A prospective study on antibiotic resistance pattern in patients with urinary tract infection
Background: Antibiotics are a blessing to the mankind in the realm of medical treatment. Quite contrary to that fact, they may cause risks in medical treatments of patients if these antibiotics are not taken under medical guidelines. In the current scenario it is a huge challenge for selecting appro...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of basic and clinical pharmacology 2023-09, Vol.12 (5), p.706-711 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 711 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 706 |
container_title | International journal of basic and clinical pharmacology |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Singh, Swastika Raj Thomas, Shibi Mary Ramaiah, Balakeshwa |
description | Background: Antibiotics are a blessing to the mankind in the realm of medical treatment. Quite contrary to that fact, they may cause risks in medical treatments of patients if these antibiotics are not taken under medical guidelines. In the current scenario it is a huge challenge for selecting appropriate antibacterial agents for the treatment of UTI. This study aims to evaluate the prescription & resistance pattern of antibiotics in patients with urinary tract infection.
Methods: A prospective observational study was carried out for a period of 1 year. Data on 100 research participants' reports and the results of their tests for antibiotic resistance were taken from the microbiology department's records, evaluated, and represented as percentages. Observations were made and meticulously recorded.
Results: Out of 100 study participants, Escherichia coli was the most common pathogen with a total of (35%) followed by Klebsiella (17%), Enterococcus with (16%). E. coli were highly resistant to Ampicillin (88.6%) and Cefazolin (88.6%), Ceftraixone (85.3%). Klebsiella were highly resistant to Ampicillin (100%) Cefazolin (93.3%), Cefuroxime (85.7%). Enterococcus were highly resistant to Tetracycline (92.9%) Ciprofloxacin (85.7%), Levofloxacin (81.8%). Where, E. coli were highly sensitive to Amikacin, Imipenem, Ertapenam. Klebsiella were highly sensitive to Meropenem, Cefoperazone/Sulbactam, Amikacin. Enterococcus was highly sensitive to Linezolid, Teicoplanin, Vancomycin.
Conclusions: Most of the identified bacteria were resistant to several of the popular antibiotics used in clinical settings. Consequently, it is vital to prescribe antibiotics rationally both before and after culture reports. |
doi_str_mv | 10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20232568 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_18203_2319_2003_ijbcp20232568</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_18203_2319_2003_ijbcp20232568</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1165-dc2611f7c586c8ae5a624637324a8d072a56f9c5589c41d33ef451150874f8b53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkM1qwzAQhEVpoSHNO-gFnGpXlrw-htA_CPTSHotRZIkqtLKRlJa8fe3-HHragR2GmY8xDmINhEJeo4S2QiHkOhz2dkSBEpWmM7ZAbNpKNCTOJ_3numSrnA9CCEAgonbBXjZ8TEMenS3hw_Fcjv2JD5GbWMI-DCVYnlwOuZhoHR9NKS5FHuIsg4sl889QXvkxhWjSiZdkbJnefs4b4hW78OYtu9XvXbLn25un7X21e7x72G52lQXQquotagDfWEXaknHKaKy1bCTWhnrRoFHat1Ypam0NvZTO1wpACWpqT3sll4x-cu20JSfnuzGF96lQB6L7JtXNDLqZQfePlPwCKeZegA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>A prospective study on antibiotic resistance pattern in patients with urinary tract infection</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Singh, Swastika Raj ; Thomas, Shibi Mary ; Ramaiah, Balakeshwa</creator><creatorcontrib>Singh, Swastika Raj ; Thomas, Shibi Mary ; Ramaiah, Balakeshwa</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Antibiotics are a blessing to the mankind in the realm of medical treatment. Quite contrary to that fact, they may cause risks in medical treatments of patients if these antibiotics are not taken under medical guidelines. In the current scenario it is a huge challenge for selecting appropriate antibacterial agents for the treatment of UTI. This study aims to evaluate the prescription & resistance pattern of antibiotics in patients with urinary tract infection.
Methods: A prospective observational study was carried out for a period of 1 year. Data on 100 research participants' reports and the results of their tests for antibiotic resistance were taken from the microbiology department's records, evaluated, and represented as percentages. Observations were made and meticulously recorded.
Results: Out of 100 study participants, Escherichia coli was the most common pathogen with a total of (35%) followed by Klebsiella (17%), Enterococcus with (16%). E. coli were highly resistant to Ampicillin (88.6%) and Cefazolin (88.6%), Ceftraixone (85.3%). Klebsiella were highly resistant to Ampicillin (100%) Cefazolin (93.3%), Cefuroxime (85.7%). Enterococcus were highly resistant to Tetracycline (92.9%) Ciprofloxacin (85.7%), Levofloxacin (81.8%). Where, E. coli were highly sensitive to Amikacin, Imipenem, Ertapenam. Klebsiella were highly sensitive to Meropenem, Cefoperazone/Sulbactam, Amikacin. Enterococcus was highly sensitive to Linezolid, Teicoplanin, Vancomycin.
Conclusions: Most of the identified bacteria were resistant to several of the popular antibiotics used in clinical settings. Consequently, it is vital to prescribe antibiotics rationally both before and after culture reports.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2319-2003</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2279-0780</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20232568</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>International journal of basic and clinical pharmacology, 2023-09, Vol.12 (5), p.706-711</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Singh, Swastika Raj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Shibi Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramaiah, Balakeshwa</creatorcontrib><title>A prospective study on antibiotic resistance pattern in patients with urinary tract infection</title><title>International journal of basic and clinical pharmacology</title><description>Background: Antibiotics are a blessing to the mankind in the realm of medical treatment. Quite contrary to that fact, they may cause risks in medical treatments of patients if these antibiotics are not taken under medical guidelines. In the current scenario it is a huge challenge for selecting appropriate antibacterial agents for the treatment of UTI. This study aims to evaluate the prescription & resistance pattern of antibiotics in patients with urinary tract infection.
Methods: A prospective observational study was carried out for a period of 1 year. Data on 100 research participants' reports and the results of their tests for antibiotic resistance were taken from the microbiology department's records, evaluated, and represented as percentages. Observations were made and meticulously recorded.
Results: Out of 100 study participants, Escherichia coli was the most common pathogen with a total of (35%) followed by Klebsiella (17%), Enterococcus with (16%). E. coli were highly resistant to Ampicillin (88.6%) and Cefazolin (88.6%), Ceftraixone (85.3%). Klebsiella were highly resistant to Ampicillin (100%) Cefazolin (93.3%), Cefuroxime (85.7%). Enterococcus were highly resistant to Tetracycline (92.9%) Ciprofloxacin (85.7%), Levofloxacin (81.8%). Where, E. coli were highly sensitive to Amikacin, Imipenem, Ertapenam. Klebsiella were highly sensitive to Meropenem, Cefoperazone/Sulbactam, Amikacin. Enterococcus was highly sensitive to Linezolid, Teicoplanin, Vancomycin.
Conclusions: Most of the identified bacteria were resistant to several of the popular antibiotics used in clinical settings. Consequently, it is vital to prescribe antibiotics rationally both before and after culture reports.</description><issn>2319-2003</issn><issn>2279-0780</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkM1qwzAQhEVpoSHNO-gFnGpXlrw-htA_CPTSHotRZIkqtLKRlJa8fe3-HHragR2GmY8xDmINhEJeo4S2QiHkOhz2dkSBEpWmM7ZAbNpKNCTOJ_3numSrnA9CCEAgonbBXjZ8TEMenS3hw_Fcjv2JD5GbWMI-DCVYnlwOuZhoHR9NKS5FHuIsg4sl889QXvkxhWjSiZdkbJnefs4b4hW78OYtu9XvXbLn25un7X21e7x72G52lQXQquotagDfWEXaknHKaKy1bCTWhnrRoFHat1Ypam0NvZTO1wpACWpqT3sll4x-cu20JSfnuzGF96lQB6L7JtXNDLqZQfePlPwCKeZegA</recordid><startdate>20230901</startdate><enddate>20230901</enddate><creator>Singh, Swastika Raj</creator><creator>Thomas, Shibi Mary</creator><creator>Ramaiah, Balakeshwa</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230901</creationdate><title>A prospective study on antibiotic resistance pattern in patients with urinary tract infection</title><author>Singh, Swastika Raj ; Thomas, Shibi Mary ; Ramaiah, Balakeshwa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1165-dc2611f7c586c8ae5a624637324a8d072a56f9c5589c41d33ef451150874f8b53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Singh, Swastika Raj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Shibi Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramaiah, Balakeshwa</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>International journal of basic and clinical pharmacology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Singh, Swastika Raj</au><au>Thomas, Shibi Mary</au><au>Ramaiah, Balakeshwa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A prospective study on antibiotic resistance pattern in patients with urinary tract infection</atitle><jtitle>International journal of basic and clinical pharmacology</jtitle><date>2023-09-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>706</spage><epage>711</epage><pages>706-711</pages><issn>2319-2003</issn><eissn>2279-0780</eissn><abstract>Background: Antibiotics are a blessing to the mankind in the realm of medical treatment. Quite contrary to that fact, they may cause risks in medical treatments of patients if these antibiotics are not taken under medical guidelines. In the current scenario it is a huge challenge for selecting appropriate antibacterial agents for the treatment of UTI. This study aims to evaluate the prescription & resistance pattern of antibiotics in patients with urinary tract infection.
Methods: A prospective observational study was carried out for a period of 1 year. Data on 100 research participants' reports and the results of their tests for antibiotic resistance were taken from the microbiology department's records, evaluated, and represented as percentages. Observations were made and meticulously recorded.
Results: Out of 100 study participants, Escherichia coli was the most common pathogen with a total of (35%) followed by Klebsiella (17%), Enterococcus with (16%). E. coli were highly resistant to Ampicillin (88.6%) and Cefazolin (88.6%), Ceftraixone (85.3%). Klebsiella were highly resistant to Ampicillin (100%) Cefazolin (93.3%), Cefuroxime (85.7%). Enterococcus were highly resistant to Tetracycline (92.9%) Ciprofloxacin (85.7%), Levofloxacin (81.8%). Where, E. coli were highly sensitive to Amikacin, Imipenem, Ertapenam. Klebsiella were highly sensitive to Meropenem, Cefoperazone/Sulbactam, Amikacin. Enterococcus was highly sensitive to Linezolid, Teicoplanin, Vancomycin.
Conclusions: Most of the identified bacteria were resistant to several of the popular antibiotics used in clinical settings. Consequently, it is vital to prescribe antibiotics rationally both before and after culture reports.</abstract><doi>10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20232568</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2319-2003 |
ispartof | International journal of basic and clinical pharmacology, 2023-09, Vol.12 (5), p.706-711 |
issn | 2319-2003 2279-0780 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_18203_2319_2003_ijbcp20232568 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
title | A prospective study on antibiotic resistance pattern in patients with urinary tract infection |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T05%3A30%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20prospective%20study%20on%20antibiotic%20resistance%20pattern%20in%20patients%20with%20urinary%20tract%20infection&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20basic%20and%20clinical%20pharmacology&rft.au=Singh,%20Swastika%20Raj&rft.date=2023-09-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=706&rft.epage=711&rft.pages=706-711&rft.issn=2319-2003&rft.eissn=2279-0780&rft_id=info:doi/10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20232568&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_18203_2319_2003_ijbcp20232568%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |