COMPARISON OF THE DOBSON MODEL WITH OTHER DIELECTRIC MODELS AT THE C-BAND MICROWAVE BAND

This study focuses on a dielectric model for wet soils that relates the complex permittivity and water content of bulk wet soils to obtain soil moisture retrievals from satellite observations. Contrary to the earlier examinations that have been made for the Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) mi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:JOURNAL OF JSCE 2023, Vol.11(1), pp.B1-E0089
1. Verfasser: TSUJIMOTO, Kumiko
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page B1-E0089
container_title JOURNAL OF JSCE
container_volume 11
creator TSUJIMOTO, Kumiko
description This study focuses on a dielectric model for wet soils that relates the complex permittivity and water content of bulk wet soils to obtain soil moisture retrievals from satellite observations. Contrary to the earlier examinations that have been made for the Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) mission of the European Satellite Agency (ESA) at 1.4 GHz (L-band microwave range), this study targets 6.9 GHz (C-band) of the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer 2 (AMSR2) of the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), considering the frequency dependency of the dielectric behavior of wet soils. The Dobson model is the most widely used dielectric model and is currently used in JAXA’s standard algorithm. ESA also used the Dobson model, but it switched to using the Mironov model in 2012 for its operational algorithm. In addition to these two models, the Wang-Schmugge model and our proposed model were numerically analyzed to clarify the effect on soil moisture retrievals by replacing the dielectric model from Dobson with another model at 6.9 GHz. Large differences were observed between the Dobson and Mironov models, especially for the soil types that contain large quantities of sand or clay. The Wang-Schmugge model showed similar estimates to those of the Mironov model but with a large difference in the estimated amount and permittivity of bound soil water. The estimated wet-soil permittivity by our proposed model was smaller than those of other models in many cases, slightly for temperate soils and significantly for tropical soils. Both the amount and permittivity of bound water in the proposed model were smaller than those of the Mironov and Wang-Schmugge models. The quantification of the amount and permittivity of bound water was shown to be the key in the dielectric model, and further validation with soil samples, especially with tropical samples, is necessary.
doi_str_mv 10.2208/journalofjsce.B1-E0089
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_2208_journalofjsce_B1_E0089</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>article_journalofjsce_11_1_11_B1_E0089_article_char_en</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3009-578a2371e732482f2ebf7d9d9fcf6b4cc4f2cd2d313326e9d59e718e211beaf63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1OwzAQhS0EElXpFZAvkOKxm79l4qQ0UlqjNFB2luvY0Ki0KCkLbk_TQAVsZubNzPcWD6FbIGNKSXBX7z-andrubd1qM47BSQkJwgs0oBD4jguEXf6ar9GobWtCCKNAPTcYoGcu5g9RkS3FAospLmcpTkTcqblI0hyvsnKGxXFd4CRL85SXRcb72xJH5QngThwtEjzPeCFW0VOKO3mDrqzatmb03YfocZqWfObk4j7jUe5oRkjouH6gKPPB-IxOAmqpWVu_CqvQauutJ1pPLNUVrRgwRj0TVm5ofAgMBVgbZT02RF7vq5t92zbGyvdm86aaTwlEdhHJPxHJGOQpoiOY92DdHtSLOWOqOWz01vzDACR05Qc_v-lX1UizY19KnHJk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>COMPARISON OF THE DOBSON MODEL WITH OTHER DIELECTRIC MODELS AT THE C-BAND MICROWAVE BAND</title><source>J-STAGE Free</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>TSUJIMOTO, Kumiko</creator><creatorcontrib>TSUJIMOTO, Kumiko</creatorcontrib><description>This study focuses on a dielectric model for wet soils that relates the complex permittivity and water content of bulk wet soils to obtain soil moisture retrievals from satellite observations. Contrary to the earlier examinations that have been made for the Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) mission of the European Satellite Agency (ESA) at 1.4 GHz (L-band microwave range), this study targets 6.9 GHz (C-band) of the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer 2 (AMSR2) of the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), considering the frequency dependency of the dielectric behavior of wet soils. The Dobson model is the most widely used dielectric model and is currently used in JAXA’s standard algorithm. ESA also used the Dobson model, but it switched to using