Recovery of fertilizer nitrogen applied to burley tobacco
The high cash value of burley tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) may lead to ineffective excess fertilization of the crop. The effects of N management on fertilizer N use efficiency by burley tobacco and recovery of residual fertilizer N by a winter cover crop were determined. Tobacco was grown in 1993...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Agronomy journal 1997-03, Vol.89 (2), p.183-189 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 189 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 183 |
container_title | Agronomy journal |
container_volume | 89 |
creator | MacKown, Charles T. Sutton, Tommy G. |
description | The high cash value of burley tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) may lead to ineffective excess fertilization of the crop. The effects of N management on fertilizer N use efficiency by burley tobacco and recovery of residual fertilizer N by a winter cover crop were determined. Tobacco was grown in 1993 at two locations with 0 to 336 kg N ha-1 broadcast applied before transplanting or 168 kg N ha-1 sidedressed at onset of rapid growth (approximately 5 wk after transplanting). Seasonal recoveries of 15N-depleted fertilizer N were determined in aboveground tissues of the tobacco crop. The amount of labeled fertilizer N recovered at harvest (29 to 124 kg N ha-1) increased with increasing amounts of N applied, but fertilizer N use efficiency was constant at 36.6 +/- 0.9% for broadcast applications. Sidedress N enhanced labeled fertilizer N recovery (43 to 54% of applied N, depending on location), even though total aboveground dry matter was equal to or 12% less than that of plants grown with the same amount of N applied by broadcast. Recovery of residual labeled fertilizer N in the cover crop ranged from 2 to 7% of applied N and was greatest for the highest amount of N applied. Fertilizer N recoveries estimated by the difference method equaled those of the 15N method at 5 wk after transplanting. At 13 wk after transplanting, the difference method, particularly for applications of 84 and 168 kg N ha-1, overestimated fertilizer N recoveries relative to the 15N method, and is unlikely to provide an accurate measure of fertilizer N use by burley tobacco across a wide range of N applications. Reducing the amount of broadcast applied fertilizer to give a 10% decrease in air-cured leaf yield would decrease the unaccounted fertilizer N by 80 to 115 kg N ha-1 depending on location. As compared with broadcast application of fertilizer N before transplanting, drill banding the N at about 5 wk after transplanting would equal or further decrease unaccounted amounts of fertilizer N. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2134/agronj1997.00021962008900020006x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>wiley_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_2134_agronj1997_00021962008900020006x</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>AGJ2AGRONJ199700021962008900020006X</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415X-5d3bf45b4009f05873bce1d6408dd5032ab980b15cf5c9d64c11fb9fea75fa423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkE9LwzAYh4MoOKdfQXrw4KXzfdOka24O0ekYDqaD3UqSJqOjLiWdf-anN7Wil108hLy8PDy_5EfIJcKAYsKu5Mq7zRqFGA4AgKJIKUAm2jmc9OOA9JAlPIaU8UPSa_dxCx2Tk6ZZAyAKhj0i5ka7N-N3kbORNX5bVuWn8dGm3Hq3MptI1nVVmiLauki9-srswqSk1u6UHFlZNebs5-6Txd3t8819PJ2NH25G01gz5MuYF4myjCsGICzwbJgobbBIGWRFwSGhUokMFHJtuRZhrxGtEtbIIbeS0aRPrjuv9q5pvLF57csX6Xc5Qt5Wkf9Vke-tIiguOkUtGy0r6-VGl82vh2YsA4YBkx32XoZ__jsmH40ndDSezx4nLbSPWYaM8y7DStcawzMWT9848oymkHwBbLSFHw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Recovery of fertilizer nitrogen applied to burley tobacco</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>MacKown, Charles T. ; Sutton, Tommy G.</creator><creatorcontrib>MacKown, Charles T. ; Sutton, Tommy G. ; USDA, ARS, El Reno, OK</creatorcontrib><description>The high cash value of burley tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) may lead to ineffective excess fertilization of the crop. The effects of N management on fertilizer N use efficiency by burley tobacco and recovery of residual fertilizer N by a winter cover crop were determined. Tobacco was grown in 1993 at two locations with 0 to 336 kg N ha-1 broadcast applied before transplanting or 168 kg N ha-1 sidedressed at onset of rapid growth (approximately 5 wk after transplanting). Seasonal recoveries of 15N-depleted fertilizer N were determined in aboveground tissues of the tobacco crop. The amount of labeled fertilizer N recovered at harvest (29 to 124 kg N ha-1) increased with increasing amounts of N applied, but fertilizer N use efficiency was constant at 36.6 +/- 0.9% for broadcast applications. Sidedress N enhanced labeled fertilizer N recovery (43 to 54% of applied N, depending on location), even though total aboveground dry matter was equal to or 12% less than that of plants grown with the same amount of N applied by broadcast. Recovery of residual labeled fertilizer N in the cover crop ranged from 2 to 7% of applied N and was greatest for the highest amount of N applied. Fertilizer N recoveries estimated by the difference method equaled those of the 15N method at 5 wk after transplanting. At 13 wk after transplanting, the difference method, particularly for applications of 84 and 168 kg N ha-1, overestimated fertilizer N recoveries relative to the 15N method, and is unlikely to provide an accurate measure of fertilizer N use by burley tobacco across a wide range of N applications. Reducing the amount of broadcast applied fertilizer to give a 10% decrease in air-cured leaf yield would decrease the unaccounted fertilizer N by 80 to 115 kg N ha-1 depending on location. As compared with broadcast application of fertilizer N before transplanting, drill banding the N at about 5 wk after transplanting would equal or further decrease unaccounted amounts of fertilizer N.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-1962</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-0645</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2134/agronj1997.00021962008900020006x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AGJOAT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy</publisher><subject>abonos nitrogenados ; absorcion de sustancias nutritivas ; absorption de substances nutritives ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; application a la volee ; application rates ; Biological and medical sciences ; broadcasting ; choix de la date ; cover plants ; crop yield ; date de traitement ; distribucion a voleo ; dose d' application ; dosis de aplicacion ; efectos residuales ; effet residuel ; efficacite ; efficiency ; eficacia ; eleccion de la epoca ; engrais azote ; fecha de tratamiento ; festuca arundinacea ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General agronomy. Plant production ; kentucky ; measurement ; medicion ; mesure ; nicotiana tabacum ; Nitrogen fertilization ; nitrogen fertilizers ; Nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium fertilizations ; nutrient uptake ; plantas de cobertura ; plante de couverture ; rendement des cultures ; rendimiento de cultivos ; residual effects ; seed drilling ; semis en ligne ; siembra en lineas ; Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments ; technique des traceurs ; tecnicas de trazadores ; timing ; tracer techniques ; treatment date ; triticum aestivum ; uses ; usos ; utilisation</subject><ispartof>Agronomy journal, 1997-03, Vol.89 (2), p.183-189</ispartof><rights>Copyright © American Society of Agronomy</rights><rights>1997 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415X-5d3bf45b4009f05873bce1d6408dd5032ab980b15cf5c9d64c11fb9fea75fa423</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2134%2Fagronj1997.00021962008900020006x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.2134%2Fagronj1997.00021962008900020006x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2848041$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>MacKown, Charles T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutton, Tommy G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>USDA, ARS, El Reno, OK</creatorcontrib><title>Recovery of fertilizer nitrogen applied to burley tobacco</title><title>Agronomy journal</title><description>The high cash value of burley tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) may lead to ineffective excess fertilization of the crop. The effects of N management on fertilizer N use efficiency by burley tobacco and recovery of residual fertilizer N by a winter cover crop were determined. Tobacco was grown in 1993 at two locations with 0 to 336 kg N ha-1 broadcast applied before transplanting or 168 kg N ha-1 sidedressed at onset of rapid growth (approximately 5 wk after transplanting). Seasonal recoveries of 15N-depleted fertilizer N were determined in aboveground tissues of the tobacco crop. The amount of labeled fertilizer N recovered at harvest (29 to 124 kg N ha-1) increased with increasing amounts of N applied, but fertilizer N use efficiency was constant at 36.6 +/- 0.9% for broadcast applications. Sidedress N enhanced labeled fertilizer N recovery (43 to 54% of applied N, depending on location), even though total aboveground dry matter was equal to or 12% less than that of plants grown with the same amount of N applied by broadcast. Recovery of residual labeled fertilizer N in the cover crop ranged from 2 to 7% of applied N and was greatest for the highest amount of N applied. Fertilizer N recoveries estimated by the difference method equaled those of the 15N method at 5 wk after transplanting. At 13 wk after transplanting, the difference method, particularly for applications of 84 and 168 kg N ha-1, overestimated fertilizer N recoveries relative to the 15N method, and is unlikely to provide an accurate measure of fertilizer N use by burley tobacco across a wide range of N applications. Reducing the amount of broadcast applied fertilizer to give a 10% decrease in air-cured leaf yield would decrease the unaccounted fertilizer N by 80 to 115 kg N ha-1 depending on location. As compared with broadcast application of fertilizer N before transplanting, drill banding the N at about 5 wk after transplanting would equal or further decrease unaccounted amounts of fertilizer N.