Fertilizer Nitrogen Rate Prescription, Interpretational Algorithms, and Individual Sensor Performance in an Array

Many sensors require algorithms/mathematical functions to translate measurements into practical outcomes. In arrays (sensor groups), the agronomic consequences of variations in individual unit performance, while driving an algorithm, remains uncharacterized. Our objective was to study the performanc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Agronomy journal 2015-09, Vol.107 (5), p.1691-1700
Hauptverfasser: Pena‐Yewtukhiw, Eugenia M., Grove, John H., Schwab, Gregory J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1700
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1691
container_title Agronomy journal
container_volume 107
creator Pena‐Yewtukhiw, Eugenia M.
Grove, John H.
Schwab, Gregory J.
description Many sensors require algorithms/mathematical functions to translate measurements into practical outcomes. In arrays (sensor groups), the agronomic consequences of variations in individual unit performance, while driving an algorithm, remains uncharacterized. Our objective was to study the performance of individual active canopy reflectance sensors outputting normalized difference vegetative index (NDVI) data, used to prescribe the corrective N fertilization rate for winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). We hypothesized that sensor output differences would influence corrective N prescriptions when the NDVI data were interpreted with the usual discontinuous, “stair‐step”, algorithms. The NDVI data from an eight‐sensor GreenSeeker array (Trimble Navigation Limited, Westminster, CO) were obtained at growth stage Feekes 6 for four wheat fields. Individual sensors were coupled with individual liquid N application nozzle sets, and operational settings make possible the independent fertilization of each 0.56 m2 of field area. Two algorithms (A and B) were evaluated. We observed large differences in individual sensor corrective N prescriptions, despite little short range (
doi_str_mv 10.2134/agronj14.0573
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wiley_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_2134_agronj14_0573</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>AGJ2AGRONJ140573</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2453-7de8784f0e2b601da9ab33c935a079663ffefd52d366d7a074f2e5e0564e2d373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFOAjEQhhujiYgevfcBWGy33S4bTxsiCCFAUM-bsp1iydLF6arBp3cRvXqazP9_M4ePkFvO-jEX8k5vsPZbLvssScUZ6XApkogpmZyTDmMsjnim4ktyFcKWMc4zyTvkbQTYuMp9AdK5a7DegKcr3QBdIoQS3b5xte_RiW8A9wiNPu66onm1qdE1r7vQo9qbFjDuw5n3tnoCH2qkS0Bb4077EqjzLURzRH24JhdWVwFufmeXvIwenoeP0WwxngzzWVTGMhFRamCQDqRlEK8V40Znei1EmYlEszRTSlgL1iSxEUqZtM2kjSEBligJbZiKLolOf0usQ0CwxR7dTuOh4Kw4-ir-fBVHXy1_f-I_XQWH_-EiH0_jfLxazKdc_lx_Ayj2c6w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fertilizer Nitrogen Rate Prescription, Interpretational Algorithms, and Individual Sensor Performance in an Array</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Pena‐Yewtukhiw, Eugenia M. ; Grove, John H. ; Schwab, Gregory J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pena‐Yewtukhiw, Eugenia M. ; Grove, John H. ; Schwab, Gregory J.</creatorcontrib><description>Many sensors require algorithms/mathematical functions to translate measurements into practical outcomes. In arrays (sensor groups), the agronomic consequences of variations in individual unit performance, while driving an algorithm, remains uncharacterized. Our objective was to study the performance of individual active canopy reflectance sensors outputting normalized difference vegetative index (NDVI) data, used to prescribe the corrective N fertilization rate for winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). We hypothesized that sensor output differences would influence corrective N prescriptions when the NDVI data were interpreted with the usual discontinuous, “stair‐step”, algorithms. The NDVI data from an eight‐sensor GreenSeeker array (Trimble Navigation Limited, Westminster, CO) were obtained at growth stage Feekes 6 for four wheat fields. Individual sensors were coupled with individual liquid N application nozzle sets, and operational settings make possible the independent fertilization of each 0.56 m2 of field area. Two algorithms (A and B) were evaluated. We observed large differences in individual sensor corrective N prescriptions, despite little short range (&lt;1 m) spatial variation in NDVI. Sensor and algorithm differences resulted in a wider range in N prescription rates for algorithm B (CV values between 4.3 and 26.2%) than for algorithm A (CV values between 5.1 and 9.9%). One sensor resulted in 18 to 21% lower N prescriptions when driving algorithm A, and 27 to 56% lower N recommendations with algorithm B. Individual sensor performance, and its interaction with data interpretational algorithms/mathematical functions, should be understood before sensor arrays are used to detect, monitor, characterize and map environmental, plant and soil properties.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-1962</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-0645</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2134/agronj14.0573</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>The American Society of Agronomy, Inc</publisher><ispartof>Agronomy journal, 2015-09, Vol.107 (5), p.1691-1700</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2015 by the American Society of Agronomy, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2453-7de8784f0e2b601da9ab33c935a079663ffefd52d366d7a074f2e5e0564e2d373</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2134%2Fagronj14.0573$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.2134%2Fagronj14.0573$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pena‐Yewtukhiw, Eugenia M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grove, John H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwab, Gregory J.</creatorcontrib><title>Fertilizer Nitrogen Rate Prescription, Interpretational Algorithms, and Individual Sensor Performance in an Array</title><title>Agronomy journal</title><description>Many sensors require algorithms/mathematical functions to translate measurements into practical outcomes. In arrays (sensor groups), the agronomic consequences of variations in individual unit performance, while driving an algorithm, remains uncharacterized. Our objective was to study the performance of individual active canopy reflectance sensors outputting normalized difference vegetative index (NDVI) data, used to prescribe the corrective N fertilization rate for winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). We hypothesized that sensor output differences would influence corrective N prescriptions when the NDVI data were interpreted with the usual discontinuous, “stair‐step”, algorithms. The NDVI data from an eight‐sensor GreenSeeker array (Trimble Navigation Limited, Westminster, CO) were obtained at growth stage Feekes 6 for four wheat fields. Individual sensors were coupled with individual liquid N application nozzle sets, and operational settings make possible the independent fertilization of each 0.56 m2 of field area. Two algorithms (A and B) were evaluated. We observed large differences in individual sensor corrective N prescriptions, despite little short range (&lt;1 m) spatial variation in NDVI. Sensor and algorithm differences resulted in a wider range in N prescription rates for algorithm B (CV values between 4.3 and 26.2%) than for algorithm A (CV values between 5.1 and 9.9%). One sensor resulted in 18 to 21% lower N prescriptions when driving algorithm A, and 27 to 56% lower N recommendations with algorithm B. Individual sensor performance, and its interaction with data interpretational algorithms/mathematical functions, should be understood before sensor arrays are used to detect, monitor, characterize and map environmental, plant and soil properties.</description><issn>0002-1962</issn><issn>1435-0645</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMFOAjEQhhujiYgevfcBWGy33S4bTxsiCCFAUM-bsp1iydLF6arBp3cRvXqazP9_M4ePkFvO-jEX8k5vsPZbLvssScUZ6XApkogpmZyTDmMsjnim4ktyFcKWMc4zyTvkbQTYuMp9AdK5a7DegKcr3QBdIoQS3b5xte_RiW8A9wiNPu66onm1qdE1r7vQo9qbFjDuw5n3tnoCH2qkS0Bb4077EqjzLURzRH24JhdWVwFufmeXvIwenoeP0WwxngzzWVTGMhFRamCQDqRlEK8V40Znei1EmYlEszRTSlgL1iSxEUqZtM2kjSEBligJbZiKLolOf0usQ0CwxR7dTuOh4Kw4-ir-fBVHXy1_f-I_XQWH_-EiH0_jfLxazKdc_lx_Ayj2c6w</recordid><startdate>201509</startdate><enddate>201509</enddate><creator>Pena‐Yewtukhiw, Eugenia M.</creator><creator>Grove, John H.</creator><creator>Schwab, Gregory J.</creator><general>The American Society of Agronomy, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201509</creationdate><title>Fertilizer Nitrogen Rate Prescription, Interpretational Algorithms, and Individual Sensor Performance in an Array</title><author>Pena‐Yewtukhiw, Eugenia M. ; Grove, John H. ; Schwab, Gregory J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2453-7de8784f0e2b601da9ab33c935a079663ffefd52d366d7a074f2e5e0564e2d373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pena‐Yewtukhiw, Eugenia M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grove, John H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwab, Gregory J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Agronomy journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pena‐Yewtukhiw, Eugenia M.</au><au>Grove, John H.</au><au>Schwab, Gregory J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fertilizer Nitrogen Rate Prescription, Interpretational Algorithms, and Individual Sensor Performance in an Array</atitle><jtitle>Agronomy journal</jtitle><date>2015-09</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>107</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1691</spage><epage>1700</epage><pages>1691-1700</pages><issn>0002-1962</issn><eissn>1435-0645</eissn><abstract>Many sensors require algorithms/mathematical functions to translate measurements into practical outcomes. In arrays (sensor groups), the agronomic consequences of variations in individual unit performance, while driving an algorithm, remains uncharacterized. Our objective was to study the performance of individual active canopy reflectance sensors outputting normalized difference vegetative index (NDVI) data, used to prescribe the corrective N fertilization rate for winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). We hypothesized that sensor output differences would influence corrective N prescriptions when the NDVI data were interpreted with the usual discontinuous, “stair‐step”, algorithms. The NDVI data from an eight‐sensor GreenSeeker array (Trimble Navigation Limited, Westminster, CO) were obtained at growth stage Feekes 6 for four wheat fields. Individual sensors were coupled with individual liquid N application nozzle sets, and operational settings make possible the independent fertilization of each 0.56 m2 of field area. Two algorithms (A and B) were evaluated. We observed large differences in individual sensor corrective N prescriptions, despite little short range (&lt;1 m) spatial variation in NDVI. Sensor and algorithm differences resulted in a wider range in N prescription rates for algorithm B (CV values between 4.3 and 26.2%) than for algorithm A (CV values between 5.1 and 9.9%). One sensor resulted in 18 to 21% lower N prescriptions when driving algorithm A, and 27 to 56% lower N recommendations with algorithm B. Individual sensor performance, and its interaction with data interpretational algorithms/mathematical functions, should be understood before sensor arrays are used to detect, monitor, characterize and map environmental, plant and soil properties.</abstract><pub>The American Society of Agronomy, Inc</pub><doi>10.2134/agronj14.0573</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-1962
ispartof Agronomy journal, 2015-09, Vol.107 (5), p.1691-1700
issn 0002-1962
1435-0645
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_2134_agronj14_0573
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
title Fertilizer Nitrogen Rate Prescription, Interpretational Algorithms, and Individual Sensor Performance in an Array
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T19%3A53%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fertilizer%20Nitrogen%20Rate%20Prescription,%20Interpretational%20Algorithms,%20and%20Individual%20Sensor%20Performance%20in%20an%20Array&rft.jtitle=Agronomy%20journal&rft.au=Pena%E2%80%90Yewtukhiw,%20Eugenia%20M.&rft.date=2015-09&rft.volume=107&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1691&rft.epage=1700&rft.pages=1691-1700&rft.issn=0002-1962&rft.eissn=1435-0645&rft_id=info:doi/10.2134/agronj14.0573&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_cross%3EAGJ2AGRONJ140573%3C/wiley_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true