The Kinetics of Repair of Sublethal Radiation-Induced Damage in Pig Skin: Studies with Multiple Interfraction Intervals
The kinetics of the repair of radiation-induced sublethal damage (SLD) was studied for the epidermis of the pig. A total of either 7 or 14 interfraction intervals with incomplete repair was achieved by giving 28 fractions either as 7 × 2 fractions/day plus a top-up dose of 17 Gy (half tolerance) or...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Radiation research 1996-05, Vol.145 (5), p.586-594 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 594 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 586 |
container_title | Radiation research |
container_volume | 145 |
creator | G. J. M. J. van den Aardweg Hopewell, J. W. Guttenberger, R. |
description | The kinetics of the repair of radiation-induced sublethal damage (SLD) was studied for the epidermis of the pig. A total of either 7 or 14 interfraction intervals with incomplete repair was achieved by giving 28 fractions either as 7 × 2 fractions/day plus a top-up dose of 17 Gy (half tolerance) or as 14 × 2 fractions/day. The dose per fraction ranged from 1.96-4.82 Gy. A total of 9 intervals ranging from 0.17 h up to 8 h between fractions was used. The incidence of moist desquamation, as an estimate of acute epidermal response, was used as an end point to establish dose-effect relationships. The data were analyzed using either the incomplete repair model of Thames, assuming monoexponential repair kinetics, or a modified version of the incomplete repair model, assuming bi-exponential repair of sublethal damage. Both methods of analysis allowed for the longer overnight interval between fractions. Analysis assuming monoexponential repair gave a T1/2 of 0.74 h for the combined data, although there was a trend toward a longer half-time when only the longer interfraction intervals (>1.0 h) were used in the analysis. A further analysis using the modified version of an incomplete repair model gave a fast and a slow component of repair with significantly different half-times of 0.09 and 4.5 h, respectively. Varying the number of incomplete repair intervals by replacing half the number of fractions with a single half-tolerance top-up dose did not modify the kinetics of repair significantly, in terms of either the repair half-times or the proportion of repair associated with a fast and slow component. Reanalysis of data published previously for 3 and 4 fractions using the modified incomplete repair model again resulted in two components of repair, represented by the significantly different half-times of 0.17 and 3.0 h. These values were similar to those obtained from the multiple-fraction experiment. These data clearly demonstrate that an acutely responding tissue is associated with a long T1/2 for the repair of SLD which is independent of the dose per fraction. For accelerated fractionation schedules in the clinic, using multiple fractions per day, these results suggest a need to control the intervals between fractions carefully and when appropriate to reduce the total dose to avoid serious normal-tissue complications. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2307/3579277 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_2307_3579277</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3579277</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3579277</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-3b528c2f13efb828ba436985e7d660777346cd9d86b95cea17781bb8981c47863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtOwzAQRS0EKuUhvgDJCyRWATtObIcdKq-KIlBb1pFfaV3SJLIdKv6eVI3KitWd0Zy5o7kAXGB0ExPEbknKspixAzDEGeFRmqDkEAwRIiRiKWfH4MT7Fep6TLMBGHCKMxQnQ7CZLw18tZUJVnlYF3BqGmHdtpq1sjRhKUo4FdqKYOsqGle6VUbDB7EWCwNtBT_sAs6-bHUHZ6HV1ni4sWEJ39oy2KY0cFwF4won1HZ_132L0p-Bo6ITc97rKfh8epyPXqLJ-_N4dD-JFCFJiIhMY67iAhNTSB5zKRJCM54apilFjDGSUKUzzanMUmUEZoxjKXnGsUoYp-QUXO98lau9d6bIG2fXwv3kGOXb5PI-uY683JFNK9dG77k-qm5-1c-FV6LsXqqU9Xuss6Kckz9s5UPt_r32CzWRgBE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Kinetics of Repair of Sublethal Radiation-Induced Damage in Pig Skin: Studies with Multiple Interfraction Intervals</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>G. J. M. J. van den Aardweg ; Hopewell, J. W. ; Guttenberger, R.</creator><creatorcontrib>G. J. M. J. van den Aardweg ; Hopewell, J. W. ; Guttenberger, R.