</description><subject>abonos nitrogenados</subject><subject>absorcion de sustancias nutritivas</subject><subject>absorption de substances nutritives</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>application a la volee</subject><subject>application rates</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>broadcasting</subject><subject>choix de la date</subject><subject>cover plants</subject><subject>crop yield</subject><subject>date de traitement</subject><subject>distribucion a voleo</subject><subject>dose d' application</subject><subject>dosis de aplicacion</subject><subject>efectos residuales</subject><subject>effet residuel</subject><subject>efficacite</subject><subject>efficiency</subject><subject>eficacia</subject><subject>eleccion de la epoca</subject><subject>engrais azote</subject><subject>fecha de tratamiento</subject><subject>festuca arundinacea</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General agronomy. Plant production</subject><subject>kentucky</subject><subject>measurement</subject><subject>medicion</subject><subject>mesure</subject><subject>nicotiana tabacum</subject><subject>Nitrogen fertilization</subject><subject>nitrogen fertilizers</subject><subject>Nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium fertilizations</subject><subject>nutrient uptake</subject><subject>plantas de cobertura</subject><subject>plante de couverture</subject><subject>rendement des cultures</subject><subject>rendimiento de cultivos</subject><subject>residual effects</subject><subject>seed drilling</subject><subject>semis en ligne</subject><subject>siembra en lineas</subject><subject>Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments</subject><subject>technique des traceurs</subject><subject>tecnicas de trazadores</subject><subject>timing</subject><subject>tracer techniques</subject><subject>treatment date</subject><subject>triticum aestivum</subject><subject>uses</subject><subject>usos</subject><subject>utilisation</subject><issn>0002-1962</issn><issn>1435-0645</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVkE9LwzAYh4MoOKdfQXrw4KXzfdOka24O0ekYDqaD3UqSJqOjLiWdf-anN7Wil108hLy8PDy_5EfIJcKAYsKu5Mq7zRqFGA4AgKJIKUAm2jmc9OOA9JAlPIaU8UPSa_dxCx2Tk6ZZAyAKhj0i5ka7N-N3kbORNX5bVuWn8dGm3Hq3MptI1nVVmiLauki9-srswqSk1u6UHFlZNebs5-6Txd3t8819PJ2NH25G01gz5MuYF4myjCsGICzwbJgobbBIGWRFwSGhUokMFHJtuRZhrxGtEtbIIbeS0aRPrjuv9q5pvLF57csX6Xc5Qt5Wkf9Vke-tIiguOkUtGy0r6-VGl82vh2YsA4YBkx32XoZ__jsmH40ndDSezx4nLbSPWYaM8y7DStcawzMWT9848oymkHwBbLSFHw</recordid><startdate>199703</startdate><enddate>199703</enddate><creator>MacKown, Charles T.</creator><creator>Sutton, Tommy G.</creator><general>American Society of Agronomy</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199703</creationdate><title>Recovery of fertilizer nitrogen applied to burley tobacco</title><author>MacKown, Charles T. ; Sutton, Tommy G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415X-5d3bf45b4009f05873bce1d6408dd5032ab980b15cf5c9d64c11fb9fea75fa423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>abonos nitrogenados</topic><topic>absorcion de sustancias nutritivas</topic><topic>absorption de substances nutritives</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>application a la volee</topic><topic>application rates</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>broadcasting</topic><topic>choix de la date</topic><topic>cover plants</topic><topic>crop yield</topic><topic>date de traitement</topic><topic>distribucion a voleo</topic><topic>dose d' application</topic><topic>dosis de aplicacion</topic><topic>efectos residuales</topic><topic>effet residuel</topic><topic>efficacite</topic><topic>efficiency</topic><topic>eficacia</topic><topic>eleccion de la epoca</topic><topic>engrais azote</topic><topic>fecha de tratamiento</topic><topic>festuca arundinacea</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General agronomy. Plant production</topic><topic>kentucky</topic><topic>measurement</topic><topic>medicion</topic><topic>mesure</topic><topic>nicotiana tabacum</topic><topic>Nitrogen fertilization</topic><topic>nitrogen fertilizers</topic><topic>Nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium fertilizations</topic><topic>nutrient uptake</topic><topic>plantas de cobertura</topic><topic>plante de couverture</topic><topic>rendement des cultures</topic><topic>rendimiento de cultivos</topic><topic>residual effects</topic><topic>seed drilling</topic><topic>semis en ligne</topic><topic>siembra en lineas</topic><topic>Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments</topic><topic>technique des traceurs</topic><topic>tecnicas de trazadores</topic><topic>timing</topic><topic>tracer techniques</topic><topic>treatment date</topic><topic>triticum aestivum</topic><topic>uses</topic><topic>usos</topic><topic>utilisation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MacKown, Charles T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutton, Tommy G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>USDA, ARS, El Reno, OK</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Agronomy journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MacKown, Charles T.