Stress distribution around dental implants, generated by six different ceramic materials for unitary restoration: An experimental photoelastic study

Various ceramic materials have been used for esthetic rehabilitation with implants, but the issues regarding the dissipation of masticatory loads are not well understood. This in vitro quasi-static study aimed to evaluate with the photoelasticity test the dissipation of stress around dental implants...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Dental and medical problems 2021-10, Vol.58 (4), p.453-461
Hauptverfasser: Abarno, Santiago, Gehrke, Arthur Felipe, Dedavid, Berenice Anina, Gehrke, Sergio Alexandre
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 461
container_issue 4
container_start_page 453
container_title Dental and medical problems
container_volume 58
creator Abarno, Santiago
Gehrke, Arthur Felipe
Dedavid, Berenice Anina
Gehrke, Sergio Alexandre
description Various ceramic materials have been used for esthetic rehabilitation with implants, but the issues regarding the dissipation of masticatory loads are not well understood. This in vitro quasi-static study aimed to evaluate with the photoelasticity test the dissipation of stress around dental implants with regard to different rehabilitation materials. A photoelastic model was elaborated in resin, where a conical Morse-tapered implant was inserted. On the abutments (1 per crown), 6 single crowns were prepared using different materials to form 6 groups: feldspathic ceramic (G1); chrome-cobalt alloy covered with ceramic (G2); hybrid ceramic (G3); zirconia covered with ceramic (G4); zirconia (G5); and lithium disilicate (G6). Axial loads of 100 N (load 1) and 300 N (load 2) were applied in the center of the crowns, and photoelastic images were captured and analyzed. The total area of stress dissipation was measured for each group. Then, a computational program was developed to measure the number of pixels of the colors generated in each group. Two image sizes were analyzed - total image and crestal image. Counting the numbers of pixels of the colors in the total images showed that G6 > G4 > G5 > G1 > G2 > G3 when load 1 was applied. When load 2 was applied, the sequence was G6 > G4 > G1 > G3 > G2 > G5. In the evaluation of the crestal area, the obtained results were G4 > G5 > G1 > G3 > G2 > G6 with load 1 and G5 > G1 > G2 > G6 > G4 > G3 with load 2. Within the limitations of this in vitro quasi-static study, the findings indicate that the zirconia crown (G5) presented higher stress in the crestal images, while the lithium disilicate crown (G6) presented higher stress in the total images.
doi_str_mv 10.17219/dmp/135997
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_17219_dmp_135997</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>34962363</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-4bb9ee2b567e29e10479b160204a4ab2500f7fd0e2dd5e8120e9e7b2eae6b49c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kMtOwzAQRS0EolXpij3yHkL9SlKzqypeUiUWgMQusuMJBOUl25Ha_-CDGRFgNrOYc-_MXELOObvmueB65dphxWWqdX5E5kIylmgm2DGZ80ypRK7ztxlZhvDJsBTjWotTMpNKZ0Jmck6-nqOHEKirQ_S1HWPdd9T4fuwcddBF09C6HRrTxXBF36EDbyI4ag801HtUVRV4xGiJg7YuaYtjX5sm0Kr3dOzqaPyB4orYoxLNb-imo7AfkGon_-Gjjz00JkTUhzi6wxk5qdAClr99QV7vbl-2D8nu6f5xu9klpRRZTJS1GkDYNMtBaOBM5dryDN9XRhkrUsaqvHIMhHMprLlgoCG3AgxkVulSLsjl5Fv6PgQPVTHgVXhwwVnxE2-B8RZTvEhfTPQw2hbcP_sXpvwGSUB61A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Stress distribution around dental implants, generated by six different ceramic materials for unitary restoration: An experimental photoelastic study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Abarno, Santiago ; Gehrke, Arthur Felipe ; Dedavid, Berenice Anina ; Gehrke, Sergio Alexandre</creator><creatorcontrib>Abarno, Santiago ; Gehrke, Arthur Felipe ; Dedavid, Berenice Anina ; Gehrke, Sergio Alexandre</creatorcontrib><description>Various ceramic materials have been used for esthetic rehabilitation with implants, but the issues regarding the dissipation of masticatory loads are not well understood. This in vitro quasi-static study aimed to evaluate with the photoelasticity test the dissipation of stress around dental implants with regard to different rehabilitation materials. A photoelastic model was elaborated in resin, where a conical Morse-tapered implant was inserted. On the abutments (1 per crown), 6 single crowns were prepared using different materials to form 6 groups: feldspathic ceramic (G1); chrome-cobalt alloy covered with ceramic (G2); hybrid ceramic (G3); zirconia covered with ceramic (G4); zirconia (G5); and lithium disilicate (G6). Axial loads of 100 N (load 1) and 300 N (load 2) were applied in the center of the crowns, and photoelastic images were captured and analyzed. The total area of stress dissipation was measured for each group. Then, a computational program was developed to measure the number of pixels of the colors generated in each group. Two image sizes were analyzed - total image and crestal image. Counting the numbers of pixels of the colors in the total images showed that G6 &gt; G4 &gt; G5 &gt; G1 &gt; G2 &gt; G3 when load 1 was applied. When load 2 was applied, the sequence was G6 &gt; G4 &gt; G1 &gt; G3 &gt; G2 &gt; G5. In the evaluation of the crestal area, the obtained results were G4 &gt; G5 &gt; G1 &gt; G3 &gt; G2 &gt; G6 with load 1 and G5 &gt; G1 &gt; G2 &gt; G6 &gt; G4 &gt; G3 with load 2. Within the limitations of this in vitro quasi-static study, the findings indicate that the zirconia crown (G5) presented higher stress in the crestal images, while the lithium disilicate crown (G6) presented higher stress in the total images.