Qualitative Analysis of State/Event Fault Trees Based on Interface Automata

State/Event Fault Tree (SEFT) can be used for safety modeling and assessment. However, SEFT does not provide adequate semantics for analyzing the minimal scenarios leading to system failures. In this paper, we propose a novel qualitative analysis method for SEFT based on interface automata. Firstly,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of safety and security engineering 2021-12, Vol.11 (6), p.663-669
Hauptverfasser: He, Gaofeng, Xu, Bingfeng
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 669
container_issue 6
container_start_page 663
container_title International journal of safety and security engineering
container_volume 11
creator He, Gaofeng
Xu, Bingfeng
description State/Event Fault Tree (SEFT) can be used for safety modeling and assessment. However, SEFT does not provide adequate semantics for analyzing the minimal scenarios leading to system failures. In this paper, we propose a novel qualitative analysis method for SEFT based on interface automata. Firstly, we propose the concept of guarded interface automata by adding guards on interface automata transitions. Based on this model, we can describe the triggers and guards of SEFT simultaneously. Then, a weak bisimilarity operation is defined to alleviate the state space explosion problem. Based on the proposed guarded interface automata and the weak bisimilarity operation, the semantics of SEFT can be precisely determined. After that, a qualitative analysis process is presented on the basis of the formal semantics of SEFT, and the analyzing result is the minimal cut sequence set representing the causes of system failures. Finally, a fire protection system case study is illustrated step by step to demonstrate the effectiveness of our method.
doi_str_mv 10.18280/ijsse.110606
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_18280_ijsse_110606</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_18280_ijsse_110606</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1916-49348df28313e523453c6925d2b70b47f77d3f2f15bb421447cda9095d8e1393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kFFrwjAUhcPYYOJ83Hv-QPXeJG2SRye6yYQx1oe9lbS5gUptRxMF__1Ex57O4cB3Hj7GnhHmaISBRbuPkeaIUEBxxyYCFGYW1Pf9f5f4yGYx7gEAtRVCmQl7_zy6rk0utSfiy95159hGPgT-ddlosT5Rn_jGHbvEy5Eo8hcXyfOh59s-0Rhcc8GOaTi45J7YQ3BdpNlfTlm5WZert2z38bpdLXdZgxaLTFmpjA_CSJSUC6ly2RRW5F7UGmqlg9ZeBhEwr2slUCndeGfB5t4QSiunLLvdNuMQ40ih-hnbgxvPFUJ1dVFdXVQ3F_IX64NRaQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Qualitative Analysis of State/Event Fault Trees Based on Interface Automata</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>He, Gaofeng ; Xu, Bingfeng</creator><creatorcontrib>He, Gaofeng ; Xu, Bingfeng</creatorcontrib><description>State/Event Fault Tree (SEFT) can be used for safety modeling and assessment. However, SEFT does not provide adequate semantics for analyzing the minimal scenarios leading to system failures. In this paper, we propose a novel qualitative analysis method for SEFT based on interface automata. Firstly, we propose the concept of guarded interface automata by adding guards on interface automata transitions. Based on this model, we can describe the triggers and guards of SEFT simultaneously. Then, a weak bisimilarity operation is defined to alleviate the state space explosion problem. Based on the proposed guarded interface automata and the weak bisimilarity operation, the semantics of SEFT can be precisely determined. After that, a qualitative analysis process is presented on the basis of the formal semantics of SEFT, and the analyzing result is the minimal cut sequence set representing the causes of system failures. Finally, a fire protection system case study is illustrated step by step to demonstrate the effectiveness of our method.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2041-9031</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2041-904X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.18280/ijsse.110606</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>International journal of safety and security engineering, 2021-12, Vol.11 (6), p.663-669</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1916-49348df28313e523453c6925d2b70b47f77d3f2f15bb421447cda9095d8e1393</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>He, Gaofeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Bingfeng</creatorcontrib><title>Qualitative Analysis of State/Event Fault Trees Based on Interface Automata</title><title>International journal of safety and security engineering</title><description>State/Event Fault Tree (SEFT) can be used for safety