A prospective study on antibiotic resistance pattern in patients with urinary tract infection

Background: Antibiotics are a blessing to the mankind in the realm of medical treatment. Quite contrary to that fact, they may cause risks in medical treatments of patients if these antibiotics are not taken under medical guidelines. In the current scenario it is a huge challenge for selecting appro...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of basic and clinical pharmacology 2023-09, Vol.12 (5), p.706-711
Hauptverfasser: Singh, Swastika Raj, Thomas, Shibi Mary, Ramaiah, Balakeshwa
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 711
container_issue 5
container_start_page 706
container_title International journal of basic and clinical pharmacology
container_volume 12
creator Singh, Swastika Raj
Thomas, Shibi Mary
Ramaiah, Balakeshwa
description Background: Antibiotics are a blessing to the mankind in the realm of medical treatment. Quite contrary to that fact, they may cause risks in medical treatments of patients if these antibiotics are not taken under medical guidelines. In the current scenario it is a huge challenge for selecting appropriate antibacterial agents for the treatment of UTI. This study aims to evaluate the prescription & resistance pattern of antibiotics in patients with urinary tract infection. Methods: A prospective observational study was carried out for a period of 1 year. Data on 100 research participants' reports and the results of their tests for antibiotic resistance were taken from the microbiology department's records, evaluated, and represented as percentages. Observations were made and meticulously recorded. Results: Out of 100 study participants, Escherichia coli was the most common pathogen with a total of (35%) followed by Klebsiella (17%), Enterococcus with (16%). E. coli were highly resistant to Ampicillin (88.6%) and Cefazolin (88.6%), Ceftraixone (85.3%). Klebsiella were highly resistant to Ampicillin (100%) Cefazolin (93.3%), Cefuroxime (85.7%). Enterococcus were highly resistant to Tetracycline (92.9%) Ciprofloxacin (85.7%), Levofloxacin (81.8%). Where, E. coli were highly sensitive to Amikacin, Imipenem, Ertapenam. Klebsiella were highly sensitive to Meropenem, Cefoperazone/Sulbactam, Amikacin. Enterococcus was highly sensitive to Linezolid, Teicoplanin, Vancomycin. Conclusions: Most of the identified bacteria were resistant to several of the popular antibiotics used in clinical settings. Consequently, it is vital to prescribe antibiotics rationally both before and after culture reports.
doi_str_mv 10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20232568
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_18203_2319_2003_ijbcp20232568</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_18203_2319_2003_ijbcp20232568</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1165-dc2611f7c586c8ae5a624637324a8d072a56f9c5589c41d33ef451150874f8b53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkM1qwzAQhEVpoSHNO-gFnGpXlrw-htA_CPTSHotRZIkqtLKRlJa8fe3-HHragR2GmY8xDmINhEJeo4S2QiHkOhz2dkSBEpWmM7ZAbNpKNCTOJ_3numSrnA9CCEAgonbBXjZ8TEMenS3hw_Fcjv2JD5GbWMI-DCVYnlwOuZhoHR9NKS5FHuIsg4sl889QXvkxhWjSiZdkbJnefs4b4hW78OYtu9XvXbLn25un7X21e7x72G52lQXQquotagDfWEXaknHKaKy1bCTWhnrRoFHat1Ypam0NvZTO1wpACWpqT3sll4x-cu20JSfnuzGF96lQB6L7JtXNDLqZQfePlPwCKeZegA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>A prospective study on antibiotic resistance pattern in patients with urinary tract infection</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Singh, Swastika Raj ; Thomas, Shibi Mary ; Ramaiah, Balakeshwa</creator><creatorcontrib>Singh, Swastika Raj ; Thomas, Shibi Mary ; Ramaiah, Balakeshwa</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Antibiotics are a blessing to the mankind in the realm of medical treatment. Quite contrary to that fact, they may cause risks in medical treatments of patients if these antibiotics are not taken under medical guidelines. In the current scenario it is a huge challenge for selecting appropriate antibacterial agents for the treatment of UTI. This study aims to evaluate the prescription &amp; resistance pattern of antibiotics in patients with urinary tract infection. Methods: A