Inclusive, Exclusive, Didactic: Typologies of Islamic Thought on Apostasy in Muhammadiyah

This study explored the typologies of Islamic thought among Muhammadiyah elites in East Java concerning the discourse on apostasy. Responses vary, with the inclusive view treating apostasy as a private matter between the individual and God, a basic human right with no legal consequences, supported b...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Afkaruna: Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Studies 2024-12, Vol.20 (2)
Hauptverfasser: Huda, Sholihul, Qodir, Zuly, Muthohirin, Nafik, Warsidi, Warsidi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page
container_title Afkaruna: Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Studies
container_volume 20
creator Huda, Sholihul
Qodir, Zuly
Muthohirin, Nafik
Warsidi, Warsidi
description This study explored the typologies of Islamic thought among Muhammadiyah elites in East Java concerning the discourse on apostasy. Responses vary, with the inclusive view treating apostasy as a private matter between the individual and God, a basic human right with no legal consequences, supported by the Qur'an and the 1945 Constitution. The exclusive view, however, sees apostasy as a public offense, where freedom of choice is conditional and legal repercussions are necessary. The didactic perspective understands apostasy as a moral error, best addressed through education and compassionate guidance to encourage a return to Islam. The findings indicate a dominant trend towards inclusive views but reveal inconsistencies, as elites may express inclusive views on religious freedom while adopting exclusive stances on legal aspects of apostasy. Despite these differences, all maintain a didactic approach when dealing with apostasy within families. This study underscored the dynamic nature of Islamic thought in Muhammadiyah, challenging the perception of rigidity and highlighting the influence of diverse sociological and intellectual backgrounds.
doi_str_mv 10.18196/afkaruna.v20i2.24555
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_18196_afkaruna_v20i2_24555</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_18196_afkaruna_v20i2_24555</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c935-ac8a9ae3ad4230e53aa46344297e9fe932d74394ee62443abba50c9a446855b33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo90M1Og0AYheGJ0cSm9hJM5gIE5xcYd02tlaTGDRtX5GMYyigwhIFG7t4Etavzrs7iQeiekpAmVEWPUH3BMHUQnhmxLGRCSnmFVkwqFRCZRNeXlvQWbbz_JIQwRRmNoxX6SDvdTN6ezQPef1_y2ZagR6ufcDb3rnEnazx2FU59A63VOKvddKpH7Dq87Z0fwc_YdvhtqqFtobQz1HfopoLGm83frlH2ss92r8Hx_ZDutsdAKy4D0AkoMBxKwTgxkgOIiAvBVGxUZRRnZSy4EsZETAgORQGSaAVCRImUBedrJH9v9eC8H0yV94NtYZhzSvJFKP8XyhehfBHiP_hOXUY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Inclusive, Exclusive, Didactic: Typologies of Islamic Thought on Apostasy in Muhammadiyah</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><creator>Huda, Sholihul ; Qodir, Zuly ; Muthohirin, Nafik ; Warsidi, Warsidi</creator><creatorcontrib>Huda, Sholihul ; Qodir, Zuly ; Muthohirin, Nafik ; Warsidi, Warsidi</creatorcontrib><description>This study explored the typologies of Islamic thought among Muhammadiyah elites in East Java concerning the discourse on apostasy. Responses vary, with the inclusive view treating apostasy as a private matter between the individual and God, a basic human right with no legal consequences, supported by the Qur'an and the 1945 Constitution. The exclusive view, however, sees apostasy as a public offense, where freedom of choice is conditional and legal repercussions are necessary. The didactic perspective understands apostasy as a moral error, best addressed through education and compassionate guidance to encourage a return to Islam. The findings indicate a dominant trend towards inclusive views but reveal inconsistencies, as elites may express inclusive views on religious freedom while adopting exclusive stances on legal aspects of apostasy. Despite these differences, all maintain a didactic approach when dealing with apostasy within families. This study underscored the dynamic nature of Islamic thought in Muhammadiyah, challenging the perception of rigidity and highlighting the influence of diverse sociological and intellectual backgrounds.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2599-0551</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2599-0586</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.18196/afkaruna.v20i2.24555</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Afkaruna: Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Studies, 2024-12, Vol.20 (2)</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huda, Sholihul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qodir, Zuly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muthohirin, Nafik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warsidi, Warsidi</creatorcontrib><title>Inclusive, Exclusive, Didactic: Typologies of Islamic Thought on Apostasy in Muhammadiyah</title><title>Afkaruna: Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Studies</title><description>This study explored the typologies of Islamic thought among Muhammadiyah