</au><au>Sutton, Tommy G.</au><aucorp>USDA, ARS, El Reno, OK</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Recovery of fertilizer nitrogen applied to burley tobacco</atitle><jtitle>Agronomy journal</jtitle><date>1997-03</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>89</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>183</spage><epage>189</epage><pages>183-189</pages><issn>0002-1962</issn><eissn>1435-0645</eissn><coden>AGJOAT</coden><abstract>The high cash value of burley tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) may lead to ineffective excess fertilization of the crop. The effects of N management on fertilizer N use efficiency by burley tobacco and recovery of residual fertilizer N by a winter cover crop were determined. Tobacco was grown in 1993 at two locations with 0 to 336 kg N ha-1 broadcast applied before transplanting or 168 kg N ha-1 sidedressed at onset of rapid growth (approximately 5 wk after transplanting). Seasonal recoveries of 15N-depleted fertilizer N were determined in aboveground tissues of the tobacco crop. The amount of labeled fertilizer N recovered at harvest (29 to 124 kg N ha-1) increased with increasing amounts of N applied, but fertilizer N use efficiency was constant at 36.6 +/- 0.9% for broadcast applications. Sidedress N enhanced labeled fertilizer N recovery (43 to 54% of applied N, depending on location), even though total aboveground dry matter was equal to or 12% less than that of plants grown with the same amount of N applied by broadcast. Recovery of residual labeled fertilizer N in the cover crop ranged from 2 to 7% of applied N and was greatest for the highest amount of N applied. Fertilizer N recoveries estimated by the difference method equaled those of the 15N method at 5 wk after transplanting. At 13 wk after transplanting, the difference method, particularly for applications of 84 and 168 kg N ha-1, overestimated fertilizer N recoveries relative to the 15N method, and is unlikely to provide an accurate measure of fertilizer N use by burley tobacco across a wide range of N applications. Reducing the amount of broadcast applied fertilizer to give a 10% decrease in air-cured leaf yield would decrease the unaccounted fertilizer N by 80 to 115 kg N ha-1 depending on location. As compared with broadcast application of fertilizer N before transplanting, drill banding the N at about 5 wk after transplanting would equal or further decrease unaccounted amounts of fertilizer N.</abstract><cop>Madison, WI</cop><pub>American Society of Agronomy</pub><doi>10.2134/agronj1997.00021962008900020006x</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-1962 |
ispartof | Agronomy journal, 1997-03, Vol.89 (2), p.183-189 |
issn | 0002-1962 1435-0645 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_2134_agronj1997_00021962008900020006x |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | abonos nitrogenados absorcion de sustancias nutritivas absorption de substances nutritives Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions application a la volee application rates Biological and medical sciences broadcasting choix de la date cover plants crop yield date de traitement distribucion a voleo dose d' application dosis de aplicacion efectos residuales effet residuel efficacite efficiency eficacia eleccion de la epoca engrais azote fecha de tratamiento festuca arundinacea Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General agronomy. Plant production kentucky measurement medicion mesure nicotiana tabacum Nitrogen fertilization nitrogen fertilizers Nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium fertilizations nutrient uptake plantas de cobertura plante de couverture rendement des cultures rendimiento de cultivos residual effects seed drilling semis en ligne siembra en lineas Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments technique des traceurs tecnicas de trazadores timing tracer techniques treatment date triticum aestivum uses usos utilisation |
title | Recovery of fertilizer nitrogen applied to burley tobacco |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T03%3A02%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Recovery%20of%20fertilizer%20nitrogen%20applied%20to%20burley%20tobacco&rft.jtitle=Agronomy%20journal&rft.au=MacKown,%20Charles%20T.&rft.aucorp=USDA,%20ARS,%20El%20Reno,%20OK&rft.date=1997-03&rft.volume=89&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=183&rft.epage=189&rft.pages=183-189&rft.issn=0002-1962&rft.eissn=1435-0645&rft.coden=AGJOAT&rft_id=info:doi/10.2134/agronj1997.00021962008900020006x&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_cross%3EAGJ2AGRONJ199700021962008900020006X%3C/wiley_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |