Recovery of fertilizer nitrogen applied to burley tobacco

The high cash value of burley tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) may lead to ineffective excess fertilization of the crop. The effects of N management on fertilizer N use efficiency by burley tobacco and recovery of residual fertilizer N by a winter cover crop were determined. Tobacco was grown in 1993...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Agronomy journal 1997-03, Vol.89 (2), p.183-189
Hauptverfasser: MacKown, Charles T., Sutton, Tommy G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 189
container_issue 2
container_start_page 183
container_title Agronomy journal
container_volume 89
creator MacKown, Charles T.
Sutton, Tommy G.
description The high cash value of burley tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) may lead to ineffective excess fertilization of the crop. The effects of N management on fertilizer N use efficiency by burley tobacco and recovery of residual fertilizer N by a winter cover crop were determined. Tobacco was grown in 1993 at two locations with 0 to 336 kg N ha-1 broadcast applied before transplanting or 168 kg N ha-1 sidedressed at onset of rapid growth (approximately 5 wk after transplanting). Seasonal recoveries of 15N-depleted fertilizer N were determined in aboveground tissues of the tobacco crop. The amount of labeled fertilizer N recovered at harvest (29 to 124 kg N ha-1) increased with increasing amounts of N applied, but fertilizer N use efficiency was constant at 36.6 +/- 0.9% for broadcast applications. Sidedress N enhanced labeled fertilizer N recovery (43 to 54% of applied N, depending on location), even though total aboveground dry matter was equal to or 12% less than that of plants grown with the same amount of N applied by broadcast. Recovery of residual labeled fertilizer N in the cover crop ranged from 2 to 7% of applied N and was greatest for the highest amount of N applied. Fertilizer N recoveries estimated by the difference method equaled those of the 15N method at 5 wk after transplanting. At 13 wk after transplanting, the difference method, particularly for applications of 84 and 168 kg N ha-1, overestimated fertilizer N recoveries relative to the 15N method, and is unlikely to provide an accurate measure of fertilizer N use by burley tobacco across a wide range of N applications. Reducing the amount of broadcast applied fertilizer to give a 10% decrease in air-cured leaf yield would decrease the unaccounted fertilizer N by 80 to 115 kg N ha-1 depending on location. As compared with broadcast application of fertilizer N before transplanting, drill banding the N at about 5 wk after transplanting would equal or further decrease unaccounted amounts of fertilizer N.
doi_str_mv 10.2134/agronj1997.00021962008900020006x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wiley_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_2134_agronj1997_00021962008900020006x</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>AGJ2AGRONJ199700021962008900020006X</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415X-5d3bf45b4009f05873bce1d6408dd5032ab980b15cf5c9d64c11fb9fea75fa423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkE9LwzAYh4MoOKdfQXrw4KXzfdOka24O0ekYDqaD3UqSJqOjLiWdf-anN7Wil108hLy8PDy_5EfIJcKAYsKu5Mq7zRqFGA4AgKJIKUAm2jmc9OOA9JAlPIaU8UPSa_dxCx2Tk6ZZAyAKhj0i5ka7N-N3kbORNX5bVuWn8dGm3Hq3MptI1nVVmiLauki9-srswqSk1u6UHFlZNebs5-6Txd3t8819PJ2NH25G01gz5MuYF4myjCsGICzwbJgobbBIGWRFwSGhUokMFHJtuRZhrxGtEtbIIbeS0aRPrjuv9q5pvLF57csX6Xc5Qt5Wkf9Vke-tIiguOkUtGy0r6-VGl82vh2YsA4YBkx32XoZ__jsmH40ndDSezx4nLbSPWYaM8y7DStcawzMWT9848oymkHwBbLSFHw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Recovery of fertilizer nitrogen applied to burley tobacco</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>MacKown, Charles T. ; Sutton, Tommy G.</creator><creatorcontrib>MacKown, Charles T. ; Sutton, Tommy G. ; USDA, ARS, El Reno, OK</creatorcontrib><description>The high cash value of burley tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) may lead to ineffective excess fertilization of the crop. The effects of N management on fertilizer N use efficiency by burley tobacco and recovery of residual fertilizer N by a winter cover crop were determined. Tobacco was grown in 1993 at two locations with 0 to 336 kg N ha-1 broadcast applied before transplanting or 168 kg N ha-1 sidedressed at onset of rapid growth (approximately 5 wk after transplanting). Seasonal recoveries of 15N-depleted fertilizer N were determined in aboveground tissues of the tobacco crop. The amount of labeled fertilizer N recovered at harvest (29 to 124 kg N ha-1) increased with increasing amounts of N applied, but fertilizer N use efficiency was constant at 36.6 +/- 0.9% for broadcast applications. Sidedress N enhanced labeled fertilizer N recovery (43 to 54% of applied N, depending on location), even though total aboveground dry matter was equal to or 12% less than that of plants grown with the same amount of N applied by broadcast. Recovery of residual labeled fertilizer N in the