Typification of Echinacea purpurea (L.) Moench (Heliantheae: Asteraceae) and Its Implications for the Correct Naming of Two Echinacea Taxa
A thorough investigation of relevant nomenclatural types and descriptions reveals that the name Echinacea purpurea (L.) Moench, which was lectotypified by McGregor in 1968, has been consistently misapplied since 1903 to a taxon distinctly different from that of its modern lectotype and of the origin...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Taxon 2001-11, Vol.50 (4), p.1169-1175 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1175 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 1169 |
| container_title | Taxon |
| container_volume | 50 |
| creator | Binns, Shannon E. Baum, Bernard R. Arnason, John T. |
| description | A thorough investigation of relevant nomenclatural types and descriptions reveals that the name Echinacea purpurea (L.) Moench, which was lectotypified by McGregor in 1968, has been consistently misapplied since 1903 to a taxon distinctly different from that of its modern lectotype and of the original Linnaean concept. Linnaeus's original concept of Rudbeckia purpurea, maintained by Candolle as Echinacea purpurea when he segregated E. serotina (Nutt.) DC., is the species now known as E. laevigata (C. L. Boynton & Beadle) S. F. Blake. Technically, therefore, the correct name for the species currently called E. laevigata is E. purpurea (L.) Moench, and the correct name for the species currently called E. purpurea is E. serotina (Nutt.) DC., for which a lectotype is designated. Conservation of the name E. purpurea in the sense of its current application, which also preserves the usage of E. laevigata, is proposed in a separate article (see Binns & al., p. 1199, this issue). |
| doi_str_mv | 10.2307/1224737 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_2307_1224737</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>1224737</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>1224737</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2902-89064f932a0e3943187077f62ea413803f0b212274ccd807fbe09aec75553e063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFLwzAYhoMoOKf4F3IQdIfOL0nbNN7GmG4w9VLBW8myL66ja0pSmfsL_mo7toOXwQfvd3h4X3gIuWUw5ALkI-M8lkKekR5TKo0yJpNz0gOIIQKe8ktyFcIagDOpRI_85rumtKXRbelq6iydmFVZa4OaNt--u-55mA8H9NVhbVb0YYpVqet2hRqf6Ci06PcwDqiul3TWBjrbNNWxL1DrPO1YOnbeo2npm96U9dd-J9-6f1u5_tHX5MLqKuDNMfvk43mSj6fR_P1lNh7NI8MV8ChTkMZWCa4BhYoFyyRIaVOOOmYiA2FhwTsJMjZmmYG0CwSl0cgkSQRCKvrk_tBrvAvBoy0aX2603xUMir3C4qiwI6MDuS0r3J3Cinz02ZkF3vF3B34dWudP1v4BuaV6kQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Typification of Echinacea purpurea (L.) Moench (Heliantheae: Asteraceae) and Its Implications for the Correct Naming of Two Echinacea Taxa</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Binns, Shannon E. ; Baum, Bernard R. ; Arnason, John T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Binns, Shannon E. ; Baum, Bernard R. ; Arnason, John T.</creatorcontrib><description>A thorough investigation of relevant nomenclatural types and descriptions reveals that the name Echinacea purpurea (L.) Moench, which was lectotypified by McGregor in 1968, has been consistently misapplied since 1903 to a taxon distinctly different from that of its modern lectotype and of the original Linnaean concept. Linnaeus's original concept of Rudbeckia purpurea, maintained by Candolle as Echinacea purpurea when he segregated E. serotina (Nutt.) DC., is the species now known as E. laevigata (C. L. Boynton & Beadle) S. F. Blake. Technically, therefore, the correct name for the species currently called E. laevigata is E. purpurea (L.) Moench, and the correct name for the species currently called E. purpurea is E. serotina (Nutt.) DC., for which a lectotype is designated. Conservation of the name E. purpurea in the sense of its current application, which also preserves the usage of E. laevigata, is proposed in a separate article (see Binns & al., p. 1199, this issue).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0040-0262</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1996-8175</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/1224737</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>International Bureau for Plant Taxonomy and Nomenclature</publisher><subject>Asteraceae ; Biological taxonomies ; diagnostic characters ; Echinacea ; Lectotypes ; lectotypification ; Nomenclature ; Taxa ; Taxonomic revisions ; Terminology ; Typification ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>Taxon, 2001-11, Vol.50 (4), p.1169-1175</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2001 IAPT (Europe), on Behalf of the International Association for Plant Taxonomy</rights><rights>2001 International Association for Plant Taxonomy (IAPT) all rights reserved</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2902-89064f932a0e3943187077f62ea413803f0b212274ccd807fbe09aec75553e063</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2902-89064f932a0e3943187077f62ea413803f0b212274ccd807fbe09aec75553e063</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1224737$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/1224737$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Binns, Shannon E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baum, Bernard R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arnason, John T.