Growth-Friendly Spine Surgery in Arthrogryposis Multiplex Congenita
Background: Arthrogryposis multiplex congenita (AMC) is a condition that describes neonates born with >= 2 distinct congenital contractures. Despite spinal deformity in 3% to 69% of patients, inadequate data exist on growth-friendly instrumentation (GFI) in AMC. Our study objectives were to descr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume 2021-04, Vol.103 (8), p.715-726 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background: Arthrogryposis multiplex congenita (AMC) is a condition that describes neonates born with >= 2 distinct congenital contractures. Despite spinal deformity in 3% to 69% of patients, inadequate data exist on growth-friendly instrumentation (GFI) in AMC. Our study objectives were to describe current GFI trends in children with AMC and early-onset scoliosis (EOS) and to compare long-term outcomes with a matched idiopathic EOS (IEOS) cohort to determine whether spinal rigidity or extremity contractures influenced outcomes. Methods: Children with AMC and spinal deformity of >= 30 degrees who were treated with GFI for >= 24 months were identified from a multicenter EOS database (1993 to 2017). Propensity scoring matched 35 patients with AMC to 112 patients with IEOS with regard to age, sex, construct, and curve. Multivariable linear mixed modeling compared changes in spinal deformity and the 24-item Early Onset Scoliosis Questionnaire (EOSQ-24) across cohorts. Cohort complications and reoperations were analyzed using multivariable Poisson regression. Results: Preoperatively, groups did not differ with regard to age (p = 0.87), sex (p = 0.96), construct (p = 0.62), rate of nonoperative treatment (p = 0.54), and major coronal curve magnitude (p = 0.96). After the index GFI, patients with AMC had reduced percentage of coronal correction (35% compared with 44%; p = 0.01), larger residual coronal curves (49 degrees compared with 42 degrees; p = 0.03), and comparable percentage of kyphosis correction (17% compared with 21%; p = 0.52). In GFI graduates (n = 81), final coronal curve magnitude (55 degrees compared with 43 degrees; p = 0.22) and final sagittal curve magnitude (47 degrees compared with 47 degrees; p = 0.45) were not significantly different at the latest follow-up after definitive surgery. The patients with AMC had reduced T1-S1 length (p < 0.001), comparable T1-S1 growth velocity (0.66 compared with 0.85 mm/month; p = 0.05), and poorer EOSQ-24 scores at the time of the latest follow-up (64 compared with 83 points; p < 0.001). After adjusting for ambulatory status and GFI duration, patients with AMC developed 51% more complications (incidence rate ratio, 1.51 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.11 to 2.04]; p = 0.009) and 0.2 more complications/year (95% CI, 0.02 to 0.33 more; p = 0.03) compared with patients with IEOS. Conclusions: Patients with AMC and EOS experienced less initial deformity correction after the index surgical procedure, but final G |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0021-9355 1535-1386 |
DOI: | 10.2106/JBJS.20.00600 |