Nodulation and Yields of Common Bean are Not Affected Either by Fungicides or by the Method of Inoculation

Core Ideas Captan and difenoconazole compromise in vitro survival of Rhizobium tropici CIAT 899. In the field, native rhizobia were clearly tolerant to most of the fungicides evaluated. Among the fungicide treatments assessed in the field, only difenoconazole is potentially damaging. When difenocona...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Agronomy journal 2019-03, Vol.111 (2), p.694-701
Hauptverfasser: Cardillo, Bruno Ewerton da Silveira, Oliveira, Dâmiany Pádua, Soares, Bruno Lima, Dias Martins, Fábio Aurélio, Rufini, Márcia, Silva, Jacqueline Savana, Ferreira Neto, Geraldo Gontijo, Andrade, Messias José Bastos, Souza Moreira, Fatima Maria
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 701
container_issue 2
container_start_page 694
container_title Agronomy journal
container_volume 111
creator Cardillo, Bruno Ewerton da Silveira
Oliveira, Dâmiany Pádua
Soares, Bruno Lima
Dias Martins, Fábio Aurélio
Rufini, Márcia
Silva, Jacqueline Savana
Ferreira Neto, Geraldo Gontijo
Andrade, Messias José Bastos
Souza Moreira, Fatima Maria
description Core Ideas Captan and difenoconazole compromise in vitro survival of Rhizobium tropici CIAT 899. In the field, native rhizobia were clearly tolerant to most of the fungicides evaluated. Among the fungicide treatments assessed in the field, only difenoconazole is potentially damaging. When difenoconazole treatment is indispensable, in‐furrow inoculation may be the most alternative. Due to the effects observed in vitro, similar precautions should also be taken with captan in the field. Though some studies observed negative effects of fungicide seed treatment on yield of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), few studies have directly evaluated fungicide compatibility with seed inoculation treatments in field conditions. For fungicides that are incompatible, rhizobia inoculation in the planting furrow (in‐furrow inoculation) would permit combined use of both management practices since this would avoid direct contact between the chemical compound and the rhizobia. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the compatibility of seed fungicide treatment and rhizobia inoculation techniques to improve N derived from rhizobia symbiosis in common bean. A preliminary in vitro experiment evaluated the survival of Rhizobium tropici after contact with fungicides compared with an untreated control. Two field experiments were conducted in a 6 × 4 factorial arrangement involving the same treatments used for the in vitro survival test, as well as four sources of N [two types of liquid inoculation (inoculation on the seed or in‐furrow inoculation), plus two controls without inoculation]. We concluded that captan and difenoconazole fungicides reduced in vitro survival of rhizobia inoculated on the seed. Yield measurements in the field studies indicated that symbiotic nitrogen fixation could replace N fertilization, regardless of the inoculation treatment method and environmental conditions. Difenoconazole is potentially harmful to native bacteria in the field; therefore, in‐furrow inoculation may be recommended when the use of difenoconazole is necessary. Moreover, based on the harmful effects observed in vitro, precautions similar to the use of difenoconazole should also be taken when using captan fungicide in field conditions.