the Mironov model in 2012 for its operational algorithm. In addition to these two models, the Wang-Schmugge model and our proposed model were numerically analyzed to clarify the effect on soil moisture retrievals by replacing the dielectric model from Dobson with another model at 6.9 GHz. Large differences were observed between the Dobson and Mironov models, especially for the soil types that contain large quantities of sand or clay. The Wang-Schmugge model showed similar estimates to those of the Mironov model but with a large difference in the estimated amount and permittivity of bound soil water. The estimated wet-soil permittivity by our proposed model was smaller than those of other models in many cases, slightly for temperate soils and significantly for tropical soils. Both the amount and permittivity of bound water in the proposed model were smaller than those of the Mironov and Wang-Schmugge models. The quantification of the amount and permittivity of bound water was shown to be the key in the dielectric model, and further validation with soil samples, especially with tropical samples, is necessary.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2187-5103</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2187-5103</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2208/journalofjsce.B1-E0089</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Japan Society of Civil Engineers</publisher><subject>dielectric constant ; microwave remote sensing ; pedotransfer function ; soil moisture</subject><ispartof>Journal of JSCE, 2023, Vol.11(1), pp.B1-E0089</ispartof><rights>2023 Japan Society of Civil Engineers</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3009-578a2371e732482f2ebf7d9d9fcf6b4cc4f2cd2d313326e9d59e718e211beaf63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1881,4022,27922,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>TSUJIMOTO, Kumiko</creatorcontrib><title>COMPARISON OF THE DOBSON MODEL WITH OTHER DIELECTRIC MODELS AT THE C-BAND MICROWAVE BAND</title><title>JOURNAL OF JSCE</title><addtitle>Journal of JSCE</addtitle><description>This study focuses on a dielectric model for wet soils that relates the complex permittivity and water content of bulk wet soils to obtain soil moisture retrievals from satellite observations. Contrary to the earlier examinations that have been made for the Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) mission of the European Satellite Agency (ESA) at 1.4 GHz (L-band microwave range), this study targets 6.9 GHz (C-band) of the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer 2 (AMSR2) of the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), considering the frequency dependency of the dielectric behavior of wet soils. The Dobson model is the most widely used dielectric model and is currently used in JAXA’s standard algorithm. ESA also used the Dobson model, but it switched to using the Mironov model in 2012 for its operational algorithm. In addition to these two models, the Wang-Schmugge model and our proposed model were numerically analyzed to clarify the effect on soil moisture retrievals by replacing the dielectric model from Dobson with another model at 6.9 GHz. Large differences were observed between the Dobson and Mironov models, especially for the soil types that contain large quantities of sand or clay. The Wang-Schmugge model showed similar estimates to those of the Mironov model but with a large difference in the estimated amount and permittivity of bound soil water. The estimated wet-soil permittivity by our proposed model was smaller than those of other models in many cases, slightly for temperate soils and significantly for tropical soils. Both the amount and permittivity of bound water in the proposed model were smaller than those of the Mironov and Wang-Schmugge models. The quantification of the amount and permittivity of bound water was shown to be the key in the dielectric model, and further validation with soil samples, especially with tropical samples, is necessary.</description><subject>dielectric constant</subject><subject>microwave remote sensing</subject><subject>pedotransfer function</subject><subject>soil moisture</subject><issn>2187-5103</issn><issn>2187-5103</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkE1OwzAQhS0EElXpFZAvkOKxm79l4qQ0UlqjNFB2luvY0Ki0KCkLbk_TQAVsZubNzPcWD6FbIGNKSXBX7z-andrubd1qM47BSQkJwgs0oBD4jguEXf6ar9GobWtCCKNAPTcYoGcu5g9RkS3FAospLmcpTkTcqblI0hyvsnKGxXFd4CRL85SXRcb72xJH5QngThwtEjzPeCFW0VOKO3mDrqzatmb03YfocZqWfObk4j7jUe5oRkjouH6gKPPB-IxOAmqpWVu_CqvQauutJ1pPLNUVrRgwRj0TVm5ofAgMBVgbZT02RF7vq5t92zbGyvdm86aaTwlEdhHJPxHJGOQpoiOY92DdHtSLOWOqOWz01vzDACR05Qc_v-lX1UizY19KnHJk</recordid><startdate>2023</startdate><enddate>2023</enddate><creator>TSUJIMOTO, Kumiko</creator><general>Japan Society of Civil Engineers</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2023</creationdate><title>COMPARISON OF THE DOBSON MODEL WITH OTHER DIELECTRIC MODELS AT THE C-BAND MICROWAVE BAND</title><author>TSUJIMOTO, Kumiko</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3009-578a2371e732482f2ebf7d9d9fcf6b4cc4f2cd2d313326e9d59e718e211beaf63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>dielectric constant</topic><topic>microwave remote sensing</topic><topic>pedotransfer function</topic><topic>soil moisture</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>TSUJIMOTO, Kumiko</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>JOURNAL OF JSCE</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>TSUJIMOTO, Kumiko</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>COMPARISON OF THE DOBSON MODEL WITH OTHER DIELECTRIC MODELS AT THE C-BAND MICROWAVE BAND</atitle><jtitle>JOURNAL OF JSCE</jtitle><addtitle>Journal of JSCE</addtitle><date>2023</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>B1-E0089</spage><pages>B1-E0089-</pages><artnum>B1-E0089</artnum><issn>2187-5103</issn><eissn>2187-5103</eissn><abstract>This study focuses on a dielectric model for wet soils that relates the complex permittivity and water content of bulk wet soils to obtain soil moisture retrievals from satellite observations. Contrary to the earlier examinations that have been made for the Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) mission of the European Satellite Agency (ESA) at 1.4 GHz (L-band microwave range), this study targets 6.9 GHz (C-band) of the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer 2 (AMSR2) of the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), considering the frequency dependency of the dielectric behavior of wet soils. The Dobson model is the most widely used dielectric model and is currently used in JAXA’s standard algorithm. ESA also used the Dobson model, but it switched to using the Mironov model in 2012 for its operational algorithm. In addition to these two models, the Wang-Schmugge model and our proposed model were numerically analyzed to clarify the effect on soil moisture retrievals by replacing the dielectric model from Dobson with another model at 6.9 GHz. Large differences were observed between the Dobson and Mironov models, especially for the soil types that contain large quantities of sand or clay. The Wang-Schmugge model showed similar estimates to those of the Mironov model but with a large difference in the estimated amount and permittivity of bound soil water. The estimated wet-soil permittivity by our proposed model was smaller than those of other models in many cases, slightly for temperate soils and significantly for tropical soils. Both the amount and permittivity of bound water in the proposed model were smaller than those of the Mironov and Wang-Schmugge models. The quantification of the amount and permittivity of bound water was shown to be the key in the dielectric model, and further validation with soil samples, especially with tropical samples, is necessary.</abstract><pub>Japan Society of Civil Engineers</pub><doi>10.2208/journalofjsce.B1-E0089</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2187-5103
ispartof Journal of JSCE, 2023, Vol.11(1), pp.B1-E0089
issn 2187-5103
2187-5103
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_2208_journalofjsce_B1_E0089
source J-STAGE Free; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects dielectric constant
microwave remote sensing
pedotransfer function
soil moisture
title COMPARISON OF THE DOBSON MODEL WITH OTHER DIELECTRIC MODELS AT THE C-BAND MICROWAVE BAND
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T14%3A01%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=COMPARISON%20OF%20THE%20DOBSON%20MODEL%20WITH%20OTHER%20DIELECTRIC%20MODELS%20AT%20THE%20C-BAND%20MICROWAVE%20BAND&rft.jtitle=JOURNAL%20OF%20JSCE&rft.au=TSUJIMOTO,%20Kumiko&rft.date=2023&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=B1-E0089&rft.pages=B1-E0089-&rft.artnum=B1-E0089&rft.issn=2187-5103&rft.eissn=2187-5103&rft_id=info:doi/10.2208/journalofjsce.B1-E0089&rft_dat=%3Cjstage_cross%3Earticle_journalofjsce_11_1_11_B1_E0089_article_char_en%3C/jstage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true