Microbial Tools in Agriculture Require an Ecological Context: Stress‐Dependent Non‐Additive Symbiont Interactions

Core Ideas Leaf fungal symbionts represent a potential new tool in agriculture. Effective fungal application requires an understanding of their interactions. Fungal interactions resulted in non‐additive plant growth and wilt responses. Fungal metabolites indicated qualitative additive, synergistic,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Agronomy journal 2017-05, Vol.109 (3), p.917-926
Hauptverfasser: Connor, Elise W., Sandy, Moriah, Hawkes, Christine V.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 926
container_issue 3
container_start_page 917
container_title Agronomy journal
container_volume 109
creator Connor, Elise W.
Sandy, Moriah
Hawkes, Christine V.
description Core Ideas Leaf fungal symbionts represent a potential new tool in agriculture. Effective fungal application requires an understanding of their interactions. Fungal interactions resulted in non‐additive plant growth and wilt responses. Fungal metabolites indicated qualitative additive, synergistic, or antagonistic plant responses. Fungal trait dissimilarity predicted the size of plant response deviations. Fungal symbionts are increasingly targeted as tools for crop management, but their use in the field requires an understanding of how fungi interact in a community context. Fungal interactions may result in additive effects on the host plant, which could be predicted simply based on individual fungal behavior. Alternatively, interactions among fungi may result in non‐additive synergistic or antagonistic effects on plant performance that are more challenging to predict. Here, we hypothesized that the effects of fungal interactions on the plant host could be predicted from their niche overlap. To test this idea, we used foliar fungal endophytes with a range of niche overlap based on trait dissimilarities to examine the effects of six fungal species pairs compared to the corresponding individual fungal species on switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) in water‐stressed and well‐watered conditions. Mixtures of endophytes had either no effect or predictable, additive effects on plant tiller number, but effects on plant growth rate and wilting were largely non‐additive. Moisture level, fungal stress, and metabolic trait dissimilarity predicted 51 to 92% of the deviation of fungal effects from additive, with less similar fungi likely to have more synergistic effects on the plant host. Furthermore, we identified indicator metabolites for fungal interaction outcomes. However, the effects of endophyte interactions on the plant host were environment dependent making single community applications more challenging. Overall, future development of microbial tools for use in agriculture must consider their interactions to optimize application.
doi_str_mv 10.2134/agronj2016.10.0568
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wiley_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_2134_agronj2016_10_0568</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>AGJ2AGRONJ2016100568</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3088-5d6f8e69d4ff60b93da0fd1dd6506a48c1d47d19239d423459a929431a2e5a273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkN9OwjAYxRujiYi-gFd9gWH_razeLYAIQUgAr5eydqRkrNhuKnc-gs_ok9iJibdefTkn53eS7wBwi1GPYMru5NbZakcQ5r1goZgnZ6CDGY0jxFl8DjoIIRJhwckluPJ-hxDGguEOaJ5M7uzGyBKurS09NBVMt87kTVk3TsOlfmlMuLKCo9yWdmvyEB3Yqtbv9T1c1U57__XxOdQHXSld1XBuq6BTpUxtXjVcHfcbE-JwEhAn8zoIfw0uCll6ffN7u-D5YbQePEazxXgySGdRTlGSRLHiRaK5UKwoONoIqiQqFFaKx4hLluRYsb7CgtAQIZTFQgoiGMWS6FiSPu0CcuoNP3rvdJEdnNlLd8wwytrhsr_hWqsdLkDDE_RmSn38B5Gl4ylJx8vFfNraGP3UfAPyxHrY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Microbial Tools in Agriculture Require an Ecological Context: Stress‐Dependent Non‐Additive Symbiont Interactions</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Connor, Elise W. ; Sandy, Moriah ; Hawkes, Christine V.</creator><creatorcontrib>Connor, Elise W. ; Sandy, Moriah ; Hawkes, Christine V.</creatorcontrib><description>Core Ideas Leaf fungal symbionts represent a potential new tool in agriculture. Effective fungal application requires an understanding of their interactions. Fungal interactions resulted in non‐additive plant growth and wilt responses. Fungal metabolites indicated qualitative additive, synergistic, or antagonistic plant responses. Fungal trait dissimilarity predicted the size of plant response deviations. Fungal symbionts are increasingly targeted as tools for crop management, but their use in the field requires an understanding of how fungi interact in a community context. Fungal interactions may result in additive effects on the host plant, which could be predicted simply based on individual fungal behavior. Alternatively, interactions among fungi may result in non‐additive synergistic or antagonistic effects on plant performance that are more challenging to predict. Here, we hypothesized that the effects of fungal interactions on the plant host could be predicted from their niche overlap. To test this idea, we used foliar fungal endophytes with a range of niche overlap based on trait dissimilarities to examine the effects of six fungal species pairs compared to the corresponding individual fungal species on switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) in water‐stressed and well‐watered conditions. Mixtures of endophytes had either no effect or predictable, additive effects on plant tiller number, but effects on plant growth rate and wilting were largely non‐additive. Moisture level, fungal stress, and metabolic trait dissimilarity predicted 51 to 92% of the deviation of fungal effects from additive, with less similar fungi likely to have more synergistic effects on the plant host. Furthermore, we identified indicator metabolites for fungal interaction outcomes. However, the effects of endophyte interactions on the plant host were environment dependent making single community applications more challenging. Overall, future development of microbial tools for use in agriculture must consider their interactions to optimize application.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-1962</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-0645</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2134/agronj2016.10.0568</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>The American Society of Agronomy, Inc</publisher><ispartof>Agronomy journal, 2017-05, Vol.109 (3), p.917-926</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2017 by the American Society of Agronomy, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3088-5d6f8e69d4ff60b93da0fd1dd6506a48c1d47d19239d423459a929431a2e5a273</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3088-5d6f8e69d4ff60b93da0fd1dd6506a48c1d47d19239d423459a929431a2e5a273</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2134%2Fagronj2016.10.0568$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.2134%2Fagronj2016.10.0568$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Connor, Elise W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandy, Moriah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawkes, Christine V.</creatorcontrib><title>Microbial Tools in Agriculture Require an Ecological Context: Stress‐Dependent Non‐Additive Symbiont Interactions</title><title>Agronomy journal</title><description>Core Ideas Leaf fungal symbionts represent a potential new tool in agriculture. Effective fungal application requires an understanding of their interactions. Fungal interactions resulted in non‐additive plant growth and wilt responses. Fungal metabolites indicated qualitative additive, synergistic, or antagonistic plant responses. Fungal trait dissimilarity predicted the size of plant response deviations. Fungal symbionts are increasingly targeted as tools for crop management, but their use in the field requires an understanding of how fungi interact in a community context. Fungal interactions may result in additive effects on the host plant, which could be predicted simply based on individual fungal behavior. Alternatively, interactions among fungi may result in non‐additive synergistic or antagonistic effects on plant performance that are more challenging to predict. Here, we hypothesized that the effects of fungal interactions on the plant host could be predicted from their niche overlap. To test this idea, we used foliar fungal endophytes with a range of niche overlap based on trait dissimilarities to examine the effects of six fungal species pairs compared to the corresponding individual fungal species on switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) in water‐stressed and well‐watered conditions. Mixtures of endophytes had either no effect or predictable, additive effects on plant tiller number, but effects on plant growth rate and wilting were largely non‐additive. Moisture level, fungal stress, and metabolic trait dissimilarity predicted 51 to 92% of the deviation of fungal effects from additive, with less similar fungi likely to have more synergistic effects on the plant host. Furthermore, we identified indicator metabolites for fungal interaction outcomes. However, the effects of endophyte interactions on the plant host were environment dependent making single community applications more challenging. Overall, future development of microbial tools for use in agriculture must consider their interactions to optimize application.</description><issn>0002-1962</issn><issn>1435-0645</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkN9OwjAYxRujiYi-gFd9gWH_razeLYAIQUgAr5eydqRkrNhuKnc-gs_ok9iJibdefTkn53eS7wBwi1GPYMru5NbZakcQ5r1goZgnZ6CDGY0jxFl8DjoIIRJhwckluPJ-hxDGguEOaJ5M7uzGyBKurS09NBVMt87kTVk3TsOlfmlMuLKCo9yWdmvyEB3Yqtbv9T1c1U57__XxOdQHXSld1XBuq6BTpUxtXjVcHfcbE-JwEhAn8zoIfw0uCll6ffN7u-D5YbQePEazxXgySGdRTlGSRLHiRaK5UKwoONoIqiQqFFaKx4hLluRYsb7CgtAQIZTFQgoiGMWS6FiSPu0CcuoNP3rvdJEdnNlLd8wwytrhsr_hWqsdLkDDE_RmSn38B5Gl4ylJx8vFfNraGP3UfAPyxHrY</recordid><startdate>201705</startdate><enddate>201705</enddate><creator>Connor, Elise W.</creator><creator>Sandy, Moriah</creator><creator>Hawkes, Christine V.</creator><general>The American Society of Agronomy, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201705</creationdate><title>Microbial Tools in Agriculture Require an Ecological Context: Stress‐Dependent Non‐Additive Symbiont Interactions</title><author>Connor, Elise W. ; Sandy, Moriah ; Hawkes, Christine V.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3088-5d6f8e69d4ff60b93da0fd1dd6506a48c1d47d19239d423459a929431a2e5a273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Connor, Elise W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandy, Moriah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawkes, Christine V.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Agronomy journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Connor, Elise W.</au><au>Sandy, Moriah</au><au>Hawkes, Christine V.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Microbial Tools in Agriculture Require an Ecological Context: Stress‐Dependent Non‐Additive Symbiont Interactions</atitle><jtitle>Agronomy journal</jtitle><date>2017-05</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>109</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>917</spage><epage>926</epage><pages>917-926</pages><issn>0002-1962</issn><eissn>1435-0645</eissn><abstract>Core Ideas Leaf fungal symbionts represent a potential new tool in agriculture. Effective fungal application requires an understanding of their interactions. Fungal interactions resulted in non‐additive plant growth and wilt responses. Fungal metabolites indicated qualitative additive, synergistic, or antagonistic plant responses. Fungal trait dissimilarity predicted the size of plant response deviations. Fungal symbionts are increasingly targeted as tools for crop management, but their use in the field requires an understanding of how fungi interact in a community context. Fungal interactions may result in additive effects on the host plant, which could be predicted simply based on individual fungal behavior. Alternatively, interactions among fungi may result in non‐additive synergistic or antagonistic effects on plant performance that are more challenging to predict. Here, we hypothesized that the effects of fungal interactions on the plant host could be predicted from their niche overlap. To test this idea, we used foliar fungal endophytes with a range of niche overlap based on trait dissimilarities to examine the effects of six fungal species pairs compared to the corresponding individual fungal species on switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) in water‐stressed and well‐watered conditions. Mixtures of endophytes had either no effect or predictable, additive effects on plant tiller number, but effects on plant growth rate and wilting were largely non‐additive. Moisture level, fungal stress, and metabolic trait dissimilarity predicted 51 to 92% of the deviation of fungal effects from additive, with less similar fungi likely to have more synergistic effects on the plant host. Furthermore, we identified indicator metabolites for fungal interaction outcomes. However, the effects of endophyte interactions on the plant host were environment dependent making single community applications more challenging. Overall, future development of microbial tools for use in agriculture must consider their interactions to optimize application.</abstract><pub>The American Society of Agronomy, Inc</pub><doi>10.2134/agronj2016.10.0568</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-1962
ispartof Agronomy journal, 2017-05, Vol.109 (3), p.917-926
issn 0002-1962
1435-0645
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_2134_agronj2016_10_0568
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
title Microbial Tools in Agriculture Require an Ecological Context: Stress‐Dependent Non‐Additive Symbiont Interactions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T00%3A40%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Microbial%20Tools%20in%20Agriculture%20Require%20an%20Ecological%20Context:%20Stress%E2%80%90Dependent%20Non%E2%80%90Additive%20Symbiont%20Interactions&rft.jtitle=Agronomy%20journal&rft.au=Connor,%20Elise%20W.&rft.date=2017-05&rft.volume=109&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=917&rft.epage=926&rft.pages=917-926&rft.issn=0002-1962&rft.eissn=1435-0645&rft_id=info:doi/10.2134/agronj2016.10.0568&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_cross%3EAGJ2AGRONJ2016100568%3C/wiley_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true