elites in East Java concerning the discourse on apostasy. Responses vary, with the inclusive view treating apostasy as a private matter between the individual and God, a basic human right with no legal consequences, supported by the Qur'an and the 1945 Constitution. The exclusive view, however, sees apostasy as a public offense, where freedom of choice is conditional and legal repercussions are necessary. The didactic perspective understands apostasy as a moral error, best addressed through education and compassionate guidance to encourage a return to Islam. The findings indicate a dominant trend towards inclusive views but reveal inconsistencies, as elites may express inclusive views on religious freedom while adopting exclusive stances on legal aspects of apostasy. Despite these differences, all maintain a didactic approach when dealing with apostasy within families. This study underscored the dynamic nature of Islamic thought in Muhammadiyah, challenging the perception of rigidity and highlighting the influence of diverse sociological and intellectual backgrounds.</description><issn>2599-0551</issn><issn>2599-0586</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo90M1Og0AYheGJ0cSm9hJM5gIE5xcYd02tlaTGDRtX5GMYyigwhIFG7t4Etavzrs7iQeiekpAmVEWPUH3BMHUQnhmxLGRCSnmFVkwqFRCZRNeXlvQWbbz_JIQwRRmNoxX6SDvdTN6ezQPef1_y2ZagR6ufcDb3rnEnazx2FU59A63VOKvddKpH7Dq87Z0fwc_YdvhtqqFtobQz1HfopoLGm83frlH2ss92r8Hx_ZDutsdAKy4D0AkoMBxKwTgxkgOIiAvBVGxUZRRnZSy4EsZETAgORQGSaAVCRImUBedrJH9v9eC8H0yV94NtYZhzSvJFKP8XyhehfBHiP_hOXUY</recordid><startdate>20241221</startdate><enddate>20241221</enddate><creator>Huda, Sholihul</creator><creator>Qodir, Zuly</creator><creator>Muthohirin, Nafik</creator><creator>Warsidi, Warsidi</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20241221</creationdate><title>Inclusive, Exclusive, Didactic: Typologies of Islamic Thought on Apostasy in Muhammadiyah</title><author>Huda, Sholihul ; Qodir, Zuly ; Muthohirin, Nafik ; Warsidi, Warsidi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c935-ac8a9ae3ad4230e53aa46344297e9fe932d74394ee62443abba50c9a446855b33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huda, Sholihul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qodir, Zuly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muthohirin, Nafik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warsidi, Warsidi</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Afkaruna: Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huda, Sholihul</au><au>Qodir, Zuly</au><au>Muthohirin, Nafik</au><au>Warsidi, Warsidi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Inclusive, Exclusive, Didactic: Typologies of Islamic Thought on Apostasy in Muhammadiyah</atitle><jtitle>Afkaruna: Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Studies</jtitle><date>2024-12-21</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>2</issue><issn>2599-0551</issn><eissn>2599-0586</eissn><abstract>This study explored the typologies of Islamic thought among Muhammadiyah elites in East Java concerning the discourse on apostasy. Responses vary, with the inclusive view treating apostasy as a private matter between the individual and God, a basic human right with no legal consequences, supported by the Qur'an and the 1945 Constitution. The exclusive view, however, sees apostasy as a public offense, where freedom of choice is conditional and legal repercussions are necessary. The didactic perspective understands apostasy as a moral error, best addressed through education and compassionate guidance to encourage a return to Islam. The findings indicate a dominant trend towards inclusive views but reveal inconsistencies, as elites may express inclusive views on religious freedom while adopting exclusive stances on legal aspects of apostasy. Despite these differences, all maintain a didactic approach when dealing with apostasy within families. This study underscored the dynamic nature of Islamic thought in Muhammadiyah, challenging the perception of rigidity and highlighting the influence of diverse sociological and intellectual backgrounds.</abstract><doi>10.18196/afkaruna.v20i2.24555</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2599-0551
ispartof Afkaruna: Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Studies, 2024-12, Vol.20 (2)
issn 2599-0551
2599-0586
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_18196_afkaruna_v20i2_24555
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
title Inclusive, Exclusive, Didactic: Typologies of Islamic Thought on Apostasy in Muhammadiyah
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T07%3A29%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Inclusive,%20Exclusive,%20Didactic:%20Typologies%20of%20Islamic%20Thought%20on%20Apostasy%20in%20Muhammadiyah&rft.jtitle=Afkaruna:%20Indonesian%20Interdisciplinary%20Journal%20of%20Islamic%20Studies&rft.au=Huda,%20Sholihul&rft.date=2024-12-21&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=2&rft.issn=2599-0551&rft.eissn=2599-0586&rft_id=info:doi/10.18196/afkaruna.v20i2.24555&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_18196_afkaruna_v20i2_24555%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true