prospective observational study was carried out for a period of 1 year. Data on 100 research participants' reports and the results of their tests for antibiotic resistance were taken from the microbiology department's records, evaluated, and represented as percentages. Observations were made and meticulously recorded. Results: Out of 100 study participants, Escherichia coli was the most common pathogen with a total of (35%) followed by Klebsiella (17%), Enterococcus with (16%). E. coli were highly resistant to Ampicillin (88.6%) and Cefazolin (88.6%), Ceftraixone (85.3%). Klebsiella were highly resistant to Ampicillin (100%) Cefazolin (93.3%), Cefuroxime (85.7%). Enterococcus were highly resistant to Tetracycline (92.9%) Ciprofloxacin (85.7%), Levofloxacin (81.8%). Where, E. coli were highly sensitive to Amikacin, Imipenem, Ertapenam. Klebsiella were highly sensitive to Meropenem, Cefoperazone/Sulbactam, Amikacin. Enterococcus was highly sensitive to Linezolid, Teicoplanin, Vancomycin. Conclusions: Most of the identified bacteria were resistant to several of the popular antibiotics used in clinical settings. Consequently, it is vital to prescribe antibiotics rationally both before and after culture reports.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2319-2003</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2279-0780</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20232568</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>International journal of basic and clinical pharmacology, 2023-09, Vol.12 (5), p.706-711</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Singh, Swastika Raj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Shibi Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramaiah, Balakeshwa</creatorcontrib><title>A prospective study on antibiotic resistance pattern in patients with urinary tract infection</title><title>International journal of basic and clinical pharmacology</title><description>Background: Antibiotics are a blessing to the mankind in the realm of medical treatment. Quite contrary to that fact, they may cause risks in medical treatments of patients if these antibiotics are not taken under medical guidelines. In the current scenario it is a huge challenge for selecting appropriate antibacterial agents for the treatment of UTI. This study aims to evaluate the prescription &amp; resistance pattern of antibiotics in patients with urinary tract infection. Methods: A prospective observational study was carried out for a period of 1 year. Data on 100 research participants' reports and the results of their tests for antibiotic resistance were taken from the microbiology department's records, evaluated, and represented as percentages. Observations were made and meticulously recorded. Results: Out of 100 study participants, Escherichia coli was the most common pathogen with a total of (35%) followed by Klebsiella (17%), Enterococcus with (16%). E. coli were highly resistant to Ampicillin (88.6%) and Cefazolin (88.6%), Ceftraixone (85.3%). Klebsiella were highly resistant to Ampicillin (100%) Cefazolin (93.3%), Cefuroxime (85.7%). Enterococcus were highly resistant to Tetracycline (92.9%) Ciprofloxacin (85.7%), Levofloxacin (81.8%). Where, E. coli were highly sensitive to Amikacin, Imipenem, Ertapenam. Klebsiella were highly sensitive to Meropenem, Cefoperazone/Sulbactam, Amikacin. Enterococcus was highly sensitive to Linezolid, Teicoplanin, Vancomycin. Conclusions: Most of the identified bacteria were resistant to several of the popular antibiotics used in clinical settings. Consequently, it is vital to prescribe antibiotics rationally both before and after culture reports.</description><issn>2319-2003</issn><issn>2279-0780</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkM1qwzAQhEVpoSHNO-gFnGpXlrw-htA_CPTSHotRZIkqtLKRlJa8fe3-HHragR2GmY8xDmINhEJeo4S2QiHkOhz2dkSBEpWmM7ZAbNpKNCTOJ_3numSrnA9CCEAgonbBXjZ8TEMenS3hw_Fcjv2JD5GbWMI-DCVYnlwOuZhoHR9NKS5FHuIsg4sl889QXvkxhWjSiZdkbJnefs4b4hW78OYtu9XvXbLn25un7X21e7x72G52lQXQquotagDfWEXaknHKaKy1bCTWhnrRoFHat1Ypam0NvZTO1wpACWpqT3sll4x-cu20JSfnuzGF96lQB6L7JtXNDLqZQfePlPwCKeZegA</recordid><startdate>20230901</startdate><enddate>20230901</enddate><creator>Singh, Swastika Raj</creator><creator>Thomas, Shibi Mary</creator><creator>Ramaiah, Balakeshwa</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230901</creationdate><title>A prospective study on antibiotic resistance pattern in patients with urinary tract infection</title><author>Singh, Swastika Raj ; Thomas, Shibi Mary ; Ramaiah, Balakeshwa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1165-dc2611f7c586c8ae5a624637324a8d072a56f9c5589c41d33ef451150874f8b53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Singh, Swastika Raj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Shibi Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramaiah, Balakeshwa</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>International journal of basic and clinical pharmacology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Singh, Swastika Raj</au><au>Thomas, Shibi Mary</au><au>Ramaiah, Balakeshwa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A prospective study on antibiotic resistance pattern in patients with urinary tract infection</atitle><jtitle>International journal of basic and clinical pharmacology</jtitle><date>2023-09-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>706</spage><epage>711</epage><pages>706-711</pages><issn>2319-2003</issn><eissn>2279-0780</eissn><abstract>Background: Antibiotics are a blessing to the mankind in the realm of medical treatment. Quite contrary to that fact, they may cause risks in medical treatments of patients if these antibiotics are not taken under medical guidelines. In the current scenario it is a huge challenge for selecting appropriate antibacterial agents for the treatment of UTI. This study aims to evaluate the prescription &amp; resistance pattern of antibiotics in patients with urinary tract infection. Methods: A prospective observational study was carried out for a period of 1 year. Data on 100 research participants' reports and the results of their tests for antibiotic resistance were taken from the microbiology department's records, evaluated, and represented as percentages. Observations were made and meticulously recorded. Results: Out of 100 study participants, Escherichia coli was the most common pathogen with a total of (35%) followed by Klebsiella (17%), Enterococcus with (16%). E. coli were highly resistant to Ampicillin (88.6%) and Cefazolin (88.6%), Ceftraixone (85.3%). Klebsiella were highly resistant to Ampicillin (100%) Cefazolin (93.3%), Cefuroxime (85.7%). Enterococcus were highly resistant to Tetracycline (92.9%) Ciprofloxacin (85.7%), Levofloxacin (81.8%). Where, E. coli were highly sensitive to Amikacin, Imipenem, Ertapenam. Klebsiella were highly sensitive to Meropenem, Cefoperazone/Sulbactam, Amikacin. Enterococcus was highly sensitive to Linezolid, Teicoplanin, Vancomycin. Conclusions: Most of the identified bacteria were resistant to several of the popular antibiotics used in clinical settings. Consequently, it is vital to prescribe antibiotics rationally both before and after culture reports.</abstract><doi>10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20232568</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2319-2003
ispartof International journal of basic and clinical pharmacology, 2023-09, Vol.12 (5), p.706-711
issn 2319-2003
2279-0780
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_18203_2319_2003_ijbcp20232568
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
title A prospective study on antibiotic resistance pattern in patients with urinary tract infection
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T05%3A30%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20prospective%20study%20on%20antibiotic%20resistance%20pattern%20in%20patients%20with%20urinary%20tract%20infection&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20basic%20and%20clinical%20pharmacology&rft.au=Singh,%20Swastika%20Raj&rft.date=2023-09-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=706&rft.epage=711&rft.pages=706-711&rft.issn=2319-2003&rft.eissn=2279-0780&rft_id=info:doi/10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20232568&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_18203_2319_2003_ijbcp20232568%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true