Evacuating Large Urban Areas: Challenges for Emergency Management Policies and Concepts

Abstract This article presents several policy observations regarding evacuation planning and disaster mitigation in large urban areas. After reviewing the research literature pertaining to disaster evacuations, the article provides background information about and lessons learned from Hurricanes Kat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management 2008-07, Vol.5 (1), p.32
Hauptverfasser: Kendra, James, Rozdilsky, Jack, McEntire, David A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 32
container_title Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management
container_volume 5
creator Kendra, James
Rozdilsky, Jack
McEntire, David A
description Abstract This article presents several policy observations regarding evacuation planning and disaster mitigation in large urban areas. After reviewing the research literature pertaining to disaster evacuations, the article provides background information about and lessons learned from Hurricanes Katrina and Rita in 2005 and Hurricane Dean in 2007. The often-erroneous planning assumptions in emergency management are then explored along with a discussion about future policy and management implications. Three themes are identified in this research, including: 1) public officials must anticipate a much broader scope of issues when issuing evacuation requests, 2) they must do more to prepare for disasters than write "fantasy" emergency operations plans, and 3) they must adjust development activities that have a negative impact upon disaster mitigation. Errata Page 7, Paragraph 2, Lines 1-3, which reads: Louisiana Governor Blanco estimated that 92 percent of the 1.3 million residents of the New Orleans area were evacuated (United States Office of the President - The White House, 2006). Should read: “Louisiana Governor Kathleen Blanco has estimated that 92 percent of the 1.3 million residents of the New Orleans area were evacuated” (Cox, 2006: 9, citing Federal Response to Hurricane Katrina: Lessons Learned. The White House, 2006: 29). Page 7, Paragraph 4, Lines 2-7, which reads: Wolshon (2002) considered New Orleans evacuation issues and estimated that 200,000 to 300,000 people in the New Orleans region do not have access to reliable transportation. Furthermore, the same study indicated that of the 1.4 million inhabitants of high risk regions in the New Orleans area, approximately 60 percent of the population or about 850,000 people will not want or be able to leave these areas (Wolshon, 2002). Should read: Wolshon (2002) considered New Orleans evacuation issues and estimated that “200,000 to 300,000 persons in the New Orleans region do not have access to reliable transportation.” Furthermore, the same study indicated that of the “[o]f the 1.4 million inhabitants in the high-threat areas, it is assumed only approximately 60 percent of the population or about 850,000 people will want, or be able, to leave the city.” (Wolshon, 2002: 45). Pages 9, Paragraph 5, Lines 1-3, which reads: As the hurricane approached, three million persons evacuated the lowlying Texas coastal areas and, with the congestion, this took an estimated four to five hours to drive the 50 miles
doi_str_mv 10.2202/1547-7355.1365
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_2202_1547_7355_1365</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>37021718</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b2448-673f8b5287130c3ac3a9a3ece30d5bd2e9158e327e6da2254ed28b6d8d35d6123</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkE1Lw0AQhhdRsFavnvfkLXU_ssnWWwn1Ayu20NLjskkmaWqyibup2H9vYqQIAzMMzzsMD0K3lEwYI-yeCj_0Qi7EhPJAnKHRaXH-b75EV87tCWGCEz5C2_mXTg66LUyOF9rmgDc21gbPLGj3gKOdLkswOTic1RbPK-gQkxzxmzY6hwpMi5d1WSRFR2iT4qg2CTStu0YXmS4d3Pz1Mdo8ztfRs7d4f3qJZgsvZr4vvSDkmYwFkyHlJOG6q6nmkAAnqYhTBlMqJHAWQpBqxoQPKZNxkMqUizSgjI_R3XC3sfXnAVyrqsIlUJbaQH1wioeE0ZDKDpwMYGJr5yxkqrFFpe1RUaJ6f6pXpHpFqvfXBbwhULgWvk-0th-q-zoUarX2lZR0-7qSS8U7Hg98DI0F506J_c5B9XvyB5arfIQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>37021718</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evacuating Large Urban Areas: Challenges for Emergency Management Policies and Concepts</title><source>De Gruyter journals</source><creator>Kendra, James ; Rozdilsky, Jack ; McEntire, David A</creator><creatorcontrib>Kendra, James ; Rozdilsky, Jack ; McEntire, David A</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract This article presents several policy observations regarding evacuation planning and disaster mitigation in large urban areas. After reviewing the research literature pertaining to disaster evacuations, the article provides background information about and lessons learned from Hurricanes Katrina and Rita in 2005 and Hurricane Dean in 2007. The often-erroneous planning assumptions in emergency management are then explored along with a discussion about future policy and management implications. Three themes are identified in this research, including: 1) public officials must anticipate a much broader scope of issues when issuing evacuation requests, 2) they must do more to prepare for disasters than write "fantasy" emergency operations plans, and 3) they must adjust development activities that have a negative impact upon disaster mitigation. Errata Page 7, Paragraph 2, Lines 1-3, which reads: Louisiana Governor Blanco estimated that 92 percent of the 1.3 million residents of the New Orleans area were evacuated (United States Office of the President - The White House, 2006). Should read: “Louisiana Governor Kathleen Blanco has estimated that 92 percent of the 1.3 million residents of the New Orleans area were evacuated” (Cox, 2006: 9, citing Federal Response to Hurricane Katrina: Lessons Learned. The White House, 2006: 29). Page 7, Paragraph 4, Lines 2-7, which reads: Wolshon (2002) considered New Orleans evacuation issues and estimated that 200,000 to 300,000 people in the New Orleans region do not have access to reliable transportation. Furthermore, the same study indicated that of the 1.4 million inhabitants of high risk regions in the New Orleans area, approximately 60 percent of the population or about 850,000 people will not want or be able to leave these areas (Wolshon, 2002). Should read: Wolshon (2002) considered New Orleans evacuation issues and estimated that “200,000 to 300,000 persons in the New Orleans region do not have access to reliable transportation.” Furthermore, the same study indicated that of the “[o]f the 1.4 million inhabitants in the high-threat areas, it is assumed only approximately 60 percent of the population or about 850,000 people will want, or be able, to leave the city.” (Wolshon, 2002: 45). Pages 9, Paragraph 5, Lines 1-3, which reads: As the hurricane approached, three million persons evacuated the lowlying Texas coastal areas and, with the congestion, this took an estimated four to five hours to drive the 50 miles to reach the city of Houston. Should read: As the hurricane approached, three million persons evacuated the lowlying Texas coastal areas and, with the congestion, this took an estimated four to five hours to drive the 50 miles to reach the city of Houston (Litman, 2006: 13). Page 10, Paragraph 2, Lines 3-10, which reads: For instance, Wolshon and others (2005) have argued the central issue confronting both the transportation engineering/planning sector and the emergency management community is trying to maintain a balance between different transportation needs. On the one hand, it may not be logical to devote significant resources toward planning, designing, and constructing infrastructure to support rare emergency management functions since large scale urban evacuations may take place only once in a generation (Wolshon, Hamilton, Levitan et al., 2005a). Should read: For instance, Wolshon and others (2005a: 161) have asserted that the principal challenge for both the transportation engineering/planning sector and the emergency management community is “trying to maintain a balance between the needs of evacuations and the enormous need for limited transportation resources for routine conditions.” One the one hand, “it may not be logical to devote significant resources toward planning, designing, and constructing transportation infrastructure for an evacuation that may occur once in a generation” (Wolshon, Hamilton, Levitan, et al 2005a: 161). Page 11, Paragraph 2, Lines 2-3, which reads: Exit capacity refers to the ability of major roadways leading out of the urban area to handle an evacuation of the urban area’s residents. Should read: “Exit Capacity refers to the capacity of major roadways leading out of an urban area to handle an evacuation of urban area residents” (Cox, 2006: 11). Page 11, Paragraph 3, Lines 3-10, which reads: Katrina evacuation problems can be related to extreme examples of the day-today problems faced by many non-drivers in places with inadequate and poorly integrated public transportation services. Rita evacuation problems can be related to the problems that result from excessive reliance on automobile transport without efficient management (Litman, 2006). Besides the problems of flow and exit capacity evident in Rita, many vehicles ran out of gas or experienced mechanical problems due to the slow moving traffic and the Texas early-autumn heat. Should read: “Katrina evacuation problems are simply extreme examples of the day-to-day problems many nondrivers face due to inadequate and poorly integrated public transportation services. Rita evacuation problems are simply extreme examples of the day-to-day traffic problems that result from excessive reliance on automobile transport without efficient management” (Litman, 2006: 17). Besides the problems of flow and exit capacity evident in Rita, many vehicles ran out of gas or experienced mechanical problems due to the slow moving traffic and the Texas early-autumn heat (Litman, 2006: 13). Page 12, Paragraph 3, Lines 1-3, which reads: While Hurricane Dean ultimately stayed far south of the Texas border, the threat of a storm surge affecting Brownsville prompted officials to implement what turned out to be a multimillion-dollar exercise (Brezosky, 2007). Should read: Brezosky (2007) cites the views of a Texas emergency official in writing, “While Dean ultimately stayed far south of the Texas border, the threat of storm surge engulfing Brownsville easily merited what turned out to be a multimillion-dollar exercise.” Recommended Citation Kendra, James; Rozdilsky, Jack; and McEntire, David A. (2008) "Evacuating Large Urban Areas: Challenges for Emergency Management Policies and Concepts," Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management: Vol. 5 : Iss. 1, Article 32. DOI: 10.2202/1547-7355.1365 Available at: http://www.bepress.com/jhsem/vol5/iss1/32</description><identifier>ISSN: 1547-7355</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1547-7355</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2202/1547-7355.1365</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>bepress</publisher><subject>disaster ; Disasters ; Emergency management ; evacuation ; Government departments ; Hurricane Katrina ; Hurricane Rita ; Management ; Planning methods ; U.S.A ; urban planning</subject><ispartof>Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 2008-07, Vol.5 (1), p.32</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b2448-673f8b5287130c3ac3a9a3ece30d5bd2e9158e327e6da2254ed28b6d8d35d6123</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27926,27927</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kendra, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rozdilsky, Jack</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McEntire, David A</creatorcontrib><title>Evacuating Large Urban Areas: Challenges for Emergency Management Policies and Concepts</title><title>Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management</title><description>Abstract This article presents several policy observations regarding evacuation planning and disaster mitigation in large urban areas. After reviewing the research literature pertaining to disaster evacuations, the article provides background information about and lessons learned from Hurricanes Katrina and Rita in 2005 and Hurricane Dean in 2007. The often-erroneous planning assumptions in emergency management are then explored along with a discussion about future policy and management implications. Three themes are identified in this research, including: 1) public officials must anticipate a much broader scope of issues when issuing evacuation requests, 2) they must do more to prepare for disasters than write "fantasy" emergency operations plans, and 3) they must adjust development activities that have a negative impact upon disaster mitigation. Errata Page 7, Paragraph 2, Lines 1-3, which reads: Louisiana Governor Blanco estimated that 92 percent of the 1.3 million residents of the New Orleans area were evacuated (United States Office of the President - The White House, 2006). Should read: “Louisiana Governor Kathleen Blanco has estimated that 92 percent of the 1.3 million residents of the New Orleans area were evacuated” (Cox, 2006: 9, citing Federal Response to Hurricane Katrina: Lessons Learned. The White House, 2006: 29). Page 7, Paragraph 4, Lines 2-7, which reads: Wolshon (2002) considered New Orleans evacuation issues and estimated that 200,000 to 300,000 people in the New Orleans region do not have access to reliable transportation. Furthermore, the same study indicated that of the 1.4 million inhabitants of high risk regions in the New Orleans area, approximately 60 percent of the population or about 850,000 people will not want or be able to leave these areas (Wolshon, 2002). Should read: Wolshon (2002) considered New Orleans evacuation issues and estimated that “200,000 to 300,000 persons in the New Orleans region do not have access to reliable transportation.” Furthermore, the same study indicated that of the “[o]f the 1.4 million inhabitants in the high-threat areas, it is assumed only approximately 60 percent of the population or about 850,000 people will want, or be able, to leave the city.” (Wolshon, 2002: 45). Pages 9, Paragraph 5, Lines 1-3, which reads: As the hurricane approached, three million persons evacuated the lowlying Texas coastal areas and, with the congestion, this took an estimated four to five hours to drive the 50 miles to reach the city of Houston. Should read: As the hurricane approached, three million persons evacuated the lowlying Texas coastal areas and, with the congestion, this took an estimated four to five hours to drive the 50 miles to reach the city of Houston (Litman, 2006: 13). Page 10, Paragraph 2, Lines 3-10, which reads: For instance, Wolshon and others (2005) have argued the central issue confronting both the transportation engineering/planning sector and the emergency management community is trying to maintain a balance between different transportation needs. On the one hand, it may not be logical to devote significant resources toward planning, designing, and constructing infrastructure to support rare emergency management functions since large scale urban evacuations may take place only once in a generation (Wolshon, Hamilton, Levitan et al., 2005a). Should read: For instance, Wolshon and others (2005a: 161) have asserted that the principal challenge for both the transportation engineering/planning sector and the emergency management community is “trying to maintain a balance between the needs of evacuations and the enormous need for limited transportation resources for routine conditions.” One the one hand, “it may not be logical to devote significant resources toward planning, designing, and constructing transportation infrastructure for an evacuation that may occur once in a generation” (Wolshon, Hamilton, Levitan, et al 2005a: 161). Page 11, Paragraph 2, Lines 2-3, which reads: Exit capacity refers to the ability of major roadways leading out of the urban area to handle an evacuation of the urban area’s residents. Should read: “Exit Capacity refers to the capacity of major roadways leading out of an urban area to handle an evacuation of urban area residents” (Cox, 2006: 11). Page 11, Paragraph 3, Lines 3-10, which reads: Katrina evacuation problems can be related to extreme examples of the day-today problems faced by many non-drivers in places with inadequate and poorly integrated public transportation services. Rita evacuation problems can be related to the problems that result from excessive reliance on automobile transport without efficient management (Litman, 2006). Besides the problems of flow and exit capacity evident in Rita, many vehicles ran out of gas or experienced mechanical problems due to the slow moving traffic and the Texas early-autumn heat. Should read: “Katrina evacuation problems are simply extreme examples of the day-to-day problems many nondrivers face due to inadequate and poorly integrated public transportation services. Rita evacuation problems are simply extreme examples of the day-to-day traffic problems that result from excessive reliance on automobile transport without efficient management” (Litman, 2006: 17). Besides the problems of flow and exit capacity evident in Rita, many vehicles ran out of gas or experienced mechanical problems due to the slow moving traffic and the Texas early-autumn heat (Litman, 2006: 13). Page 12, Paragraph 3, Lines 1-3, which reads: While Hurricane Dean ultimately stayed far south of the Texas border, the threat of a storm surge affecting Brownsville prompted officials to implement what turned out to be a multimillion-dollar exercise (Brezosky, 2007). Should read: Brezosky (2007) cites the views of a Texas emergency official in writing, “While Dean ultimately stayed far south of the Texas border, the threat of storm surge engulfing Brownsville easily merited what turned out to be a multimillion-dollar exercise.” Recommended Citation Kendra, James; Rozdilsky, Jack; and McEntire, David A. (2008) "Evacuating Large Urban Areas: Challenges for Emergency Management Policies and Concepts," Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management: Vol. 5 : Iss. 1, Article 32. DOI: 10.2202/1547-7355.1365 Available at: http://www.bepress.com/jhsem/vol5/iss1/32</description><subject>disaster</subject><subject>Disasters</subject><subject>Emergency management</subject><subject>evacuation</subject><subject>Government departments</subject><subject>Hurricane Katrina</subject><subject>Hurricane Rita</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Planning methods</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>urban planning</subject><issn>1547-7355</issn><issn>1547-7355</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkE1Lw0AQhhdRsFavnvfkLXU_ssnWWwn1Ayu20NLjskkmaWqyibup2H9vYqQIAzMMzzsMD0K3lEwYI-yeCj_0Qi7EhPJAnKHRaXH-b75EV87tCWGCEz5C2_mXTg66LUyOF9rmgDc21gbPLGj3gKOdLkswOTic1RbPK-gQkxzxmzY6hwpMi5d1WSRFR2iT4qg2CTStu0YXmS4d3Pz1Mdo8ztfRs7d4f3qJZgsvZr4vvSDkmYwFkyHlJOG6q6nmkAAnqYhTBlMqJHAWQpBqxoQPKZNxkMqUizSgjI_R3XC3sfXnAVyrqsIlUJbaQH1wioeE0ZDKDpwMYGJr5yxkqrFFpe1RUaJ6f6pXpHpFqvfXBbwhULgWvk-0th-q-zoUarX2lZR0-7qSS8U7Hg98DI0F506J_c5B9XvyB5arfIQ</recordid><startdate>20080716</startdate><enddate>20080716</enddate><creator>Kendra, James</creator><creator>Rozdilsky, Jack</creator><creator>McEntire, David A</creator><general>bepress</general><general>De Gruyter</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080716</creationdate><title>Evacuating Large Urban Areas: Challenges for Emergency Management Policies and Concepts</title><author>Kendra, James ; Rozdilsky, Jack ; McEntire, David A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b2448-673f8b5287130c3ac3a9a3ece30d5bd2e9158e327e6da2254ed28b6d8d35d6123</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>disaster</topic><topic>Disasters</topic><topic>Emergency management</topic><topic>evacuation</topic><topic>Government departments</topic><topic>Hurricane Katrina</topic><topic>Hurricane Rita</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Planning methods</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>urban planning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kendra, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rozdilsky, Jack</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McEntire, David A</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kendra, James</au><au>Rozdilsky, Jack</au><au>McEntire, David A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evacuating Large Urban Areas: Challenges for Emergency Management Policies and Concepts</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management</jtitle><date>2008-07-16</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>32</spage><pages>32-</pages><issn>1547-7355</issn><eissn>1547-7355</eissn><abstract>Abstract This article presents several policy observations regarding evacuation planning and disaster mitigation in large urban areas. After reviewing the research literature pertaining to disaster evacuations, the article provides background information about and lessons learned from Hurricanes Katrina and Rita in 2005 and Hurricane Dean in 2007. The often-erroneous planning assumptions in emergency management are then explored along with a discussion about future policy and management implications. Three themes are identified in this research, including: 1) public officials must anticipate a much broader scope of issues when issuing evacuation requests, 2) they must do more to prepare for disasters than write "fantasy" emergency operations plans, and 3) they must adjust development activities that have a negative impact upon disaster mitigation. Errata Page 7, Paragraph 2, Lines 1-3, which reads: Louisiana Governor Blanco estimated that 92 percent of the 1.3 million residents of the New Orleans area were evacuated (United States Office of the President - The White House, 2006). Should read: “Louisiana Governor Kathleen Blanco has estimated that 92 percent of the 1.3 million residents of the New Orleans area were evacuated” (Cox, 2006: 9, citing Federal Response to Hurricane Katrina: Lessons Learned. The White House, 2006: 29). Page 7, Paragraph 4, Lines 2-7, which reads: Wolshon (2002) considered New Orleans evacuation issues and estimated that 200,000 to 300,000 people in the New Orleans region do not have access to reliable transportation. Furthermore, the same study indicated that of the 1.4 million inhabitants of high risk regions in the New Orleans area, approximately 60 percent of the population or about 850,000 people will not want or be able to leave these areas (Wolshon, 2002). Should read: Wolshon (2002) considered New Orleans evacuation issues and estimated that “200,000 to 300,000 persons in the New Orleans region do not have access to reliable transportation.” Furthermore, the same study indicated that of the “[o]f the 1.4 million inhabitants in the high-threat areas, it is assumed only approximately 60 percent of the population or about 850,000 people will want, or be able, to leave the city.” (Wolshon, 2002: 45). Pages 9, Paragraph 5, Lines 1-3, which reads: As the hurricane approached, three million persons evacuated the lowlying Texas coastal areas and, with the congestion, this took an estimated four to five hours to drive the 50 miles to reach the city of Houston. Should read: As the hurricane approached, three million persons evacuated the lowlying Texas coastal areas and, with the congestion, this took an estimated four to five hours to drive the 50 miles to reach the city of Houston (Litman, 2006: 13). Page 10, Paragraph 2, Lines 3-10, which reads: For instance, Wolshon and others (2005) have argued the central issue confronting both the transportation engineering/planning sector and the emergency management community is trying to maintain a balance between different transportation needs. On the one hand, it may not be logical to devote significant resources toward planning, designing, and constructing infrastructure to support rare emergency management functions since large scale urban evacuations may take place only once in a generation (Wolshon, Hamilton, Levitan et al., 2005a). Should read: For instance, Wolshon and others (2005a: 161) have asserted that the principal challenge for both the transportation engineering/planning sector and the emergency management community is “trying to maintain a balance between the needs of evacuations and the enormous need for limited transportation resources for routine conditions.” One the one hand, “it may not be logical to devote significant resources toward planning, designing, and constructing transportation infrastructure for an evacuation that may occur once in a generation” (Wolshon, Hamilton, Levitan, et al 2005a: 161). Page 11, Paragraph 2, Lines 2-3, which reads: Exit capacity refers to the ability of major roadways leading out of the urban area to handle an evacuation of the urban area’s residents. Should read: “Exit Capacity refers to the capacity of major roadways leading out of an urban area to handle an evacuation of urban area residents” (Cox, 2006: 11). Page 11, Paragraph 3, Lines 3-10, which reads: Katrina evacuation problems can be related to extreme examples of the day-today problems faced by many non-drivers in places with inadequate and poorly integrated public transportation services. Rita evacuation problems can be related to the problems that result from excessive reliance on automobile transport without efficient management (Litman, 2006). Besides the problems of flow and exit capacity evident in Rita, many vehicles ran out of gas or experienced mechanical problems due to the slow moving traffic and the Texas early-autumn heat. Should read: “Katrina evacuation problems are simply extreme examples of the day-to-day problems many nondrivers face due to inadequate and poorly integrated public transportation services. Rita evacuation problems are simply extreme examples of the day-to-day traffic problems that result from excessive reliance on automobile transport without efficient management” (Litman, 2006: 17). Besides the problems of flow and exit capacity evident in Rita, many vehicles ran out of gas or experienced mechanical problems due to the slow moving traffic and the Texas early-autumn heat (Litman, 2006: 13). Page 12, Paragraph 3, Lines 1-3, which reads: While Hurricane Dean ultimately stayed far south of the Texas border, the threat of a storm surge affecting Brownsville prompted officials to implement what turned out to be a multimillion-dollar exercise (Brezosky, 2007). Should read: Brezosky (2007) cites the views of a Texas emergency official in writing, “While Dean ultimately stayed far south of the Texas border, the threat of storm surge engulfing Brownsville easily merited what turned out to be a multimillion-dollar exercise.” Recommended Citation Kendra, James; Rozdilsky, Jack; and McEntire, David A. (2008) "Evacuating Large Urban Areas: Challenges for Emergency Management Policies and Concepts," Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management: Vol. 5 : Iss. 1, Article 32. DOI: 10.2202/1547-7355.1365 Available at: http://www.bepress.com/jhsem/vol5/iss1/32</abstract><pub>bepress</pub><doi>10.2202/1547-7355.1365</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1547-7355
ispartof Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 2008-07, Vol.5 (1), p.32
issn 1547-7355
1547-7355
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_2202_1547_7355_1365
source De Gruyter journals
subjects disaster
Disasters
Emergency management
evacuation
Government departments
Hurricane Katrina
Hurricane Rita
Management
Planning methods
U.S.A
urban planning
title Evacuating Large Urban Areas: Challenges for Emergency Management Policies and Concepts
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T08%3A04%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evacuating%20Large%20Urban%20Areas:%20Challenges%20for%20Emergency%20Management%20Policies%20and%20Concepts&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Homeland%20Security%20and%20Emergency%20Management&rft.au=Kendra,%20James&rft.date=2008-07-16&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=32&rft.pages=32-&rft.issn=1547-7355&rft.eissn=1547-7355&rft_id=info:doi/10.2202/1547-7355.1365&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E37021718%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=37021718&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true