Differences in wildfires among ecoregions and land management agencies in the Sierra Nevada region, California, USA

Recent research has indicated that in most of the western United States, fire size is increasing, large fires are becoming more frequent, and in at least some locations percentage of high-severity fire is also increasing. These changes in the contemporary fire regime are largely attributed to both c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecosphere (Washington, D.C) D.C), 2012-09, Vol.3 (9), p.art80-20
Hauptverfasser: Miller, Jay D, Collins, Brandon M, Lutz, James A, Stephens, Scott L, van Wagtendonk, Jan W, Yasuda, Donald A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 20
container_issue 9
container_start_page art80
container_title Ecosphere (Washington, D.C)
container_volume 3
creator Miller, Jay D
Collins, Brandon M
Lutz, James A
Stephens, Scott L
van Wagtendonk, Jan W
Yasuda, Donald A
description Recent research has indicated that in most of the western United States, fire size is increasing, large fires are becoming more frequent, and in at least some locations percentage of high-severity fire is also increasing. These changes in the contemporary fire regime are largely attributed to both changing climate and land management practices, including suppression of fires and past timber harvesting, over the last century. Fire management, including suppression and using wildfire for resource benefits, varies among federal land management agencies, yet no published studies have directly compared fire statistics between federal land management agencies in our study area. The primary response to wildfire on Forest Service areas is immediate suppression, while the National Park Service is more likely to use wildfire for resource benefits. We use fire perimeters and satellite-derived estimates of fire severity to compare fire statistics for wildfires (fire size, percentage of high-severity fire and high-severity patch size) among ecoregions, forest types, and land management agencies 1984-2009 in the Sierra Nevada, Southern Cascades, and Modoc Plateau of California, USA. High-severity patch size and percentage of high-severity fire, regardless of forest type, were less ( P < 0.05) in Yosemite National Park than on Forest Service lands. Yosemite fires were smaller on average than fires on Forest Service lands on the east side of the Sierra Nevada, southern Cascades and Modoc Plateau. Depending upon whether fires that crossed boundaries were included or not, mean size of Yosemite fires was either smaller or not significantly different from Forest Service fires on the west side of the Sierra Nevada. Even under current conditions, it appears that fire management practices that emulate those used in Yosemite could moderate effects of past land management, restoring and helping to maintain old forest conditions within the greater Sierra Nevada region, including the southern Cascades and Modoc Plateau.
doi_str_mv 10.1890/ES12-00158.1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1890_ES12_00158_1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2299129448</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3401-ad93b5a22909ecf7fa57982d0beffe998b28c50d417009d0676b852513ec2bd03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1PAjEQhjdGEwly8wc0MfHEYtvdsu2RIH4kRA8r56a7nWIJdLFdP_j3FtYDB-Iknek0zzudvElyTfCIcIHvZiWhKcaE8RE5S3qUMJxyQdn50f0yGYSwwjFYXvA86yXh3hoDHlwNAVmHvu1aG-tjozaNWyKoGw9L27j44DRa79NGObWEDbgWxepq20nbd0ClBe8VeoEvpRXqlEM0VWtrGu-sGqJFOblKLoxaBxj81X6yeJi9TZ_S-evj83QyT1WWY5IqLbKKKUoFFlCbwihWCE41riCuLASvKK8Z1jkpMBYaj4txxRllJIOaVhpn_eSmm7v1zccnhFaumk_v4pcyDhWEijznkRp2VO2bEDwYufV2o_xOEiz3zsq9s_LgrCQRH3d4dAp2_7JyNi0poYduL7zthKrdbRsnIah4juitNrL9aU-CJ1f5BQvrkv4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2299129448</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differences in wildfires among ecoregions and land management agencies in the Sierra Nevada region, California, USA</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Miller, Jay D ; Collins, Brandon M ; Lutz, James A ; Stephens, Scott L ; van Wagtendonk, Jan W ; Yasuda, Donald A</creator><creatorcontrib>Miller, Jay D ; Collins, Brandon M ; Lutz, James A ; Stephens, Scott L ; van Wagtendonk, Jan W ; Yasuda, Donald A</creatorcontrib><description>Recent research has indicated that in most of the western United States, fire size is increasing, large fires are becoming more frequent, and in at least some locations percentage of high-severity fire is also increasing. These changes in the contemporary fire regime are largely attributed to both changing climate and land management practices, including suppression of fires and past timber harvesting, over the last century. Fire management, including suppression and using wildfire for resource benefits, varies among federal land management agencies, yet no published studies have directly compared fire statistics between federal land management agencies in our study area. The primary response to wildfire on Forest Service areas is immediate suppression, while the National Park Service is more likely to use wildfire for resource benefits. We use fire perimeters and satellite-derived estimates of fire severity to compare fire statistics for wildfires (fire size, percentage of high-severity fire and high-severity patch size) among ecoregions, forest types, and land management agencies 1984-2009 in the Sierra Nevada, Southern Cascades, and Modoc Plateau of California, USA. High-severity patch size and percentage of high-severity fire, regardless of forest type, were less ( P &lt; 0.05) in Yosemite National Park than on Forest Service lands. Yosemite fires were smaller on average than fires on Forest Service lands on the east side of the Sierra Nevada, southern Cascades and Modoc Plateau. Depending upon whether fires that crossed boundaries were included or not, mean size of Yosemite fires was either smaller or not significantly different from Forest Service fires on the west side of the Sierra Nevada. Even under current conditions, it appears that fire management practices that emulate those used in Yosemite could moderate effects of past land management, restoring and helping to maintain old forest conditions within the greater Sierra Nevada region, including the southern Cascades and Modoc Plateau.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2150-8925</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2150-8925</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1890/ES12-00158.1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Ecological Society of America</publisher><subject>Climate change ; fire effects ; fire severity ; fire suppression policy ; Forest &amp; brush fires ; Forest Service ; Forests ; Land management ; Land use planning ; National Park Service ; National parks ; Prescribed fire ; RdNBR ; Sierra Nevada, USA ; Wilderness areas ; wildfire ; Wildfires</subject><ispartof>Ecosphere (Washington, D.C), 2012-09, Vol.3 (9), p.art80-20</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2012 Miller et al.</rights><rights>2012. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3401-ad93b5a22909ecf7fa57982d0beffe998b28c50d417009d0676b852513ec2bd03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3401-ad93b5a22909ecf7fa57982d0beffe998b28c50d417009d0676b852513ec2bd03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1890%2FES12-00158.1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1890%2FES12-00158.1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,1417,11562,27924,27925,45574,45575,46052,46476</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Miller, Jay D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins, Brandon M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lutz, James A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stephens, Scott L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Wagtendonk, Jan W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yasuda, Donald A</creatorcontrib><title>Differences in wildfires among ecoregions and land management agencies in the Sierra Nevada region, California, USA</title><title>Ecosphere (Washington, D.C)</title><description>Recent research has indicated that in most of the western United States, fire size is increasing, large fires are becoming more frequent, and in at least some locations percentage of high-severity fire is also increasing. These changes in the contemporary fire regime are largely attributed to both changing climate and land management practices, including suppression of fires and past timber harvesting, over the last century. Fire management, including suppression and using wildfire for resource benefits, varies among federal land management agencies, yet no published studies have directly compared fire statistics between federal land management agencies in our study area. The primary response to wildfire on Forest Service areas is immediate suppression, while the National Park Service is more likely to use wildfire for resource benefits. We use fire perimeters and satellite-derived estimates of fire severity to compare fire statistics for wildfires (fire size, percentage of high-severity fire and high-severity patch size) among ecoregions, forest types, and land management agencies 1984-2009 in the Sierra Nevada, Southern Cascades, and Modoc Plateau of California, USA. High-severity patch size and percentage of high-severity fire, regardless of forest type, were less ( P &lt; 0.05) in Yosemite National Park than on Forest Service lands. Yosemite fires were smaller on average than fires on Forest Service lands on the east side of the Sierra Nevada, southern Cascades and Modoc Plateau. Depending upon whether fires that crossed boundaries were included or not, mean size of Yosemite fires was either smaller or not significantly different from Forest Service fires on the west side of the Sierra Nevada. Even under current conditions, it appears that fire management practices that emulate those used in Yosemite could moderate effects of past land management, restoring and helping to maintain old forest conditions within the greater Sierra Nevada region, including the southern Cascades and Modoc Plateau.</description><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>fire effects</subject><subject>fire severity</subject><subject>fire suppression policy</subject><subject>Forest &amp; brush fires</subject><subject>Forest Service</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Land management</subject><subject>Land use planning</subject><subject>National Park Service</subject><subject>National parks</subject><subject>Prescribed fire</subject><subject>RdNBR</subject><subject>Sierra Nevada, USA</subject><subject>Wilderness areas</subject><subject>wildfire</subject><subject>Wildfires</subject><issn>2150-8925</issn><issn>2150-8925</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1PAjEQhjdGEwly8wc0MfHEYtvdsu2RIH4kRA8r56a7nWIJdLFdP_j3FtYDB-Iknek0zzudvElyTfCIcIHvZiWhKcaE8RE5S3qUMJxyQdn50f0yGYSwwjFYXvA86yXh3hoDHlwNAVmHvu1aG-tjozaNWyKoGw9L27j44DRa79NGObWEDbgWxepq20nbd0ClBe8VeoEvpRXqlEM0VWtrGu-sGqJFOblKLoxaBxj81X6yeJi9TZ_S-evj83QyT1WWY5IqLbKKKUoFFlCbwihWCE41riCuLASvKK8Z1jkpMBYaj4txxRllJIOaVhpn_eSmm7v1zccnhFaumk_v4pcyDhWEijznkRp2VO2bEDwYufV2o_xOEiz3zsq9s_LgrCQRH3d4dAp2_7JyNi0poYduL7zthKrdbRsnIah4juitNrL9aU-CJ1f5BQvrkv4</recordid><startdate>201209</startdate><enddate>201209</enddate><creator>Miller, Jay D</creator><creator>Collins, Brandon M</creator><creator>Lutz, James A</creator><creator>Stephens, Scott L</creator><creator>van Wagtendonk, Jan W</creator><creator>Yasuda, Donald A</creator><general>Ecological Society of America</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201209</creationdate><title>Differences in wildfires among ecoregions and land management agencies in the Sierra Nevada region, California, USA</title><author>Miller, Jay D ; Collins, Brandon M ; Lutz, James A ; Stephens, Scott L ; van Wagtendonk, Jan W ; Yasuda, Donald A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3401-ad93b5a22909ecf7fa57982d0beffe998b28c50d417009d0676b852513ec2bd03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>fire effects</topic><topic>fire severity</topic><topic>fire suppression policy</topic><topic>Forest &amp; brush fires</topic><topic>Forest Service</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Land management</topic><topic>Land use planning</topic><topic>National Park Service</topic><topic>National parks</topic><topic>Prescribed fire</topic><topic>RdNBR</topic><topic>Sierra Nevada, USA</topic><topic>Wilderness areas</topic><topic>wildfire</topic><topic>Wildfires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Miller, Jay D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins, Brandon M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lutz, James A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stephens, Scott L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Wagtendonk, Jan W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yasuda, Donald A</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Ecosphere (Washington, D.C)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Miller, Jay D</au><au>Collins, Brandon M</au><au>Lutz, James A</au><au>Stephens, Scott L</au><au>van Wagtendonk, Jan W</au><au>Yasuda, Donald A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differences in wildfires among ecoregions and land management agencies in the Sierra Nevada region, California, USA</atitle><jtitle>Ecosphere (Washington, D.C)</jtitle><date>2012-09</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>art80</spage><epage>20</epage><pages>art80-20</pages><issn>2150-8925</issn><eissn>2150-8925</eissn><abstract>Recent research has indicated that in most of the western United States, fire size is increasing, large fires are becoming more frequent, and in at least some locations percentage of high-severity fire is also increasing. These changes in the contemporary fire regime are largely attributed to both changing climate and land management practices, including suppression of fires and past timber harvesting, over the last century. Fire management, including suppression and using wildfire for resource benefits, varies among federal land management agencies, yet no published studies have directly compared fire statistics between federal land management agencies in our study area. The primary response to wildfire on Forest Service areas is immediate suppression, while the National Park Service is more likely to use wildfire for resource benefits. We use fire perimeters and satellite-derived estimates of fire severity to compare fire statistics for wildfires (fire size, percentage of high-severity fire and high-severity patch size) among ecoregions, forest types, and land management agencies 1984-2009 in the Sierra Nevada, Southern Cascades, and Modoc Plateau of California, USA. High-severity patch size and percentage of high-severity fire, regardless of forest type, were less ( P &lt; 0.05) in Yosemite National Park than on Forest Service lands. Yosemite fires were smaller on average than fires on Forest Service lands on the east side of the Sierra Nevada, southern Cascades and Modoc Plateau. Depending upon whether fires that crossed boundaries were included or not, mean size of Yosemite fires was either smaller or not significantly different from Forest Service fires on the west side of the Sierra Nevada. Even under current conditions, it appears that fire management practices that emulate those used in Yosemite could moderate effects of past land management, restoring and helping to maintain old forest conditions within the greater Sierra Nevada region, including the southern Cascades and Modoc Plateau.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Ecological Society of America</pub><doi>10.1890/ES12-00158.1</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2150-8925
ispartof Ecosphere (Washington, D.C), 2012-09, Vol.3 (9), p.art80-20
issn 2150-8925
2150-8925
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1890_ES12_00158_1
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Climate change
fire effects
fire severity
fire suppression policy
Forest & brush fires
Forest Service
Forests
Land management
Land use planning
National Park Service
National parks
Prescribed fire
RdNBR
Sierra Nevada, USA
Wilderness areas
wildfire
Wildfires
title Differences in wildfires among ecoregions and land management agencies in the Sierra Nevada region, California, USA
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T04%3A45%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differences%20in%20wildfires%20among%20ecoregions%20and%20land%20management%20agencies%20in%20the%20Sierra%20Nevada%20region,%20California,%20USA&rft.jtitle=Ecosphere%20(Washington,%20D.C)&rft.au=Miller,%20Jay%20D&rft.date=2012-09&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=art80&rft.epage=20&rft.pages=art80-20&rft.issn=2150-8925&rft.eissn=2150-8925&rft_id=info:doi/10.1890/ES12-00158.1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2299129448%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2299129448&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true