Cost-Benefit Analysis in Criminal Law
This Article explores the prospects for integrating criminal law into the widespread trend elsewhere in the executive branch of using costbenefit analysis (CBA) to improve criminal justice policy making and enforcement practice. The Article describes an array of unnoticed and undervalued costs creat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | California law review 2004-03, Vol.92 (2), p.323-372 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 372 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 323 |
container_title | California law review |
container_volume | 92 |
creator | Brown, Darryl K. |
description | This Article explores the prospects for integrating criminal law into the widespread trend elsewhere in the executive branch of using costbenefit analysis (CBA) to improve criminal justice policy making and enforcement practice. The Article describes an array of unnoticed and undervalued costs created by America's unique and fairly recent commitment to severe incarceration policies. It then maps the challenges for employing CBA in criminal enforcement practice. Those challenges include CBA's own methodological and conceptual limitations, public choice problems created by the populist structure of criminal justice administration, constraints on CBA in criminal justice in light of theoretical commitments to retributivism, and practical limits to employing such a policy in the executive branch when legislatures are unwilling to reduce statutory punishment mandates. Despite these obstacles, the Article argues that a properly devised, CBA-based decision procedure-one that takes account of distributive and other non-quantifiable, qualitative concerns-is a promising avenue for rationalization and reform of state and federal criminal justice. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2307/3481427 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_2307_3481427</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><informt_id>10.3316/informit.T2024070400012890852195572</informt_id><jstor_id>3481427</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3481427</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-744482dbc2ac9eeb978d89fffd2ff2df9da70dc1d3353d820c12fc504956a1723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWKv4FxZRPK0mk6RJjnXxCwpeqteQ5qOmtE1Ntkj_vVu34MnT8M48M_PyInRJ8B1QLO4pk4SBOEIDohjUI87gGA0wxrImAOQUnZWy6CRhAg_QTZNKWz_4tQ-xrcZrs9yVWKq4rpocV7HT1cR8n6OTYJbFXxzqEL0_PU6bl3ry9vzajCe1pYq0tWCMSXAzC8Yq72dKSCdVCMFBCOCCckZgZ4mjlFMnAVsCwXLMFB8ZIoAO0VV_d5PT19aXVi_SNncmigbMCFESeAfd9pDNqZTsg950Vk3eaYL1PgJ9iKAjP3oyr2KrzTyWTauLN9l-6rgO6bed8ly7FPfLlJLR32AKGBgWmO3DAqmw5EAU578-r_vDi9Km_O__H2JNcqA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>204119825</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cost-Benefit Analysis in Criminal Law</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Brown, Darryl K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Brown, Darryl K.</creatorcontrib><description>This Article explores the prospects for integrating criminal law into the widespread trend elsewhere in the executive branch of using costbenefit analysis (CBA) to improve criminal justice policy making and enforcement practice. The Article describes an array of unnoticed and undervalued costs created by America's unique and fairly recent commitment to severe incarceration policies. It then maps the challenges for employing CBA in criminal enforcement practice. Those challenges include CBA's own methodological and conceptual limitations, public choice problems created by the populist structure of criminal justice administration, constraints on CBA in criminal justice in light of theoretical commitments to retributivism, and practical limits to employing such a policy in the executive branch when legislatures are unwilling to reduce statutory punishment mandates. Despite these obstacles, the Article argues that a properly devised, CBA-based decision procedure-one that takes account of distributive and other non-quantifiable, qualitative concerns-is a promising avenue for rationalization and reform of state and federal criminal justice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-1221</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1942-6542</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/3481427</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CLARDJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berkeley CA United States of America: School of Law, University of California, Berkeley</publisher><subject>Administrative agencies ; Communities ; Cost benefit analysis ; Crime prevention ; Criminal justice ; Criminal justice, Administration of ; Criminal law ; Criminal prosecution ; Criminal punishment ; Criminals ; Imprisonment ; Law enforcement ; Legal reform ; Policy making ; Prosecuting attorneys ; Statutory law</subject><ispartof>California law review, 2004-03, Vol.92 (2), p.323-372</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2004 California Law Review, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright University of California Press Mar 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-744482dbc2ac9eeb978d89fffd2ff2df9da70dc1d3353d820c12fc504956a1723</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3481427$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3481427$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27903,27904,57995,58228</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brown, Darryl K.</creatorcontrib><title>Cost-Benefit Analysis in Criminal Law</title><title>California law review</title><description>This Article explores the prospects for integrating criminal law into the widespread trend elsewhere in the executive branch of using costbenefit analysis (CBA) to improve criminal justice policy making and enforcement practice. The Article describes an array of unnoticed and undervalued costs created by America's unique and fairly recent commitment to severe incarceration policies. It then maps the challenges for employing CBA in criminal enforcement practice. Those challenges include CBA's own methodological and conceptual limitations, public choice problems created by the populist structure of criminal justice administration, constraints on CBA in criminal justice in light of theoretical commitments to retributivism, and practical limits to employing such a policy in the executive branch when legislatures are unwilling to reduce statutory punishment mandates. Despite these obstacles, the Article argues that a properly devised, CBA-based decision procedure-one that takes account of distributive and other non-quantifiable, qualitative concerns-is a promising avenue for rationalization and reform of state and federal criminal justice.</description><subject>Administrative agencies</subject><subject>Communities</subject><subject>Cost benefit analysis</subject><subject>Crime prevention</subject><subject>Criminal justice</subject><subject>Criminal justice, Administration of</subject><subject>Criminal law</subject><subject>Criminal prosecution</subject><subject>Criminal punishment</subject><subject>Criminals</subject><subject>Imprisonment</subject><subject>Law enforcement</subject><subject>Legal reform</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Prosecuting attorneys</subject><subject>Statutory law</subject><issn>0008-1221</issn><issn>1942-6542</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWKv4FxZRPK0mk6RJjnXxCwpeqteQ5qOmtE1Ntkj_vVu34MnT8M48M_PyInRJ8B1QLO4pk4SBOEIDohjUI87gGA0wxrImAOQUnZWy6CRhAg_QTZNKWz_4tQ-xrcZrs9yVWKq4rpocV7HT1cR8n6OTYJbFXxzqEL0_PU6bl3ry9vzajCe1pYq0tWCMSXAzC8Yq72dKSCdVCMFBCOCCckZgZ4mjlFMnAVsCwXLMFB8ZIoAO0VV_d5PT19aXVi_SNncmigbMCFESeAfd9pDNqZTsg950Vk3eaYL1PgJ9iKAjP3oyr2KrzTyWTauLN9l-6rgO6bed8ly7FPfLlJLR32AKGBgWmO3DAqmw5EAU578-r_vDi9Km_O__H2JNcqA</recordid><startdate>20040301</startdate><enddate>20040301</enddate><creator>Brown, Darryl K.</creator><general>School of Law, University of California, Berkeley</general><general>California Law Review Inc</general><general>University of California - Berkeley, School of Law</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040301</creationdate><title>Cost-Benefit Analysis in Criminal Law</title><author>Brown, Darryl K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-744482dbc2ac9eeb978d89fffd2ff2df9da70dc1d3353d820c12fc504956a1723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Administrative agencies</topic><topic>Communities</topic><topic>Cost benefit analysis</topic><topic>Crime prevention</topic><topic>Criminal justice</topic><topic>Criminal justice, Administration of</topic><topic>Criminal law</topic><topic>Criminal prosecution</topic><topic>Criminal punishment</topic><topic>Criminals</topic><topic>Imprisonment</topic><topic>Law enforcement</topic><topic>Legal reform</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Prosecuting attorneys</topic><topic>Statutory law</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brown, Darryl K.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>California law review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brown, Darryl K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cost-Benefit Analysis in Criminal Law</atitle><jtitle>California law review</jtitle><date>2004-03-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>92</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>323</spage><epage>372</epage><pages>323-372</pages><issn>0008-1221</issn><eissn>1942-6542</eissn><coden>CLARDJ</coden><abstract>This Article explores the prospects for integrating criminal law into the widespread trend elsewhere in the executive branch of using costbenefit analysis (CBA) to improve criminal justice policy making and enforcement practice. The Article describes an array of unnoticed and undervalued costs created by America's unique and fairly recent commitment to severe incarceration policies. It then maps the challenges for employing CBA in criminal enforcement practice. Those challenges include CBA's own methodological and conceptual limitations, public choice problems created by the populist structure of criminal justice administration, constraints on CBA in criminal justice in light of theoretical commitments to retributivism, and practical limits to employing such a policy in the executive branch when legislatures are unwilling to reduce statutory punishment mandates. Despite these obstacles, the Article argues that a properly devised, CBA-based decision procedure-one that takes account of distributive and other non-quantifiable, qualitative concerns-is a promising avenue for rationalization and reform of state and federal criminal justice.</abstract><cop>Berkeley CA United States of America</cop><pub>School of Law, University of California, Berkeley</pub><doi>10.2307/3481427</doi><tpages>50</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0008-1221 |
ispartof | California law review, 2004-03, Vol.92 (2), p.323-372 |
issn | 0008-1221 1942-6542 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_2307_3481427 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Business Source Complete |
subjects | Administrative agencies Communities Cost benefit analysis Crime prevention Criminal justice Criminal justice, Administration of Criminal law Criminal prosecution Criminal punishment Criminals Imprisonment Law enforcement Legal reform Policy making Prosecuting attorneys Statutory law |
title | Cost-Benefit Analysis in Criminal Law |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T04%3A27%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cost-Benefit%20Analysis%20in%20Criminal%20Law&rft.jtitle=California%20law%20review&rft.au=Brown,%20Darryl%20K.&rft.date=2004-03-01&rft.volume=92&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=323&rft.epage=372&rft.pages=323-372&rft.issn=0008-1221&rft.eissn=1942-6542&rft.coden=CLARDJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/3481427&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E3481427%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=204119825&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_informt_id=10.3316/informit.T2024070400012890852195572&rft_jstor_id=3481427&rfr_iscdi=true |