Comparison and Diet Preference of Novel Endophyte‐Infected Tall Fescue Cultivars

A fungal endophyte, Epichloë coenophiala (Morgan‐Jones & W. Gams) C.W. Bacon & Schardl, naturally infects tall fescue [Lolium arundinaceum (Schreb.) Darbysh.]. The common, toxic endophyte produces ergot alkaloids that cause the livestock disorder known as tall fescue toxicosis. Strains of E....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Crop science 2019-05, Vol.59 (3), p.1317-1329
Hauptverfasser: Kenyon, Sarah L., Roberts, Craig A., Lory, John A., Bailey, Eric A., Kallenbach, Robert L., Rottinghaus, George E., Young, Carolyn A., Davis, David K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1329
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1317
container_title Crop science
container_volume 59
creator Kenyon, Sarah L.
Roberts, Craig A.
Lory, John A.
Bailey, Eric A.
Kallenbach, Robert L.
Rottinghaus, George E.
Young, Carolyn A.
Davis, David K.
description A fungal endophyte, Epichloë coenophiala (Morgan‐Jones & W. Gams) C.W. Bacon & Schardl, naturally infects tall fescue [Lolium arundinaceum (Schreb.) Darbysh.]. The common, toxic endophyte produces ergot alkaloids that cause the livestock disorder known as tall fescue toxicosis. Strains of E. coenophiala that produce little or no toxic ergot alkaloids are referred to as “novel” endophyte associations and offer a solution to tall fescue toxicosis. The objective of this study was to determine differences in animal preference and ground cover among commercially available novel endophyte‐infected tall fescue cultivars. Six cultivars of novel tall fescue and controls of common, toxic endophyte‐infected and endophyte‐free tall fescue were evaluated for animal preference, forage mass, forage removal, forage quality, and ground cover during a 2‐yr grazing trial at Linneus, MO. Plots were grazed over nine grazing events by beef cattle (Bos spp.) during the 2‐yr study, and some animals were fitted with GPS collars to determine which cultivar was grazed first and most often. ‘BarOptima’, a soft‐leaf cultivar, was grazed first and most frequently. Forage mass, forage removal, and forage quality measurements of crude protein, acid detergent fiber, and neutral detergent fiber were similar among cultivars. Ground cover increased each year of the study, even though seed production was inhibited. In addition, rust (Puccinia spp.) susceptibility differed among cultivars. Under this management system, which used up to 24‐h grazing periods and at least 8‐cm stubble height, animal preference was not based on endophyte status.
doi_str_mv 10.2135/cropsci2018.10.0626
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wiley_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_2135_cropsci2018_10_0626</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>CSC2CROPSCI2018100626</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3126-f2f979e8cc385107d3f84346376305b22bf1efa376bc2168887132049b6597053</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEFOwzAQRS0EEqVwAja-QMrYjh1niUwLlSqK2iKxixJnLILSJIrTou44AmfkJCSUBUtWo3nS-5r5hFwzmHAm5I1t68bbggPTk56B4uqEjFgoZABKilMyAmAsYFq8nJML798AIIojOSIrU2-btC18XdG0yuldgR19atFhi5VFWjv6WO-xpNMqr5vXQ4dfH5_zyqHtMKebtCzpDL3dITW7siv2aesvyZlLS49Xv3NMnmfTjXkIFsv7ubldBFYwrgLHXRzFqK0VWjKIcuF0KEIlIiVAZpxnjqFL-zWznCmtdcQEhzDOlIwjkGJMxDG3_977_uSkaYtt2h4SBslQS_KnloENtfTW7Gi9FyUe_qMkZm24WS2f1mY-cAY_Qd9AuWzs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison and Diet Preference of Novel Endophyte‐Infected Tall Fescue Cultivars</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Kenyon, Sarah L. ; Roberts, Craig A. ; Lory, John A. ; Bailey, Eric A. ; Kallenbach, Robert L. ; Rottinghaus, George E. ; Young, Carolyn A. ; Davis, David K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kenyon, Sarah L. ; Roberts, Craig A. ; Lory, John A. ; Bailey, Eric A. ; Kallenbach, Robert L. ; Rottinghaus, George E. ; Young, Carolyn A. ; Davis, David K.</creatorcontrib><description>A fungal endophyte, Epichloë coenophiala (Morgan‐Jones &amp; W. Gams) C.W. Bacon &amp; Schardl, naturally infects tall fescue [Lolium arundinaceum (Schreb.) Darbysh.]. The common, toxic endophyte produces ergot alkaloids that cause the livestock disorder known as tall fescue toxicosis. Strains of E. coenophiala that produce little or no toxic ergot alkaloids are referred to as “novel” endophyte associations and offer a solution to tall fescue toxicosis. The objective of this study was to determine differences in animal preference and ground cover among commercially available novel endophyte‐infected tall fescue cultivars. Six cultivars of novel tall fescue and controls of common, toxic endophyte‐infected and endophyte‐free tall fescue were evaluated for animal preference, forage mass, forage removal, forage quality, and ground cover during a 2‐yr grazing trial at Linneus, MO. Plots were grazed over nine grazing events by beef cattle (Bos spp.) during the 2‐yr study, and some animals were fitted with GPS collars to determine which cultivar was grazed first and most often. ‘BarOptima’, a soft‐leaf cultivar, was grazed first and most frequently. Forage mass, forage removal, and forage quality measurements of crude protein, acid detergent fiber, and neutral detergent fiber were similar among cultivars. Ground cover increased each year of the study, even though seed production was inhibited. In addition, rust (Puccinia spp.) susceptibility differed among cultivars. Under this management system, which used up to 24‐h grazing periods and at least 8‐cm stubble height, animal preference was not based on endophyte status.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0011-183X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-0653</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2018.10.0626</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>The Crop Science Society of America, Inc</publisher><ispartof>Crop science, 2019-05, Vol.59 (3), p.1317-1329</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Re-use requires permission from the publisher.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3126-f2f979e8cc385107d3f84346376305b22bf1efa376bc2168887132049b6597053</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3126-f2f979e8cc385107d3f84346376305b22bf1efa376bc2168887132049b6597053</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2135%2Fcropsci2018.10.0626$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.2135%2Fcropsci2018.10.0626$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kenyon, Sarah L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Craig A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lory, John A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bailey, Eric A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kallenbach, Robert L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rottinghaus, George E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, Carolyn A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, David K.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison and Diet Preference of Novel Endophyte‐Infected Tall Fescue Cultivars</title><title>Crop science</title><description>A fungal endophyte, Epichloë coenophiala (Morgan‐Jones &amp; W. Gams) C.W. Bacon &amp; Schardl, naturally infects tall fescue [Lolium arundinaceum (Schreb.) Darbysh.]. The common, toxic endophyte produces ergot alkaloids that cause the livestock disorder known as tall fescue toxicosis. Strains of E. coenophiala that produce little or no toxic ergot alkaloids are referred to as “novel” endophyte associations and offer a solution to tall fescue toxicosis. The objective of this study was to determine differences in animal preference and ground cover among commercially available novel endophyte‐infected tall fescue cultivars. Six cultivars of novel tall fescue and controls of common, toxic endophyte‐infected and endophyte‐free tall fescue were evaluated for animal preference, forage mass, forage removal, forage quality, and ground cover during a 2‐yr grazing trial at Linneus, MO. Plots were grazed over nine grazing events by beef cattle (Bos spp.) during the 2‐yr study, and some animals were fitted with GPS collars to determine which cultivar was grazed first and most often. ‘BarOptima’, a soft‐leaf cultivar, was grazed first and most frequently. Forage mass, forage removal, and forage quality measurements of crude protein, acid detergent fiber, and neutral detergent fiber were similar among cultivars. Ground cover increased each year of the study, even though seed production was inhibited. In addition, rust (Puccinia spp.) susceptibility differed among cultivars. Under this management system, which used up to 24‐h grazing periods and at least 8‐cm stubble height, animal preference was not based on endophyte status.</description><issn>0011-183X</issn><issn>1435-0653</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkEFOwzAQRS0EEqVwAja-QMrYjh1niUwLlSqK2iKxixJnLILSJIrTou44AmfkJCSUBUtWo3nS-5r5hFwzmHAm5I1t68bbggPTk56B4uqEjFgoZABKilMyAmAsYFq8nJML798AIIojOSIrU2-btC18XdG0yuldgR19atFhi5VFWjv6WO-xpNMqr5vXQ4dfH5_zyqHtMKebtCzpDL3dITW7siv2aesvyZlLS49Xv3NMnmfTjXkIFsv7ubldBFYwrgLHXRzFqK0VWjKIcuF0KEIlIiVAZpxnjqFL-zWznCmtdcQEhzDOlIwjkGJMxDG3_977_uSkaYtt2h4SBslQS_KnloENtfTW7Gi9FyUe_qMkZm24WS2f1mY-cAY_Qd9AuWzs</recordid><startdate>201905</startdate><enddate>201905</enddate><creator>Kenyon, Sarah L.</creator><creator>Roberts, Craig A.</creator><creator>Lory, John A.</creator><creator>Bailey, Eric A.</creator><creator>Kallenbach, Robert L.</creator><creator>Rottinghaus, George E.</creator><creator>Young, Carolyn A.</creator><creator>Davis, David K.</creator><general>The Crop Science Society of America, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201905</creationdate><title>Comparison and Diet Preference of Novel Endophyte‐Infected Tall Fescue Cultivars</title><author>Kenyon, Sarah L. ; Roberts, Craig A. ; Lory, John A. ; Bailey, Eric A. ; Kallenbach, Robert L. ; Rottinghaus, George E. ; Young, Carolyn A. ; Davis, David K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3126-f2f979e8cc385107d3f84346376305b22bf1efa376bc2168887132049b6597053</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kenyon, Sarah L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Craig A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lory, John A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bailey, Eric A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kallenbach, Robert L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rottinghaus, George E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, Carolyn A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, David K.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Crop science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kenyon, Sarah L.</au><au>Roberts, Craig A.</au><au>Lory, John A.</au><au>Bailey, Eric A.</au><au>Kallenbach, Robert L.</au><au>Rottinghaus, George E.</au><au>Young, Carolyn A.</au><au>Davis, David K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison and Diet Preference of Novel Endophyte‐Infected Tall Fescue Cultivars</atitle><jtitle>Crop science</jtitle><date>2019-05</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1317</spage><epage>1329</epage><pages>1317-1329</pages><issn>0011-183X</issn><eissn>1435-0653</eissn><abstract>A fungal endophyte, Epichloë coenophiala (Morgan‐Jones &amp; W. Gams) C.W. Bacon &amp; Schardl, naturally infects tall fescue [Lolium arundinaceum (Schreb.) Darbysh.]. The common, toxic endophyte produces ergot alkaloids that cause the livestock disorder known as tall fescue toxicosis. Strains of E. coenophiala that produce little or no toxic ergot alkaloids are referred to as “novel” endophyte associations and offer a solution to tall fescue toxicosis. The objective of this study was to determine differences in animal preference and ground cover among commercially available novel endophyte‐infected tall fescue cultivars. Six cultivars of novel tall fescue and controls of common, toxic endophyte‐infected and endophyte‐free tall fescue were evaluated for animal preference, forage mass, forage removal, forage quality, and ground cover during a 2‐yr grazing trial at Linneus, MO. Plots were grazed over nine grazing events by beef cattle (Bos spp.) during the 2‐yr study, and some animals were fitted with GPS collars to determine which cultivar was grazed first and most often. ‘BarOptima’, a soft‐leaf cultivar, was grazed first and most frequently. Forage mass, forage removal, and forage quality measurements of crude protein, acid detergent fiber, and neutral detergent fiber were similar among cultivars. Ground cover increased each year of the study, even though seed production was inhibited. In addition, rust (Puccinia spp.) susceptibility differed among cultivars. Under this management system, which used up to 24‐h grazing periods and at least 8‐cm stubble height, animal preference was not based on endophyte status.</abstract><pub>The Crop Science Society of America, Inc</pub><doi>10.2135/cropsci2018.10.0626</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0011-183X
ispartof Crop science, 2019-05, Vol.59 (3), p.1317-1329
issn 0011-183X
1435-0653
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_2135_cropsci2018_10_0626
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Comparison and Diet Preference of Novel Endophyte‐Infected Tall Fescue Cultivars
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T03%3A11%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20and%20Diet%20Preference%20of%20Novel%20Endophyte%E2%80%90Infected%20Tall%20Fescue%20Cultivars&rft.jtitle=Crop%20science&rft.au=Kenyon,%20Sarah%20L.&rft.date=2019-05&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1317&rft.epage=1329&rft.pages=1317-1329&rft.issn=0011-183X&rft.eissn=1435-0653&rft_id=info:doi/10.2135/cropsci2018.10.0626&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_cross%3ECSC2CROPSCI2018100626%3C/wiley_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true