</creatorcontrib><title>Typification of Echinacea purpurea (L.) Moench (Heliantheae: Asteraceae) and Its Implications for the Correct Naming of Two Echinacea Taxa</title><title>Taxon</title><description>A thorough investigation of relevant nomenclatural types and descriptions reveals that the name Echinacea purpurea (L.) Moench, which was lectotypified by McGregor in 1968, has been consistently misapplied since 1903 to a taxon distinctly different from that of its modern lectotype and of the original Linnaean concept. Linnaeus's original concept of Rudbeckia purpurea, maintained by Candolle as Echinacea purpurea when he segregated E. serotina (Nutt.) DC., is the species now known as E. laevigata (C. L. Boynton & Beadle) S. F. Blake. Technically, therefore, the correct name for the species currently called E. laevigata is E. purpurea (L.) Moench, and the correct name for the species currently called E. purpurea is E. serotina (Nutt.) DC., for which a lectotype is designated. Conservation of the name E. purpurea in the sense of its current application, which also preserves the usage of E. laevigata, is proposed in a separate article (see Binns & al., p. 1199, this issue).</description><subject>Asteraceae</subject><subject>Biological taxonomies</subject><subject>diagnostic characters</subject><subject>Echinacea</subject><subject>Lectotypes</subject><subject>lectotypification</subject><subject>Nomenclature</subject><subject>Taxa</subject><subject>Taxonomic revisions</subject><subject>Terminology</subject><subject>Typification</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>0040-0262</issn><issn>1996-8175</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEFLwzAYhoMoOKf4F3IQdIfOL0nbNN7GmG4w9VLBW8myL66ja0pSmfsL_mo7toOXwQfvd3h4X3gIuWUw5ALkI-M8lkKekR5TKo0yJpNz0gOIIQKe8ktyFcIagDOpRI_85rumtKXRbelq6iydmFVZa4OaNt--u-55mA8H9NVhbVb0YYpVqet2hRqf6Ci06PcwDqiul3TWBjrbNNWxL1DrPO1YOnbeo2npm96U9dd-J9-6f1u5_tHX5MLqKuDNMfvk43mSj6fR_P1lNh7NI8MV8ChTkMZWCa4BhYoFyyRIaVOOOmYiA2FhwTsJMjZmmYG0CwSl0cgkSQRCKvrk_tBrvAvBoy0aX2603xUMir3C4qiwI6MDuS0r3J3Cinz02ZkF3vF3B34dWudP1v4BuaV6kQ</recordid><startdate>200111</startdate><enddate>200111</enddate><creator>Binns, Shannon E.</creator><creator>Baum, Bernard R.</creator><creator>Arnason, John T.</creator><general>International Bureau for Plant Taxonomy and Nomenclature</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200111</creationdate><title>Typification of Echinacea purpurea (L.) Moench (Heliantheae: Asteraceae) and Its Implications for the Correct Naming of Two Echinacea Taxa</title><author>Binns, Shannon E. ; Baum, Bernard R. ; Arnason, John T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2902-89064f932a0e3943187077f62ea413803f0b212274ccd807fbe09aec75553e063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Asteraceae</topic><topic>Biological taxonomies</topic><topic>diagnostic characters</topic><topic>Echinacea</topic><topic>Lectotypes</topic><topic>lectotypification</topic><topic>Nomenclature</topic><topic>Taxa</topic><topic>Taxonomic revisions</topic><topic>Terminology</topic><topic>Typification</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Binns, Shannon E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baum, Bernard R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arnason, John T.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Taxon</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Binns, Shannon E.</au><au>Baum, Bernard R.</au><au>Arnason, John T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Typification of Echinacea purpurea (L.) Moench (Heliantheae: Asteraceae) and Its Implications for the Correct Naming of Two Echinacea Taxa</atitle><jtitle>Taxon</jtitle><date>2001-11</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1169</spage><epage>1175</epage><pages>1169-1175</pages><issn>0040-0262</issn><eissn>1996-8175</eissn><abstract>A thorough investigation of relevant nomenclatural types and descriptions reveals that the name Echinacea purpurea (L.) Moench, which was lectotypified by McGregor in 1968, has been consistently misapplied since 1903 to a taxon distinctly different from that of its modern lectotype and of the original Linnaean concept. Linnaeus's original concept of Rudbeckia purpurea, maintained by Candolle as Echinacea purpurea when he segregated E. serotina (Nutt.) DC., is the species now known as E. laevigata (C. L. Boynton & Beadle) S. F. Blake. Technically, therefore, the correct name for the species currently called E. laevigata is E. purpurea (L.) Moench, and the correct name for the species currently called E. purpurea is E. serotina (Nutt.) DC., for which a lectotype is designated. Conservation of the name E. purpurea in the sense of its current application, which also preserves the usage of E. laevigata, is proposed in a separate article (see Binns & al., p. 1199, this issue).</abstract><pub>International Bureau for Plant Taxonomy and Nomenclature</pub><doi>10.2307/1224737</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0040-0262 |
| ispartof | Taxon, 2001-11, Vol.50 (4), p.1169-1175 |
| issn | 0040-0262 1996-8175 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_2307_1224737 |
| source | JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
| subjects | Asteraceae Biological taxonomies diagnostic characters Echinacea Lectotypes lectotypification Nomenclature Taxa Taxonomic revisions Terminology Typification Wildlife conservation |
| title | Typification of Echinacea purpurea (L.) Moench (Heliantheae: Asteraceae) and Its Implications for the Correct Naming of Two Echinacea Taxa |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T00%3A27%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Typification%20of%20Echinacea%20purpurea%20(L.)%20Moench%20(Heliantheae:%20Asteraceae)%20and%20Its%20Implications%20for%20the%20Correct%20Naming%20of%20Two%20Echinacea%20Taxa&rft.jtitle=Taxon&rft.au=Binns,%20Shannon%20E.&rft.date=2001-11&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1169&rft.epage=1175&rft.pages=1169-1175&rft.issn=0040-0262&rft.eissn=1996-8175&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/1224737&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E1224737%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=1224737&rfr_iscdi=true |