doi_str_mv 10.2134/agronj2018.06.0389
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wiley_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_2134_agronj2018_06_0389</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>AGJ2AGRONJ2018060389</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3089-f32c2fdea093c1875ea88301c52dc4e3373be139e5aa0edaa96ba56f145a367b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkNFOwjAYhRujiYi-gFd9geHfdi3b5URACEJi9MKrpWv_wshYzTZi9vZuQOKtVyc5J993cQh5ZDDiTIRPelv5cs-BRSNQIxBRfEUGLBQyABXKazIAAB6wWPFbclfXewDG4pANyH7t7bHQTe5LqktLv3IsbE29oxN_OHTlM-puqZCufUMT59A0aOk0b3ZY0ayls2O5zU1usYNORTfQN2x23vaWRenNxX9Pbpwuany45JB8zqYfk9dgtZkvJskqMAKiOHCCG-4saoiFYdFYoo4iAcxIbk2IQoxFhkzEKLUGtFrHKtNSORZKLdQ4E0PCz15T-bqu0KXfVX7QVZsySPu30r-3UlBp_1YHvZyhn7zA9h9EmsyXPJm_b9bLvgZ10vwCgxV0BA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nodulation and Yields of Common Bean are Not Affected Either by Fungicides or by the Method of Inoculation</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Cardillo, Bruno Ewerton da Silveira ; Oliveira, Dâmiany Pádua ; Soares, Bruno Lima ; Dias Martins, Fábio Aurélio ; Rufini, Márcia ; Silva, Jacqueline Savana ; Ferreira Neto, Geraldo Gontijo ; Andrade, Messias José Bastos ; Souza Moreira, Fatima Maria</creator><creatorcontrib>Cardillo, Bruno Ewerton da Silveira ; Oliveira, Dâmiany Pádua ; Soares, Bruno Lima ; Dias Martins, Fábio Aurélio ; Rufini, Márcia ; Silva, Jacqueline Savana ; Ferreira Neto, Geraldo Gontijo ; Andrade, Messias José Bastos ; Souza Moreira, Fatima Maria</creatorcontrib><description>Core Ideas Captan and difenoconazole compromise in vitro survival of Rhizobium tropici CIAT 899. In the field, native rhizobia were clearly tolerant to most of the fungicides evaluated. Among the fungicide treatments assessed in the field, only difenoconazole is potentially damaging. When difenoconazole treatment is indispensable, in‐furrow inoculation may be the most alternative. Due to the effects observed in vitro, similar precautions should also be taken with captan in the field. Though some studies observed negative effects of fungicide seed treatment on yield of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), few studies have directly evaluated fungicide compatibility with seed inoculation treatments in field conditions. For fungicides that are incompatible, rhizobia inoculation in the planting furrow (in‐furrow inoculation) would permit combined use of both management practices since this would avoid direct contact between the chemical compound and the rhizobia. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the compatibility of seed fungicide treatment and rhizobia inoculation techniques to improve N derived from rhizobia symbiosis in common bean. A preliminary in vitro experiment evaluated the survival of Rhizobium tropici after contact with fungicides compared with an untreated control. Two field experiments were conducted in a 6 × 4 factorial arrangement involving the same treatments used for the in vitro survival test, as well as four sources of N [two types of liquid inoculation (inoculation on the seed or in‐furrow inoculation), plus two controls without inoculation]. We concluded that captan and difenoconazole fungicides reduced in vitro survival of rhizobia inoculated on the seed. Yield measurements in the field studies indicated that symbiotic nitrogen fixation could replace N fertilization, regardless of the inoculation treatment method and environmental conditions. Difenoconazole is potentially harmful to native bacteria in the field; therefore, in‐furrow inoculation may be recommended when the use of difenoconazole is necessary. Moreover, based on the harmful effects observed in vitro, precautions similar to the use of difenoconazole should also be taken when using captan fungicide in field conditions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-1962</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-0645</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2134/agronj2018.06.0389</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>The American Society of Agronomy, Inc</publisher><ispartof>Agronomy journal, 2019-03, Vol.111 (2), p.694-701</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2019 by the American Society of Agronomy, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3089-f32c2fdea093c1875ea88301c52dc4e3373be139e5aa0edaa96ba56f145a367b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3089-f32c2fdea093c1875ea88301c52dc4e3373be139e5aa0edaa96ba56f145a367b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2134%2Fagronj2018.06.0389$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.2134%2Fagronj2018.06.0389$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cardillo, Bruno Ewerton da Silveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Dâmiany Pádua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soares, Bruno Lima</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dias Martins, Fábio Aurélio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rufini, Márcia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Jacqueline Savana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira Neto, Geraldo Gontijo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrade, Messias José Bastos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Souza Moreira, Fatima Maria</creatorcontrib><title>Nodulation and Yields of Common Bean are Not Affected Either by Fungicides or by the Method of Inoculation</title><title>Agronomy journal</title><description>Core Ideas Captan and difenoconazole compromise in vitro survival of Rhizobium tropici CIAT 899. In the field, native rhizobia were clearly tolerant to most of the fungicides evaluated. Among the fungicide treatments assessed in the field, only difenoconazole is potentially damaging. When difenoconazole treatment is indispensable, in‐furrow inoculation may be the most alternative. Due to the effects observed in vitro, similar precautions should also be taken with captan in the field. Though some studies observed negative effects of fungicide seed treatment on yield of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), few studies have directly evaluated fungicide compatibility with seed inoculation treatments in field conditions. For fungicides that are incompatible, rhizobia inoculation in the planting furrow (in‐furrow inoculation) would permit combined use of both management practices since this would avoid direct contact between the chemical compound and the rhizobia. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the compatibility of seed fungicide treatment and rhizobia inoculation techniques to improve N derived from rhizobia symbiosis in common bean. A preliminary in vitro experiment evaluated the survival of Rhizobium tropici after contact with fungicides compared with an untreated control. Two field experiments were conducted in a 6 × 4 factorial arrangement involving the same treatments used for the in vitro survival test, as well as four sources of N [two types of liquid inoculation (inoculation on the seed or in‐furrow inoculation), plus two controls without inoculation]. We concluded that captan and difenoconazole fungicides reduced in vitro survival of rhizobia inoculated on the seed. Yield measurements in the field studies indicated that symbiotic nitrogen fixation could replace N fertilization, regardless of the inoculation treatment method and environmental conditions. Difenoconazole is potentially harmful to native bacteria in the field; therefore, in‐furrow inoculation may be recommended when the use of difenoconazole is necessary. Moreover, based on the harmful effects observed in vitro, precautions similar to the use of difenoconazole should also be taken when using captan fungicide in field conditions.</description><issn>0002-1962</issn><issn>1435-0645</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkNFOwjAYhRujiYi-gFd9geHfdi3b5URACEJi9MKrpWv_wshYzTZi9vZuQOKtVyc5J993cQh5ZDDiTIRPelv5cs-BRSNQIxBRfEUGLBQyABXKazIAAB6wWPFbclfXewDG4pANyH7t7bHQTe5LqktLv3IsbE29oxN_OHTlM-puqZCufUMT59A0aOk0b3ZY0ayls2O5zU1usYNORTfQN2x23vaWRenNxX9Pbpwuany45JB8zqYfk9dgtZkvJskqMAKiOHCCG-4saoiFYdFYoo4iAcxIbk2IQoxFhkzEKLUGtFrHKtNSORZKLdQ4E0PCz15T-bqu0KXfVX7QVZsySPu30r-3UlBp_1YHvZyhn7zA9h9EmsyXPJm_b9bLvgZ10vwCgxV0BA</recordid><startdate>201903</startdate><enddate>201903</enddate><creator>Cardillo, Bruno Ewerton da Silveira</creator><creator>Oliveira, Dâmiany Pádua</creator><creator>Soares, Bruno Lima</creator><creator>Dias Martins, Fábio Aurélio</creator><creator>Rufini, Márcia</creator><creator>Silva, Jacqueline Savana</creator><creator>Ferreira Neto, Geraldo Gontijo</creator><creator>Andrade, Messias José Bastos</creator><creator>Souza Moreira, Fatima Maria</creator><general>The American Society of Agronomy, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201903</creationdate><title>Nodulation and Yields of Common Bean are Not Affected Either by Fungicides or by the Method of Inoculation</title><author>Cardillo, Bruno Ewerton da Silveira ; Oliveira, Dâmiany Pádua ; Soares, Bruno Lima ; Dias Martins, Fábio Aurélio ; Rufini, Márcia ; Silva, Jacqueline Savana ; Ferreira Neto, Geraldo Gontijo ; Andrade, Messias José Bastos ; Souza Moreira, Fatima Maria</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3089-f32c2fdea093c1875ea88301c52dc4e3373be139e5aa0edaa96ba56f145a367b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cardillo, Bruno Ewerton da Silveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Dâmiany