Recursive categoricity and persistence

This paper is concerned with recursive structures and the persistance of an effective notion of categoricity. The terminology and notational conventions are standard. We will devote the rest of this paragraph to a cursory review of some of the assumed conventions. If θ is a formula, then θ k denotes...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of symbolic logic 1986-06, Vol.51 (2), p.430-434
1. Verfasser: Millar, Terrence
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 434
container_issue 2
container_start_page 430
container_title The Journal of symbolic logic
container_volume 51
creator Millar, Terrence
description This paper is concerned with recursive structures and the persistance of an effective notion of categoricity. The terminology and notational conventions are standard. We will devote the rest of this paragraph to a cursory review of some of the assumed conventions. If θ is a formula, then θ k denotes θ if k is zero, and ¬ θ if k is one. If A is a sequence with domain a subset of ω , then A ∣ n denotes the sequence obtained by restricting the domain of A to n . For an effective first order language L , let { c i ∣ i < ω } be distinct new constants, and let { θ i ∣ i < ω } be an effective enumeration of all sentences in the language L ∪ { c i ∣ j < ω }. An infinite L-structure is recursive iff it has universe ω and the set is recursive, where c n is interpreted by n . In general we say that a set of formulas is recursive if the set of its indices with respect to an enumeration such as above is recursive. The ∃-diagram of a structure is recursive if the structure is recursive and the set and θ i is an existential sentence} is also recursive. The definition of “the ∀∃-diagram of is recursive” is similar.
doi_str_mv 10.2307/2274066
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_2307_2274066</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_2307_2274066</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c155t-9925cce90c8657fb0311a00f23f63dc254864af1bb6bf1436215b1b97dfb75573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj8tKBDEQAIMoOK7iL8xJT9HuJJ3HURZfsCCInoekJ5ER3V2SUdi_V3FPdSgoKCHOEa6UBnetlDNg7YHoMBgtyXt7KDoApaTxqI7FSWvvAEDB-E5cPGf-qm36zj3HOb9t6sTTvOvjeuy3-Ve0Oa85n4qjEj9aPttzIV7vbl-WD3L1dP-4vFlJRqJZhqCIOQdgb8mVBBoxAhSli9UjKzLemlgwJZsKGm0VUsIU3FiSI3J6IS7_u1w3rdVchm2dPmPdDQjD396w39M_xotAbA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Recursive categoricity and persistence</title><source>JSTOR Mathematics &amp; Statistics</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Millar, Terrence</creator><creatorcontrib>Millar, Terrence</creatorcontrib><description>This paper is concerned with recursive structures and the persistance of an effective notion of categoricity. The terminology and notational conventions are standard. We will devote the rest of this paragraph to a cursory review of some of the assumed conventions. If θ is a formula, then θ k denotes θ if k is zero, and ¬ θ if k is one. If A is a sequence with domain a subset of ω , then A ∣ n denotes the sequence obtained by restricting the domain of A to n . For an effective first order language L , let { c i ∣ i &lt; ω } be distinct new constants, and let { θ i ∣ i &lt; ω } be an effective enumeration of all sentences in the language L ∪ { c i ∣ j &lt; ω }. An infinite L-structure is recursive iff it has universe ω and the set is recursive, where c n is interpreted by n . In general we say that a set of formulas is recursive if the set of its indices with respect to an enumeration such as above is recursive. The ∃-diagram of a structure is recursive if the structure is recursive and the set and θ i is an existential sentence} is also recursive. The definition of “the ∀∃-diagram of is recursive” is similar.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-4812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-5886</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/2274066</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>The Journal of symbolic logic, 1986-06, Vol.51 (2), p.430-434</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c155t-9925cce90c8657fb0311a00f23f63dc254864af1bb6bf1436215b1b97dfb75573</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Millar, Terrence</creatorcontrib><title>Recursive categoricity and persistence</title><title>The Journal of symbolic logic</title><description>This paper is concerned with recursive structures and the persistance of an effective notion of categoricity. The terminology and notational conventions are standard. We will devote the rest of this paragraph to a cursory review of some of the assumed conventions. If θ is a formula, then θ k denotes θ if k is zero, and ¬ θ if k is one. If A is a sequence with domain a subset of ω , then A ∣ n denotes the sequence obtained by restricting the domain of A to n . For an effective first order language L , let { c i ∣ i &lt; ω } be distinct new constants, and let { θ i ∣ i &lt; ω } be an effective enumeration of all sentences in the language L ∪ { c i ∣ j &lt; ω }. An infinite L-structure is recursive iff it has universe ω and the set is recursive, where c n is interpreted by n . In general we say that a set of formulas is recursive if the set of its indices with respect to an enumeration such as above is recursive. The ∃-diagram of a structure is recursive if the structure is recursive and the set and θ i is an existential sentence} is also recursive. The definition of “the ∀∃-diagram of is recursive” is similar.</description><issn>0022-4812</issn><issn>1943-5886</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1986</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotj8tKBDEQAIMoOK7iL8xJT9HuJJ3HURZfsCCInoekJ5ER3V2SUdi_V3FPdSgoKCHOEa6UBnetlDNg7YHoMBgtyXt7KDoApaTxqI7FSWvvAEDB-E5cPGf-qm36zj3HOb9t6sTTvOvjeuy3-Ve0Oa85n4qjEj9aPttzIV7vbl-WD3L1dP-4vFlJRqJZhqCIOQdgb8mVBBoxAhSli9UjKzLemlgwJZsKGm0VUsIU3FiSI3J6IS7_u1w3rdVchm2dPmPdDQjD396w39M_xotAbA</recordid><startdate>198606</startdate><enddate>198606</enddate><creator>Millar, Terrence</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198606</creationdate><title>Recursive categoricity and persistence</title><author>Millar, Terrence</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c155t-9925cce90c8657fb0311a00f23f63dc254864af1bb6bf1436215b1b97dfb75573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1986</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Millar, Terrence</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Journal of symbolic logic</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Millar, Terrence</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Recursive categoricity and persistence</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of symbolic logic</jtitle><date>1986-06</date><risdate>1986</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>430</spage><epage>434</epage><pages>430-434</pages><issn>0022-4812</issn><eissn>1943-5886</eissn><abstract>This paper is concerned with recursive structures and the persistance of an effective notion of categoricity. The terminology and notational conventions are standard. We will devote the rest of this paragraph to a cursory review of some of the assumed conventions. If θ is a formula, then θ k denotes θ if k is zero, and ¬ θ if k is one. If A is a sequence with domain a subset of ω , then A ∣ n denotes the sequence obtained by restricting the domain of A to n . For an effective first order language L , let { c i ∣ i &lt; ω } be distinct new constants, and let { θ i ∣ i &lt; ω } be an effective enumeration of all sentences in the language L ∪ { c i ∣ j &lt; ω }. An infinite L-structure is recursive iff it has universe ω and the set is recursive, where c n is interpreted by n . In general we say that a set of formulas is recursive if the set of its indices with respect to an enumeration such as above is recursive. The ∃-diagram of a structure is recursive if the structure is recursive and the set and θ i is an existential sentence} is also recursive. The definition of “the ∀∃-diagram of is recursive” is similar.</abstract><doi>10.2307/2274066</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-4812
ispartof The Journal of symbolic logic, 1986-06, Vol.51 (2), p.430-434
issn 0022-4812
1943-5886
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_2307_2274066
source JSTOR Mathematics & Statistics; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
title Recursive categoricity and persistence
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T02%3A39%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Recursive%20categoricity%20and%20persistence&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20symbolic%20logic&rft.au=Millar,%20Terrence&rft.date=1986-06&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=430&rft.epage=434&rft.pages=430-434&rft.issn=0022-4812&rft.eissn=1943-5886&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/2274066&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_2307_2274066%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true