Anatomo-morphological features of free-living and farmed pheasants

This study compared pheasant roosters living in a natural habitat (n = 10), where farm-bred birds had not been released for 7 years (hence the wild-living birds were assumed to have been determined exclusively by environmental conditions),. The other group (n = 10) comprised farmed pheasant roosters...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medycyna weterynaryjna 2017-06, Vol.73 (6), p.370-374
Hauptverfasser: Beeger, Sławomir, Wójcik, Mariusz, Flis, Marian, Marecki, Marek, Dziedzic, Robert Pyrkosz Roman
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 374
container_issue 6
container_start_page 370
container_title Medycyna weterynaryjna
container_volume 73
creator Beeger, Sławomir
Wójcik, Mariusz
Flis, Marian
Marecki, Marek
Dziedzic, Robert Pyrkosz Roman
description This study compared pheasant roosters living in a natural habitat (n = 10), where farm-bred birds had not been released for 7 years (hence the wild-living birds were assumed to have been determined exclusively by environmental conditions),. The other group (n = 10) comprised farmed pheasant roosters. In December 2010, the pheasants were hunted, and biometric measurements of some traits were performed. After dissection, the muscles, bones, organs, and gastrointestinal tract were weighed, and the length of the intestines was measured. It was shown that the farmed pheasants had a significantly higher body weight (1583 g and 1407 g), which was mainly related to the higher fat content (144 g and 30 g). The farmed roosters had shorter rectrices. The heart-to-body weight and liver-to-body weight ratios, i.e. 0.6 % and 1.9 % respectively, were the same in both groups. No differences were found between the groups in terms of the weight of the pectoral, limb, and wing muscles, but the farmed roosters had heavier leg and wing bones. The length of the intestines per 100 g body weight was 10.5 cm in the farmed roosters and 13.3 cm in the free-living birds. Statistical analysis of variance was performed, and the differences between the groups were verified with the Mann-Whitney test. The farmed pheasants were shown to differ only slightly from the free-living birds from the natural habitat; hence, they are suitable for reintroduction.
doi_str_mv 10.21521/mw.5702
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_21521_mw_5702</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_21521_mw_5702</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c191t-c929bafd81c095454cc6b097f8a63f361469eef68123c494eebe39e6446cdf323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj7tOwzAUQD2ARFUq8QkeWVz8bjyWipdUiQVm68a5boPiOLIDFX_P8yxnO9Ih5ErwtRRGipt0WpsNl2dkwbk0rLGyuSCrWt_4N9YIYfWC3G5HmHPKLOUyHfOQD32AgUaE-b1gpTnSWBDZ0H_044HC2NEIJWFHpyNChXGul-Q8wlBx9e8leb2_e9k9sv3zw9Nuu2dBODGz4KRrIXaNCNwZbXQItuVuExuwKiortHWI0TZCqqCdRmxRObRa29BFJdWSXP91Q8m1Fox-Kn2C8ukF97_LPp38z7L6AqmfS2o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Anatomo-morphological features of free-living and farmed pheasants</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Beeger, Sławomir ; Wójcik, Mariusz ; Flis, Marian ; Marecki, Marek ; Dziedzic, Robert Pyrkosz Roman</creator><creatorcontrib>Beeger, Sławomir ; Wójcik, Mariusz ; Flis, Marian ; Marecki, Marek ; Dziedzic, Robert Pyrkosz Roman</creatorcontrib><description>This study compared pheasant roosters living in a natural habitat (n = 10), where farm-bred birds had not been released for 7 years (hence the wild-living birds were assumed to have been determined exclusively by environmental conditions),. The other group (n = 10) comprised farmed pheasant roosters. In December 2010, the pheasants were hunted, and biometric measurements of some traits were performed. After dissection, the muscles, bones, organs, and gastrointestinal tract were weighed, and the length of the intestines was measured. It was shown that the farmed pheasants had a significantly higher body weight (1583 g and 1407 g), which was mainly related to the higher fat content (144 g and 30 g). The farmed roosters had shorter rectrices. The heart-to-body weight and liver-to-body weight ratios, i.e. 0.6 % and 1.9 % respectively, were the same in both groups. No differences were found between the groups in terms of the weight of the pectoral, limb, and wing muscles, but the farmed roosters had heavier leg and wing bones. The length of the intestines per 100 g body weight was 10.5 cm in the farmed roosters and 13.3 cm in the free-living birds. Statistical analysis of variance was performed, and the differences between the groups were verified with the Mann-Whitney test. The farmed pheasants were shown to differ only slightly from the free-living birds from the natural habitat; hence, they are suitable for reintroduction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-8628</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.21521/mw.5702</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Medycyna weterynaryjna, 2017-06, Vol.73 (6), p.370-374</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c191t-c929bafd81c095454cc6b097f8a63f361469eef68123c494eebe39e6446cdf323</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Beeger, Sławomir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wójcik, Mariusz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flis, Marian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marecki, Marek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dziedzic, Robert Pyrkosz Roman</creatorcontrib><title>Anatomo-morphological features of free-living and farmed pheasants</title><title>Medycyna weterynaryjna</title><description>This study compared pheasant roosters living in a natural habitat (n = 10), where farm-bred birds had not been released for 7 years (hence the wild-living birds were assumed to have been determined exclusively by environmental conditions),. The other group (n = 10) comprised farmed pheasant roosters. In December 2010, the pheasants were hunted, and biometric measurements of some traits were performed. After dissection, the muscles, bones, organs, and gastrointestinal tract were weighed, and the length of the intestines was measured. It was shown that the farmed pheasants had a significantly higher body weight (1583 g and 1407 g), which was mainly related to the higher fat content (144 g and 30 g). The farmed roosters had shorter rectrices. The heart-to-body weight and liver-to-body weight ratios, i.e. 0.6 % and 1.9 % respectively, were the same in both groups. No differences were found between the groups in terms of the weight of the pectoral, limb, and wing muscles, but the farmed roosters had heavier leg and wing bones. The length of the intestines per 100 g body weight was 10.5 cm in the farmed roosters and 13.3 cm in the free-living birds. Statistical analysis of variance was performed, and the differences between the groups were verified with the Mann-Whitney test. The farmed pheasants were shown to differ only slightly from the free-living birds from the natural habitat; hence, they are suitable for reintroduction.</description><issn>0025-8628</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotj7tOwzAUQD2ARFUq8QkeWVz8bjyWipdUiQVm68a5boPiOLIDFX_P8yxnO9Ih5ErwtRRGipt0WpsNl2dkwbk0rLGyuSCrWt_4N9YIYfWC3G5HmHPKLOUyHfOQD32AgUaE-b1gpTnSWBDZ0H_044HC2NEIJWFHpyNChXGul-Q8wlBx9e8leb2_e9k9sv3zw9Nuu2dBODGz4KRrIXaNCNwZbXQItuVuExuwKiortHWI0TZCqqCdRmxRObRa29BFJdWSXP91Q8m1Fox-Kn2C8ukF97_LPp38z7L6AqmfS2o</recordid><startdate>20170601</startdate><enddate>20170601</enddate><creator>Beeger, Sławomir</creator><creator>Wójcik, Mariusz</creator><creator>Flis, Marian</creator><creator>Marecki, Marek</creator><creator>Dziedzic, Robert Pyrkosz Roman</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170601</creationdate><title>Anatomo-morphological features of free-living and farmed pheasants</title><author>Beeger, Sławomir ; Wójcik, Mariusz ; Flis, Marian ; Marecki, Marek ; Dziedzic, Robert Pyrkosz Roman</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c191t-c929bafd81c095454cc6b097f8a63f361469eef68123c494eebe39e6446cdf323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Beeger, Sławomir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wójcik, Mariusz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flis, Marian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marecki, Marek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dziedzic, Robert Pyrkosz Roman</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Medycyna weterynaryjna</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Beeger, Sławomir</au><au>Wójcik, Mariusz</au><au>Flis, Marian</au><au>Marecki, Marek</au><au>Dziedzic, Robert Pyrkosz Roman</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Anatomo-morphological features of free-living and farmed pheasants</atitle><jtitle>Medycyna weterynaryjna</jtitle><date>2017-06-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>73</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>370</spage><epage>374</epage><pages>370-374</pages><issn>0025-8628</issn><abstract>This study compared pheasant roosters living in a natural habitat (n = 10), where farm-bred birds had not been released for 7 years (hence the wild-living birds were assumed to have been determined exclusively by environmental conditions),. The other group (n = 10) comprised farmed pheasant roosters. In December 2010, the pheasants were hunted, and biometric measurements of some traits were performed. After dissection, the muscles, bones, organs, and gastrointestinal tract were weighed, and the length of the intestines was measured. It was shown that the farmed pheasants had a significantly higher body weight (1583 g and 1407 g), which was mainly related to the higher fat content (144 g and 30 g). The farmed roosters had shorter rectrices. The heart-to-body weight and liver-to-body weight ratios, i.e. 0.6 % and 1.9 % respectively, were the same in both groups. No differences were found between the groups in terms of the weight of the pectoral, limb, and wing muscles, but the farmed roosters had heavier leg and wing bones. The length of the intestines per 100 g body weight was 10.5 cm in the farmed roosters and 13.3 cm in the free-living birds. Statistical analysis of variance was performed, and the differences between the groups were verified with the Mann-Whitney test. The farmed pheasants were shown to differ only slightly from the free-living birds from the natural habitat; hence, they are suitable for reintroduction.</abstract><doi>10.21521/mw.5702</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0025-8628
ispartof Medycyna weterynaryjna, 2017-06, Vol.73 (6), p.370-374
issn 0025-8628
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_21521_mw_5702
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
title Anatomo-morphological features of free-living and farmed pheasants
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T20%3A28%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Anatomo-morphological%20features%20of%20free-living%20and%20farmed%20pheasants&rft.jtitle=Medycyna%20weterynaryjna&rft.au=Beeger,%20S%C5%82awomir&rft.date=2017-06-01&rft.volume=73&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=370&rft.epage=374&rft.pages=370-374&rft.issn=0025-8628&rft_id=info:doi/10.21521/mw.5702&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_21521_mw_5702%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true