EFFICACY OF TTK CHITRA MECHANICAL HEART VALVE VERSUS ST JUDE MECHANICAL HEART VALVE IN AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT

Background: For patients having aortic valve replacement (AVR), the St. Jude and TTK Chitra mechanical heart valves are both often utilised in daily practise. The effectiveness of these valves is still up for discussion, though. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the outcomes of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of advanced research (Indore) 2023-11, Vol.11 (11), p.87-93
Hauptverfasser: Balaiah, Mariappan, Lakshmanan, Satish, S., Manimaaran
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 93
container_issue 11
container_start_page 87
container_title International journal of advanced research (Indore)
container_volume 11
creator Balaiah, Mariappan
Lakshmanan, Satish
S., Manimaaran
description Background: For patients having aortic valve replacement (AVR), the St. Jude and TTK Chitra mechanical heart valves are both often utilised in daily practise. The effectiveness of these valves is still up for discussion, though. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the outcomes of patients who underwent AVR with a St. Jude mechanical valve (SJMV) or a Chitra heart valve prosthesis (CHVP). Methods: We performed a single-center prospective cohort study among patients undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement at the MMC Institute of Cardiology and Cardiothoracic Vascular Surgery in Chennai between January 2022 and June 2023. An aortic valve replacement was necessary in 60 patients in total. Thirty cases underwent AVR with the St. Jude valve and the remaining thirty cases were treated with the TTK Chitra valve. Data were collected and analysis was carried out using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences. Results: Group SJ had 90% of instances with RHD, whereas group C had 93.3% of cases with RHD. In groups SJ and C, calcified AV was observed in 33.3% and 40% of patients, respectively, and bicuspid AV in 26.7% and 23.3% of cases, respectively. Both group SJ and group Cs baseline cardiac parameters were determined to be comparable. Both at baseline and one month after surgery, the mean EF, LVSD, and LVDD in groups SJ and C were comparable. At one month after surgery, both groups mean gradient across the aortic valve was significantly lower than baseline. Groups SJ and C had mortality rates of 6.7% and 3.3%, respectively. Conclusion: Aortic valve replacement patients in low-resource countries can now explore cardiac surgery because to the TTK Chitra mechanical heart valve, which provides comparable results at around half the cost of an imported St. Jude mechanical heart valve with similar efficacy and safety.
doi_str_mv 10.21474/IJAR01/17805
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_21474_IJAR01_17805</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_21474_IJAR01_17805</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c775-4cbc69254b6a539569974a885820c440b4d3e22673d30cb0bcdce70842ac826d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD1PwzAYhC0EElXpyO4_EPr6K3ZGyzgkJU2Q40ZiihInlUCgomTi30M_Bhamu9OdbngQuifwQAmXfJ1vtAOyJlKBuEILyihEgoO8_uNv0Wqe3wGAME7iRC7QwaZpbrR5xVWKvX_GJsu903hrTabL36bAmdXO40YXjcWNdfWuxrXHm92j_W-Vl1hXzufmkp19KbSxW1v6O3Sz7z7mcXXRJfKp9SaLiurp-BMFKUXEQx_ihArex51giYiTRPJOKaEoBM6h5wMbKY0lGxiEHvowhFGC4rQLisYDW6LofBumwzxP4779mt4-u-m7JdCeeLVnXu2JF_sBipBSnQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>EFFICACY OF TTK CHITRA MECHANICAL HEART VALVE VERSUS ST JUDE MECHANICAL HEART VALVE IN AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Balaiah, Mariappan ; Lakshmanan, Satish ; S., Manimaaran</creator><creatorcontrib>Balaiah, Mariappan ; Lakshmanan, Satish ; S., Manimaaran</creatorcontrib><description>Background: For patients having aortic valve replacement (AVR), the St. Jude and TTK Chitra mechanical heart valves are both often utilised in daily practise. The effectiveness of these valves is still up for discussion, though. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the outcomes of patients who underwent AVR with a St. Jude mechanical valve (SJMV) or a Chitra heart valve prosthesis (CHVP). Methods: We performed a single-center prospective cohort study among patients undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement at the MMC Institute of Cardiology and Cardiothoracic Vascular Surgery in Chennai between January 2022 and June 2023. An aortic valve replacement was necessary in 60 patients in total. Thirty cases underwent AVR with the St. Jude valve and the remaining thirty cases were treated with the TTK Chitra valve. Data were collected and analysis was carried out using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences. Results: Group SJ had 90% of instances with RHD, whereas group C had 93.3% of cases with RHD. In groups SJ and C, calcified AV was observed in 33.3% and 40% of patients, respectively, and bicuspid AV in 26.7% and 23.3% of cases, respectively. Both group SJ and group Cs baseline cardiac parameters were determined to be comparable. Both at baseline and one month after surgery, the mean EF, LVSD, and LVDD in groups SJ and C were comparable. At one month after surgery, both groups mean gradient across the aortic valve was significantly lower than baseline. Groups SJ and C had mortality rates of 6.7% and 3.3%, respectively. Conclusion: Aortic valve replacement patients in low-resource countries can now explore cardiac surgery because to the TTK Chitra mechanical heart valve, which provides comparable results at around half the cost of an imported St. Jude mechanical heart valve with similar efficacy and safety.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2320-5407</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2320-5407</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.21474/IJAR01/17805</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>International journal of advanced research (Indore), 2023-11, Vol.11 (11), p.87-93</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Balaiah, Mariappan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lakshmanan, Satish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>S., Manimaaran</creatorcontrib><title>EFFICACY OF TTK CHITRA MECHANICAL HEART VALVE VERSUS ST JUDE MECHANICAL HEART VALVE IN AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT</title><title>International journal of advanced research (Indore)</title><description>Background: For patients having aortic valve replacement (AVR), the St. Jude and TTK Chitra mechanical heart valves are both often utilised in daily practise. The effectiveness of these valves is still up for discussion, though. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the outcomes of patients who underwent AVR with a St. Jude mechanical valve (SJMV) or a Chitra heart valve prosthesis (CHVP). Methods: We performed a single-center prospective cohort study among patients undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement at the MMC Institute of Cardiology and Cardiothoracic Vascular Surgery in Chennai between January 2022 and June 2023. An aortic valve replacement was necessary in 60 patients in total. Thirty cases underwent AVR with the St. Jude valve and the remaining thirty cases were treated with the TTK Chitra valve. Data were collected and analysis was carried out using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences. Results: Group SJ had 90% of instances with RHD, whereas group C had 93.3% of cases with RHD. In groups SJ and C, calcified AV was observed in 33.3% and 40% of patients, respectively, and bicuspid AV in 26.7% and 23.3% of cases, respectively. Both group SJ and group Cs baseline cardiac parameters were determined to be comparable. Both at baseline and one month after surgery, the mean EF, LVSD, and LVDD in groups SJ and C were comparable. At one month after surgery, both groups mean gradient across the aortic valve was significantly lower than baseline. Groups SJ and C had mortality rates of 6.7% and 3.3%, respectively. Conclusion: Aortic valve replacement patients in low-resource countries can now explore cardiac surgery because to the TTK Chitra mechanical heart valve, which provides comparable results at around half the cost of an imported St. Jude mechanical heart valve with similar efficacy and safety.</description><issn>2320-5407</issn><issn>2320-5407</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kD1PwzAYhC0EElXpyO4_EPr6K3ZGyzgkJU2Q40ZiihInlUCgomTi30M_Bhamu9OdbngQuifwQAmXfJ1vtAOyJlKBuEILyihEgoO8_uNv0Wqe3wGAME7iRC7QwaZpbrR5xVWKvX_GJsu903hrTabL36bAmdXO40YXjcWNdfWuxrXHm92j_W-Vl1hXzufmkp19KbSxW1v6O3Sz7z7mcXXRJfKp9SaLiurp-BMFKUXEQx_ihArex51giYiTRPJOKaEoBM6h5wMbKY0lGxiEHvowhFGC4rQLisYDW6LofBumwzxP4779mt4-u-m7JdCeeLVnXu2JF_sBipBSnQ</recordid><startdate>20231130</startdate><enddate>20231130</enddate><creator>Balaiah, Mariappan</creator><creator>Lakshmanan, Satish</creator><creator>S., Manimaaran</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231130</creationdate><title>EFFICACY OF TTK CHITRA MECHANICAL HEART VALVE VERSUS ST JUDE MECHANICAL HEART VALVE IN AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT</title><author>Balaiah, Mariappan ; Lakshmanan, Satish ; S., Manimaaran</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c775-4cbc69254b6a539569974a885820c440b4d3e22673d30cb0bcdce70842ac826d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Balaiah, Mariappan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lakshmanan, Satish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>S., Manimaaran</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>International journal of advanced research (Indore)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Balaiah, Mariappan</au><au>Lakshmanan, Satish</au><au>S., Manimaaran</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>EFFICACY OF TTK CHITRA MECHANICAL HEART VALVE VERSUS ST JUDE MECHANICAL HEART VALVE IN AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT</atitle><jtitle>International journal of advanced research (Indore)</jtitle><date>2023-11-30</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>87</spage><epage>93</epage><pages>87-93</pages><issn>2320-5407</issn><eissn>2320-5407</eissn><abstract>Background: For patients having aortic valve replacement (AVR), the St. Jude and TTK Chitra mechanical heart valves are both often utilised in daily practise. The effectiveness of these valves is still up for discussion, though. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the outcomes of patients who underwent AVR with a St. Jude mechanical valve (SJMV) or a Chitra heart valve prosthesis (CHVP). Methods: We performed a single-center prospective cohort study among patients undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement at the MMC Institute of Cardiology and Cardiothoracic Vascular Surgery in Chennai between January 2022 and June 2023. An aortic valve replacement was necessary in 60 patients in total. Thirty cases underwent AVR with the St. Jude valve and the remaining thirty cases were treated with the TTK Chitra valve. Data were collected and analysis was carried out using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences. Results: Group SJ had 90% of instances with RHD, whereas group C had 93.3% of cases with RHD. In groups SJ and C, calcified AV was observed in 33.3% and 40% of patients, respectively, and bicuspid AV in 26.7% and 23.3% of cases, respectively. Both group SJ and group Cs baseline cardiac parameters were determined to be comparable. Both at baseline and one month after surgery, the mean EF, LVSD, and LVDD in groups SJ and C were comparable. At one month after surgery, both groups mean gradient across the aortic valve was significantly lower than baseline. Groups SJ and C had mortality rates of 6.7% and 3.3%, respectively. Conclusion: Aortic valve replacement patients in low-resource countries can now explore cardiac surgery because to the TTK Chitra mechanical heart valve, which provides comparable results at around half the cost of an imported St. Jude mechanical heart valve with similar efficacy and safety.</abstract><doi>10.21474/IJAR01/17805</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2320-5407
ispartof International journal of advanced research (Indore), 2023-11, Vol.11 (11), p.87-93
issn 2320-5407
2320-5407
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_21474_IJAR01_17805
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
title EFFICACY OF TTK CHITRA MECHANICAL HEART VALVE VERSUS ST JUDE MECHANICAL HEART VALVE IN AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T07%3A52%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=EFFICACY%20OF%20TTK%20CHITRA%20MECHANICAL%20HEART%20VALVE%20VERSUS%20ST%20JUDE%20MECHANICAL%20HEART%20VALVE%20IN%20AORTIC%20VALVE%20REPLACEMENT&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20advanced%20research%20(Indore)&rft.au=Balaiah,%20Mariappan&rft.date=2023-11-30&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=87&rft.epage=93&rft.pages=87-93&rft.issn=2320-5407&rft.eissn=2320-5407&rft_id=info:doi/10.21474/IJAR01/17805&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_21474_IJAR01_17805%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true