</creatorcontrib><description>The kinetics of the repair of radiation-induced sublethal damage (SLD) was studied for the epidermis of the pig. A total of either 7 or 14 interfraction intervals with incomplete repair was achieved by giving 28 fractions either as 7 × 2 fractions/day plus a top-up dose of 17 Gy (half tolerance) or as 14 × 2 fractions/day. The dose per fraction ranged from 1.96-4.82 Gy. A total of 9 intervals ranging from 0.17 h up to 8 h between fractions was used. The incidence of moist desquamation, as an estimate of acute epidermal response, was used as an end point to establish dose-effect relationships. The data were analyzed using either the incomplete repair model of Thames, assuming monoexponential repair kinetics, or a modified version of the incomplete repair model, assuming bi-exponential repair of sublethal damage. Both methods of analysis allowed for the longer overnight interval between fractions. Analysis assuming monoexponential repair gave a T1/2 of 0.74 h for the combined data, although there was a trend toward a longer half-time when only the longer interfraction intervals (>1.0 h) were used in the analysis. A further analysis using the modified version of an incomplete repair model gave a fast and a slow component of repair with significantly different half-times of 0.09 and 4.5 h, respectively. Varying the number of incomplete repair intervals by replacing half the number of fractions with a single half-tolerance top-up dose did not modify the kinetics of repair significantly, in terms of either the repair half-times or the proportion of repair associated with a fast and slow component. Reanalysis of data published previously for 3 and 4 fractions using the modified incomplete repair model again resulted in two components of repair, represented by the significantly different half-times of 0.17 and 3.0 h. These values were similar to those obtained from the multiple-fraction experiment. These data clearly demonstrate that an acutely responding tissue is associated with a long T1/2 for the repair of SLD which is independent of the dose per fraction. For accelerated fractionation schedules in the clinic, using multiple fractions per day, these results suggest a need to control the intervals between fractions carefully and when appropriate to reduce the total dose to avoid serious normal-tissue complications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-7587</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-5404</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/3579277</identifier><identifier>PMID: 8619024</identifier><identifier>CODEN: RAREAE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oak Brook, Il: Radiation Research Society</publisher><subject>Animals ; Beta Particles ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biological effects of radiation ; Dose fractionation ; Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation ; Epidermis - pathology ; Epidermis - radiation effects ; Female ; Fractionation ; Fractions ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Ionizing radiations ; Kinetics ; Musical intervals ; Probability ; Radiation damage ; Radiation dosage ; Radiation Tolerance ; Radiotherapy ; Skin ; Skin - pathology ; Skin - radiation effects ; Strontium ; Swine ; Time Factors ; Tissues, organs and organisms biophysics ; Yttrium Radioisotopes</subject><ispartof>Radiation research, 1996-05, Vol.145 (5), p.586-594</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1996 The Radiation Research Society</rights><rights>1996 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-3b528c2f13efb828ba436985e7d660777346cd9d86b95cea17781bb8981c47863</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3579277$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3579277$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,800,27905,27906,57998,58231</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=3076883$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8619024$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>G. J. M. J. van den Aardweg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hopewell, J. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guttenberger, R.</creatorcontrib><title>The Kinetics of Repair of Sublethal Radiation-Induced Damage in Pig Skin: Studies with Multiple Interfraction Intervals</title><title>Radiation research</title><addtitle>Radiat Res</addtitle><description>The kinetics of the repair of radiation-induced sublethal damage (SLD) was studied for the epidermis of the pig. A total of either 7 or 14 interfraction intervals with incomplete repair was achieved by giving 28 fractions either as 7 × 2 fractions/day plus a top-up dose of 17 Gy (half tolerance) or as 14 × 2 fractions/day. The dose per fraction ranged from 1.96-4.82 Gy. A total of 9 intervals ranging from 0.17 h up to 8 h between fractions was used. The incidence of moist desquamation, as an estimate of acute epidermal response, was used as an end point to establish dose-effect relationships. The data were analyzed using either the incomplete repair model of Thames, assuming monoexponential repair kinetics, or a modified version of the incomplete repair model, assuming bi-exponential repair of sublethal damage. Both methods of analysis allowed for the