The Caseload Controversy and the Study of Criminal Courts
Reviews the traditional role of caseload pressure in the study of criminal courts, as well as recent studies attacking it. The impact of variations in caseloads are re-examined from a different analytical perspective than used by earlier researchers.
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The journal of criminal law & criminology 1979-04, Vol.70 (1), p.89-101 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 101 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 89 |
| container_title | The journal of criminal law & criminology |
| container_volume | 70 |
| creator | Nardulli, Peter F. |
| description | Reviews the traditional role of caseload pressure in the study of criminal courts, as well as recent studies attacking it. The impact of variations in caseloads are re-examined from a different analytical perspective than used by earlier researchers. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.2307/1142969 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_2307_1142969</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><informt_id>10.3316/agispt.19791346</informt_id><jstor_id>1142969</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>1142969</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c308t-8587bb71e23ef21fef1c96f73d7b73c9072706057727b6b4701b56377130635b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kDFPwzAUhD2ARCmIvxAJJKaAn53Y8YgiCkiVGCizZSd2m6qNg-0g9d_jkjLylhvep7vTIXQD-IFQzB8BCiKYOEMzjAXkBTBxgS5D2OLjVcUMidXGZLUKZudUm9Wuj959Gx8OmerbLKbnRxzbQ-ZsVvtu3_Vql6jRx3CFzq3aBXN90jn6XDyv6td8-f7yVj8t84biKuZVWXGtORhCjSVgjYVGMMtpyzWnjcCccMxwyZNqpguOQZeMcg4UM1pqOke3k-_g3ddoQpTblJ96BAlE4EKUJaGJup-oxrsQvLFySHWVP0jA8riFPG2RyMVE-n0XpVp3YYhyE-MQZKuikl1v3e_L-bVsXXc0oBTYHwqCC6AFS0Z3k9E2ROf_zfsBdMVz7A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1290495523</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Caseload Controversy and the Study of Criminal Courts</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>EBSCOhost Political Science Complete</source><creator>Nardulli, Peter F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Nardulli, Peter F.</creatorcontrib><description>Reviews the traditional role of caseload pressure in the study of criminal courts, as well as recent studies attacking it. The impact of variations in caseloads are re-examined from a different analytical perspective than used by earlier researchers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0091-4169</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/1142969</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Baltimore, Md., etc: Williams & Wilkins Company</publisher><subject>Caseloads ; Courtrooms ; COURTS ; Criminal courts ; Criminal justice ; Criminal sentencing ; Criminals ; Criminology ; Defendants ; Due process of law ; Guilty verdicts ; Trials</subject><ispartof>The journal of criminal law & criminology, 1979-04, Vol.70 (1), p.89-101</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1979 Northwestern University School of Law</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c308t-8587bb71e23ef21fef1c96f73d7b73c9072706057727b6b4701b56377130635b3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1142969$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/1142969$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27869,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nardulli, Peter F.</creatorcontrib><title>The Caseload Controversy and the Study of Criminal Courts</title><title>The journal of criminal law & criminology</title><description>Reviews the traditional role of caseload pressure in the study of criminal courts, as well as recent studies attacking it. The impact of variations in caseloads are re-examined from a different analytical perspective than used by earlier researchers.</description><subject>Caseloads</subject><subject>Courtrooms</subject><subject>COURTS</subject><subject>Criminal courts</subject><subject>Criminal justice</subject><subject>Criminal sentencing</subject><subject>Criminals</subject><subject>Criminology</subject><subject>Defendants</subject><subject>Due process of law</subject><subject>Guilty verdicts</subject><subject>Trials</subject><issn>0091-4169</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1979</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kDFPwzAUhD2ARCmIvxAJJKaAn53Y8YgiCkiVGCizZSd2m6qNg-0g9d_jkjLylhvep7vTIXQD-IFQzB8BCiKYOEMzjAXkBTBxgS5D2OLjVcUMidXGZLUKZudUm9Wuj959Gx8OmerbLKbnRxzbQ-ZsVvtu3_Vql6jRx3CFzq3aBXN90jn6XDyv6td8-f7yVj8t84biKuZVWXGtORhCjSVgjYVGMMtpyzWnjcCccMxwyZNqpguOQZeMcg4UM1pqOke3k-_g3ddoQpTblJ96BAlE4EKUJaGJup-oxrsQvLFySHWVP0jA8riFPG2RyMVE-n0XpVp3YYhyE-MQZKuikl1v3e_L-bVsXXc0oBTYHwqCC6AFS0Z3k9E2ROf_zfsBdMVz7A</recordid><startdate>19790401</startdate><enddate>19790401</enddate><creator>Nardulli, Peter F.</creator><general>Williams & Wilkins Company</general><general>Williams and Wilkins, etc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>EOLOZ</scope><scope>FUVTR</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>SFNNT</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19790401</creationdate><title>The Caseload Controversy and the Study of Criminal Courts</title><author>Nardulli, Peter F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c308t-8587bb71e23ef21fef1c96f73d7b73c9072706057727b6b4701b56377130635b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1979</creationdate><topic>Caseloads</topic><topic>Courtrooms</topic><topic>COURTS</topic><topic>Criminal courts</topic><topic>Criminal justice</topic><topic>Criminal sentencing</topic><topic>Criminals</topic><topic>Criminology</topic><topic>Defendants</topic><topic>Due process of law</topic><topic>Guilty verdicts</topic><topic>Trials</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nardulli, Peter F.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 01</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 06</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 44</collection><jtitle>The journal of criminal law & criminology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nardulli, Peter F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Caseload Controversy and the Study of Criminal Courts</atitle><jtitle>The journal of criminal law & criminology</jtitle><date>1979-04-01</date><risdate>1979</risdate><volume>70</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>89</spage><epage>101</epage><pages>89-101</pages><issn>0091-4169</issn><abstract>Reviews the traditional role of caseload pressure in the study of criminal courts, as well as recent studies attacking it. The impact of variations in caseloads are re-examined from a different analytical perspective than used by earlier researchers.</abstract><cop>Baltimore, Md., etc</cop><pub>Williams & Wilkins Company</pub><doi>10.2307/1142969</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0091-4169 |
| ispartof | The journal of criminal law & criminology, 1979-04, Vol.70 (1), p.89-101 |
| issn | 0091-4169 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_2307_1142969 |
| source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Periodicals Index Online; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; EBSCOhost Political Science Complete |
| subjects | Caseloads Courtrooms COURTS Criminal courts Criminal justice Criminal sentencing Criminals Criminology Defendants Due process of law Guilty verdicts Trials |
| title | The Caseload Controversy and the Study of Criminal Courts |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T23%3A53%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Caseload%20Controversy%20and%20the%20Study%20of%20Criminal%20Courts&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20criminal%20law%20&%20criminology&rft.au=Nardulli,%20Peter%20F.&rft.date=1979-04-01&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=89&rft.epage=101&rft.pages=89-101&rft.issn=0091-4169&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/1142969&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E1142969%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1290495523&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_informt_id=10.3316/agispt.19791346&rft_jstor_id=1142969&rfr_iscdi=true |