Resistance or Emigration? Response of Alpine Plants to the Ice Ages

There is a long-standing debate about the fate of the mountain flora of the European Alps during the Pleistocene ice ages. Two main scenarios of glacial survival of alpine plant taxa have been discussed, namely (1) total extinction within glaciated areas, survival in peripheral refugia, and postglac...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Taxon 2003-08, Vol.52 (3), p.499-510
1. Verfasser: Stehlik, Ivana
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 510
container_issue 3
container_start_page 499
container_title Taxon
container_volume 52
creator Stehlik, Ivana
description There is a long-standing debate about the fate of the mountain flora of the European Alps during the Pleistocene ice ages. Two main scenarios of glacial survival of alpine plant taxa have been discussed, namely (1) total extinction within glaciated areas, survival in peripheral refugia, and postglacial re-immigration into vacant areas (tabula rasa hypothesis), and (2) long-term in situ survival within glaciated regions in isolated ice-free areas above the ice-shield (nunatak hypothesis). Four alpine species with differing distributions and ecological demands were investigated to elucidate their glacial history using molecular methods (AFLPs, RFLPs of cpDNA, RAPDs). Their glacial histories are very diverse. Whereas in situ survival in the most intensely glaciated Central Alps played an important role in Eritrichium nanum, the low alpine Erinus alpinus survived in situ on some mountains of the northern Swiss Prealps, and Rumex nivalis grows at intermediate alpine elevations in snow-beds in both the northern and the Central Swiss Alps. In the common arctic-alpine Saxifraga oppositifolia, the species with the widest distribution and ecological amplitude as compared to the other three species, it is not possible to reconstruct its glacial history. It is probable, therefore, that in the Alps, as in northern Europe, resident genotypes surviving glaciation in situ were integrated into the gene pool of postglacially immigrating periglacial individuals. The size of refugia differed according to species and region. On the one hand, refugia were restricted to individual mountains (E. alpinus, R. nivalis). On the other hand, they spanned several mountain ranges in larger areas (E. nanum, E. alpinus). Postglacial migration over longer distances was inferred for E. alpinus from southern France to northern Switzerland, and, over shorter distances, for R. nivalis from the northern Prealps into the Central Alps in Switzerland. Both postglacial immigration and in situ survival shaped the phylogeography at least of E. alpinus and R. nivalis. It is likely, therefore, that the nunatak and the tabula rasa hypotheses are too simplistic to describe the rich diversity of glacial and postglacial processes in Alpine plant species. It rather appears that the glacial history of each species is to a certain degree unique and influenced by its ecological demands or breeding systems. Moreover, stochasticity has to be regarded of essential importance, since factors such as preglacial distr
doi_str_mv 10.2307/3647448
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_2307_3647448</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3647448</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3647448</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3158-54d82b8b0245081fed6d82c4206edf9944df462d9a40b4e07cd06d242d39243b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1j1FLwzAUhYMoWKf4F_Ig-FR3k9ymzZOUselgoMgE30rapLOja0sSkP17Kx34tKcL537fgUPIPYMnLiCdC4kpYnZBIqaUjDOWJpckAkCIgUt-TW683wNwlioRkcWH9Y0Puqss7R1dHpqd06Hpu2c6foa-82Ne07wdms7S91Z3wdPQ0_Bt6Xp08p31t-Sq1q23d6c7I5-r5XbxGm_eXtaLfBNrwZIsTtBkvMxK4JhAxmpr5BhUyEFaUyuFaGqU3CiNUKKFtDIgDUduhOIoSjEjj1Nv5Xrvna2LwTUH7Y4Fg-Jve3HaPpLzifxpWns8hxXb_OvfeJiMvQ-9O1v8C1hSYt0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Resistance or Emigration? Response of Alpine Plants to the Ice Ages</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Stehlik, Ivana</creator><creatorcontrib>Stehlik, Ivana</creatorcontrib><description>There is a long-standing debate about the fate of the mountain flora of the European Alps during the Pleistocene ice ages. Two main scenarios of glacial survival of alpine plant taxa have been discussed, namely (1) total extinction within glaciated areas, survival in peripheral refugia, and postglacial re-immigration into vacant areas (tabula rasa hypothesis), and (2) long-term in situ survival within glaciated regions in isolated ice-free areas above the ice-shield (nunatak hypothesis). Four alpine species with differing distributions and ecological demands were investigated to elucidate their glacial history using molecular methods (AFLPs, RFLPs of cpDNA, RAPDs). Their glacial histories are very diverse. Whereas in situ survival in the most intensely glaciated Central Alps played an important role in Eritrichium nanum, the low alpine Erinus alpinus survived in situ on some mountains of the northern Swiss Prealps, and Rumex nivalis grows at intermediate alpine elevations in snow-beds in both the northern and the Central Swiss Alps. In the common arctic-alpine Saxifraga oppositifolia, the species with the widest distribution and ecological amplitude as compared to the other three species, it is not possible to reconstruct its glacial history. It is probable, therefore, that in the Alps, as in northern Europe, resident genotypes surviving glaciation in situ were integrated into the gene pool of postglacially immigrating periglacial individuals. The size of refugia differed according to species and region. On the one hand, refugia were restricted to individual mountains (E. alpinus, R. nivalis). On the other hand, they spanned several mountain ranges in larger areas (E. nanum, E. alpinus). Postglacial migration over longer distances was inferred for E. alpinus from southern France to northern Switzerland, and, over shorter distances, for R. nivalis from the northern Prealps into the Central Alps in Switzerland. Both postglacial immigration and in situ survival shaped the phylogeography at least of E. alpinus and R. nivalis. It is likely, therefore, that the nunatak and the tabula rasa hypotheses are too simplistic to describe the rich diversity of glacial and postglacial processes in Alpine plant species. It rather appears that the glacial history of each species is to a certain degree unique and influenced by its ecological demands or breeding systems. Moreover, stochasticity has to be regarded of essential importance, since factors such as preglacial distribution patterns or postglacial dispersal or extinction events should have had effects on the present genetic composition and the distribution of a species.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0040-0262</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1996-8175</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/3647448</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>International Association for Plant Taxonomy</publisher><subject>Alpine glaciers ; Alpine plants ; Alps ; Erinus alpinus ; Eritrichium nanum ; Haplotypes ; Nunataks ; Phylogeography ; Plants ; Pleistocene glaciations ; Population distributions ; Population genetics ; Quaternary glacial periods ; Refuge habitats ; Rumex nivalis ; Saxifraga oppositifolia ; Tabula rasa</subject><ispartof>Taxon, 2003-08, Vol.52 (3), p.499-510</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2003 IAPT</rights><rights>2003 International Association for Plant Taxonomy (IAPT) all rights reserved</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3158-54d82b8b0245081fed6d82c4206edf9944df462d9a40b4e07cd06d242d39243b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3158-54d82b8b0245081fed6d82c4206edf9944df462d9a40b4e07cd06d242d39243b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3647448$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3647448$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stehlik, Ivana</creatorcontrib><title>Resistance or Emigration? Response of Alpine Plants to the Ice Ages</title><title>Taxon</title><description>There is a long-standing debate about the fate of the mountain flora of the European Alps during the Pleistocene ice ages. Two main scenarios of glacial survival of alpine plant taxa have been discussed, namely (1) total extinction within glaciated areas, survival in peripheral refugia, and postglacial re-immigration into vacant areas (tabula rasa hypothesis), and (2) long-term in situ survival within glaciated regions in isolated ice-free areas above the ice-shield (nunatak hypothesis). Four alpine species with differing distributions and ecological demands were investigated to elucidate their glacial history using molecular methods (AFLPs, RFLPs of cpDNA, RAPDs). Their glacial histories are very diverse. Whereas in situ survival in the most intensely glaciated Central Alps played an important role in Eritrichium nanum, the low alpine Erinus alpinus survived in situ on some mountains of the northern Swiss Prealps, and Rumex nivalis grows at intermediate alpine elevations in snow-beds in both the northern and the Central Swiss Alps. In the common arctic-alpine Saxifraga oppositifolia, the species with the widest distribution and ecological amplitude as compared to the other three species, it is not possible to reconstruct its glacial history. It is probable, therefore, that in the Alps, as in northern Europe, resident genotypes surviving glaciation in situ were integrated into the gene pool of postglacially immigrating periglacial individuals. The size of refugia differed according to species and region. On the one hand, refugia were restricted to individual mountains (E. alpinus, R. nivalis). On the other hand, they spanned several mountain ranges in larger areas (E. nanum, E. alpinus). Postglacial migration over longer distances was inferred for E. alpinus from southern France to northern Switzerland, and, over shorter distances, for R. nivalis from the northern Prealps into the Central Alps in Switzerland. Both postglacial immigration and in situ survival shaped the phylogeography at least of E. alpinus and R. nivalis. It is likely, therefore, that the nunatak and the tabula rasa hypotheses are too simplistic to describe the rich diversity of glacial and postglacial processes in Alpine plant species. It rather appears that the glacial history of each species is to a certain degree unique and influenced by its ecological demands or breeding systems. Moreover, stochasticity has to be regarded of essential importance, since factors such as preglacial distribution patterns or postglacial dispersal or extinction events should have had effects on the present genetic composition and the distribution of a species.</description><subject>Alpine glaciers</subject><subject>Alpine plants</subject><subject>Alps</subject><subject>Erinus alpinus</subject><subject>Eritrichium nanum</subject><subject>Haplotypes</subject><subject>Nunataks</subject><subject>Phylogeography</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Pleistocene glaciations</subject><subject>Population distributions</subject><subject>Population genetics</subject><subject>Quaternary glacial periods</subject><subject>Refuge habitats</subject><subject>Rumex nivalis</subject><subject>Saxifraga oppositifolia</subject><subject>Tabula rasa</subject><issn>0040-0262</issn><issn>1996-8175</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1j1FLwzAUhYMoWKf4F_Ig-FR3k9ymzZOUselgoMgE30rapLOja0sSkP17Kx34tKcL537fgUPIPYMnLiCdC4kpYnZBIqaUjDOWJpckAkCIgUt-TW683wNwlioRkcWH9Y0Puqss7R1dHpqd06Hpu2c6foa-82Ne07wdms7S91Z3wdPQ0_Bt6Xp08p31t-Sq1q23d6c7I5-r5XbxGm_eXtaLfBNrwZIsTtBkvMxK4JhAxmpr5BhUyEFaUyuFaGqU3CiNUKKFtDIgDUduhOIoSjEjj1Nv5Xrvna2LwTUH7Y4Fg-Jve3HaPpLzifxpWns8hxXb_OvfeJiMvQ-9O1v8C1hSYt0</recordid><startdate>200308</startdate><enddate>200308</enddate><creator>Stehlik, Ivana</creator><general>International Association for Plant Taxonomy</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200308</creationdate><title>Resistance or Emigration? Response of Alpine Plants to the Ice Ages</title><author>Stehlik, Ivana</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3158-54d82b8b0245081fed6d82c4206edf9944df462d9a40b4e07cd06d242d39243b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Alpine glaciers</topic><topic>Alpine plants</topic><topic>Alps</topic><topic>Erinus alpinus</topic><topic>Eritrichium nanum</topic><topic>Haplotypes</topic><topic>Nunataks</topic><topic>Phylogeography</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Pleistocene glaciations</topic><topic>Population distributions</topic><topic>Population genetics</topic><topic>Quaternary glacial periods</topic><topic>Refuge habitats</topic><topic>Rumex nivalis</topic><topic>Saxifraga oppositifolia</topic><topic>Tabula rasa</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stehlik, Ivana</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Taxon</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stehlik, Ivana</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Resistance or Emigration? Response of Alpine Plants to the Ice Ages</atitle><jtitle>Taxon</jtitle><date>2003-08</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>499</spage><epage>510</epage><pages>499-510</pages><issn>0040-0262</issn><eissn>1996-8175</eissn><abstract>There is a long-standing debate about the fate of the mountain flora of the European Alps during the Pleistocene ice ages. Two main scenarios of glacial survival of alpine plant taxa have been discussed, namely (1) total extinction within glaciated areas, survival in peripheral refugia, and postglacial re-immigration into vacant areas (tabula rasa hypothesis), and (2) long-term in situ survival within glaciated regions in isolated ice-free areas above the ice-shield (nunatak hypothesis). Four alpine species with differing distributions and ecological demands were investigated to elucidate their glacial history using molecular methods (AFLPs, RFLPs of cpDNA, RAPDs). Their glacial histories are very diverse. Whereas in situ survival in the most intensely glaciated Central Alps played an important role in Eritrichium nanum, the low alpine Erinus alpinus survived in situ on some mountains of the northern Swiss Prealps, and Rumex nivalis grows at intermediate alpine elevations in snow-beds in both the northern and the Central Swiss Alps. In the common arctic-alpine Saxifraga oppositifolia, the species with the widest distribution and ecological amplitude as compared to the other three species, it is not possible to reconstruct its glacial history. It is probable, therefore, that in the Alps, as in northern Europe, resident genotypes surviving glaciation in situ were integrated into the gene pool of postglacially immigrating periglacial individuals. The size of refugia differed according to species and region. On the one hand, refugia were restricted to individual mountains (E. alpinus, R. nivalis). On the other hand, they spanned several mountain ranges in larger areas (E. nanum, E. alpinus). Postglacial migration over longer distances was inferred for E. alpinus from southern France to northern Switzerland, and, over shorter distances, for R. nivalis from the northern Prealps into the Central Alps in Switzerland. Both postglacial immigration and in situ survival shaped the phylogeography at least of E. alpinus and R. nivalis. It is likely, therefore, that the nunatak and the tabula rasa hypotheses are too simplistic to describe the rich diversity of glacial and postglacial processes in Alpine plant species. It rather appears that the glacial history of each species is to a certain degree unique and influenced by its ecological demands or breeding systems. Moreover, stochasticity has to be regarded of essential importance, since factors such as preglacial distribution patterns or postglacial dispersal or extinction events should have had effects on the present genetic composition and the distribution of a species.</abstract><pub>International Association for Plant Taxonomy</pub><doi>10.2307/3647448</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0040-0262
ispartof Taxon, 2003-08, Vol.52 (3), p.499-510
issn 0040-0262
1996-8175
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_2307_3647448
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Alpine glaciers
Alpine plants
Alps
Erinus alpinus
Eritrichium nanum
Haplotypes
Nunataks
Phylogeography
Plants
Pleistocene glaciations
Population distributions
Population genetics
Quaternary glacial periods
Refuge habitats
Rumex nivalis
Saxifraga oppositifolia
Tabula rasa
title Resistance or Emigration? Response of Alpine Plants to the Ice Ages
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T16%3A41%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Resistance%20or%20Emigration?%20Response%20of%20Alpine%20Plants%20to%20the%20Ice%20Ages&rft.jtitle=Taxon&rft.au=Stehlik,%20Ivana&rft.date=2003-08&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=499&rft.epage=510&rft.pages=499-510&rft.issn=0040-0262&rft.eissn=1996-8175&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/3647448&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E3647448%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3647448&rfr_iscdi=true