Environmental Dispute Resolution and Hazardous Waste Cleanups: A CautionaryTale of Policy Implementation
New York State experimented with replacing their litigation-oriented system for achieving toxic dump site cleanup with one promising to lower transaction costs through alternative dispute resolution. Our analysis of outcomes is informed by three generations of implementation work focusing on (1) the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of policy analysis and management 1991-04, Vol.10 (2), p.204-221 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 221 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 204 |
container_title | Journal of policy analysis and management |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Nakamura, Robert T. Church, Thomas W. Cooper, Phillip J. |
description | New York State experimented with replacing their litigation-oriented system for achieving toxic dump site cleanup with one promising to lower transaction costs through alternative dispute resolution. Our analysis of outcomes is informed by three generations of implementation work focusing on (1) the motivations and incentives shaping individual behavior, (2) the larger organizational and political factors associated with variation across cases, and (3) the generic properties of policy implements. This mosaic approach to explanation produces, we believe, a more lifelike picture of use to policy makers for understanding the dynamic and interrelated nature of their choices. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2307/3325172 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_2307_3325172</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3325172</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3325172</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c992-2c11faca0a117925b801b82be607c0428c03a4759b98600239b4e5c8f5bb01883</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFLwzAYhoMoOKf4F3IQPFW_JEuTeBt1usFAkYHH8jVLsSNrStIK89e7uV09vYf34eHlJeSWwQMXoB6F4JIpfkZGTHLI8lzrczICrvJMK2EuyVVKGwCQYNiIfM3a7yaGduvaHj19blI39I5-uBT80Dehpdiu6Rx_MK7DkOgnpn1deIft0KUnOqUF_nEYdyv0joaavgff2B1dbDvv_ryH_ppc1OiTuznlmKxeZqtini3fXhfFdJlZY3jGLWM1WgRkTBkuKw2s0rxyOSgLE64tCJwoaSqjcwAuTDVx0upaVhUwrcWY3B-1NoaUoqvLLjbb_biSQXn4pzz9syfvjuQm9SH-i_0CBj5jMw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Environmental Dispute Resolution and Hazardous Waste Cleanups: A CautionaryTale of Policy Implementation</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Nakamura, Robert T. ; Church, Thomas W. ; Cooper, Phillip J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Nakamura, Robert T. ; Church, Thomas W. ; Cooper, Phillip J.</creatorcontrib><description>New York State experimented with replacing their litigation-oriented system for achieving toxic dump site cleanup with one promising to lower transaction costs through alternative dispute resolution. Our analysis of outcomes is informed by three generations of implementation work focusing on (1) the motivations and incentives shaping individual behavior, (2) the larger organizational and political factors associated with variation across cases, and (3) the generic properties of policy implements. This mosaic approach to explanation produces, we believe, a more lifelike picture of use to policy makers for understanding the dynamic and interrelated nature of their choices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0276-8739</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-6688</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/3325172</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Alternative dispute resolution ; Attorneys general ; Dispute Resolution ; Environmental law ; Environmental policy ; Hazardous waste ; Legal liability ; Litigation ; Mediation ; Public policy ; Several liability</subject><ispartof>Journal of policy analysis and management, 1991-04, Vol.10 (2), p.204-221</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1991 Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c992-2c11faca0a117925b801b82be607c0428c03a4759b98600239b4e5c8f5bb01883</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3325172$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3325172$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nakamura, Robert T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Church, Thomas W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, Phillip J.</creatorcontrib><title>Environmental Dispute Resolution and Hazardous Waste Cleanups: A CautionaryTale of Policy Implementation</title><title>Journal of policy analysis and management</title><description>New York State experimented with replacing their litigation-oriented system for achieving toxic dump site cleanup with one promising to lower transaction costs through alternative dispute resolution. Our analysis of outcomes is informed by three generations of implementation work focusing on (1) the motivations and incentives shaping individual behavior, (2) the larger organizational and political factors associated with variation across cases, and (3) the generic properties of policy implements. This mosaic approach to explanation produces, we believe, a more lifelike picture of use to policy makers for understanding the dynamic and interrelated nature of their choices.