cover crop ranged from 2 to 7% of applied N and was greatest for the highest amount of N applied. Fertilizer N recoveries estimated by the difference method equaled those of the 15N method at 5 wk after transplanting. At 13 wk after transplanting, the difference method, particularly for applications of 84 and 168 kg N ha-1, overestimated fertilizer N recoveries relative to the 15N method, and is unlikely to provide an accurate measure of fertilizer N use by burley tobacco across a wide range of N applications. Reducing the amount of broadcast applied fertilizer to give a 10% decrease in air-cured leaf yield would decrease the unaccounted fertilizer N by 80 to 115 kg N ha-1 depending on location. As compared with broadcast application of fertilizer N before transplanting, drill banding the N at about 5 wk after transplanting would equal or further decrease unaccounted amounts of fertilizer N.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-1962</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-0645</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2134/agronj1997.00021962008900020006x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AGJOAT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy</publisher><subject>abonos nitrogenados ; absorcion de sustancias nutritivas ; absorption de substances nutritives ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; application a la volee ; application rates ; Biological and medical sciences ; broadcasting ; choix de la date ; cover plants ; crop yield ; date de traitement ; distribucion a voleo ; dose d' application ; dosis de aplicacion ; efectos residuales ; effet residuel ; efficacite ; efficiency ; eficacia ; eleccion de la epoca ; engrais azote ; fecha de tratamiento ; festuca arundinacea ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General agronomy. Plant production ; kentucky ; measurement ; medicion ; mesure ; nicotiana tabacum ; Nitrogen fertilization ; nitrogen fertilizers ; Nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium fertilizations ; nutrient uptake ; plantas de cobertura ; plante de couverture ; rendement des cultures ; rendimiento de cultivos ; residual effects ; seed drilling ; semis en ligne ; siembra en lineas ; Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments ; technique des traceurs ; tecnicas de trazadores ; timing ; tracer techniques ; treatment date ; triticum aestivum ; uses ; usos ; utilisation</subject><ispartof>Agronomy journal, 1997-03, Vol.89 (2), p.183-189</ispartof><rights>Copyright © American Society of Agronomy</rights><rights>1997 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415X-5d3bf45b4009f05873bce1d6408dd5032ab980b15cf5c9d64c11fb9fea75fa423</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2134%2Fagronj1997.00021962008900020006x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.2134%2Fagronj1997.00021962008900020006x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2848041$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>MacKown, Charles T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutton, Tommy G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>USDA, ARS, El Reno, OK</creatorcontrib><title>Recovery of fertilizer nitrogen applied to burley tobacco</title><title>Agronomy journal</title><description>The high cash value of burley tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) may lead to ineffective excess fertilization of the crop. The effects of N management on fertilizer N use efficiency by burley tobacco and recovery of residual fertilizer N by a winter cover crop were determined. Tobacco was grown in 1993 at two locations with 0 to 336 kg N ha-1 broadcast applied before transplanting or 168 kg N ha-1 sidedressed at onset of rapid growth (approximately 5 wk after transplanting). Seasonal recoveries of 15N-depleted fertilizer N were determined in aboveground tissues of the tobacco crop. The amount of labeled fertilizer N recovered at harvest (29 to 124 kg N ha-1) increased with increasing amounts of N applied, but fertilizer N use efficiency was constant at 36.6 +/- 0.9% for broadcast applications. Sidedress N enhanced labeled fertilizer N recovery (43 to 54% of applied N, depending on location), even though total aboveground dry matter was equal to or 12% less than that of plants grown with the same amount of N applied by broadcast. Recovery of residual labeled fertilizer N in the cover crop ranged from 2 to 7% of applied N and was greatest for the highest amount of N applied. Fertilizer N recoveries estimated by the difference method equaled those of the 15N method at 5 wk after transplanting. At 13 wk after transplanting, the difference method, particularly for applications of 84 and 168 kg N ha-1, overestimated fertilizer N recoveries relative to the 15N method, and is unlikely to provide an accurate measure of fertilizer N use by burley tobacco across a wide range of N applications. Reducing the amount of broadcast applied fertilizer to give a 10% decrease in air-cured leaf yield would decrease the unaccounted fertilizer N by 80 to 115 kg N ha-1 depending on location. As compared with broadcast application of fertilizer N before transplanting, drill banding the N at about 5 wk after transplanting would equal or further decrease unaccounted amounts of fertilizer N.</description><subject>abonos nitrogenados</subject><subject>absorcion de sustancias nutritivas</subject><subject>absorption de substances nutritives</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>application a la volee</subject><subject>application rates</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>broadcasting</subject><subject>choix de la date</subject><subject>cover plants</subject><subject>crop yield</subject><subject>date de traitement</subject><subject>distribucion a voleo</subject><subject>dose d' application</subject><subject>dosis de aplicacion</subject><subject>efectos residuales</subject><subject>effet residuel</subject><subject>efficacite</subject><subject>efficiency</subject><subject>eficacia</subject><subject>eleccion de la epoca</subject><subject>engrais azote</subject><subject>fecha de tratamiento</subject><subject>festuca arundinacea</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General agronomy. Plant production</subject><subject>kentucky</subject><subject>measurement</subject><subject>medicion</subject><subject>mesure</subject><subject>nicotiana tabacum</subject><subject>Nitrogen fertilization</subject><subject>nitrogen fertilizers</subject><subject>Nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium fertilizations</subject><subject>nutrient uptake</subject><subject>plantas de cobertura</subject><subject>plante de couverture</subject><subject>rendement des cultures</subject><subject>rendimiento de cultivos</subject><subject>residual effects</subject><subject>seed drilling</subject><subject>semis en ligne</subject><subject>siembra en lineas</subject><subject>Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments</subject><subject>technique des traceurs</subject><subject>tecnicas de trazadores</subject><subject>timing</subject><subject>tracer techniques</subject><subject>treatment date</subject><subject>triticum aestivum</subject><subject>uses</subject><subject>usos</subject><subject>utilisation</subject><issn>0002-1962</issn><issn>1435-0645</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVkE9LwzAYh4MoOKdfQXrw4KXzfdOka24O0ekYDqaD3UqSJqOjLiWdf-anN7Wil108hLy8PDy_5EfIJcKAYsKu5Mq7zRqFGA4AgKJIKUAm2jmc9OOA9JAlPIaU8UPSa_dxCx2Tk6ZZAyAKhj0i5ka7N-N3kbORNX5bVuWn8dGm3Hq3MptI1nVVmiLauki9-srswqSk1u6UHFlZNebs5-6Txd3t8819PJ2NH25G01gz5MuYF4myjCsGICzwbJgobbBIGWRFwSGhUokMFHJtuRZhrxGtEtbIIbeS0aRPrjuv9q5pvLF57csX6Xc5Qt5Wkf9Vke-tIiguOkUtGy0r6-VGl82vh2YsA4YBkx32XoZ__jsmH40ndDSezx4nLbSPWYaM8y7DStcawzMWT9848oymkHwBbLSFHw</recordid><startdate>199703</startdate><enddate>199703</enddate><creator>MacKown, Charles T.</creator><creator>Sutton, Tommy G.</creator><general>American Society of Agronomy</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199703</creationdate><title>Recovery of fertilizer nitrogen applied to burley tobacco</title><author>MacKown, Charles T. ; Sutton, Tommy G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415X-5d3bf45b4009f05873bce1d6408dd5032ab980b15cf5c9d64c11fb9fea75fa423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>abonos nitrogenados</topic><topic>absorcion de sustancias nutritivas</topic><topic>absorption de substances nutritives</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>application a la volee</topic><topic>application rates</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>broadcasting</topic><topic>choix de la date</topic><topic>cover plants</topic><topic>crop yield</topic><topic>date de traitement</topic><topic>distribucion a voleo</topic><topic>dose d' application</topic><topic>dosis de aplicacion</topic><topic>efectos residuales</topic><topic>effet residuel</topic><topic>efficacite</topic><topic>efficiency</topic><topic>eficacia</topic><topic>eleccion de la epoca</topic><topic>engrais azote</topic><topic>fecha de tratamiento</topic><topic>festuca arundinacea</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General agronomy. Plant production</topic><topic>kentucky</topic><topic>measurement</topic><topic>medicion</topic><topic>mesure</topic><topic>nicotiana tabacum</topic><topic>Nitrogen fertilization</topic><topic>nitrogen fertilizers</topic><topic>Nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium fertilizations</topic><topic>nutrient uptake</topic><topic>plantas de cobertura</topic><topic>plante de couverture</topic><topic>rendement des cultures</topic><topic>rendimiento de cultivos</topic><topic>residual effects</topic><topic>seed drilling</topic><topic>semis en ligne</topic><topic>siembra en lineas</topic><topic>Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments</topic><topic>technique des traceurs</topic><topic>tecnicas de trazadores</topic><topic>timing</topic><topic>tracer techniques</topic><topic>treatment date</topic><topic>triticum aestivum</topic><topic>uses</topic><topic>usos</topic><topic>utilisation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MacKown, Charles T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutton, Tommy G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>USDA, ARS, El Reno, OK</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Agronomy journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MacKown, Charles T.