longer overnight interval between fractions. Analysis assuming monoexponential repair gave a T1/2 of 0.74 h for the combined data, although there was a trend toward a longer half-time when only the longer interfraction intervals (>1.0 h) were used in the analysis. A further analysis using the modified version of an incomplete repair model gave a fast and a slow component of repair with significantly different half-times of 0.09 and 4.5 h, respectively. Varying the number of incomplete repair intervals by replacing half the number of fractions with a single half-tolerance top-up dose did not modify the kinetics of repair significantly, in terms of either the repair half-times or the proportion of repair associated with a fast and slow component. Reanalysis of data published previously for 3 and 4 fractions using the modified incomplete repair model again resulted in two components of repair, represented by the significantly different half-times of 0.17 and 3.0 h. These values were similar to those obtained from the multiple-fraction experiment. These data clearly demonstrate that an acutely responding tissue is associated with a long T1/2 for the repair of SLD which is independent of the dose per fraction. For accelerated fractionation schedules in the clinic, using multiple fractions per day, these results suggest a need to control the intervals between fractions carefully and when appropriate to reduce the total dose to avoid serious normal-tissue complications.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Beta Particles</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biological effects of radiation</subject><subject>Dose fractionation</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation</subject><subject>Epidermis - pathology</subject><subject>Epidermis - radiation effects</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fractionation</subject><subject>Fractions</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Ionizing radiations</subject><subject>Kinetics</subject><subject>Musical intervals</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Radiation damage</subject><subject>Radiation dosage</subject><subject>Radiation Tolerance</subject><subject>Radiotherapy</subject><subject>Skin</subject><subject>Skin - pathology</subject><subject>Skin - radiation effects</subject><subject>Strontium</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Tissues, organs and organisms biophysics</subject><subject>Yttrium Radioisotopes</subject><issn>0033-7587</issn><issn>1938-5404</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMtOwzAQRS0EKuUhvgDJCyRWATtObIcdKq-KIlBb1pFfaV3SJLIdKv6eVI3KitWd0Zy5o7kAXGB0ExPEbknKspixAzDEGeFRmqDkEAwRIiRiKWfH4MT7Fep6TLMBGHCKMxQnQ7CZLw18tZUJVnlYF3BqGmHdtpq1sjRhKUo4FdqKYOsqGle6VUbDB7EWCwNtBT_sAs6-bHUHZ6HV1ni4sWEJ39oy2KY0cFwF4won1HZ_132L0p-Bo6ITc97rKfh8epyPXqLJ-_N4dD-JFCFJiIhMY67iAhNTSB5zKRJCM54apilFjDGSUKUzzanMUmUEZoxjKXnGsUoYp-QUXO98lau9d6bIG2fXwv3kGOXb5PI-uY683JFNK9dG77k-qm5-1c-FV6LsXqqU9Xuss6Kckz9s5UPt_r32CzWRgBE</recordid><startdate>19960501</startdate><enddate>19960501</enddate><creator>G. J. M. J. van den Aardweg</creator><creator>Hopewell, J. W.</creator><creator>Guttenberger, R.</creator><general>Radiation Research Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960501</creationdate><title>The Kinetics of Repair of Sublethal Radiation-Induced Damage in Pig Skin: Studies with Multiple Interfraction Intervals</title><author>G. J. M. J. van den Aardweg ; Hopewell, J. W. ; Guttenberger, R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-3b528c2f13efb828ba436985e7d660777346cd9d86b95cea17781bb8981c47863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Beta Particles</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biological effects of radiation</topic><topic>Dose fractionation</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation</topic><topic>Epidermis - pathology</topic><topic>Epidermis - radiation effects</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fractionation</topic><topic>Fractions</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Ionizing radiations</topic><topic>Kinetics</topic><topic>Musical intervals</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Radiation damage</topic><topic>Radiation dosage</topic><topic>Radiation Tolerance</topic><topic>Radiotherapy</topic><topic>Skin</topic><topic>Skin - pathology</topic><topic>Skin - radiation effects</topic><topic>Strontium</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Tissues, organs and organisms biophysics</topic><topic>Yttrium Radioisotopes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>G. J. M. J. van den Aardweg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hopewell, J. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guttenberger, R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Radiation research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>G. J. M. J. van den Aardweg</au><au>Hopewell, J. W.</au><au>Guttenberger, R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Kinetics of Repair of Sublethal Radiation-Induced Damage in Pig Skin: Studies with Multiple Interfraction Intervals</atitle><jtitle>Radiation research</jtitle><addtitle>Radiat Res</addtitle><date>1996-05-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>145</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>586</spage><epage>594</epage><pages>586-594</pages><issn>0033-7587</issn><eissn>1938-5404</eissn><coden>RAREAE</coden><abstract>The kinetics of the repair of radiation-induced sublethal damage (SLD) was studied for the epidermis of the pig. A total of either 7 or 14 interfraction intervals with incomplete repair was achieved by giving 28 fractions either as 7 × 2 fractions/day plus a top-up dose of 17 Gy (half tolerance) or as 14 × 2 fractions/day. The dose per fraction ranged from 1.96-4.82 Gy. A total of 9 intervals ranging from 0.17 h up to 8 h between fractions was used. The incidence of moist desquamation, as an estimate of acute epidermal response, was used as an end point to establish dose-effect relationships. The data were analyzed using either the incomplete repair model of Thames, assuming monoexponential repair kinetics, or a modified version of the incomplete repair model, assuming bi-exponential repair of sublethal damage. Both methods of analysis allowed for the longer overnight interval between fractions. Analysis assuming monoexponential repair gave a T1/2 of 0.74 h for the combined data, although there was a trend toward a longer half-time when only the longer interfraction intervals (>1.0 h) were used in the analysis. A further analysis using the modified version of an incomplete repair model gave a fast and a slow component of repair with significantly different half-times of 0.09 and 4.5 h, respectively. Varying the number of incomplete repair intervals by replacing half the number of fractions with a single half-tolerance top-up dose did not modify the kinetics of repair significantly, in terms of either the repair half-times or the proportion of repair associated with a fast and slow component. Reanalysis of data published previously for 3 and 4 fractions using the modified incomplete repair model again resulted in two components of repair, represented by the significantly different half-times of 0.17 and 3.0 h. These values were similar to those obtained from the multiple-fraction experiment. These data clearly demonstrate that an acutely responding tissue is associated with a long T1/2 for the repair of SLD which is independent of the dose per fraction. For accelerated fractionation schedules in the clinic, using multiple fractions per day, these results suggest a need to control the intervals between fractions carefully and when appropriate to reduce the total dose to avoid serious normal-tissue complications.</abstract><cop>Oak Brook, Il</cop><pub>Radiation Research Society</pub><pmid>8619024</pmid><doi>10.2307/3579277</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0033-7587 |
ispartof | Radiation research, 1996-05, Vol.145 (5), p.586-594 |
issn | 0033-7587 1938-5404 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_2307_3579277 |
source | MEDLINE; Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | Animals Beta Particles Biological and medical sciences Biological effects of radiation Dose fractionation Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation Epidermis - pathology Epidermis - radiation effects Female Fractionation Fractions Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Ionizing radiations Kinetics Musical intervals Probability Radiation damage Radiation dosage Radiation Tolerance Radiotherapy Skin Skin - pathology Skin - radiation effects Strontium Swine Time Factors Tissues, organs and organisms biophysics Yttrium Radioisotopes |
title | The Kinetics of Repair of Sublethal Radiation-Induced Damage in Pig Skin: Studies with Multiple Interfraction Intervals |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T18%3A31%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Kinetics%20of%20Repair%20of%20Sublethal%20Radiation-Induced%20Damage%20in%20Pig%20Skin:%20Studies%20with%20Multiple%20Interfraction%20Intervals&rft.jtitle=Radiation%20research&rft.au=G.%20J.%20M.%20J.%20van%20den%20Aardweg&rft.date=1996-05-01&rft.volume=145&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=586&rft.epage=594&rft.pages=586-594&rft.issn=0033-7587&rft.eissn=1938-5404&rft.coden=RAREAE&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/3579277&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E3579277%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/8619024&rft_jstor_id=3579277&rfr_iscdi=true |