modeling and assessment. However, SEFT does not provide adequate semantics for analyzing the minimal scenarios leading to system failures. In this paper, we propose a novel qualitative analysis method for SEFT based on interface automata. Firstly, we propose the concept of guarded interface automata by adding guards on interface automata transitions. Based on this model, we can describe the triggers and guards of SEFT simultaneously. Then, a weak bisimilarity operation is defined to alleviate the state space explosion problem. Based on the proposed guarded interface automata and the weak bisimilarity operation, the semantics of SEFT can be precisely determined. After that, a qualitative analysis process is presented on the basis of the formal semantics of SEFT, and the analyzing result is the minimal cut sequence set representing the causes of system failures. Finally, a fire protection system case study is illustrated step by step to demonstrate the effectiveness of our method.</description><issn>2041-9031</issn><issn>2041-904X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kFFrwjAUhcPYYOJ83Hv-QPXeJG2SRye6yYQx1oe9lbS5gUptRxMF__1Ex57O4cB3Hj7GnhHmaISBRbuPkeaIUEBxxyYCFGYW1Pf9f5f4yGYx7gEAtRVCmQl7_zy6rk0utSfiy95159hGPgT-ddlosT5Rn_jGHbvEy5Eo8hcXyfOh59s-0Rhcc8GOaTi45J7YQ3BdpNlfTlm5WZert2z38bpdLXdZgxaLTFmpjA_CSJSUC6ly2RRW5F7UGmqlg9ZeBhEwr2slUCndeGfB5t4QSiunLLvdNuMQ40ih-hnbgxvPFUJ1dVFdXVQ3F_IX64NRaQ</recordid><startdate>20211228</startdate><enddate>20211228</enddate><creator>He, Gaofeng</creator><creator>Xu, Bingfeng</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211228</creationdate><title>Qualitative Analysis of State/Event Fault Trees Based on Interface Automata</title><author>He, Gaofeng ; Xu, Bingfeng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1916-49348df28313e523453c6925d2b70b47f77d3f2f15bb421447cda9095d8e1393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>He, Gaofeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Bingfeng</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>International journal of safety and security engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>He, Gaofeng</au><au>Xu, Bingfeng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Qualitative Analysis of State/Event Fault Trees Based on Interface Automata</atitle><jtitle>International journal of safety and security engineering</jtitle><date>2021-12-28</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>663</spage><epage>669</epage><pages>663-669</pages><issn>2041-9031</issn><eissn>2041-904X</eissn><abstract>State/Event Fault Tree (SEFT) can be used for safety modeling and assessment. However, SEFT does not provide adequate semantics for analyzing the minimal scenarios leading to system failures. In this paper, we propose a novel qualitative analysis method for SEFT based on interface automata. Firstly, we propose the concept of guarded interface automata by adding guards on interface automata transitions. Based on this model, we can describe the triggers and guards of SEFT simultaneously. Then, a weak bisimilarity operation is defined to alleviate the state space explosion problem. Based on the proposed guarded interface automata and the weak bisimilarity operation, the semantics of SEFT can be precisely determined. After that, a qualitative analysis process is presented on the basis of the formal semantics of SEFT, and the analyzing result is the minimal cut sequence set representing the causes of system failures. Finally, a fire protection system case study is illustrated step by step to demonstrate the effectiveness of our method.</abstract><doi>10.18280/ijsse.110606</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2041-9031
ispartof International journal of safety and security engineering, 2021-12, Vol.11 (6), p.663-669
issn 2041-9031
2041-904X
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_18280_ijsse_110606
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Qualitative Analysis of State/Event Fault Trees Based on Interface Automata
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T21%3A46%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Qualitative%20Analysis%20of%20State/Event%20Fault%20Trees%20Based%20on%20Interface%20Automata&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20safety%20and%20security%20engineering&rft.au=He,%20Gaofeng&rft.date=2021-12-28&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=663&rft.epage=669&rft.pages=663-669&rft.issn=2041-9031&rft.eissn=2041-904X&rft_id=info:doi/10.18280/ijsse.110606&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_18280_ijsse_110606%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true