</au><au>Sutton, Tommy G.</au><aucorp>USDA, ARS, El Reno, OK</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Recovery of fertilizer nitrogen applied to burley tobacco</atitle><jtitle>Agronomy journal</jtitle><date>1997-03</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>89</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>183</spage><epage>189</epage><pages>183-189</pages><issn>0002-1962</issn><eissn>1435-0645</eissn><coden>AGJOAT</coden><abstract>The high cash value of burley tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) may lead to ineffective excess fertilization of the crop. The effects of N management on fertilizer N use efficiency by burley tobacco and recovery of residual fertilizer N by a winter cover crop were determined. Tobacco was grown in 1993 at two locations with 0 to 336 kg N ha-1 broadcast applied before transplanting or 168 kg N ha-1 sidedressed at onset of rapid growth (approximately 5 wk after transplanting). Seasonal recoveries of 15N-depleted fertilizer N were determined in aboveground tissues of the tobacco crop. The amount of labeled fertilizer N recovered at harvest (29 to 124 kg N ha-1) increased with increasing amounts of N applied, but fertilizer N use efficiency was constant at 36.6 +/- 0.9% for broadcast applications. Sidedress N enhanced labeled fertilizer N recovery (43 to 54% of applied N, depending on location), even though total aboveground dry matter was equal to or 12% less than that of plants grown with the same amount of N applied by broadcast. Recovery of residual labeled fertilizer N in the cover crop ranged from 2 to 7% of applied N and was greatest for the highest amount of N applied. Fertilizer N recoveries estimated by the difference method equaled those of the 15N method at 5 wk after transplanting. At 13 wk after transplanting, the difference method, particularly for applications of 84 and 168 kg N ha-1, overestimated fertilizer N recoveries relative to the 15N method, and is unlikely to provide an accurate measure of fertilizer N use by burley tobacco across a wide range of N applications. Reducing the amount of broadcast applied fertilizer to give a 10% decrease in air-cured leaf yield would decrease the unaccounted fertilizer N by 80 to 115 kg N ha-1 depending on location. As compared with broadcast application of fertilizer N before transplanting, drill banding the N at about 5 wk after transplanting would equal or further decrease unaccounted amounts of fertilizer N.</abstract><cop>Madison, WI</cop><pub>American Society of Agronomy</pub><doi>10.2134/agronj1997.00021962008900020006x</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-1962
ispartof Agronomy journal, 1997-03, Vol.89 (2), p.183-189
issn 0002-1962
1435-0645
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_2134_agronj1997_00021962008900020006x
source Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects abonos nitrogenados
absorcion de sustancias nutritivas
absorption de substances nutritives
Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions
application a la volee
application rates
Biological and medical sciences
broadcasting
choix de la date
cover plants
crop yield
date de traitement
distribucion a voleo
dose d' application
dosis de aplicacion
efectos residuales
effet residuel
efficacite
efficiency
eficacia
eleccion de la epoca
engrais azote
fecha de tratamiento
festuca arundinacea
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General agronomy. Plant production
kentucky
measurement
medicion
mesure
nicotiana tabacum
Nitrogen fertilization
nitrogen fertilizers
Nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium fertilizations
nutrient uptake
plantas de cobertura
plante de couverture
rendement des cultures
rendimiento de cultivos
residual effects
seed drilling
semis en ligne
siembra en lineas
Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments
technique des traceurs
tecnicas de trazadores
timing
tracer techniques
treatment date
triticum aestivum
uses
usos
utilisation
title Recovery of fertilizer nitrogen applied to burley tobacco
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T03%3A02%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Recovery%20of%20fertilizer%20nitrogen%20applied%20to%20burley%20tobacco&rft.jtitle=Agronomy%20journal&rft.au=MacKown,%20Charles%20T.&rft.aucorp=USDA,%20ARS,%20El%20Reno,%20OK&rft.date=1997-03&rft.volume=89&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=183&rft.epage=189&rft.pages=183-189&rft.issn=0002-1962&rft.eissn=1435-0645&rft.coden=AGJOAT&rft_id=info:doi/10.2134/agronj1997.00021962008900020006x&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_cross%3EAGJ2AGRONJ199700021962008900020006X%3C/wiley_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true