Curriculum Analysis of Computer Science Departments by Simplified, Supervised LDA
The design of appropriate curricula is one of the most important issues in higher educational institutions, and there are many features to be considered. In this paper, the two key features (“locality bias” and “combination of two simple factors”) were discovered by investigating the actual computer...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Information Processing 2018, Vol.26, pp.497-508 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 508 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 497 |
container_title | Journal of Information Processing |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Matsuda, Yoshitatsu Sekiya, Takayuki Yamaguchi, Kazunori |
description | The design of appropriate curricula is one of the most important issues in higher educational institutions, and there are many features to be considered. In this paper, the two key features (“locality bias” and “combination of two simple factors”) were discovered by investigating the actual computer science (CS) curricula of the top-ranked universities on the basis of Computer Science Curricula 2013 (CS2013), where the CS topics are classified into the 18 Knowledge Areas (KAs). We applied a machine learning method named simplified, supervised latent Dirichlet allocation (ssLDA) to the actual syllabi of the CS departments of the 47 top-ranked universities. ssLDA estimates the relative weights of the KAs of CS2013 in each syllabus. Then, each CS department was characterized as the averaged weights of the KAs over its included syllabi. We applied the three well-known data analysis methods (hierarchical cluster analysis, principle component analysis, and non-negative matrix factorization) to the averaged weights of each department and found the above two key features quantitatively and objectively. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2197/ipsjjip.26.497 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_2197_ipsjjip_26_497</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>article_ipsjjip_26_0_26_497_article_char_en</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4197-bcd1def46516b476b17948169b422db21e16a0ac65ffff0fe3e032d62813800f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkE9rhDAQxUNpodttrz3nA1SbRI16FLf_QCjF9hxinLQRdUOihf32tawsO5cZmPeGNz-E7ikJGc3TR2N91xkbMh7GeXqBNjTLWMB5wi7P5mt0431HCM9JQjboo5ydM2ru5wEXo-wP3ni817jcD3aewOFaGRgV4B1Y6aYBxsnj5oBrM9jeaAPtA65nC-7XeGhxtStu0ZWWvYe7tW_R1_PTZ_kaVO8vb2VRBSpe0gaNamkLOuYJ5U2c8oameZxRnjcxY23DKFAuiVQ80UsRDRGQiLWcZTTKCNHRFoXHu8rtvXeghXVmkO4gKBH_QMQKRDAuFiCLoTgaOj_JbzjJl7eM6uFcTlbPaad-pBMwRn-0gW5O</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Curriculum Analysis of Computer Science Departments by Simplified, Supervised LDA</title><source>J-STAGE Free</source><creator>Matsuda, Yoshitatsu ; Sekiya, Takayuki ; Yamaguchi, Kazunori</creator><creatorcontrib>Matsuda, Yoshitatsu ; Sekiya, Takayuki ; Yamaguchi, Kazunori</creatorcontrib><description>The design of appropriate curricula is one of the most important issues in higher educational institutions, and there are many features to be considered. In this paper, the two key features (“locality bias” and “combination of two simple factors”) were discovered by investigating the actual computer science (CS) curricula of the top-ranked universities on the basis of Computer Science Curricula 2013 (CS2013), where the CS topics are classified into the 18 Knowledge Areas (KAs). We applied a machine learning method named simplified, supervised latent Dirichlet allocation (ssLDA) to the actual syllabi of the CS departments of the 47 top-ranked universities. ssLDA estimates the relative weights of the KAs of CS2013 in each syllabus. Then, each CS department was characterized as the averaged weights of the KAs over its included syllabi. We applied the three well-known data analysis methods (hierarchical cluster analysis, principle component analysis, and non-negative matrix factorization) to the averaged weights of each department and found the above two key features quantitatively and objectively.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1882-6652</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1882-6652</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2197/ipsjjip.26.497</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Information Processing Society of Japan</publisher><subject>CS2013 ; curriculum ; curriculum analysis ; supervised LDA ; syllabus</subject><ispartof>Journal of Information Processing, 2018, Vol.26, pp.497-508</ispartof><rights>2018 by the Information Processing Society of Japan</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4197-bcd1def46516b476b17948169b422db21e16a0ac65ffff0fe3e032d62813800f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4197-bcd1def46516b476b17948169b422db21e16a0ac65ffff0fe3e032d62813800f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1883,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Matsuda, Yoshitatsu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sekiya, Takayuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamaguchi, Kazunori</creatorcontrib><title>Curriculum Analysis of Computer Science Departments by Simplified, Supervised LDA</title><title>Journal of Information Processing</title><addtitle>Journal of Information Processing</addtitle><description>The design of appropriate curricula is one of the most important issues in higher educational institutions, and there are many features to be considered. In this paper, the two key features (“locality bias” and “combination of two simple factors”) were discovered by investigating the actual computer science (CS) curricula of the top-ranked universities on the basis of Computer Science Curricula 2013 (CS2013), where the CS topics are classified into the 18 Knowledge Areas (KAs). We applied a machine learning method named simplified, supervised latent Dirichlet allocation (ssLDA) to the actual syllabi of the CS departments of the 47 top-ranked universities. ssLDA estimates the relative weights of the KAs of CS2013 in each syllabus. Then, each CS department was characterized as the averaged weights of the KAs over its included syllabi. We applied the three well-known data analysis methods (hierarchical cluster analysis, principle component analysis, and non-negative matrix factorization) to the averaged weights of each department and found the above two key features quantitatively and objectively.</description><subject>CS2013</subject><subject>curriculum</subject><subject>curriculum analysis</subject><subject>supervised LDA</subject><subject>syllabus</subject><issn>1882-6652</issn><issn>1882-6652</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkE9rhDAQxUNpodttrz3nA1SbRI16FLf_QCjF9hxinLQRdUOihf32tawsO5cZmPeGNz-E7ikJGc3TR2N91xkbMh7GeXqBNjTLWMB5wi7P5mt0431HCM9JQjboo5ydM2ru5wEXo-wP3ni817jcD3aewOFaGRgV4B1Y6aYBxsnj5oBrM9jeaAPtA65nC-7XeGhxtStu0ZWWvYe7tW_R1_PTZ_kaVO8vb2VRBSpe0gaNamkLOuYJ5U2c8oameZxRnjcxY23DKFAuiVQ80UsRDRGQiLWcZTTKCNHRFoXHu8rtvXeghXVmkO4gKBH_QMQKRDAuFiCLoTgaOj_JbzjJl7eM6uFcTlbPaad-pBMwRn-0gW5O</recordid><startdate>2018</startdate><enddate>2018</enddate><creator>Matsuda, Yoshitatsu</creator><creator>Sekiya, Takayuki</creator><creator>Yamaguchi, Kazunori</creator><general>Information Processing Society of Japan</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2018</creationdate><title>Curriculum Analysis of Computer Science Departments by Simplified, Supervised LDA</title><author>Matsuda, Yoshitatsu ; Sekiya, Takayuki ; Yamaguchi, Kazunori</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4197-bcd1def46516b476b17948169b422db21e16a0ac65ffff0fe3e032d62813800f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>CS2013</topic><topic>curriculum</topic><topic>curriculum analysis</topic><topic>supervised LDA</topic><topic>syllabus</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Matsuda, Yoshitatsu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sekiya, Takayuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamaguchi, Kazunori</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of Information Processing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Matsuda, Yoshitatsu</au><au>Sekiya, Takayuki</au><au>Yamaguchi, Kazunori</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Curriculum Analysis of Computer Science Departments by Simplified, Supervised LDA</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Information Processing</jtitle><addtitle>Journal of Information Processing</addtitle><date>2018</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>26</volume><spage>497</spage><epage>508</epage><pages>497-508</pages><issn>1882-6652</issn><eissn>1882-6652</eissn><abstract>The design of appropriate curricula is one of the most important issues in higher educational institutions, and there are many features to be considered. In this paper, the two key features (“locality bias” and “combination of two simple factors”) were discovered by investigating the actual computer science (CS) curricula of the top-ranked universities on the basis of Computer Science Curricula 2013 (CS2013), where the CS topics are classified into the 18 Knowledge Areas (KAs). We applied a machine learning method named simplified, supervised latent Dirichlet allocation (ssLDA) to the actual syllabi of the CS departments of the 47 top-ranked universities. ssLDA estimates the relative weights of the KAs of CS2013 in each syllabus. Then, each CS department was characterized as the averaged weights of the KAs over its included syllabi. We applied the three well-known data analysis methods (hierarchical cluster analysis, principle component analysis, and non-negative matrix factorization) to the averaged weights of each department and found the above two key features quantitatively and objectively.</abstract><pub>Information Processing Society of Japan</pub><doi>10.2197/ipsjjip.26.497</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1882-6652 |
ispartof | Journal of Information Processing, 2018, Vol.26, pp.497-508 |
issn | 1882-6652 1882-6652 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_2197_ipsjjip_26_497 |
source | J-STAGE Free |
subjects | CS2013 curriculum curriculum analysis supervised LDA syllabus |
title | Curriculum Analysis of Computer Science Departments by Simplified, Supervised LDA |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-31T00%3A28%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Curriculum%20Analysis%20of%20Computer%20Science%20Departments%20by%20Simplified,%20Supervised%20LDA&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Information%20Processing&rft.au=Matsuda,%20Yoshitatsu&rft.date=2018&rft.volume=26&rft.spage=497&rft.epage=508&rft.pages=497-508&rft.issn=1882-6652&rft.eissn=1882-6652&rft_id=info:doi/10.2197/ipsjjip.26.497&rft_dat=%3Cjstage_cross%3Earticle_ipsjjip_26_0_26_497_article_char_en%3C/jstage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |