Genomic Selection of Forage Quality Traits in Winter Wheat

ABSTRACT Phenotyping forage quality traits is time‐consuming in forage wheat breeding. In this study, prediction accuracies of three genomic selection (GS) models (ridge regression best linear unbiased prediction [RRBLUP], Gaussian kernel [GAUSS], and Bayesian LASSO [BL, where LASSO stands for least...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Crop science 2019-11, Vol.59 (6), p.2473-2483
Hauptverfasser: Maulana, Frank, Kim, Ki‐Seung, Anderson, Joshua D., Sorrells, Mark E., Butler, Twain J., Liu, Shuyu, Baenziger, P. Stephen, Byrne, Patrick F., Ma, Xue‐Feng
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2483
container_issue 6
container_start_page 2473
container_title Crop science
container_volume 59
creator Maulana, Frank
Kim, Ki‐Seung
Anderson, Joshua D.
Sorrells, Mark E.
Butler, Twain J.
Liu, Shuyu
Baenziger, P. Stephen
Byrne, Patrick F.
Ma, Xue‐Feng
description ABSTRACT Phenotyping forage quality traits is time‐consuming in forage wheat breeding. In this study, prediction accuracies of three genomic selection (GS) models (ridge regression best linear unbiased prediction [RRBLUP], Gaussian kernel [GAUSS], and Bayesian LASSO [BL, where LASSO stands for least absolute shrinkage and selection operator]) for forage quality traits of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) were compared using two genotype sampling methods. In addition, the impact of training population (TP) size and marker density on prediction accuracy was explored. The study was done using a diversity panel (n = 298) that was genotyped using 90K single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and phenotyped for forage quality traits including crude protein, acid detergent fiber, neutral detergent fiber, sugars, lignin content, and in vitro true dry matter digestibility. Generally, the three models produced similar prediction accuracies, which ranged from 0.34 to 0.61, for all traits. The sampling method had little effect on accuracy. Crude protein was one of the traits with the highest prediction accuracy, and it required only 1000 markers to attain its highest prediction accuracy value. Increasing TP size and marker density increased accuracies of all traits, and increasing the TP size was more effective than increasing marker density. For this panel, the optimal TP size (nTP) was 150, at which point prediction accuracies of all traits, except for sugars, reached over 90% of the highest value at nTP = 250. However, the sampling method for marker density had no effect on accuracy. The results suggest that GS can be an alternative approach to facilitate selection of forage quality traits during forage wheat breeding.
doi_str_mv 10.2135/cropsci2018.10.0655
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wiley_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_2135_cropsci2018_10_0655</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>CSC2CROPSCI2018100655</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3575-249ad40289c293663daf8354906b80268f4bb2a3a78a9220d91f92138d4737173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNj9FKwzAUhoMoWKdP4E1eoPMkaZrEOwluDgZTO5l3JW1TjXTtSCrSt7d1Xnjp1Tl88P3wIXRNYE4J4zel7w6hdBSInI8MUs5PUEQSxuPxZ6coAiAkJpK9nqOLED4AQCjBI3S7tG23dyXObGPL3nUt7mq86Lx5s_jp0zSuH_DWG9cH7Fq8c21vPd69W9NforPaNMFe_d4Zelncb_VDvN4sV_puHZeMCx7TRJkqASpVSRVLU1aZWjKeKEgLCTSVdVIU1DAjpFGUQqVIrcYqWSWCCSLYDLHj7lgZgrd1fvBub_yQE8in_PxP_sSm_NFaHK0v19jhP0quM0318-Yx06uJE_gZ-gY902Ld</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Genomic Selection of Forage Quality Traits in Winter Wheat</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Maulana, Frank ; Kim, Ki‐Seung ; Anderson, Joshua D. ; Sorrells, Mark E. ; Butler, Twain J. ; Liu, Shuyu ; Baenziger, P. Stephen ; Byrne, Patrick F. ; Ma, Xue‐Feng</creator><creatorcontrib>Maulana, Frank ; Kim, Ki‐Seung ; Anderson, Joshua D. ; Sorrells, Mark E. ; Butler, Twain J. ; Liu, Shuyu ; Baenziger, P. Stephen ; Byrne, Patrick F. ; Ma, Xue‐Feng</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT Phenotyping forage quality traits is time‐consuming in forage wheat breeding. In this study, prediction accuracies of three genomic selection (GS) models (ridge regression best linear unbiased prediction [RRBLUP], Gaussian kernel [GAUSS], and Bayesian LASSO [BL, where LASSO stands for least absolute shrinkage and selection operator]) for forage quality traits of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) were compared using two genotype sampling methods. In addition, the impact of training population (TP) size and marker density on prediction accuracy was explored. The study was done using a diversity panel (n = 298) that was genotyped using 90K single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and phenotyped for forage quality traits including crude protein, acid detergent fiber, neutral detergent fiber, sugars, lignin content, and in vitro true dry matter digestibility. Generally, the three models produced similar prediction accuracies, which ranged from 0.34 to 0.61, for all traits. The sampling method had little effect on accuracy. Crude protein was one of the traits with the highest prediction accuracy, and it required only 1000 markers to attain its highest prediction accuracy value. Increasing TP size and marker density increased accuracies of all traits, and increasing the TP size was more effective than increasing marker density. For this panel, the optimal TP size (nTP) was 150, at which point prediction accuracies of all traits, except for sugars, reached over 90% of the highest value at nTP = 250. However, the sampling method for marker density had no effect on accuracy. The results suggest that GS can be an alternative approach to facilitate selection of forage quality traits during forage wheat breeding.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0011-183X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-0653</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2018.10.0655</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>The Crop Science Society of America, Inc</publisher><ispartof>Crop science, 2019-11, Vol.59 (6), p.2473-2483</ispartof><rights>2019 The Authors.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3575-249ad40289c293663daf8354906b80268f4bb2a3a78a9220d91f92138d4737173</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3575-249ad40289c293663daf8354906b80268f4bb2a3a78a9220d91f92138d4737173</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2135%2Fcropsci2018.10.0655$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.2135%2Fcropsci2018.10.0655$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27929,27930,45579,45580</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Maulana, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Ki‐Seung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Joshua D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sorrells, Mark E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butler, Twain J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Shuyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baenziger, P. Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Byrne, Patrick F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Xue‐Feng</creatorcontrib><title>Genomic Selection of Forage Quality Traits in Winter Wheat</title><title>Crop science</title><description>ABSTRACT Phenotyping forage quality traits is time‐consuming in forage wheat breeding. In this study, prediction accuracies of three genomic selection (GS) models (ridge regression best linear unbiased prediction [RRBLUP], Gaussian kernel [GAUSS], and Bayesian LASSO [BL, where LASSO stands for least absolute shrinkage and selection operator]) for forage quality traits of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) were compared using two genotype sampling methods. In addition, the impact of training population (TP) size and marker density on prediction accuracy was explored. The study was done using a diversity panel (n = 298) that was genotyped using 90K single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and phenotyped for forage quality traits including crude protein, acid detergent fiber, neutral detergent fiber, sugars, lignin content, and in vitro true dry matter digestibility. Generally, the three models produced similar prediction accuracies, which ranged from 0.34 to 0.61, for all traits. The sampling method had little effect on accuracy. Crude protein was one of the traits with the highest prediction accuracy, and it required only 1000 markers to attain its highest prediction accuracy value. Increasing TP size and marker density increased accuracies of all traits, and increasing the TP size was more effective than increasing marker density. For this panel, the optimal TP size (nTP) was 150, at which point prediction accuracies of all traits, except for sugars, reached over 90% of the highest value at nTP = 250. However, the sampling method for marker density had no effect on accuracy. The results suggest that GS can be an alternative approach to facilitate selection of forage quality traits during forage wheat breeding.</description><issn>0011-183X</issn><issn>1435-0653</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNqNj9FKwzAUhoMoWKdP4E1eoPMkaZrEOwluDgZTO5l3JW1TjXTtSCrSt7d1Xnjp1Tl88P3wIXRNYE4J4zel7w6hdBSInI8MUs5PUEQSxuPxZ6coAiAkJpK9nqOLED4AQCjBI3S7tG23dyXObGPL3nUt7mq86Lx5s_jp0zSuH_DWG9cH7Fq8c21vPd69W9NforPaNMFe_d4Zelncb_VDvN4sV_puHZeMCx7TRJkqASpVSRVLU1aZWjKeKEgLCTSVdVIU1DAjpFGUQqVIrcYqWSWCCSLYDLHj7lgZgrd1fvBub_yQE8in_PxP_sSm_NFaHK0v19jhP0quM0318-Yx06uJE_gZ-gY902Ld</recordid><startdate>201911</startdate><enddate>201911</enddate><creator>Maulana, Frank</creator><creator>Kim, Ki‐Seung</creator><creator>Anderson, Joshua D.</creator><creator>Sorrells, Mark E.</creator><creator>Butler, Twain J.</creator><creator>Liu, Shuyu</creator><creator>Baenziger, P. Stephen</creator><creator>Byrne, Patrick F.</creator><creator>Ma, Xue‐Feng</creator><general>The Crop Science Society of America, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201911</creationdate><title>Genomic Selection of Forage Quality Traits in Winter Wheat</title><author>Maulana, Frank ; Kim, Ki‐Seung ; Anderson, Joshua D. ; Sorrells, Mark E. ; Butler, Twain J. ; Liu, Shuyu ; Baenziger, P. Stephen ; Byrne, Patrick F. ; Ma, Xue‐Feng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3575-249ad40289c293663daf8354906b80268f4bb2a3a78a9220d91f92138d4737173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maulana, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Ki‐Seung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Joshua D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sorrells, Mark E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butler, Twain J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Shuyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baenziger, P. Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Byrne, Patrick F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Xue‐Feng</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Crop science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maulana, Frank</au><au>Kim, Ki‐Seung</au><au>Anderson, Joshua D.</au><au>Sorrells, Mark E.</au><au>Butler, Twain J.</au><au>Liu, Shuyu</au><au>Baenziger, P. Stephen</au><au>Byrne, Patrick F.</au><au>Ma, Xue‐Feng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Genomic Selection of Forage Quality Traits in Winter Wheat</atitle><jtitle>Crop science</jtitle><date>2019-11</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>2473</spage><epage>2483</epage><pages>2473-2483</pages><issn>0011-183X</issn><eissn>1435-0653</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT Phenotyping forage quality traits is time‐consuming in forage wheat breeding. In this study, prediction accuracies of three genomic selection (GS) models (ridge regression best linear unbiased prediction [RRBLUP], Gaussian kernel [GAUSS], and Bayesian LASSO [BL, where LASSO stands for least absolute shrinkage and selection operator]) for forage quality traits of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) were compared using two genotype sampling methods. In addition, the impact of training population (TP) size and marker density on prediction accuracy was explored. The study was done using a diversity panel (n = 298) that was genotyped using 90K single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and phenotyped for forage quality traits including crude protein, acid detergent fiber, neutral detergent fiber, sugars, lignin content, and in vitro true dry matter digestibility. Generally, the three models produced similar prediction accuracies, which ranged from 0.34 to 0.61, for all traits. The sampling method had little effect on accuracy. Crude protein was one of the traits with the highest prediction accuracy, and it required only 1000 markers to attain its highest prediction accuracy value. Increasing TP size and marker density increased accuracies of all traits, and increasing the TP size was more effective than increasing marker density. For this panel, the optimal TP size (nTP) was 150, at which point prediction accuracies of all traits, except for sugars, reached over 90% of the highest value at nTP = 250. However, the sampling method for marker density had no effect on accuracy. The results suggest that GS can be an alternative approach to facilitate selection of forage quality traits during forage wheat breeding.</abstract><pub>The Crop Science Society of America, Inc</pub><doi>10.2135/cropsci2018.10.0655</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0011-183X
ispartof Crop science, 2019-11, Vol.59 (6), p.2473-2483
issn 0011-183X
1435-0653
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_2135_cropsci2018_10_0655
source Access via Wiley Online Library; Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Genomic Selection of Forage Quality Traits in Winter Wheat
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T17%3A03%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Genomic%20Selection%20of%20Forage%20Quality%20Traits%20in%20Winter%20Wheat&rft.jtitle=Crop%20science&rft.au=Maulana,%20Frank&rft.date=2019-11&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2473&rft.epage=2483&rft.pages=2473-2483&rft.issn=0011-183X&rft.eissn=1435-0653&rft_id=info:doi/10.2135/cropsci2018.10.0655&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_cross%3ECSC2CROPSCI2018100655%3C/wiley_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true