Cost-Benefit Analysis in Criminal Law

This Article explores the prospects for integrating criminal law into the widespread trend elsewhere in the executive branch of using costbenefit analysis (CBA) to improve criminal justice policy making and enforcement practice. The Article describes an array of unnoticed and undervalued costs creat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:California law review 2004-03, Vol.92 (2), p.323-372
1. Verfasser: Brown, Darryl K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 372
container_issue 2
container_start_page 323
container_title California law review
container_volume 92
creator Brown, Darryl K.
description This Article explores the prospects for integrating criminal law into the widespread trend elsewhere in the executive branch of using costbenefit analysis (CBA) to improve criminal justice policy making and enforcement practice. The Article describes an array of unnoticed and undervalued costs created by America's unique and fairly recent commitment to severe incarceration policies. It then maps the challenges for employing CBA in criminal enforcement practice. Those challenges include CBA's own methodological and conceptual limitations, public choice problems created by the populist structure of criminal justice administration, constraints on CBA in criminal justice in light of theoretical commitments to retributivism, and practical limits to employing such a policy in the executive branch when legislatures are unwilling to reduce statutory punishment mandates. Despite these obstacles, the Article argues that a properly devised, CBA-based decision procedure-one that takes account of distributive and other non-quantifiable, qualitative concerns-is a promising avenue for rationalization and reform of state and federal criminal justice.
doi_str_mv 10.2307/3481427
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_2307_3481427</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><informt_id>10.3316/informit.T2024070400012890852195572</informt_id><jstor_id>3481427</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3481427</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-744482dbc2ac9eeb978d89fffd2ff2df9da70dc1d3353d820c12fc504956a1723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWKv4FxZRPK0mk6RJjnXxCwpeqteQ5qOmtE1Ntkj_vVu34MnT8M48M_PyInRJ8B1QLO4pk4SBOEIDohjUI87gGA0wxrImAOQUnZWy6CRhAg_QTZNKWz_4tQ-xrcZrs9yVWKq4rpocV7HT1cR8n6OTYJbFXxzqEL0_PU6bl3ry9vzajCe1pYq0tWCMSXAzC8Yq72dKSCdVCMFBCOCCckZgZ4mjlFMnAVsCwXLMFB8ZIoAO0VV_d5PT19aXVi_SNncmigbMCFESeAfd9pDNqZTsg950Vk3eaYL1PgJ9iKAjP3oyr2KrzTyWTauLN9l-6rgO6bed8ly7FPfLlJLR32AKGBgWmO3DAqmw5EAU578-r_vDi9Km_O__H2JNcqA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>204119825</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cost-Benefit Analysis in Criminal Law</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Brown, Darryl K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Brown, Darryl K.</creatorcontrib><description>This Article explores the prospects for integrating criminal law into the widespread trend elsewhere in the executive branch of using costbenefit analysis (CBA) to improve criminal justice policy making and enforcement practice. The Article describes an array of unnoticed and undervalued costs created by America's unique and fairly recent commitment to severe incarceration policies. It then maps the challenges for employing CBA in criminal enforcement practice. Those challenges include CBA's own methodological and conceptual limitations, public choice problems created by the populist structure of criminal justice administration, constraints on CBA in criminal justice in light of theoretical commitments to retributivism, and practical limits to employing such a policy in the executive branch when legislatures are unwilling to reduce statutory punishment mandates. Despite these obstacles, the Article argues that a properly devised, CBA-based decision procedure-one that takes account of distributive and other non-quantifiable, qualitative concerns-is a promising avenue for rationalization and reform of state and federal criminal justice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-1221</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1942-6542</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/3481427</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CLARDJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berkeley CA United States of America: School of Law, University of California, Berkeley</publisher><subject>Administrative agencies ; Communities ; Cost benefit analysis ; Crime prevention ; Criminal justice ; Criminal justice, Administration of ; Criminal law ; Criminal prosecution ; Criminal punishment ; Criminals ; Imprisonment ; Law enforcement ; Legal reform ; Policy making ; Prosecuting attorneys ; Statutory law</subject><ispartof>California law review, 2004-03, Vol.92 (2), p.323-372</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2004 California Law Review, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright University of California Press Mar 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-744482dbc2ac9eeb978d89fffd2ff2df9da70dc1d3353d820c12fc504956a1723</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3481427$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3481427$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27903,27904,57995,58228</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brown, Darryl K.</creatorcontrib><title>Cost-Benefit Analysis in Criminal Law</title><title>California law review</title><description>This Article explores the prospects for integrating criminal law into the widespread trend elsewhere in the executive branch of using costbenefit analysis (CBA) to improve criminal justice policy making and enforcement practice. The Article describes an array of unnoticed and undervalued costs created by America's unique and fairly recent commitment to severe incarceration policies. It then maps the challenges for employing CBA in criminal enforcement practice. Those challenges include CBA's own methodological and conceptual limitations, public choice problems created by the populist structure of criminal justice administration, constraints on CBA in criminal justice in light of theoretical commitments to retributivism, and practical limits to employing such a policy in the executive branch when legislatures are unwilling to reduce statutory punishment mandates. Despite these obstacles, the Article argues that a properly devised, CBA-based decision procedure-one that takes account of distributive and other non-quantifiable, qualitative concerns-is a promising avenue for rationalization and reform of state and federal criminal justice.</description><subject>Administrative agencies</subject><subject>Communities</subject><subject>Cost benefit analysis</subject><subject>Crime prevention</subject><subject>Criminal justice</subject><subject>Criminal justice, Administration of</subject><subject>Criminal law</subject><subject>Criminal prosecution</subject><subject>Criminal punishment</subject><subject>Criminals</subject><subject>Imprisonment</subject><subject>Law enforcement</subject><subject>Legal reform</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Prosecuting attorneys</subject><subject>Statutory law</subject><issn>0008-1221</issn><issn>1942-6542</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWKv4FxZRPK0mk6RJjnXxCwpeqteQ5qOmtE1Ntkj_vVu34MnT8M48M_PyInRJ8B1QLO4pk4SBOEIDohjUI87gGA0wxrImAOQUnZWy6CRhAg_QTZNKWz_4tQ-xrcZrs9yVWKq4rpocV7HT1cR8n6OTYJbFXxzqEL0_PU6bl3ry9vzajCe1pYq0tWCMSXAzC8Yq72dKSCdVCMFBCOCCckZgZ4mjlFMnAVsCwXLMFB8ZIoAO0VV_d5PT19aXVi_SNncmigbMCFESeAfd9pDNqZTsg950Vk3eaYL1PgJ9iKAjP3oyr2KrzTyWTauLN9l-6rgO6bed8ly7FPfLlJLR32AKGBgWmO3DAqmw5EAU578-r_vDi9Km_O__H2JNcqA</recordid><startdate>20040301</startdate><enddate>20040301</enddate><creator>Brown, Darryl K.</creator><general>School of Law, University of California, Berkeley</general><general>California Law Review Inc</general><general>University of California - Berkeley, School of Law</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040301</creationdate><title>Cost-Benefit Analysis in Criminal Law</title><author>Brown, Darryl K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-744482dbc2ac9eeb978d89fffd2ff2df9da70dc1d3353d820c12fc504956a1723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Administrative agencies</topic><topic>Communities</topic><topic>Cost benefit analysis</topic><topic>Crime prevention</topic><topic>Criminal justice</topic><topic>Criminal justice, Administration of</topic><topic>Criminal law</topic><topic>Criminal prosecution</topic><topic>Criminal punishment</topic><topic>Criminals</topic><topic>Imprisonment</topic><topic>Law enforcement</topic><topic>Legal reform</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Prosecuting attorneys</topic><topic>Statutory law</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brown, Darryl K.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>California law review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brown, Darryl K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cost-Benefit Analysis in Criminal Law</atitle><jtitle>California law review</jtitle><date>2004-03-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>92</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>323</spage><epage>372</epage><pages>323-372</pages><issn>0008-1221</issn><eissn>1942-6542</eissn><coden>CLARDJ</coden><abstract>This Article explores the prospects for integrating criminal law into the widespread trend elsewhere in the executive branch of using costbenefit analysis (CBA) to improve criminal justice policy making and enforcement practice. The Article describes an array of unnoticed and undervalued costs created by America's unique and fairly recent commitment to severe incarceration policies. It then maps the challenges for employing CBA in criminal enforcement practice. Those challenges include CBA's own methodological and conceptual limitations, public choice problems created by the populist structure of criminal justice administration, constraints on CBA in criminal justice in light of theoretical commitments to retributivism, and practical limits to employing such a policy in the executive branch when legislatures are unwilling to reduce statutory punishment mandates. Despite these obstacles, the Article argues that a properly devised, CBA-based decision procedure-one that takes account of distributive and other non-quantifiable, qualitative concerns-is a promising avenue for rationalization and reform of state and federal criminal justice.</abstract><cop>Berkeley CA United States of America</cop><pub>School of Law, University of California, Berkeley</pub><doi>10.2307/3481427</doi><tpages>50</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0008-1221
ispartof California law review, 2004-03, Vol.92 (2), p.323-372
issn 0008-1221
1942-6542
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_2307_3481427
source Jstor Complete Legacy; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Business Source Complete
subjects Administrative agencies
Communities
Cost benefit analysis
Crime prevention
Criminal justice
Criminal justice, Administration of
Criminal law
Criminal prosecution
Criminal punishment
Criminals
Imprisonment
Law enforcement
Legal reform
Policy making
Prosecuting attorneys
Statutory law
title Cost-Benefit Analysis in Criminal Law
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T04%3A27%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cost-Benefit%20Analysis%20in%20Criminal%20Law&rft.jtitle=California%20law%20review&rft.au=Brown,%20Darryl%20K.&rft.date=2004-03-01&rft.volume=92&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=323&rft.epage=372&rft.pages=323-372&rft.issn=0008-1221&rft.eissn=1942-6542&rft.coden=CLARDJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/3481427&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E3481427%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=204119825&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_informt_id=10.3316/informit.T2024070400012890852195572&rft_jstor_id=3481427&rfr_iscdi=true