A Multiyear Lattice Sampling Design for Maryland-Wide Fish Abundance Estimation

A latticed, multiyear, multistaged sampling design developed for the Maryland Biological Stream Survey (MBSS) enabled the Maryland Department of Natural Resources to make design-based, Maryland-wide estimates of fish abundance in wadable nontidal streams. Because budget and labor constraints prohibi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of agricultural, biological, and environmental statistics biological, and environmental statistics, 1999-12, Vol.4 (4), p.443-455
Hauptverfasser: Heimbuch, Douglas G., Seibel, John C., Wilson, Harold T., Kazyak, Paul F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 455
container_issue 4
container_start_page 443
container_title Journal of agricultural, biological, and environmental statistics
container_volume 4
creator Heimbuch, Douglas G.
Seibel, John C.
Wilson, Harold T.
Kazyak, Paul F.
description A latticed, multiyear, multistaged sampling design developed for the Maryland Biological Stream Survey (MBSS) enabled the Maryland Department of Natural Resources to make design-based, Maryland-wide estimates of fish abundance in wadable nontidal streams. Because budget and labor constraints prohibited completing the field work required for statewide estimates within a single year, a 3-year sampling program was designed. A sampling lattice was constructed with the 3 years of sampling (1995, 1996, 1997) as the columns and three regions within the state of Maryland (eastern, central, and western) as the rows. Each one of the three regions consisted of six river basins, and the primary sampling units (PSUs) were defined as the combinations of these basins with the 3 years for a total of 54 PSUs. Two basins from each region were sampled in each year so that all basins were sampled once. In addition, one basin within each region was sampled in a second year under a restricted randomized design to complete the first stage of sampling. This additional sample insured that all joint inclusion probabilities of primary sampling units were nonzero. In all 3 years, the second stage consisted of simple random samples of reaches proportionally selected within strata defined by Strahler order. However, the MBSS's latticed sampling design combined with estimators based on the Horvitz-Thompson method would allow the calculation of statewide totals using different sampling designs within PSUs. Two species of fish, creek chub and largemouth bass, are used to illustrate the approach.
doi_str_mv 10.2307/1400501
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_2307_1400501</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>1400501</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>1400501</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c273t-897dfc22f94c9c56024331bac559a7fd583bbfcee584096403a0344926c16fe53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkE1LAzEQhoMoWKv4BzzkIHhanXxtNsdSWxVaelDxuGSzSU3Z7pYkPfTfG2mhpxmYZx5eXoTuCTxTBvKFcAAB5AKNiGCyoKVil3mHShSSEHmNbmLcABBWAh2h1QQv913yB6sDXuiUvLH4U293ne_X-NVGv-6xGwJe6nDodN8WP761eO7jL540-77VfX6YxeS3Ovmhv0VXTnfR3p3mGH3PZ1_T92KxevuYThaFoZKlolKydYZSp7hRRuQonDHSaCOE0tK1omJN44y1ouKgSg5MA-Nc0dKQ0lnBxujp6DVhiDFYV-9CjhAONYH6v4f61EMmH4_kTkejOxdyYh_POBVZW2Xs4YhtYhrC-Xyy_AEgnmQh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Multiyear Lattice Sampling Design for Maryland-Wide Fish Abundance Estimation</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>JSTOR Mathematics &amp; Statistics</source><creator>Heimbuch, Douglas G. ; Seibel, John C. ; Wilson, Harold T. ; Kazyak, Paul F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Heimbuch, Douglas G. ; Seibel, John C. ; Wilson, Harold T. ; Kazyak, Paul F.</creatorcontrib><description>A latticed, multiyear, multistaged sampling design developed for the Maryland Biological Stream Survey (MBSS) enabled the Maryland Department of Natural Resources to make design-based, Maryland-wide estimates of fish abundance in wadable nontidal streams. Because budget and labor constraints prohibited completing the field work required for statewide estimates within a single year, a 3-year sampling program was designed. A sampling lattice was constructed with the 3 years of sampling (1995, 1996, 1997) as the columns and three regions within the state of Maryland (eastern, central, and western) as the rows. Each one of the three regions consisted of six river basins, and the primary sampling units (PSUs) were defined as the combinations of these basins with the 3 years for a total of 54 PSUs. Two basins from each region were sampled in each year so that all basins were sampled once. In addition, one basin within each region was sampled in a second year under a restricted randomized design to complete the first stage of sampling. This additional sample insured that all joint inclusion probabilities of primary sampling units were nonzero. In all 3 years, the second stage consisted of simple random samples of reaches proportionally selected within strata defined by Strahler order. However, the MBSS's latticed sampling design combined with estimators based on the Horvitz-Thompson method would allow the calculation of statewide totals using different sampling designs within PSUs. Two species of fish, creek chub and largemouth bass, are used to illustrate the approach.