Competence units or holistic assessment: The language may be different but the challenges continue

When public attention is focused upon the profession of social work, a typical response has been to change initial training and the learning outcomes by which students are assessed. Although social work education has employed competency frameworks for two decades the incompetence discourse and the c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The journal of practice teaching & learning 2015-02, Vol.13 (1), p.44-56
1. Verfasser: Stone, Clare
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 56
container_issue 1
container_start_page 44
container_title The journal of practice teaching & learning
container_volume 13
creator Stone, Clare
description When public attention is focused upon the profession of social work, a typical response has been to change initial training and the learning outcomes by which students are assessed. Although social work education has employed competency frameworks for two decades the incompetence discourse and the concern about graduates’ ability to undertake competent social work practice continues. Empirical research problematized the competence phenomenon to explore practice educators’ experiences of using competency units and their perspectives of competence for social work. This paper draws upon findings from that research to explore the concept of holistic assessment and to suggest that educators need to reconsider the epistemological principles of assessment for social work practice.
doi_str_mv 10.1921/jpts.v13i1.809
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1921_jpts_v13i1_809</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1921_jpts_v13i1_809</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c849-787c861d65aa41e9d0ffc2028578c4f40b3fb2f4f148350d0e8251829bf59e8d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkD9rwzAUxEVpoSHN2llfwK6ebMVStxL6DwJdshtZfkoUbDn4yYV8-zpth9xyB3fc8GPsEUQORsLT8ZQo_4YiQK6FuWELqJTJFChxe5Xv2YroKGbpSksoFqzZDP0JE0aHfIohER9Gfhi6QCk4bomQqMeYnvnugLyzcT_ZPfLennmDvA3e4zjXvJkST_PCHWzXYdwjcTfEFOKED-zO245w9e9Ltnt73W0-su3X--fmZZs5XZqs0pXTa2jXytoS0LTCeyeF1KrSrvSlaArfSF96KHWhRCtQSwVamsYrg7otliz_u3XjQDSir09j6O14rkHUF0b1hVH9y6ieGRU_4BFcvg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Competence units or holistic assessment: The language may be different but the challenges continue</title><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Stone, Clare</creator><creatorcontrib>Stone, Clare</creatorcontrib><description>When public attention is focused upon the profession of social work, a typical response has been to change initial training and the learning outcomes by which students are assessed. Although social work education has employed competency frameworks for two decades the incompetence discourse and the concern about graduates’ ability to undertake competent social work practice continues. Empirical research problematized the competence phenomenon to explore practice educators’ experiences of using competency units and their perspectives of competence for social work. This paper draws upon findings from that research to explore the concept of holistic assessment and to suggest that educators need to reconsider the epistemological principles of assessment for social work practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1759-5150</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1759-5150</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1921/jpts.v13i1.809</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>The journal of practice teaching &amp; learning, 2015-02, Vol.13 (1), p.44-56</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c849-787c861d65aa41e9d0ffc2028578c4f40b3fb2f4f148350d0e8251829bf59e8d3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stone, Clare</creatorcontrib><title>Competence units or holistic assessment: The language may be different but the challenges continue</title><title>The journal of practice teaching &amp; learning</title><description>When public attention is focused upon the profession of social work, a typical response has been to change initial training and the learning outcomes by which students are assessed. Although social work education has employed competency frameworks for two decades the incompetence discourse and the concern about graduates’ ability to undertake competent social work practice continues. Empirical research problematized the competence phenomenon to explore practice educators’ experiences of using competency units and their perspectives of competence for social work. This paper draws upon findings from that research to explore the concept of holistic assessment and to suggest that educators need to reconsider the epistemological principles of assessment for social work practice.</description><issn>1759-5150</issn><issn>1759-5150</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkD9rwzAUxEVpoSHN2llfwK6ebMVStxL6DwJdshtZfkoUbDn4yYV8-zpth9xyB3fc8GPsEUQORsLT8ZQo_4YiQK6FuWELqJTJFChxe5Xv2YroKGbpSksoFqzZDP0JE0aHfIohER9Gfhi6QCk4bomQqMeYnvnugLyzcT_ZPfLennmDvA3e4zjXvJkST_PCHWzXYdwjcTfEFOKED-zO245w9e9Ltnt73W0-su3X--fmZZs5XZqs0pXTa2jXytoS0LTCeyeF1KrSrvSlaArfSF96KHWhRCtQSwVamsYrg7otliz_u3XjQDSir09j6O14rkHUF0b1hVH9y6ieGRU_4BFcvg</recordid><startdate>20150221</startdate><enddate>20150221</enddate><creator>Stone, Clare</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150221</creationdate><title>Competence units or holistic assessment: The language may be different but the challenges continue</title><author>Stone, Clare</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c849-787c861d65aa41e9d0ffc2028578c4f40b3fb2f4f148350d0e8251829bf59e8d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stone, Clare</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The journal of practice teaching &amp; learning</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stone, Clare</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Competence units or holistic assessment: The language may be different but the challenges continue</atitle><jtitle>The journal of practice teaching &amp; learning</jtitle><date>2015-02-21</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>44</spage><epage>56</epage><pages>44-56</pages><issn>1759-5150</issn><eissn>1759-5150</eissn><abstract>When public attention is focused upon the profession of social work, a typical response has been to change initial training and the learning outcomes by which students are assessed. Although social work education has employed competency frameworks for two decades the incompetence discourse and the concern about graduates’ ability to undertake competent social work practice continues. Empirical research problematized the competence phenomenon to explore practice educators’ experiences of using competency units and their perspectives of competence for social work. This paper draws upon findings from that research to explore the concept of holistic assessment and to suggest that educators need to reconsider the epistemological principles of assessment for social work practice.</abstract><doi>10.1921/jpts.v13i1.809</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1759-5150
ispartof The journal of practice teaching & learning, 2015-02, Vol.13 (1), p.44-56
issn 1759-5150
1759-5150
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1921_jpts_v13i1_809
source EBSCOhost Education Source
title Competence units or holistic assessment: The language may be different but the challenges continue
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T22%3A11%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Competence%20units%20or%20holistic%20assessment:%20The%20language%20may%20be%20different%20but%20the%20challenges%20continue&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20practice%20teaching%20&%20learning&rft.au=Stone,%20Clare&rft.date=2015-02-21&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=44&rft.epage=56&rft.pages=44-56&rft.issn=1759-5150&rft.eissn=1759-5150&rft_id=info:doi/10.1921/jpts.v13i1.809&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1921_jpts_v13i1_809%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true