Evaluation and Error Analysis of Official Tropical Cyclone Intensity Forecasts during 2005–2018 for the Western North Pacific

This study systematically evaluates the accuracy, trends, and error sources for western North Pacific tropical cyclone intensity forecasts between 2005 and 2018. The study uses homogeneous samples from tropical cyclone (TC) intensity official forecasts issued by the China Meteorological Administrati...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan 2021, Vol.99(1), pp.139-163
Hauptverfasser: HUANG, Xiaogang, PENG, Xudong, FEI, Jianfang, CHENG, Xiaoping, DING, Juli, YU, Dandan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 163
container_issue 1
container_start_page 139
container_title Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan
container_volume 99
creator HUANG, Xiaogang
PENG, Xudong
FEI, Jianfang
CHENG, Xiaoping
DING, Juli
YU, Dandan
description This study systematically evaluates the accuracy, trends, and error sources for western North Pacific tropical cyclone intensity forecasts between 2005 and 2018. The study uses homogeneous samples from tropical cyclone (TC) intensity official forecasts issued by the China Meteorological Administration (CMA), Joint Typhoon Warning Center (JTWC), and Regional Specialized Meteorological Center Tokyo-Typhoon Center (RSMC-Tokyo). The TC intensity forecast accuracy performances are as follows: 24–48 h, JTWC > RSMC-Tokyo > CMA; 72 h, JTWC > CMA > RSMC-Tokyo; and 96–120 h, JTWC > CMA. Improvements in TC intensity forecasting are marginal but steady for all three centers. The 24–72 h improvement rate is approximately 1–2 % yr−1. The improvement rates are statistically significant at the 95 % level for almost half of the verification times from 0–120 h. The three centers tend to overestimate weak TCs over the northern South China Sea, but strong TCs are sometimes underestimated over the area east of the Philippines. The three centers generally have higher skill scores associated with forecasting of rapid weakening (RW) events than rapid intensification (RI) events. Overall, the three centers are not skillful in forecasting RI events more than three days in advance. Fortunately, RW events could be forecasted five days in advance with an accuracy order of CMA > RSMC-Tokyo > JTWC.
doi_str_mv 10.2151/jmsj.2021-008
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_2151_jmsj_2021_008</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>article_jmsj_99_1_99_2021_008_article_char_en</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-4a952ef81436f930e936165e63fff10460e26a9bf930c3a477efae3549ff6b0c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kEtOwzAQhi0EEqWwZO8LpPiROPGyilqoVAGLIpaR645bR6lT2S5SVnAHbshJSFToZp7f_NL8CN1TMmE0ow_1PtQTRhhNCCku0IjRQiSSZPklGhHCREKpyK7RTQj10Ka5GKHP2Ydqjira1mHlNnjmfevx1KmmCzbg1uAXY6y2qsEr3x6s7ouy003rAC9cBBds7PC89aBViAFvjt66LWaEZD9f34zQApteMO4Av0OI4B1-bn3c4VelbS98i66MagLc_eUxepvPVuVTsnx5XJTTZaK54DFJlcwYmIKmXBjJCUgu-mdAcGMMJakgwISS62GnuUrzHIwCnqXSGLHuR2OUnHS1b0PwYKqDt3vlu4qSanCvGtyrBveq3r2eL098HaLawplWPlrdwImWsqJD-L86b_VO-Qoc_wWuMHzM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation and Error Analysis of Official Tropical Cyclone Intensity Forecasts during 2005–2018 for the Western North Pacific</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>HUANG, Xiaogang ; PENG, Xudong ; FEI, Jianfang ; CHENG, Xiaoping ; DING, Juli ; YU, Dandan</creator><creatorcontrib>HUANG, Xiaogang ; PENG, Xudong ; FEI, Jianfang ; CHENG, Xiaoping ; DING, Juli ; YU, Dandan</creatorcontrib><description>This study systematically evaluates the accuracy, trends, and error sources for western North Pacific tropical cyclone intensity forecasts between 2005 and 2018. The study uses homogeneous samples from tropical cyclone (TC) intensity official forecasts issued by the China Meteorological Administration (CMA), Joint Typhoon Warning Center (JTWC), and Regional Specialized Meteorological Center Tokyo-Typhoon Center (RSMC-Tokyo). The TC intensity forecast accuracy performances are as follows: 24–48 h, JTWC &gt; RSMC-Tokyo &gt; CMA; 72 h, JTWC &gt; CMA &gt; RSMC-Tokyo; and 96–120 h, JTWC &gt; CMA. Improvements in TC intensity forecasting are marginal but steady for all three centers. The 24–72 h improvement rate is approximately 1–2 % yr−1. The improvement rates are statistically significant at the 95 % level for almost half of the verification times from 0–120 h. The three centers tend to overestimate weak TCs over the northern South China Sea, but strong TCs are sometimes underestimated over the area east of the Philippines. The three centers generally have higher skill scores associated with forecasting of rapid weakening (RW) events than rapid intensification (RI) events. Overall, the three centers are not skillful in forecasting RI events more than three days in advance. Fortunately, RW events could be forecasted five days in advance with an accuracy order of CMA &gt; RSMC-Tokyo &gt; JTWC.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0026-1165</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2186-9057</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2151/jmsj.2021-008</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Meteorological Society of Japan</publisher><subject>accuracy analysis ; error source ; trend analysis ; tropical cyclone intensity forecast</subject><ispartof>Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan. Ser. II, 2021, Vol.99(1), pp.139-163</ispartof><rights>2021 The Author(s) CC-BY 4.0 (Before 2018: Copyright © Meteorological Society of Japan)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-4a952ef81436f930e936165e63fff10460e26a9bf930c3a477efae3549ff6b0c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-4a952ef81436f930e936165e63fff10460e26a9bf930c3a477efae3549ff6b0c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,4010,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>HUANG, Xiaogang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PENG, Xudong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FEI, Jianfang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CHENG, Xiaoping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DING, Juli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YU, Dandan</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation and Error Analysis of Official Tropical Cyclone Intensity Forecasts during 2005–2018 for the Western North Pacific</title><title>Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan</title><description>This study systematically evaluates the accuracy, trends, and error sources for western North Pacific tropical cyclone intensity forecasts between 2005 and 2018. The study uses homogeneous samples from tropical cyclone (TC) intensity official forecasts issued by the China Meteorological Administration (CMA), Joint Typhoon Warning Center (JTWC), and Regional Specialized Meteorological Center Tokyo-Typhoon Center (RSMC-Tokyo). The TC intensity forecast accuracy performances are as follows: 24–48 h, JTWC &gt; RSMC-Tokyo &gt; CMA; 72 h, JTWC &gt; CMA &gt; RSMC-Tokyo; and 96–120 h, JTWC &gt; CMA. Improvements in TC intensity forecasting are marginal but steady for all three centers. The 24–72 h improvement rate is approximately 1–2 % yr−1. The improvement rates are statistically significant at the 95 % level for almost half of the verification times from 0–120 h. The three centers tend to overestimate weak TCs over the northern South China Sea, but strong TCs are sometimes underestimated over the area east of the Philippines. The three centers generally have higher skill scores associated with forecasting of rapid weakening (RW) events than rapid intensification (RI) events. Overall, the three centers are not skillful in forecasting RI events more than three days in advance. Fortunately, RW events could be forecasted five days in advance with an accuracy order of CMA &gt; RSMC-Tokyo &gt; JTWC.</description><subject>accuracy analysis</subject><subject>error source</subject><subject>trend analysis</subject><subject>tropical cyclone intensity forecast</subject><issn>0026-1165</issn><issn>2186-9057</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kEtOwzAQhi0EEqWwZO8LpPiROPGyilqoVAGLIpaR645bR6lT2S5SVnAHbshJSFToZp7f_NL8CN1TMmE0ow_1PtQTRhhNCCku0IjRQiSSZPklGhHCREKpyK7RTQj10Ka5GKHP2Ydqjira1mHlNnjmfevx1KmmCzbg1uAXY6y2qsEr3x6s7ouy003rAC9cBBds7PC89aBViAFvjt66LWaEZD9f34zQApteMO4Av0OI4B1-bn3c4VelbS98i66MagLc_eUxepvPVuVTsnx5XJTTZaK54DFJlcwYmIKmXBjJCUgu-mdAcGMMJakgwISS62GnuUrzHIwCnqXSGLHuR2OUnHS1b0PwYKqDt3vlu4qSanCvGtyrBveq3r2eL098HaLawplWPlrdwImWsqJD-L86b_VO-Qoc_wWuMHzM</recordid><startdate>2021</startdate><enddate>2021</enddate><creator>HUANG, Xiaogang</creator><creator>PENG, Xudong</creator><creator>FEI, Jianfang</creator><creator>CHENG, Xiaoping</creator><creator>DING, Juli</creator><creator>YU, Dandan</creator><general>Meteorological Society of Japan</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2021</creationdate><title>Evaluation and Error Analysis of Official Tropical Cyclone Intensity Forecasts during 2005–2018 for the Western North Pacific</title><author>HUANG, Xiaogang ; PENG, Xudong ; FEI, Jianfang ; CHENG, Xiaoping ; DING, Juli ; YU, Dandan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-4a952ef81436f930e936165e63fff10460e26a9bf930c3a477efae3549ff6b0c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>accuracy analysis</topic><topic>error source</topic><topic>trend analysis</topic><topic>tropical cyclone intensity forecast</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>HUANG, Xiaogang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PENG, Xudong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FEI, Jianfang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CHENG, Xiaoping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DING, Juli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YU, Dandan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>HUANG, Xiaogang</au><au>PENG, Xudong</au><au>FEI, Jianfang</au><au>CHENG, Xiaoping</au><au>DING, Juli</au><au>YU, Dandan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation and Error Analysis of Official Tropical Cyclone Intensity Forecasts during 2005–2018 for the Western North Pacific</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan</jtitle><date>2021</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>99</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>139</spage><epage>163</epage><pages>139-163</pages><issn>0026-1165</issn><eissn>2186-9057</eissn><abstract>This study systematically evaluates the accuracy, trends, and error sources for western North Pacific tropical cyclone intensity forecasts between 2005 and 2018. The study uses homogeneous samples from tropical cyclone (TC) intensity official forecasts issued by the China Meteorological Administration (CMA), Joint Typhoon Warning Center (JTWC), and Regional Specialized Meteorological Center Tokyo-Typhoon Center (RSMC-Tokyo). The TC intensity forecast accuracy performances are as follows: 24–48 h, JTWC &gt; RSMC-Tokyo &gt; CMA; 72 h, JTWC &gt; CMA &gt; RSMC-Tokyo; and 96–120 h, JTWC &gt; CMA. Improvements in TC intensity forecasting are marginal but steady for all three centers. The 24–72 h improvement rate is approximately 1–2 % yr−1. The improvement rates are statistically significant at the 95 % level for almost half of the verification times from 0–120 h. The three centers tend to overestimate weak TCs over the northern South China Sea, but strong TCs are sometimes underestimated over the area east of the Philippines. The three centers generally have higher skill scores associated with forecasting of rapid weakening (RW) events than rapid intensification (RI) events. Overall, the three centers are not skillful in forecasting RI events more than three days in advance. Fortunately, RW events could be forecasted five days in advance with an accuracy order of CMA &gt; RSMC-Tokyo &gt; JTWC.</abstract><pub>Meteorological Society of Japan</pub><doi>10.2151/jmsj.2021-008</doi><tpages>25</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0026-1165
ispartof Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan. Ser. II, 2021, Vol.99(1), pp.139-163
issn 0026-1165
2186-9057
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_2151_jmsj_2021_008
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects accuracy analysis
error source
trend analysis
tropical cyclone intensity forecast
title Evaluation and Error Analysis of Official Tropical Cyclone Intensity Forecasts during 2005–2018 for the Western North Pacific
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T00%3A16%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20and%20Error%20Analysis%20of%20Official%20Tropical%20Cyclone%20Intensity%20Forecasts%20during%202005%E2%80%932018%20for%20the%20Western%20North%20Pacific&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20Meteorological%20Society%20of%20Japan&rft.au=HUANG,%20Xiaogang&rft.date=2021&rft.volume=99&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=139&rft.epage=163&rft.pages=139-163&rft.issn=0026-1165&rft.eissn=2186-9057&rft_id=info:doi/10.2151/jmsj.2021-008&rft_dat=%3Cjstage_cross%3Earticle_jmsj_99_1_99_2021_008_article_char_en%3C/jstage_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true