Mutuality Talk in a Family-Owned Multinational

This article draws on work carried out as part of a collaboration between an elite business school and a family-owned multinational corporation, concerned with promoting ‘mutuality in business’ as a new frontier of responsible capitalism. While the business school partners treated mutuality as a new...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of business anthropology 2020-04, Vol.9 (1), p.19-43
Hauptverfasser: Gilbert, Paul Robert, Dolan, Catherine
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 43
container_issue 1
container_start_page 19
container_title Journal of business anthropology
container_volume 9
creator Gilbert, Paul Robert
Dolan, Catherine
description This article draws on work carried out as part of a collaboration between an elite business school and a family-owned multinational corporation, concerned with promoting ‘mutuality in business’ as a new frontier of responsible capitalism. While the business school partners treated mutuality as a new principle central to an emergent ethical capitalism, the corporation claimed mutuality as a long-established value unique to their company. Both interpretations foreground a central problem in recent writing on the anthropology of business/corporations: the tension between the claim that economic life is always embedded within a moral calculus, and the shift towards increasingly ethical behaviour among many corporations. Further, recent work in the anthropology of business rejects normative evaluations of corporate ethicizing. When corporations lay claim to ethical renewal, but maintain a commitment to competition and growth, then anthropologists must balance a sympathetic engagement with corporate ethicizing, and critical engagement with growth-based strategies.
doi_str_mv 10.22439/jba.v9i1.5958
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_22439_jba_v9i1_5958</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_22439_jba_v9i1_5958</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-crossref_primary_10_22439_jba_v9i1_59583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVzkELgjAcBfARBUl57bwv4PpvKuU5ki7Sxfv4VwqzOWObhd8-jQ5dO73Hgwc_QjYcmBBJnG2bC7JnpjhLs3Q_I8G4plEi-G7-05ckdK4BAB4nAjgEhBW971ErP9AS9Z0qQ5Hm2Co9ROeXqW606LVXBr3qDOo1WdSoXRV-c0VYfiwPp-hqO-dsVcuHVS3aQXKQH5gcYXKCyQkW_314A44xQMk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mutuality Talk in a Family-Owned Multinational</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Gilbert, Paul Robert ; Dolan, Catherine</creator><creatorcontrib>Gilbert, Paul Robert ; Dolan, Catherine</creatorcontrib><description>This article draws on work carried out as part of a collaboration between an elite business school and a family-owned multinational corporation, concerned with promoting ‘mutuality in business’ as a new frontier of responsible capitalism. While the business school partners treated mutuality as a new principle central to an emergent ethical capitalism, the corporation claimed mutuality as a long-established value unique to their company. Both interpretations foreground a central problem in recent writing on the anthropology of business/corporations: the tension between the claim that economic life is always embedded within a moral calculus, and the shift towards increasingly ethical behaviour among many corporations. Further, recent work in the anthropology of business rejects normative evaluations of corporate ethicizing. When corporations lay claim to ethical renewal, but maintain a commitment to competition and growth, then anthropologists must balance a sympathetic engagement with corporate ethicizing, and critical engagement with growth-based strategies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2245-4217</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2245-4217</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.22439/jba.v9i1.5958</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Journal of business anthropology, 2020-04, Vol.9 (1), p.19-43</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gilbert, Paul Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dolan, Catherine</creatorcontrib><title>Mutuality Talk in a Family-Owned Multinational</title><title>Journal of business anthropology</title><description>This article draws on work carried out as part of a collaboration between an elite business school and a family-owned multinational corporation, concerned with promoting ‘mutuality in business’ as a new frontier of responsible capitalism. While the business school partners treated mutuality as a new principle central to an emergent ethical capitalism, the corporation claimed mutuality as a long-established value unique to their company. Both interpretations foreground a central problem in recent writing on the anthropology of business/corporations: the tension between the claim that economic life is always embedded within a moral calculus, and the shift towards increasingly ethical behaviour among many corporations. Further, recent work in the anthropology of business rejects normative evaluations of corporate ethicizing. When corporations lay claim to ethical renewal, but maintain a commitment to competition and growth, then anthropologists must balance a sympathetic engagement with corporate ethicizing, and critical engagement with growth-based strategies.</description><issn>2245-4217</issn><issn>2245-4217</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVzkELgjAcBfARBUl57bwv4PpvKuU5ki7Sxfv4VwqzOWObhd8-jQ5dO73Hgwc_QjYcmBBJnG2bC7JnpjhLs3Q_I8G4plEi-G7-05ckdK4BAB4nAjgEhBW971ErP9AS9Z0qQ5Hm2Co9ROeXqW606LVXBr3qDOo1WdSoXRV-c0VYfiwPp-hqO-dsVcuHVS3aQXKQH5gcYXKCyQkW_314A44xQMk</recordid><startdate>20200430</startdate><enddate>20200430</enddate><creator>Gilbert, Paul Robert</creator><creator>Dolan, Catherine</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200430</creationdate><title>Mutuality Talk in a Family-Owned Multinational</title><author>Gilbert, Paul Robert ; Dolan, Catherine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-crossref_primary_10_22439_jba_v9i1_59583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gilbert, Paul Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dolan, Catherine</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of business anthropology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gilbert, Paul Robert</au><au>Dolan, Catherine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mutuality Talk in a Family-Owned Multinational</atitle><jtitle>Journal of business anthropology</jtitle><date>2020-04-30</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>19</spage><epage>43</epage><pages>19-43</pages><issn>2245-4217</issn><eissn>2245-4217</eissn><abstract>This article draws on work carried out as part of a collaboration between an elite business school and a family-owned multinational corporation, concerned with promoting ‘mutuality in business’ as a new frontier of responsible capitalism. While the business school partners treated mutuality as a new principle central to an emergent ethical capitalism, the corporation claimed mutuality as a long-established value unique to their company. Both interpretations foreground a central problem in recent writing on the anthropology of business/corporations: the tension between the claim that economic life is always embedded within a moral calculus, and the shift towards increasingly ethical behaviour among many corporations. Further, recent work in the anthropology of business rejects normative evaluations of corporate ethicizing. When corporations lay claim to ethical renewal, but maintain a commitment to competition and growth, then anthropologists must balance a sympathetic engagement with corporate ethicizing, and critical engagement with growth-based strategies.</abstract><doi>10.22439/jba.v9i1.5958</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2245-4217
ispartof Journal of business anthropology, 2020-04, Vol.9 (1), p.19-43
issn 2245-4217
2245-4217
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_22439_jba_v9i1_5958
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
title Mutuality Talk in a Family-Owned Multinational
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T07%3A20%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mutuality%20Talk%20in%20a%20Family-Owned%20Multinational&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20business%20anthropology&rft.au=Gilbert,%20Paul%20Robert&rft.date=2020-04-30&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=19&rft.epage=43&rft.pages=19-43&rft.issn=2245-4217&rft.eissn=2245-4217&rft_id=info:doi/10.22439/jba.v9i1.5958&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_22439_jba_v9i1_5958%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true