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1085-7117</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-2693</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/1400501</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Statistical Association and the International Biometric Society</publisher><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Confidence interval ; Creeks ; Estimation methods ; Estimators ; Fish ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects. Techniques ; Inclusion bodies ; Methods and techniques (sampling, tagging, trapping, modelling...) ; Species ; Streams ; Survey design ; Survey sampling</subject><ispartof>Journal of agricultural, biological, and environmental statistics, 1999-12, Vol.4 (4), p.443-455</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1999 American Statistical Association and the International Biometric Society</rights><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c273t-897dfc22f94c9c56024331bac559a7fd583bbfcee584096403a0344926c16fe53</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1400501$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/1400501$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,799,828,23909,23910,25118,27901,27902,57992,57996,58225,58229</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1254928$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Heimbuch, Douglas G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seibel, John C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Harold T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kazyak, Paul F.</creatorcontrib><title>A Multiyear Lattice Sampling Design for Maryland-Wide Fish Abundance Estimation</title><title>Journal of agricultural, biological, and environmental statistics</title><description>A latticed, multiyear, multistaged sampling design developed for the Maryland Biological Stream Survey (MBSS) enabled the Maryland Department of Natural Resources to make design-based, Maryland-wide estimates of fish abundance in wadable nontidal streams. Because budget and labor constraints prohibited completing the field work required for statewide estimates within a single year, a 3-year sampling program was designed. A sampling lattice was constructed with the 3 years of sampling (1995, 1996, 1997) as the columns and three regions within the state of Maryland (eastern, central, and western) as the rows. Each one of the three regions consisted of six river basins, and the primary sampling units (PSUs) were defined as the combinations of these basins with the 3 years for a total of 54 PSUs. Two basins from each region were sampled in each year so that all basins were sampled once. In addition, one basin within each region was sampled in a second year under a restricted randomized design to complete the first stage of sampling. This additional sample insured that all joint inclusion probabilities of primary sampling units were nonzero. In all 3 years, the second stage consisted of simple random samples of reaches proportionally selected within strata defined by Strahler order. However, the MBSS's latticed sampling design combined with estimators based on the Horvitz-Thompson method would allow the calculation of statewide totals using different sampling designs within PSUs. Two species of fish, creek chub and largemouth bass, are used to illustrate the approach.</description><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Confidence interval</subject><subject>Creeks</subject><subject>Estimation methods</subject><subject>Estimators</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects. Techniques</subject><subject>Inclusion bodies</subject><subject>Methods and techniques (sampling, tagging, trapping, modelling...)</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Streams</subject><subject>Survey design</subject><subject>Survey sampling</subject><issn>1085-7117</issn><issn>1537-2693</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkE1LAzEQhoMoWKv4BzzkIHhanXxtNsdSWxVaelDxuGSzSU3Z7pYkPfTfG2mhpxmYZx5eXoTuCTxTBvKFcAAB5AKNiGCyoKVil3mHShSSEHmNbmLcABBWAh2h1QQv913yB6sDXuiUvLH4U293ne_X-NVGv-6xGwJe6nDodN8WP761eO7jL540-77VfX6YxeS3Ovmhv0VXTnfR3p3mGH3PZ1_T92KxevuYThaFoZKlolKydYZSp7hRRuQonDHSaCOE0tK1omJN44y1ouKgSg5MA-Nc0dKQ0lnBxujp6DVhiDFYV-9CjhAONYH6v4f61EMmH4_kTkejOxdyYh_POBVZW2Xs4YhtYhrC-Xyy_AEgnmQh</recordid><startdate>19991201</startdate><enddate>19991201</enddate><creator>Heimbuch, Douglas G.</creator><creator>Seibel, John C.</creator><creator>Wilson, Harold T.</creator><creator>Kazyak, Paul F.