Competence units or holistic assessment: The language may be different but the challenges continue
When public attention is focused upon the profession of social work, a typical response has been to change initial training and the learning outcomes by which students are assessed. Although social work education has employed competency frameworks for two decades the incompetence discourse and the c...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The journal of practice teaching & learning 2015-02, Vol.13 (1), p.44-56 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 56 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 44 |
container_title | The journal of practice teaching & learning |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Stone, Clare |
description | When public attention is focused upon the profession of social work, a typical response has been to change initial training and the learning outcomes by which students are assessed. Although social work education has employed competency frameworks for two decades the incompetence discourse and the concern about graduates’ ability to undertake competent social work practice continues. Empirical research problematized the competence phenomenon to explore practice educators’ experiences of using competency units and their perspectives of competence for social work. This paper draws upon findings from that research to explore the concept of holistic assessment and to suggest that educators need to reconsider the epistemological principles of assessment for social work practice. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1921/jpts.v13i1.809 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1921_jpts_v13i1_809</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1921_jpts_v13i1_809</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c849-787c861d65aa41e9d0ffc2028578c4f40b3fb2f4f148350d0e8251829bf59e8d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkD9rwzAUxEVpoSHN2llfwK6ebMVStxL6DwJdshtZfkoUbDn4yYV8-zpth9xyB3fc8GPsEUQORsLT8ZQo_4YiQK6FuWELqJTJFChxe5Xv2YroKGbpSksoFqzZDP0JE0aHfIohER9Gfhi6QCk4bomQqMeYnvnugLyzcT_ZPfLennmDvA3e4zjXvJkST_PCHWzXYdwjcTfEFOKED-zO245w9e9Ltnt73W0-su3X--fmZZs5XZqs0pXTa2jXytoS0LTCeyeF1KrSrvSlaArfSF96KHWhRCtQSwVamsYrg7otliz_u3XjQDSir09j6O14rkHUF0b1hVH9y6ieGRU_4BFcvg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Competence units or holistic assessment: The language may be different but the challenges continue</title><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Stone, Clare</creator><creatorcontrib>Stone, Clare</creatorcontrib><description>When public attention is focused upon the profession of social work, a typical response has been to change initial training and the learning outcomes by which students are assessed. Although social work education has employed competency frameworks for two decades the incompetence discourse and the concern about graduates’ ability to undertake competent social work practice continues. Empirical research problematized the competence phenomenon to explore practice educators’ experiences of using competency units and their perspectives of competence for social work. This paper draws upon findings from that research to explore the concept of holistic assessment and to suggest that educators need to reconsider the epistemological principles of assessment for social work practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1759-5150</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1759-5150</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1921/jpts.v13i1.809</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>The journal of practice teaching & learning, 2015-02, Vol.13 (1), p.44-56</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c849-787c861d65aa41e9d0ffc2028578c4f40b3fb2f4f148350d0e8251829bf59e8d3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stone, Clare</creatorcontrib><title>Competence units or holistic assessment: The language may be different but the challenges continue</title><title>The journal of practice teaching & learning</title><description>When public attention is focused upon the profession of social work, a typical response has been to change initial training and the learning outcomes by which students are assessed. Although social work education has employed competency frameworks for two decades the incompetence discourse and the concern about graduates’ ability to undertake competent social work practice continues. Empirical research problematized the competence phenomenon to explore practice educators’ experiences of using competency units and their perspectives of competence for social work. This paper draws upon findings from that research to explore the concept of holistic assessment and to suggest that educators need to reconsider the epistemological principles of assessment for social work practice.</description><issn>1759-5150</issn><issn>1759-5150</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkD9rwzAUxEVpoSHN2llfwK6ebMVStxL6DwJdshtZfkoUbDn4yYV8-zpth9xyB3fc8GPsEUQORsLT8ZQo_4YiQK6FuWELqJTJFChxe5Xv2YroKGbpSksoFqzZDP0JE0aHfIohER9Gfhi6QCk4bomQqMeYnvnugLyzcT_ZPfLennmDvA3e4zjXvJkST_PCHWzXYdwjcTfEFOKED-zO245w9e9Ltnt73W0-su3X--fmZZs5XZqs0pXTa2jXytoS0LTCeyeF1KrSrvSlaArfSF96KHWhRCtQSwVamsYrg7otliz_u3XjQDSir09j6O14rkHUF0b1hVH9y6ieGRU_4BFcvg</recordid><startdate>20150221</startdate><enddate>20150221</enddate><creator>Stone, Clare</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150221</creationdate><title>Competence units or holistic assessment: The language may be different but the challenges continue</title><author>Stone, Clare</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c849-787c861d65aa41e9d0ffc2028578c4f40b3fb2f4f148350d0e8251829bf59e8d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stone, Clare</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The journal of practice teaching & learning</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stone, Clare</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Competence units or holistic assessment: The language may be different but the challenges continue</atitle><jtitle>The journal of practice teaching & learning</jtitle><date>2015-02-21</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>44</spage><epage>56</epage><pages>44-56</pages><issn>1759-5150</issn><eissn>1759-5150</eissn><abstract>When public attention is focused upon the profession of social work, a typical response has been to change initial training and the learning outcomes by which students are assessed. Although social work education has employed competency frameworks for two decades the incompetence discourse and the concern about graduates’ ability to undertake competent social work practice continues. Empirical research problematized the competence phenomenon to explore practice educators’ experiences of using competency units and their perspectives of competence for social work. This paper draws upon findings from that research to explore the concept of holistic assessment and to suggest that educators need to reconsider the epistemological principles of assessment for social work practice.</abstract><doi>10.1921/jpts.v13i1.809</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1759-5150 |
ispartof | The journal of practice teaching & learning, 2015-02, Vol.13 (1), p.44-56 |
issn | 1759-5150 1759-5150 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1921_jpts_v13i1_809 |
source | EBSCOhost Education Source |
title | Competence units or holistic assessment: The language may be different but the challenges continue |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T22%3A11%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Competence%20units%20or%20holistic%20assessment:%20The%20language%20may%20be%20different%20but%20the%20challenges%20continue&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20practice%20teaching%20&%20learning&rft.au=Stone,%20Clare&rft.date=2015-02-21&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=44&rft.epage=56&rft.pages=44-56&rft.issn=1759-5150&rft.eissn=1759-5150&rft_id=info:doi/10.1921/jpts.v13i1.809&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1921_jpts_v13i1_809%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |