From comparative studies to hermeneutic cartography of world philosophy

The radical change in the status of non-Western philosophical traditions was the trigger for the development of the methodology for studying philosophy between cultures, the revision of the nature of philosophy itself, which is a matter of metaphilosophy. Hermeneutic works appear on the fundamental...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies 2022, Vol.38 (4), p.473-486
Hauptverfasser: Kolesnikov, Anatoly S., Alieva, Cholpon E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 486
container_issue 4
container_start_page 473
container_title Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies
container_volume 38
creator Kolesnikov, Anatoly S.
Alieva, Cholpon E.
description The radical change in the status of non-Western philosophical traditions was the trigger for the development of the methodology for studying philosophy between cultures, the revision of the nature of philosophy itself, which is a matter of metaphilosophy. Hermeneutic works appear on the fundamental fabric of philosophical ideas — basic concepts, their relationship to other ways of thinking, considering their potential and alternative productive lines. Thus, the history of comparative philosophy, through its stages, is formed into a single scheme of complementary philosophical activity and a single comprehensive metaphilosophical project. It is revealed through an “archival” approach (exploring single philosophical traditions in parallel), “equivalent” (comparing the existing traditions in the context of analogies and contrasts), and “problem solving” (using many traditions to provide philosophical solutions), and through a comprehensive hermeneutic project of “cartographic” concepts and their possibilities. This constitutes a theory of philosophy that draws on multiple perspectives of the interconnected traditions of East and West, implicitly participating in mapping the underlying eidetic structure on which philosophy does its work, and outlining conceptual possibilities around any idea. There is a need to study the ability of philosophy to form a broader hermeneutic understanding of the field of concept, giving rise to each philosophical problem, comprehended in their strengths and weaknesses and in connection with alternative configurations — under traditions, conditions, periods and cultures A view of global philosophy is formed, which brings us back to the old idea that philosophy stays above pragmatic goals, it takes on the eidetic fabric of ideas of the world — past, present, possible — as an object of a special kind of hermeneutic understanding, including applied problems in a broader speculative frame, that is, cleaned up through a comparison of radically different approaches. It is here, in philosophy as a study of the “structure of ideas themselves”, that we will see a multicultural philosophy proving its indispensability.
doi_str_mv 10.21638/spbu17.2022.403
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_21638_spbu17_2022_403</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_21638_spbu17_2022_403</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c833-f26edd84a81546e352aa479ab08f7d2deebc8dbb0bde8366979d8babb85e69c33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNot0L1OwzAUBWALgURVujP6BRKca8d2RlTRglSpS3fLPzckUoIjOwH17Skt0zk6wxk-Qp4rVkIluX7Jk1sqVQIDKAXjd2QFtaiKhmu4v3YoAJR-JJuce8eEUFKIGlZkv0txpD6Ok0127r-R5nkJPWY6R9phGvELl7n31Ns0x89kp-5MY0t_YhoCnbp-iDletify0Noh4-Y_1-S0eztt34vDcf-xfT0UXnNetCAxBC2srmohkddgrVCNdUy3KkBAdF4H55gLqLmUjWqCdtY5XaNsPOdrwm63PsWcE7ZmSv1o09lUzFwpzI3C_FGYCwX_Bd6bVPE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>From comparative studies to hermeneutic cartography of world philosophy</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Kolesnikov, Anatoly S. ; Alieva, Cholpon E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kolesnikov, Anatoly S. ; Alieva, Cholpon E. ; International University “Ala-Too” ; St. Petersburg State University ; International University of Kyrgyzstan</creatorcontrib><description>The radical change in the status of non-Western philosophical traditions was the trigger for the development of the methodology for studying philosophy between cultures, the revision of the nature of philosophy itself, which is a matter of metaphilosophy. Hermeneutic works appear on the fundamental fabric of philosophical ideas — basic concepts, their relationship to other ways of thinking, considering their potential and alternative productive lines. Thus, the history of comparative philosophy, through its stages, is formed into a single scheme of complementary philosophical activity and a single comprehensive metaphilosophical project. It is revealed through an “archival” approach (exploring single philosophical traditions in parallel), “equivalent” (comparing the existing traditions in the context of analogies and contrasts), and “problem solving” (using many traditions to provide philosophical solutions), and through a comprehensive hermeneutic project of “cartographic” concepts and their possibilities. This constitutes a theory of philosophy that draws on multiple perspectives of the interconnected traditions of East and West, implicitly participating in mapping the underlying eidetic structure on which philosophy does its work, and outlining conceptual possibilities around any idea. There is a need to study the ability of philosophy to form a broader hermeneutic understanding of the field of concept, giving rise to each philosophical problem, comprehended in their strengths and weaknesses and in connection with alternative configurations — under traditions, conditions, periods and cultures A view of global philosophy is formed, which brings us back to the old idea that philosophy stays above pragmatic goals, it takes on the eidetic fabric of ideas of the world — past, present, possible — as an object of a special kind of hermeneutic understanding, including applied problems in a broader speculative frame, that is, cleaned up through a comparison of radically different approaches. It is here, in philosophy as a study of the “structure of ideas themselves”, that we will see a multicultural philosophy proving its indispensability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2542-2278</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2541-9382</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.21638/spbu17.2022.403</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 2022, Vol.38 (4), p.473-486</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kolesnikov, Anatoly S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alieva, Cholpon E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>International University “Ala-Too”</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>St. Petersburg State University</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>International University of Kyrgyzstan</creatorcontrib><title>From comparative studies to hermeneutic cartography of world philosophy</title><title>Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies</title><description>The radical change in the status of non-Western philosophical traditions was the trigger for the development of the methodology for studying philosophy between cultures, the revision of the nature of philosophy itself, which is a matter of metaphilosophy. Hermeneutic works appear on the fundamental fabric of philosophical ideas — basic concepts, their relationship to other ways of thinking, considering their potential and alternative productive lines. Thus, the history of comparative philosophy, through its stages, is formed into a single scheme of complementary philosophical activity and a single comprehensive metaphilosophical project. It is revealed through an “archival” approach (exploring single philosophical traditions in parallel), “equivalent” (comparing the existing traditions in the context of analogies and contrasts), and “problem solving” (using many traditions to provide philosophical solutions), and through a comprehensive hermeneutic project of “cartographic” concepts and their possibilities. This constitutes a theory of philosophy that draws on multiple perspectives of the interconnected traditions of East and West, implicitly participating in mapping the underlying eidetic structure on which philosophy does its work, and outlining conceptual possibilities around any idea. There is a need to study the ability of philosophy to form a broader hermeneutic understanding of the field of concept, giving rise to each philosophical problem, comprehended in their strengths and weaknesses and in connection with alternative configurations — under traditions, conditions, periods and cultures A view of global philosophy is formed, which brings us back to the old idea that philosophy stays above pragmatic goals, it takes on the eidetic fabric of ideas of the world — past, present, possible — as an object of a special kind of hermeneutic understanding, including applied problems in a broader speculative frame, that is, cleaned up through a comparison of radically different approaches. It is here, in philosophy as a study of the “structure of ideas themselves”, that we will see a multicultural philosophy proving its indispensability.</description><issn>2542-2278</issn><issn>2541-9382</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNot0L1OwzAUBWALgURVujP6BRKca8d2RlTRglSpS3fLPzckUoIjOwH17Skt0zk6wxk-Qp4rVkIluX7Jk1sqVQIDKAXjd2QFtaiKhmu4v3YoAJR-JJuce8eEUFKIGlZkv0txpD6Ok0127r-R5nkJPWY6R9phGvELl7n31Ns0x89kp-5MY0t_YhoCnbp-iDletify0Noh4-Y_1-S0eztt34vDcf-xfT0UXnNetCAxBC2srmohkddgrVCNdUy3KkBAdF4H55gLqLmUjWqCdtY5XaNsPOdrwm63PsWcE7ZmSv1o09lUzFwpzI3C_FGYCwX_Bd6bVPE</recordid><startdate>2022</startdate><enddate>2022</enddate><creator>Kolesnikov, Anatoly S.</creator><creator>Alieva, Cholpon E.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2022</creationdate><title>From comparative studies to hermeneutic cartography of world philosophy</title><author>Kolesnikov, Anatoly S. ; Alieva, Cholpon E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c833-f26edd84a81546e352aa479ab08f7d2deebc8dbb0bde8366979d8babb85e69c33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kolesnikov, Anatoly S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alieva, Cholpon E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>International University “Ala-Too”</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>St. Petersburg State University</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>International University of Kyrgyzstan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kolesnikov, Anatoly S.</au><au>Alieva, Cholpon E.</au><aucorp>International University “Ala-Too”</aucorp><aucorp>St. Petersburg State University</aucorp><aucorp>International University of Kyrgyzstan</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>From comparative studies to hermeneutic cartography of world philosophy</atitle><jtitle>Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies</jtitle><date>2022</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>473</spage><epage>486</epage><pages>473-486</pages><issn>2542-2278</issn><eissn>2541-9382</eissn><abstract>The radical change in the status of non-Western philosophical traditions was the trigger for the development of the methodology for studying philosophy between cultures, the revision of the nature of philosophy itself, which is a matter of metaphilosophy. Hermeneutic works appear on the fundamental fabric of philosophical ideas — basic concepts, their relationship to other ways of thinking, considering their potential and alternative productive lines. Thus, the history of comparative philosophy, through its stages, is formed into a single scheme of complementary philosophical activity and a single comprehensive metaphilosophical project. It is revealed through an “archival” approach (exploring single philosophical traditions in parallel), “equivalent” (comparing the existing traditions in the context of analogies and contrasts), and “problem solving” (using many traditions to provide philosophical solutions), and through a comprehensive hermeneutic project of “cartographic” concepts and their possibilities. This constitutes a theory of philosophy that draws on multiple perspectives of the interconnected traditions of East and West, implicitly participating in mapping the underlying eidetic structure on which philosophy does its work, and outlining conceptual possibilities around any idea. There is a need to study the ability of philosophy to form a broader hermeneutic understanding of the field of concept, giving rise to each philosophical problem, comprehended in their strengths and weaknesses and in connection with alternative configurations — under traditions, conditions, periods and cultures A view of global philosophy is formed, which brings us back to the old idea that philosophy stays above pragmatic goals, it takes on the eidetic fabric of ideas of the world — past, present, possible — as an object of a special kind of hermeneutic understanding, including applied problems in a broader speculative frame, that is, cleaned up through a comparison of radically different approaches. It is here, in philosophy as a study of the “structure of ideas themselves”, that we will see a multicultural philosophy proving its indispensability.</abstract><doi>10.21638/spbu17.2022.403</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2542-2278
ispartof Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 2022, Vol.38 (4), p.473-486
issn 2542-2278
2541-9382
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_21638_spbu17_2022_403
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
title From comparative studies to hermeneutic cartography of world philosophy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T21%3A00%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=From%20comparative%20studies%20to%20hermeneutic%20cartography%20of%20world%20philosophy&rft.jtitle=Vestnik%20of%20Saint%20Petersburg%20University.%20Philosophy%20and%20Conflict%20Studies&rft.au=Kolesnikov,%20Anatoly%20S.&rft.aucorp=International%20University%20%E2%80%9CAla-Too%E2%80%9D&rft.date=2022&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=473&rft.epage=486&rft.pages=473-486&rft.issn=2542-2278&rft.eissn=2541-9382&rft_id=info:doi/10.21638/spbu17.2022.403&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_21638_spbu17_2022_403%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true