Problems of freedom of association and scope of collective agreements in Belarus as a challenge to international labor standards
The Law of the Republic of Belarus of 18.07.2019 No. 219-Z of Article 365 of the Labor Code of the Republic of Belarus was set forth in a new version. The interpretation of the norms enshrined in it regarding the scope of collective agreements has caused not only difficulties in practice for trade u...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Pravo (Online) 2021, Vol.12 (4), p.1082-1094 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1094 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1082 |
container_title | Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Pravo (Online) |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Tomashevski, Kirill L. |
description | The Law of the Republic of Belarus of 18.07.2019 No. 219-Z of Article 365 of the Labor Code of the Republic of Belarus was set forth in a new version. The interpretation of the norms enshrined in it regarding the scope of collective agreements has caused not only difficulties in practice for trade unions and employers, but also indirectly threatens freedom of association and the principle of non-discrimination. The joint explanation by the Ministry of Labor and Social Protection and the Federation of Trade Unions of Belarus, adopted in October 2020, did not remove all questions, since its literal interpretation can lead to discrimination in labor relations. The article analyzes the statement of a Belarusian politician regarding the mandatory creation of trade unions in all private companies under the threat of their liquidation. This statement in comparison with the collective bargaining endeavor of 2020–2021 on amendments and additions to collective agreements at many Belarusian enterprises is compared with international legal acts, the norms of the Constitution of Belarus, and the Labor Code of Belarus. It is concluded that such statements and attempts to include discriminatory norms in collective agreements, making the application of their provisions dependent on participation or non-participation in a trade union, are in contradiction with the norms of the Constitution of Belarus, international labor standards in terms of the generally recognized principle of freedom of association and the effective right to collective bargaining, proclaimed in a number of international legal acts of the UN and the ILO. Proposals are made to overcome the trade union monopoly in terms of collective agreements, expanding the scope of collective agreements in the Republic of Belarus, taking into account the previous historical experience of Belarus and the positive experience of the Russian Federation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.21638/spbu14.2021.417 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_21638_spbu14_2021_417</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_21638_spbu14_2021_417</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c215t-4ebf3ee0b6cb78c15e0dd791e98669e2fac3fc923f96a988f9e1e07880ea02663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkMtOwzAQRS0EElXpnqV_IMWPxLGXUPGSKsEC1tHYGZdISVzZLhI7Ph23ZTVXunfO4hByy9lacCX1XdrbA6_Xggm-rnl7QRai0W3VaCkvS2ZtXXFRy2uySmmwTLKaK9OoBfl9j8GOOCUaPPURsQ_TMUJKwQ2QhzBTmHuaXNjjsXBhHNHl4Rsp7Mp-wjknOsz0AUeIh1Q-KVD3BWU275DmUMqMcT6xYKQj2BBpyoUKsU835MrDmHD1f5fk8-nxY_NSbd-eXzf328oJ3uSqRuslIrPK2VY73iDr-9ZwNFopg8KDk94ZIb1RYLT2BjmyVmuGwIRScknYmetiSCmi7_ZxmCD-dJx1J4ndWWJ3lNgVifIPtRVpGw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Problems of freedom of association and scope of collective agreements in Belarus as a challenge to international labor standards</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Tomashevski, Kirill L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tomashevski, Kirill L. ; Belarusian State University</creatorcontrib><description>The Law of the Republic of Belarus of 18.07.2019 No. 219-Z of Article 365 of the Labor Code of the Republic of Belarus was set forth in a new version. The interpretation of the norms enshrined in it regarding the scope of collective agreements has caused not only difficulties in practice for trade unions and employers, but also indirectly threatens freedom of association and the principle of non-discrimination. The joint explanation by the Ministry of Labor and Social Protection and the Federation of Trade Unions of Belarus, adopted in October 2020, did not remove all questions, since its literal interpretation can lead to discrimination in labor relations. The article analyzes the statement of a Belarusian politician regarding the mandatory creation of trade unions in all private companies under the threat of their liquidation. This statement in comparison with the collective bargaining endeavor of 2020–2021 on amendments and additions to collective agreements at many Belarusian enterprises is compared with international legal acts, the norms of the Constitution of Belarus, and the Labor Code of Belarus. It is concluded that such statements and attempts to include discriminatory norms in collective agreements, making the application of their provisions dependent on participation or non-participation in a trade union, are in contradiction with the norms of the Constitution of Belarus, international labor standards in terms of the generally recognized principle of freedom of association and the effective right to collective bargaining, proclaimed in a number of international legal acts of the UN and the ILO. Proposals are made to overcome the trade union monopoly in terms of collective agreements, expanding the scope of collective agreements in the Republic of Belarus, taking into account the previous historical experience of Belarus and the positive experience of the Russian Federation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2074-1243</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2587-5833</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.21638/spbu14.2021.417</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Pravo (Online), 2021, Vol.12 (4), p.1082-1094</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c215t-4ebf3ee0b6cb78c15e0dd791e98669e2fac3fc923f96a988f9e1e07880ea02663</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4009,27902,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tomashevski, Kirill L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belarusian State University</creatorcontrib><title>Problems of freedom of association and scope of collective agreements in Belarus as a challenge to international labor standards</title><title>Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Pravo (Online)</title><description>The Law of the Republic of Belarus of 18.07.2019 No. 219-Z of Article 365 of the Labor Code of the Republic of Belarus was set forth in a new version. The interpretation of the norms enshrined in it regarding the scope of collective agreements has caused not only difficulties in practice for trade unions and employers, but also indirectly threatens freedom of association and the principle of non-discrimination. The joint explanation by the Ministry of Labor and Social Protection and the Federation of Trade Unions of Belarus, adopted in October 2020, did not remove all questions, since its literal interpretation can lead to discrimination in labor relations. The article analyzes the statement of a Belarusian politician regarding the mandatory creation of trade unions in all private companies under the threat of their liquidation. This statement in comparison with the collective bargaining endeavor of 2020–2021 on amendments and additions to collective agreements at many Belarusian enterprises is compared with international legal acts, the norms of the Constitution of Belarus, and the Labor Code of Belarus. It is concluded that such statements and attempts to include discriminatory norms in collective agreements, making the application of their provisions dependent on participation or non-participation in a trade union, are in contradiction with the norms of the Constitution of Belarus, international labor standards in terms of the generally recognized principle of freedom of association and the effective right to collective bargaining, proclaimed in a number of international legal acts of the UN and the ILO. Proposals are made to overcome the trade union monopoly in terms of collective agreements, expanding the scope of collective agreements in the Republic of Belarus, taking into account the previous historical experience of Belarus and the positive experience of the Russian Federation.</description><issn>2074-1243</issn><issn>2587-5833</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkMtOwzAQRS0EElXpnqV_IMWPxLGXUPGSKsEC1tHYGZdISVzZLhI7Ph23ZTVXunfO4hByy9lacCX1XdrbA6_Xggm-rnl7QRai0W3VaCkvS2ZtXXFRy2uySmmwTLKaK9OoBfl9j8GOOCUaPPURsQ_TMUJKwQ2QhzBTmHuaXNjjsXBhHNHl4Rsp7Mp-wjknOsz0AUeIh1Q-KVD3BWU275DmUMqMcT6xYKQj2BBpyoUKsU835MrDmHD1f5fk8-nxY_NSbd-eXzf328oJ3uSqRuslIrPK2VY73iDr-9ZwNFopg8KDk94ZIb1RYLT2BjmyVmuGwIRScknYmetiSCmi7_ZxmCD-dJx1J4ndWWJ3lNgVifIPtRVpGw</recordid><startdate>2021</startdate><enddate>2021</enddate><creator>Tomashevski, Kirill L.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2021</creationdate><title>Problems of freedom of association and scope of collective agreements in Belarus as a challenge to international labor standards</title><author>Tomashevski, Kirill L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c215t-4ebf3ee0b6cb78c15e0dd791e98669e2fac3fc923f96a988f9e1e07880ea02663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tomashevski, Kirill L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belarusian State University</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Pravo (Online)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tomashevski, Kirill L.</au><aucorp>Belarusian State University</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Problems of freedom of association and scope of collective agreements in Belarus as a challenge to international labor standards</atitle><jtitle>Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Pravo (Online)</jtitle><date>2021</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1082</spage><epage>1094</epage><pages>1082-1094</pages><issn>2074-1243</issn><eissn>2587-5833</eissn><abstract>The Law of the Republic of Belarus of 18.07.2019 No. 219-Z of Article 365 of the Labor Code of the Republic of Belarus was set forth in a new version. The interpretation of the norms enshrined in it regarding the scope of collective agreements has caused not only difficulties in practice for trade unions and employers, but also indirectly threatens freedom of association and the principle of non-discrimination. The joint explanation by the Ministry of Labor and Social Protection and the Federation of Trade Unions of Belarus, adopted in October 2020, did not remove all questions, since its literal interpretation can lead to discrimination in labor relations. The article analyzes the statement of a Belarusian politician regarding the mandatory creation of trade unions in all private companies under the threat of their liquidation. This statement in comparison with the collective bargaining endeavor of 2020–2021 on amendments and additions to collective agreements at many Belarusian enterprises is compared with international legal acts, the norms of the Constitution of Belarus, and the Labor Code of Belarus. It is concluded that such statements and attempts to include discriminatory norms in collective agreements, making the application of their provisions dependent on participation or non-participation in a trade union, are in contradiction with the norms of the Constitution of Belarus, international labor standards in terms of the generally recognized principle of freedom of association and the effective right to collective bargaining, proclaimed in a number of international legal acts of the UN and the ILO. Proposals are made to overcome the trade union monopoly in terms of collective agreements, expanding the scope of collective agreements in the Republic of Belarus, taking into account the previous historical experience of Belarus and the positive experience of the Russian Federation.</abstract><doi>10.21638/spbu14.2021.417</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2074-1243 |
ispartof | Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Pravo (Online), 2021, Vol.12 (4), p.1082-1094 |
issn | 2074-1243 2587-5833 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_21638_spbu14_2021_417 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; HeinOnline Law Journal Library |
title | Problems of freedom of association and scope of collective agreements in Belarus as a challenge to international labor standards |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T11%3A40%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Problems%20of%20freedom%20of%20association%20and%20scope%20of%20collective%20agreements%20in%20Belarus%20as%20a%20challenge%20to%20international%20labor%20standards&rft.jtitle=Vestnik%20Sankt-Peterburgskogo%20universiteta.%20Pravo%20(Online)&rft.au=Tomashevski,%20Kirill%20L.&rft.aucorp=Belarusian%20State%20University&rft.date=2021&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1082&rft.epage=1094&rft.pages=1082-1094&rft.issn=2074-1243&rft.eissn=2587-5833&rft_id=info:doi/10.21638/spbu14.2021.417&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_21638_spbu14_2021_417%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |