Epileptologists infrequently discuss the risk of intubation with patients with epilepsy in the United States

The aim of this study was to assess how frequently epileptologists discuss advance directives regarding intubation and mechanical ventilation with patients with epilepsy. A secondary aim was to understand the attitudes of neurologists toward discussion and implementation of such advance directives i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of palliative medicine 2021-04, Vol.10 (4), p.3626-3632
Hauptverfasser: Solomon, Andrew J, Macauley, Robert, Spencer, David
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3632
container_issue 4
container_start_page 3626
container_title Annals of palliative medicine
container_volume 10
creator Solomon, Andrew J
Macauley, Robert
Spencer, David
description The aim of this study was to assess how frequently epileptologists discuss advance directives regarding intubation and mechanical ventilation with patients with epilepsy. A secondary aim was to understand the attitudes of neurologists toward discussion and implementation of such advance directives in epilepsy care. An online study survey was developed and distributed by email invitation to 210 neurologists at academic epilepsy and neurophysiology programs in the United States in December 2018. Seventy-seven neurologists, 95% with a clinical practice focus of epilepsy in adults, participated in the study (37% response rate). Three percent reported discussion of risk of intubation with "every" or a "majority" of patients newly diagnosed with epilepsy. Seventy-seven percent indicated a neurologist was the "most appropriate provider to have discussions concerning mechanical ventilation with patients with epilepsy." Twenty-five percent "strongly agreed" that "every patient with epilepsy should have an advance directive specifying their preferences concerning mechanical ventilation in the setting of treatment for seizures." A majority favored overriding a hypothetical patient's advance directive specifying no intubation in the context of airway compromise as a consequence of status epilepticus and its treatment. Epileptologists infrequently discuss the risk of intubation and mechanical ventilation with patients with epilepsy. Many felt that such discussions are unnecessary with most patients, but also best led by a neurologist. Neurologists with expertise in epilepsy may favor overriding advance directives in the setting of status epilepticus. Further data is needed surrounding discussion and implementation of advance care planning in patients with epilepsy.
doi_str_mv 10.21037/apm-20-1831
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_21037_apm_20_1831</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>33691447</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-d87b536f695b7ef92d18b16e932b51205e561239226171be9372cfdbf8a2cc883</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE1PwzAMhiMEYtPYjTPKD6CQOP1IjmgaA2kSB9i5atqEBfpFnQrt3xNW2MmvrceW_BByzdkdcCay-6JvImARl4KfkTkAxFEihTo_ZWAzskT8YIxxEDJWcElmQqSKx3E2J_W6d7XpfVd37w49UtfawXyNpvX1gVYOyxGR-r2hg8NP2tkA-FEX3nUt_XZ-T_uQA41TZ47n8BCw49audd5U9NUX3uAVubBFjWb5Vxdk97h-Wz1F25fN8-phG5UClI8qmelEpDZVic6MVVBxqXlqlACdcGCJSdLwiwJIecZ1mGdQ2kpbWUBZSikW5Ha6Ww4d4mBs3g-uKYZDzll-9JYHbzmw_NdbwG8mvB91Y6oT_G9J_ACBt2rE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Epileptologists infrequently discuss the risk of intubation with patients with epilepsy in the United States</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Solomon, Andrew J ; Macauley, Robert ; Spencer, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Solomon, Andrew J ; Macauley, Robert ; Spencer, David</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to assess how frequently epileptologists discuss advance directives regarding intubation and mechanical ventilation with patients with epilepsy. A secondary aim was to understand the attitudes of neurologists toward discussion and implementation of such advance directives in epilepsy care. An online study survey was developed and distributed by email invitation to 210 neurologists at academic epilepsy and neurophysiology programs in the United States in December 2018. Seventy-seven neurologists, 95% with a clinical practice focus of epilepsy in adults, participated in the study (37% response rate). Three percent reported discussion of risk of intubation with "every" or a "majority" of patients newly diagnosed with epilepsy. Seventy-seven percent indicated a neurologist was the "most appropriate provider to have discussions concerning mechanical ventilation with patients with epilepsy." Twenty-five percent "strongly agreed" that "every patient with epilepsy should have an advance directive specifying their preferences concerning mechanical ventilation in the setting of treatment for seizures." A majority favored overriding a hypothetical patient's advance directive specifying no intubation in the context of airway compromise as a consequence of status epilepticus and its treatment. Epileptologists infrequently discuss the risk of intubation and mechanical ventilation with patients with epilepsy. Many felt that such discussions are unnecessary with most patients, but also best led by a neurologist. Neurologists with expertise in epilepsy may favor overriding advance directives in the setting of status epilepticus. Further data is needed surrounding discussion and implementation of advance care planning in patients with epilepsy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2224-5820</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2224-5839</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.21037/apm-20-1831</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33691447</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>China</publisher><subject>Adult ; Advance Directives ; Epilepsy ; Humans ; Intubation, Intratracheal ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; United States</subject><ispartof>Annals of palliative medicine, 2021-04, Vol.10 (4), p.3626-3632</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-d87b536f695b7ef92d18b16e932b51205e561239226171be9372cfdbf8a2cc883</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33691447$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Solomon, Andrew J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macauley, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spencer, David</creatorcontrib><title>Epileptologists infrequently discuss the risk of intubation with patients with epilepsy in the United States</title><title>Annals of palliative medicine</title><addtitle>Ann Palliat Med</addtitle><description>The aim of this study was to assess how frequently epileptologists discuss advance directives regarding intubation and mechanical ventilation with patients with epilepsy. A secondary aim was to understand the attitudes of neurologists toward discussion and implementation of such advance directives in epilepsy care. An online study survey was developed and distributed by email invitation to 210 neurologists at academic epilepsy and neurophysiology programs in the United States in December 2018. Seventy-seven neurologists, 95% with a clinical practice focus of epilepsy in adults, participated in the study (37% response rate). Three percent reported discussion of risk of intubation with "every" or a "majority" of patients newly diagnosed with epilepsy. Seventy-seven percent indicated a neurologist was the "most appropriate provider to have discussions concerning mechanical ventilation with patients with epilepsy." Twenty-five percent "strongly agreed" that "every patient with epilepsy should have an advance directive specifying their preferences concerning mechanical ventilation in the setting of treatment for seizures." A majority favored overriding a hypothetical patient's advance directive specifying no intubation in the context of airway compromise as a consequence of status epilepticus and its treatment. Epileptologists infrequently discuss the risk of intubation and mechanical ventilation with patients with epilepsy. Many felt that such discussions are unnecessary with most patients, but also best led by a neurologist. Neurologists with expertise in epilepsy may favor overriding advance directives in the setting of status epilepticus. Further data is needed surrounding discussion and implementation of advance care planning in patients with epilepsy.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Advance Directives</subject><subject>Epilepsy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intubation, Intratracheal</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>2224-5820</issn><issn>2224-5839</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kE1PwzAMhiMEYtPYjTPKD6CQOP1IjmgaA2kSB9i5atqEBfpFnQrt3xNW2MmvrceW_BByzdkdcCay-6JvImARl4KfkTkAxFEihTo_ZWAzskT8YIxxEDJWcElmQqSKx3E2J_W6d7XpfVd37w49UtfawXyNpvX1gVYOyxGR-r2hg8NP2tkA-FEX3nUt_XZ-T_uQA41TZ47n8BCw49audd5U9NUX3uAVubBFjWb5Vxdk97h-Wz1F25fN8-phG5UClI8qmelEpDZVic6MVVBxqXlqlACdcGCJSdLwiwJIecZ1mGdQ2kpbWUBZSikW5Ha6Ww4d4mBs3g-uKYZDzll-9JYHbzmw_NdbwG8mvB91Y6oT_G9J_ACBt2rE</recordid><startdate>202104</startdate><enddate>202104</enddate><creator>Solomon, Andrew J</creator><creator>Macauley, Robert</creator><creator>Spencer, David</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202104</creationdate><title>Epileptologists infrequently discuss the risk of intubation with patients with epilepsy in the United States</title><author>Solomon, Andrew J ; Macauley, Robert ; Spencer, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-d87b536f695b7ef92d18b16e932b51205e561239226171be9372cfdbf8a2cc883</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Advance Directives</topic><topic>Epilepsy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intubation, Intratracheal</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Solomon, Andrew J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macauley, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spencer, David</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Annals of palliative medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Solomon, Andrew J</au><au>Macauley, Robert</au><au>Spencer, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Epileptologists infrequently discuss the risk of intubation with patients with epilepsy in the United States</atitle><jtitle>Annals of palliative medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Palliat Med</addtitle><date>2021-04</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>3626</spage><epage>3632</epage><pages>3626-3632</pages><issn>2224-5820</issn><eissn>2224-5839</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study was to assess how frequently epileptologists discuss advance directives regarding intubation and mechanical ventilation with patients with epilepsy. A secondary aim was to understand the attitudes of neurologists toward discussion and implementation of such advance directives in epilepsy care. An online study survey was developed and distributed by email invitation to 210 neurologists at academic epilepsy and neurophysiology programs in the United States in December 2018. Seventy-seven neurologists, 95% with a clinical practice focus of epilepsy in adults, participated in the study (37% response rate). Three percent reported discussion of risk of intubation with "every" or a "majority" of patients newly diagnosed with epilepsy. Seventy-seven percent indicated a neurologist was the "most appropriate provider to have discussions concerning mechanical ventilation with patients with epilepsy." Twenty-five percent "strongly agreed" that "every patient with epilepsy should have an advance directive specifying their preferences concerning mechanical ventilation in the setting of treatment for seizures." A majority favored overriding a hypothetical patient's advance directive specifying no intubation in the context of airway compromise as a consequence of status epilepticus and its treatment. Epileptologists infrequently discuss the risk of intubation and mechanical ventilation with patients with epilepsy. Many felt that such discussions are unnecessary with most patients, but also best led by a neurologist. Neurologists with expertise in epilepsy may favor overriding advance directives in the setting of status epilepticus. Further data is needed surrounding discussion and implementation of advance care planning in patients with epilepsy.</abstract><cop>China</cop><pmid>33691447</pmid><doi>10.21037/apm-20-1831</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2224-5820
ispartof Annals of palliative medicine, 2021-04, Vol.10 (4), p.3626-3632
issn 2224-5820
2224-5839
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_21037_apm_20_1831
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Adult
Advance Directives
Epilepsy
Humans
Intubation, Intratracheal
Surveys and Questionnaires
United States
title Epileptologists infrequently discuss the risk of intubation with patients with epilepsy in the United States
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T21%3A16%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Epileptologists%20infrequently%20discuss%20the%20risk%20of%20intubation%20with%20patients%20with%20epilepsy%20in%20the%20United%20States&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20palliative%20medicine&rft.au=Solomon,%20Andrew%20J&rft.date=2021-04&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=3626&rft.epage=3632&rft.pages=3626-3632&rft.issn=2224-5820&rft.eissn=2224-5839&rft_id=info:doi/10.21037/apm-20-1831&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E33691447%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/33691447&rfr_iscdi=true