Ennahda’s Muslim Democracy in Post-Arab Spring Tunisia: Synthesizing Political Thought and Practice
This article explores the interplay between political thought and practice within Tunisia’s Ennahda party, first during its period in opposition, then after it took power in 2011, and finally in the aftermath of the 2021 coup. We trace the genealogy of political thought within the party from the poi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Filozofija i društvo (Zbornik radova) 2024, Vol.35 (3), p.515-536 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 536 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 515 |
container_title | Filozofija i društvo (Zbornik radova) |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Alsoos, Imad Dihstelhoff, Julius |
description | This article explores the interplay between political thought and practice within Tunisia’s Ennahda party, first during its period in opposition, then after it took power in 2011, and finally in the aftermath of the 2021 coup. We trace the genealogy of political thought within the party from the point of its foundation. In doing so, we explore the gradual evolution of party ideology, from a daʿwa-based belief system between 1969 and 1981, to Islamic democracy between 1981 and 2011, to ‘Muslim democracy’ after the 2011 uprising. We examine this ideological evolution through the framework of three key elements: (i) Islam, (ii) Tunisia’s changing socio-political context, and (iii) the broader universal episteme. As we show, a significant turning point came in 2016, with the separation of the daʿwa from party politics, which revealed a burgeoning state / party conceptualization of politics. However, the 2021 coup challenged Ennahda’s concept of Muslim democracy, as well as all aspects of the party’s own sense of continuity as a significant socio-political actor, such as its institutional structure, leadership, membership, social base, political strategy, and ideology. Ennahda is now confronted by an authoritarian resurgence, which aims at containing the party, and at delegitimizing its participation within nation-state structures. Empirical evidence, based on content-analytical evaluations of personal interviews as well as the media’s coverage of Ennahda, shows that the party’s representatives are increasingly focusing on organizational reform in order to deal with the ramifications of the 2021 coup. Their aim seems to be to democratize both Ennahda and the Tunisian state itself. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2298/FID2403515A |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>ceeol_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_2298_FID2403515A</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ceeol_id>1269798</ceeol_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_a4c491d2f5b44b17afdab0b77dfa9c59</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>1269798</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c246t-4651de888c5f097a606d7acad25e86c2b8701a2323762b538f62b3b590718c073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkM1qGzEUhUVoIK6TVdYB7cu0-h1pujNO3BpSYoizFnckjS0zHhVpvHBWeY28Xp8kSmNKVwc-Dh_nXoSuKfnKWKO_LZa3TBAuqZydoQnjXFRaKvUJTQrklVRcX6DPOe8IEaTWYoL83TDA1sGfl9eMfx1yH_b41u-jTWCPOAx4FfNYzRK0-PF3CsMGrw9DyAG-48fjMG59Ds_vdBX7MAYLPV5v42GzHTEMDq-KpVB_ic476LO_OuUUPS3u1vOf1f3Dj-V8dl9ZJuqxErWkzmutrexIo6AmtVNgwTHpdW1ZqxWhwDjjqmat5LorwVvZEEW1JYpP0fLD6yLsTNm7h3Q0EYL5C2LaGEhlUO8NCCsa6lgnWyFaqqBz0JJWKddBY2VTXF8-XDbFnJPv_vkoMe_fNv99u7RvTm3vY2928ZCGcqmhrG5Uo_kb3MB8qw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ennahda’s Muslim Democracy in Post-Arab Spring Tunisia: Synthesizing Political Thought and Practice</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Alsoos, Imad ; Dihstelhoff, Julius</creator><creatorcontrib>Alsoos, Imad ; Dihstelhoff, Julius</creatorcontrib><description>This article explores the interplay between political thought and practice within Tunisia’s Ennahda party, first during its period in opposition, then after it took power in 2011, and finally in the aftermath of the 2021 coup. We trace the genealogy of political thought within the party from the point of its foundation. In doing so, we explore the gradual evolution of party ideology, from a daʿwa-based belief system between 1969 and 1981, to Islamic democracy between 1981 and 2011, to ‘Muslim democracy’ after the 2011 uprising. We examine this ideological evolution through the framework of three key elements: (i) Islam, (ii) Tunisia’s changing socio-political context, and (iii) the broader universal episteme. As we show, a significant turning point came in 2016, with the separation of the daʿwa from party politics, which revealed a burgeoning state / party conceptualization of politics. However, the 2021 coup challenged Ennahda’s concept of Muslim democracy, as well as all aspects of the party’s own sense of continuity as a significant socio-political actor, such as its institutional structure, leadership, membership, social base, political strategy, and ideology. Ennahda is now confronted by an authoritarian resurgence, which aims at containing the party, and at delegitimizing its participation within nation-state structures. Empirical evidence, based on content-analytical evaluations of personal interviews as well as the media’s coverage of Ennahda, shows that the party’s representatives are increasingly focusing on organizational reform in order to deal with the ramifications of the 2021 coup. Their aim seems to be to democratize both Ennahda and the Tunisian state itself.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0353-5738</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2334-8577</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2298/FID2403515A</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory</publisher><subject>ennahda ; functional specialization ; Islam studies ; muslim democracy ; organizational reformation ; political islam ; Political Theory ; Politics / Political Sciences ; Politics and religion ; re-authoritarianism ; Sociology of Religion ; Theology and Religion</subject><ispartof>Filozofija i društvo (Zbornik radova), 2024, Vol.35 (3), p.515-536</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c246t-4651de888c5f097a606d7acad25e86c2b8701a2323762b538f62b3b590718c073</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9287-1457</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://www.ceeol.com//api/image/getissuecoverimage?id=picture_2024_84317.jpg</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,2102,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alsoos, Imad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dihstelhoff, Julius</creatorcontrib><title>Ennahda’s Muslim Democracy in Post-Arab Spring Tunisia: Synthesizing Political Thought and Practice</title><title>Filozofija i društvo (Zbornik radova)</title><addtitle>Philosophy and Society</addtitle><description>This article explores the interplay between political thought and practice within Tunisia’s Ennahda party, first during its period in opposition, then after it took power in 2011, and finally in the aftermath of the 2021 coup. We trace the genealogy of political thought within the party from the point of its foundation. In doing so, we explore the gradual evolution of party ideology, from a daʿwa-based belief system between 1969 and 1981, to Islamic democracy between 1981 and 2011, to ‘Muslim democracy’ after the 2011 uprising. We examine this ideological evolution through the framework of three key elements: (i) Islam, (ii) Tunisia’s changing socio-political context, and (iii) the broader universal episteme. As we show, a significant turning point came in 2016, with the separation of the daʿwa from party politics, which revealed a burgeoning state / party conceptualization of politics. However, the 2021 coup challenged Ennahda’s concept of Muslim democracy, as well as all aspects of the party’s own sense of continuity as a significant socio-political actor, such as its institutional structure, leadership, membership, social base, political strategy, and ideology. Ennahda is now confronted by an authoritarian resurgence, which aims at containing the party, and at delegitimizing its participation within nation-state structures. Empirical evidence, based on content-analytical evaluations of personal interviews as well as the media’s coverage of Ennahda, shows that the party’s representatives are increasingly focusing on organizational reform in order to deal with the ramifications of the 2021 coup. Their aim seems to be to democratize both Ennahda and the Tunisian state itself.</description><subject>ennahda</subject><subject>functional specialization</subject><subject>Islam studies</subject><subject>muslim democracy</subject><subject>organizational reformation</subject><subject>political islam</subject><subject>Political Theory</subject><subject>Politics / Political Sciences</subject><subject>Politics and religion</subject><subject>re-authoritarianism</subject><subject>Sociology of Religion</subject><subject>Theology and Religion</subject><issn>0353-5738</issn><issn>2334-8577</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>REL</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkM1qGzEUhUVoIK6TVdYB7cu0-h1pujNO3BpSYoizFnckjS0zHhVpvHBWeY28Xp8kSmNKVwc-Dh_nXoSuKfnKWKO_LZa3TBAuqZydoQnjXFRaKvUJTQrklVRcX6DPOe8IEaTWYoL83TDA1sGfl9eMfx1yH_b41u-jTWCPOAx4FfNYzRK0-PF3CsMGrw9DyAG-48fjMG59Ds_vdBX7MAYLPV5v42GzHTEMDq-KpVB_ic476LO_OuUUPS3u1vOf1f3Dj-V8dl9ZJuqxErWkzmutrexIo6AmtVNgwTHpdW1ZqxWhwDjjqmat5LorwVvZEEW1JYpP0fLD6yLsTNm7h3Q0EYL5C2LaGEhlUO8NCCsa6lgnWyFaqqBz0JJWKddBY2VTXF8-XDbFnJPv_vkoMe_fNv99u7RvTm3vY2928ZCGcqmhrG5Uo_kb3MB8qw</recordid><startdate>2024</startdate><enddate>2024</enddate><creator>Alsoos, Imad</creator><creator>Dihstelhoff, Julius</creator><general>Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory</general><general>Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju</general><general>Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, Belgrade</general><scope>AE2</scope><scope>BIXPP</scope><scope>REL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9287-1457</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2024</creationdate><title>Ennahda’s Muslim Democracy in Post-Arab Spring Tunisia: Synthesizing Political Thought and Practice</title><author>Alsoos, Imad ; Dihstelhoff, Julius</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c246t-4651de888c5f097a606d7acad25e86c2b8701a2323762b538f62b3b590718c073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>ennahda</topic><topic>functional specialization</topic><topic>Islam studies</topic><topic>muslim democracy</topic><topic>organizational reformation</topic><topic>political islam</topic><topic>Political Theory</topic><topic>Politics / Political Sciences</topic><topic>Politics and religion</topic><topic>re-authoritarianism</topic><topic>Sociology of Religion</topic><topic>Theology and Religion</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alsoos, Imad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dihstelhoff, Julius</creatorcontrib><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library (C.E.E.O.L.) (DFG Nationallizenzen)</collection><collection>CEEOL: Open Access</collection><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library - CEEOL Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Filozofija i društvo (Zbornik radova)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alsoos, Imad</au><au>Dihstelhoff, Julius</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ennahda’s Muslim Democracy in Post-Arab Spring Tunisia: Synthesizing Political Thought and Practice</atitle><jtitle>Filozofija i društvo (Zbornik radova)</jtitle><addtitle>Philosophy and Society</addtitle><date>2024</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>515</spage><epage>536</epage><pages>515-536</pages><issn>0353-5738</issn><eissn>2334-8577</eissn><abstract>This article explores the interplay between political thought and practice within Tunisia’s Ennahda party, first during its period in opposition, then after it took power in 2011, and finally in the aftermath of the 2021 coup. We trace the genealogy of political thought within the party from the point of its foundation. In doing so, we explore the gradual evolution of party ideology, from a daʿwa-based belief system between 1969 and 1981, to Islamic democracy between 1981 and 2011, to ‘Muslim democracy’ after the 2011 uprising. We examine this ideological evolution through the framework of three key elements: (i) Islam, (ii) Tunisia’s changing socio-political context, and (iii) the broader universal episteme. As we show, a significant turning point came in 2016, with the separation of the daʿwa from party politics, which revealed a burgeoning state / party conceptualization of politics. However, the 2021 coup challenged Ennahda’s concept of Muslim democracy, as well as all aspects of the party’s own sense of continuity as a significant socio-political actor, such as its institutional structure, leadership, membership, social base, political strategy, and ideology. Ennahda is now confronted by an authoritarian resurgence, which aims at containing the party, and at delegitimizing its participation within nation-state structures. Empirical evidence, based on content-analytical evaluations of personal interviews as well as the media’s coverage of Ennahda, shows that the party’s representatives are increasingly focusing on organizational reform in order to deal with the ramifications of the 2021 coup. Their aim seems to be to democratize both Ennahda and the Tunisian state itself.</abstract><pub>Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory</pub><doi>10.2298/FID2403515A</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9287-1457</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0353-5738 |
ispartof | Filozofija i društvo (Zbornik radova), 2024, Vol.35 (3), p.515-536 |
issn | 0353-5738 2334-8577 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_2298_FID2403515A |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | ennahda functional specialization Islam studies muslim democracy organizational reformation political islam Political Theory Politics / Political Sciences Politics and religion re-authoritarianism Sociology of Religion Theology and Religion |
title | Ennahda’s Muslim Democracy in Post-Arab Spring Tunisia: Synthesizing Political Thought and Practice |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T14%3A35%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ceeol_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ennahda%E2%80%99s%20Muslim%20Democracy%20in%20Post-Arab%20Spring%20Tunisia:%20Synthesizing%20Political%20Thought%20and%20Practice&rft.jtitle=Filozofija%20i%20dru%C5%A1tvo%20(Zbornik%20radova)&rft.au=Alsoos,%20Imad&rft.date=2024&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=515&rft.epage=536&rft.pages=515-536&rft.issn=0353-5738&rft.eissn=2334-8577&rft_id=info:doi/10.2298/FID2403515A&rft_dat=%3Cceeol_cross%3E1269798%3C/ceeol_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ceeol_id=1269798&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_a4c491d2f5b44b17afdab0b77dfa9c59&rfr_iscdi=true |