</creator><general>American Statistical Association and the International Biometric Society</general><general>American Statistical Association</general><general>International Biometric Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19991201</creationdate><title>A Multiyear Lattice Sampling Design for Maryland-Wide Fish Abundance Estimation</title><author>Heimbuch, Douglas G. ; Seibel, John C. ; Wilson, Harold T. ; Kazyak, Paul F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c273t-897dfc22f94c9c56024331bac559a7fd583bbfcee584096403a0344926c16fe53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Confidence interval</topic><topic>Creeks</topic><topic>Estimation methods</topic><topic>Estimators</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects. Techniques</topic><topic>Inclusion bodies</topic><topic>Methods and techniques (sampling, tagging, trapping, modelling...)</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Streams</topic><topic>Survey design</topic><topic>Survey sampling</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Heimbuch, Douglas G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seibel, John C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Harold T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kazyak, Paul F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of agricultural, biological, and environmental statistics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Heimbuch, Douglas G.</au><au>Seibel, John C.</au><au>Wilson, Harold T.</au><au>Kazyak, Paul F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Multiyear Lattice Sampling Design for Maryland-Wide Fish Abundance Estimation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of agricultural, biological, and environmental statistics</jtitle><date>1999-12-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>443</spage><epage>455</epage><pages>443-455</pages><issn>1085-7117</issn><eissn>1537-2693</eissn><abstract>A latticed, multiyear, multistaged sampling design developed for the Maryland Biological Stream Survey (MBSS) enabled the Maryland Department of Natural Resources to make design-based, Maryland-wide estimates of fish abundance in wadable nontidal streams. Because budget and labor constraints prohibited completing the field work required for statewide estimates within a single year, a 3-year sampling program was designed. A sampling lattice was constructed with the 3 years of sampling (1995, 1996, 1997) as the columns and three regions within the state of Maryland (eastern, central, and western) as the rows. Each one of the three regions consisted of six river basins, and the primary sampling units (PSUs) were defined as the combinations of these basins with the 3 years for a total of 54 PSUs. Two basins from each region were sampled in each year so that all basins were sampled once. In addition, one basin within each region was sampled in a second year under a restricted randomized design to complete the first stage of sampling. This additional sample insured that all joint inclusion probabilities of primary sampling units were nonzero. In all 3 years, the second stage consisted of simple random samples of reaches proportionally selected within strata defined by Strahler order. However, the MBSS's latticed sampling design combined with estimators based on the Horvitz-Thompson method would allow the calculation of statewide totals using different sampling designs within PSUs. Two species of fish, creek chub and largemouth bass, are used to illustrate the approach.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Statistical Association and the International Biometric Society</pub><doi>10.2307/1400501</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1085-7117
ispartof Journal of agricultural, biological, and environmental statistics, 1999-12, Vol.4 (4), p.443-455
issn 1085-7117
1537-2693
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_2307_1400501
source Jstor Complete Legacy; JSTOR Mathematics & Statistics
subjects Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Biological and medical sciences
Confidence interval
Creeks
Estimation methods
Estimators
Fish
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General aspects. Techniques
Inclusion bodies
Methods and techniques (sampling, tagging, trapping, modelling...)
Species
Streams
Survey design
Survey sampling
title A Multiyear Lattice Sampling Design for Maryland-Wide Fish Abundance Estimation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T03%3A54%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Multiyear%20Lattice%20Sampling%20Design%20for%20Maryland-Wide%20Fish%20Abundance%20Estimation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20agricultural,%20biological,%20and%20environmental%20statistics&rft.au=Heimbuch,%20Douglas%20G.&rft.date=1999-12-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=443&rft.epage=455&rft.pages=443-455&rft.issn=1085-7117&rft.eissn=1537-2693&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/1400501&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E1400501%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=1400501&rfr_iscdi=true