Cross-Species Hybrids and Bioethics in Early Soviet Fiction
My article addresses issues of bioethics in cross-species hybridism raised in Robert and Beylis’ well-known “Crossing species boundaries” (2003) and the ensuing discussion by examination of two important stories written in the Soviet 1920s, “A Dog’s Heart” and “The Amphibian Man”. I argue that these...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | JAHR (Rijeka ) 2023, Vol.14 (1), p.169-189 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | My article addresses issues of bioethics in cross-species hybridism raised in Robert and Beylis’ well-known “Crossing species boundaries” (2003) and the ensuing discussion by examination of two important stories written in the Soviet 1920s, “A Dog’s Heart” and “The Amphibian Man”. I argue that these two fictional narratives show that literature not only responds to changing trends in biological sciences but also heuristically considers and intuits wider social implications of radical experimentation. My approach is both synchronic and diachronic as I demonstrate that while being grounded in the same reformative atmosphere of the 1920s, the two texts present divergent responses to the issue of cross-species hybridism relevant for our contemporary debates. In particular, I deal with the notions of man playing God, species identity in analogy to ‘race’, procreation of human-animal hybrids, and also consider the relevance of culture-specific concepts of charismatic and distant species for cross-species discourse.
U članku se bavim bioetičkim pitanjima hibridizacije različitih vrsta u poznatom radu „Crossing species boundaries” („Prijelaz granica između vrsta”) (2003.) Roberta i Beylisa i raspravom koja iz toga proizlazi analizirajući dvije važne priče napisane 1920-ih godina u Sovjetskom Savezu, „Pseće srce” i „Čovjek vodozemac”. Tvrdim da ove dvije izmišljene priče dokazuju da književnost ne odgovara samo na mijenjanje trendova u biološkim znanostima, već heuristički i intuitivno razmatra šire društvene posljedice radikalnog eksperimentiranja. Pristup u procesu dokazivanja da oba teksta, unatoč činjenici da su ukorijenjeni u reformacijskoj atmosferi 1920-ih, predstavljaju različite odgovore na problematiku hibridizacije različitih veza koji su relevantni u današnjim debatama, istovremeno je sinkronijski i dijakronijski. Posebice se bavim idejom da čovjek glumi Boga, identitetom vrsta kao analogijom za rasu i stvaranjem ljudsko-životinjskih hibrida. Također se bavim relevantnošću koncepata specifičnih za određenu kulturu i udaljenih vrsta za raspravu o različitim vrstama. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1847-6376 1848-7874 |
DOI: | 10.21860/j.14.1.9 |