Pádua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soares, Bruno Lima</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dias Martins, Fábio Aurélio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rufini, Márcia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Jacqueline Savana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira Neto, Geraldo Gontijo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrade, Messias José Bastos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Souza Moreira, Fatima Maria</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Agronomy journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cardillo, Bruno Ewerton da Silveira</au><au>Oliveira, Dâmiany Pádua</au><au>Soares, Bruno Lima</au><au>Dias Martins, Fábio Aurélio</au><au>Rufini, Márcia</au><au>Silva, Jacqueline Savana</au><au>Ferreira Neto, Geraldo Gontijo</au><au>Andrade, Messias José Bastos</au><au>Souza Moreira, Fatima Maria</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nodulation and Yields of Common Bean are Not Affected Either by Fungicides or by the Method of Inoculation</atitle><jtitle>Agronomy journal</jtitle><date>2019-03</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>111</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>694</spage><epage>701</epage><pages>694-701</pages><issn>0002-1962</issn><eissn>1435-0645</eissn><abstract>Core Ideas Captan and difenoconazole compromise in vitro survival of Rhizobium tropici CIAT 899. In the field, native rhizobia were clearly tolerant to most of the fungicides evaluated. Among the fungicide treatments assessed in the field, only difenoconazole is potentially damaging. When difenoconazole treatment is indispensable, in‐furrow inoculation may be the most alternative. Due to the effects observed in vitro, similar precautions should also be taken with captan in the field. Though some studies observed negative effects of fungicide seed treatment on yield of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), few studies have directly evaluated fungicide compatibility with seed inoculation treatments in field conditions. For fungicides that are incompatible, rhizobia inoculation in the planting furrow (in‐furrow inoculation) would permit combined use of both management practices since this would avoid direct contact between the chemical compound and the rhizobia. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the compatibility of seed fungicide treatment and rhizobia inoculation techniques to improve N derived from rhizobia symbiosis in common bean. A preliminary in vitro experiment evaluated the survival of Rhizobium tropici after contact with fungicides compared with an untreated control. Two field experiments were conducted in a 6 × 4 factorial arrangement involving the same treatments used for the in vitro survival test, as well as four sources of N [two types of liquid inoculation (inoculation on the seed or in‐furrow inoculation), plus two controls without inoculation]. We concluded that captan and difenoconazole fungicides reduced in vitro survival of rhizobia inoculated on the seed. Yield measurements in the field studies indicated that symbiotic nitrogen fixation could replace N fertilization, regardless of the inoculation treatment method and environmental conditions. Difenoconazole is potentially harmful to native bacteria in the field; therefore, in‐furrow inoculation may be recommended when the use of difenoconazole is necessary. Moreover, based on the harmful effects observed in vitro, precautions similar to the use of difenoconazole should also be taken when using captan fungicide in field conditions.</abstract><pub>The American Society of Agronomy, Inc</pub><doi>10.2134/agronj2018.06.0389</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-1962
ispartof Agronomy journal, 2019-03, Vol.111 (2), p.694-701
issn 0002-1962
1435-0645
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_2134_agronj2018_06_0389
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
title Nodulation and Yields of Common Bean are Not Affected Either by Fungicides or by the Method of Inoculation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T05%3A05%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nodulation%20and%20Yields%20of%20Common%20Bean%20are%20Not%20Affected%20Either%20by%20Fungicides%20or%20by%20the%20Method%20of%20Inoculation&rft.jtitle=Agronomy%20journal&rft.au=Cardillo,%20Bruno%20Ewerton%20da%20Silveira&rft.date=2019-03&rft.volume=111&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=694&rft.epage=701&rft.pages=694-701&rft.issn=0002-1962&rft.eissn=1435-0645&rft_id=info:doi/10.2134/agronj2018.06.0389&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_cross%3EAGJ2AGRONJ2018060389%3C/wiley_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true