displaying an individual's cognitive style is described and the distribution of cognitive style scores of information students is compared with that of business students in Keen's study. Seventy-two percent of the subject information professionals demonstrate a dominant cognitive style in at least one dimension; while 33 percent have dominant styles in both dimensions. The latter group were dispersed across the four combinations, unlike graduate business students.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0604</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/40322704</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Association of American Library Schools</publisher><subject>Cognitive models ; Cognitive style ; Factor analysis ; Information professionals ; Librarianship ; Linguistic scrambling ; Modeling ; Paper folding ; Two dimensional modeling ; Words</subject><ispartof>Journal of education for librarianship, 1982-01, Vol.22 (3), p.127-142</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1982 Association of American Library Schools</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c187t-de4a6d4a52b0fee95045e86d6fb7e1ce2bab73f8b4f8c12635e6725e73a21b8d3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40322704$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40322704$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,804,4025,27928,27929,27930,58022,58255</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Kerry A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Marilyn Domas</creatorcontrib><title>The Cognitive Style of Information Professionals</title><title>Journal of education for librarianship</title><description>This paper reports the results of research which tested the applicability of the two-dimensional McKenney-Keen Model of Cognitive Style to information professionals. A battery of nine standardized tests from the Kit of Factor-Referenced Cognitive Tests was administered to students at the University of Maryland (N=57). Factor analysis was used to explore patterns among test results and supported the hypthesized four-factor model. The four factors are: preceptive and receptive, identifying the poles of the information-gathering dimension; and systematic and intuitive factors, identifying the poles of the information-evaluation dimension. A method of graphically displaying an individual's cognitive style is described and the distribution of cognitive style scores of information students is compared with that of business students in Keen's study. Seventy-two percent of the subject information professionals demonstrate a dominant cognitive style in at least one dimension; while 33 percent have dominant styles in both dimensions. The latter group were dispersed across the four combinations, unlike graduate business students.</description><subject>Cognitive models</subject><subject>Cognitive style</subject><subject>Factor analysis</subject><subject>Information professionals</subject><subject>Librarianship</subject><subject>Linguistic scrambling</subject><subject>Modeling</subject><subject>Paper folding</subject><subject>Two dimensional modeling</subject><subject>Words</subject><issn>0022-0604</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1982</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1j0tLAzEURrNQsFbBn5CN4Gb05uY1LmXwUSgotF0PycyNTmknkgSh_96R6tLV-RaHDw5jVwJuUYK9UyARLagTNgNArMCAOmPnOW8BtDRCzxisP4g38X0cyvBFfFUOO-Ix8MUYYtq7MsSRv6UYKOdpul2-YKdhAl3-cs42T4_r5qVavj4vmodl1Ynalqon5UyvnEYPgeheg9JUm94Eb0l0hN55K0PtVag7gUZqMhY1WelQ-LqXc3Zz_O1SzDlRaD_TsHfp0Apof-rav7pJvT6q21xi-t_7BhFNTsI</recordid><startdate>19820101</startdate><enddate>19820101</enddate><creator>Johnson, Kerry A.</creator><creator>White, Marilyn Domas</creator><general>Association of American Library Schools</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19820101</creationdate><title>The Cognitive Style of Information Professionals</title><author>Johnson, Kerry A. ; White, Marilyn Domas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c187t-de4a6d4a52b0fee95045e86d6fb7e1ce2bab73f8b4f8c12635e6725e73a21b8d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1982</creationdate><topic>Cognitive models</topic><topic>Cognitive style</topic><topic>Factor analysis</topic><topic>Information professionals</topic><topic>Librarianship</topic><topic>Linguistic scrambling</topic><topic>Modeling</topic><topic>Paper folding</topic><topic>Two dimensional modeling</topic><topic>Words</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Kerry A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Marilyn Domas</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of education for librarianship</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Johnson, Kerry A.</au><au>White, Marilyn Domas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Cognitive Style of Information Professionals</atitle><jtitle>Journal of education for librarianship</jtitle><date>1982-01-01</date><risdate>1982</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>127</spage><epage>142</epage><pages>127-142</pages><issn>0022-0604</issn><abstract>This paper reports the results of research which tested the applicability of the two-dimensional McKenney-Keen Model of Cognitive Style to information professionals. A battery of nine standardized tests from the Kit of Factor-Referenced Cognitive Tests was administered to students at the University of Maryland (N=57). Factor analysis was used to explore patterns among test results and supported the hypthesized four-factor model. The four factors are: preceptive and receptive, identifying the poles of the information-gathering dimension; and systematic and intuitive factors, identifying the poles of the information-evaluation dimension. A method of graphically displaying an individual's cognitive style is described and the distribution of cognitive style scores of information students is compared with that of business students in Keen's study. Seventy-two percent of the subject information professionals demonstrate a dominant cognitive style in at least one dimension; while 33 percent have dominant styles in both dimensions. The latter group were dispersed across the four combinations, unlike graduate business students.</abstract><pub>Association of American Library Schools</pub><doi>10.2307/40322704</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-0604
ispartof Journal of education for librarianship, 1982-01, Vol.22 (3), p.127-142
issn 0022-0604
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_2307_40322704
source JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Cognitive models
Cognitive style
Factor analysis
Information professionals
Librarianship
Linguistic scrambling
Modeling
Paper folding
Two dimensional modeling
Words
title The Cognitive Style of Information Professionals
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T04%3A43%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Cognitive%20Style%20of%20Information%20Professionals&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20education%20for%20librarianship&rft.au=Johnson,%20Kerry%20A.&rft.date=1982-01-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=127&rft.epage=142&rft.pages=127-142&rft.issn=0022-0604&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/40322704&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E40322704%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=40322704&rfr_iscdi=true