</description><subject>Alternative dispute resolution</subject><subject>Attorneys general</subject><subject>Dispute Resolution</subject><subject>Environmental law</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Hazardous waste</subject><subject>Legal liability</subject><subject>Litigation</subject><subject>Mediation</subject><subject>Public policy</subject><subject>Several liability</subject><issn>0276-8739</issn><issn>1520-6688</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1991</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEFLwzAYhoMoOKf4F3IQPFW_JEuTeBt1usFAkYHH8jVLsSNrStIK89e7uV09vYf34eHlJeSWwQMXoB6F4JIpfkZGTHLI8lzrczICrvJMK2EuyVVKGwCQYNiIfM3a7yaGduvaHj19blI39I5-uBT80Dehpdiu6Rx_MK7DkOgnpn1deIft0KUnOqUF_nEYdyv0joaavgff2B1dbDvv_ryH_ppc1OiTuznlmKxeZqtini3fXhfFdJlZY3jGLWM1WgRkTBkuKw2s0rxyOSgLE64tCJwoaSqjcwAuTDVx0upaVhUwrcWY3B-1NoaUoqvLLjbb_biSQXn4pzz9syfvjuQm9SH-i_0CBj5jMw</recordid><startdate>19910401</startdate><enddate>19910401</enddate><creator>Nakamura, Robert T.</creator><creator>Church, Thomas W.</creator><creator>Cooper, Phillip J.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19910401</creationdate><title>Environmental Dispute Resolution and Hazardous Waste Cleanups: A CautionaryTale of Policy Implementation</title><author>Nakamura, Robert T. ; Church, Thomas W. ; Cooper, Phillip J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c992-2c11faca0a117925b801b82be607c0428c03a4759b98600239b4e5c8f5bb01883</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1991</creationdate><topic>Alternative dispute resolution</topic><topic>Attorneys general</topic><topic>Dispute Resolution</topic><topic>Environmental law</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Hazardous waste</topic><topic>Legal liability</topic><topic>Litigation</topic><topic>Mediation</topic><topic>Public policy</topic><topic>Several liability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nakamura, Robert T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Church, Thomas W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, Phillip J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of policy analysis and management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nakamura, Robert T.</au><au>Church, Thomas W.</au><au>Cooper, Phillip J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Environmental Dispute Resolution and Hazardous Waste Cleanups: A CautionaryTale of Policy Implementation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of policy analysis and management</jtitle><date>1991-04-01</date><risdate>1991</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>204</spage><epage>221</epage><pages>204-221</pages><issn>0276-8739</issn><eissn>1520-6688</eissn><abstract>New York State experimented with replacing their litigation-oriented system for achieving toxic dump site cleanup with one promising to lower transaction costs through alternative dispute resolution. Our analysis of outcomes is informed by three generations of implementation work focusing on (1) the motivations and incentives shaping individual behavior, (2) the larger organizational and political factors associated with variation across cases, and (3) the generic properties of policy implements. This mosaic approach to explanation produces, we believe, a more lifelike picture of use to policy makers for understanding the dynamic and interrelated nature of their choices.</abstract><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.2307/3325172</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0276-8739 |
ispartof | Journal of policy analysis and management, 1991-04, Vol.10 (2), p.204-221 |
issn | 0276-8739 1520-6688 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_2307_3325172 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Business Source Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Alternative dispute resolution Attorneys general Dispute Resolution Environmental law Environmental policy Hazardous waste Legal liability Litigation Mediation Public policy Several liability |
title | Environmental Dispute Resolution and Hazardous Waste Cleanups: A CautionaryTale of Policy Implementation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T21%3A29%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Environmental%20Dispute%20Resolution%20and%20Hazardous%20Waste%20Cleanups:%20A%20CautionaryTale%20of%20Policy%20Implementation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20policy%20analysis%20and%20management&rft.au=Nakamura,%20Robert%20T.&rft.date=1991-04-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=204&rft.epage=221&rft.pages=204-221&rft.issn=0276-8739&rft.eissn=1520-6688&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/3325172&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E3325172%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3325172&rfr_iscdi=true |