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1644-387X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2300-9020</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.17219/dmp/135997</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34962363</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Poland</publisher><subject>Ceramics ; Crowns ; Dental Implants ; Dental Stress Analysis - methods ; Esthetics, Dental ; Humans</subject><ispartof>Dental and medical problems, 2021-10, Vol.58 (4), p.453-461</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-4bb9ee2b567e29e10479b160204a4ab2500f7fd0e2dd5e8120e9e7b2eae6b49c3</citedby><orcidid>0000-0002-9057-2568 ; 0000-0001-8679-7951 ; 0000-0003-3480-1722 ; 0000-0002-5863-9101</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34962363$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Abarno, Santiago</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gehrke, Arthur Felipe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dedavid, Berenice Anina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gehrke, Sergio Alexandre</creatorcontrib><title>Stress distribution around dental implants, generated by six different ceramic materials for unitary restoration: An experimental photoelastic study</title><title>Dental and medical problems</title><addtitle>Dent Med Probl</addtitle><description>Various ceramic materials have been used for esthetic rehabilitation with implants, but the issues regarding the dissipation of masticatory loads are not well understood. This in vitro quasi-static study aimed to evaluate with the photoelasticity test the dissipation of stress around dental implants with regard to different rehabilitation materials. A photoelastic model was elaborated in resin, where a conical Morse-tapered implant was inserted. On the abutments (1 per crown), 6 single crowns were prepared using different materials to form 6 groups: feldspathic ceramic (G1); chrome-cobalt alloy covered with ceramic (G2); hybrid ceramic (G3); zirconia covered with ceramic (G4); zirconia (G5); and lithium disilicate (G6). Axial loads of 100 N (load 1) and 300 N (load 2) were applied in the center of the crowns, and photoelastic images were captured and analyzed. The total area of stress dissipation was measured for each group. Then, a computational program was developed to measure the number of pixels of the colors generated in each group. Two image sizes were analyzed - total image and crestal image. Counting the numbers of pixels of the colors in the total images showed that G6 &gt; G4 &gt; G5 &gt; G1 &gt; G2 &gt; G3 when load 1 was applied. When load 2 was applied, the sequence was G6 &gt; G4 &gt; G1 &gt; G3 &gt; G2 &gt; G5. In the evaluation of the crestal area, the obtained results were G4 &gt; G5 &gt; G1 &gt; G3 &gt; G2 &gt; G6 with load 1 and G5 &gt; G1 &gt; G2 &gt; G6 &gt; G4 &gt; G3 with load 2. Within the limitations of this in vitro quasi-static study, the findings indicate that the zirconia crown (G5) presented higher stress in the crestal images, while the lithium disilicate crown (G6) presented higher stress in the total images.</description><subject>Ceramics</subject><subject>Crowns</subject><subject>Dental Implants</subject><subject>Dental Stress Analysis - methods</subject><subject>Esthetics, Dental</subject><subject>Humans</subject><issn>1644-387X</issn><issn>2300-9020</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kMtOwzAQRS0EolXpij3yHkL9SlKzqypeUiUWgMQusuMJBOUl25Ha_-CDGRFgNrOYc-_MXELOObvmueB65dphxWWqdX5E5kIylmgm2DGZ80ypRK7ztxlZhvDJsBTjWotTMpNKZ0Jmck6-nqOHEKirQ_S1HWPdd9T4fuwcddBF09C6HRrTxXBF36EDbyI4ag801HtUVRV4xGiJg7YuaYtjX5sm0Kr3dOzqaPyB4orYoxLNb-imo7AfkGon_-Gjjz00JkTUhzi6wxk5qdAClr99QV7vbl-2D8nu6f5xu9klpRRZTJS1GkDYNMtBaOBM5dryDN9XRhkrUsaqvHIMhHMprLlgoCG3AgxkVulSLsjl5Fv6PgQPVTHgVXhwwVnxE2-B8RZTvEhfTPQw2hbcP_sXpvwGSUB61A</recordid><startdate>20211001</startdate><enddate>20211001</enddate><creator>Abarno, Santiago</creator><creator>Gehrke, Arthur Felipe</creator><creator>Dedavid, Berenice Anina</creator><creator>Gehrke, Sergio Alexandre</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9057-2568</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8679-7951</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3480-1722</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5863-9101</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211001</creationdate><title>Stress distribution around dental implants, generated by six different ceramic materials for unitary restoration: An experimental photoelastic study</title><author>Abarno, Santiago ; Gehrke, Arthur Felipe ; Dedavid, Berenice Anina ; Gehrke, Sergio Alexandre</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-4bb9ee2b567e29e10479b160204a4ab2500f7fd0e2dd5e8120e9e7b2eae6b49c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Ceramics</topic><topic>Crowns</topic><topic>Dental Implants</topic><topic>Dental Stress Analysis - methods</topic><topic>Esthetics, Dental</topic><topic>Humans</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Abarno, Santiago</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gehrke, Arthur Felipe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dedavid, Berenice Anina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gehrke, Sergio Alexandre</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Dental and medical problems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Abarno, Santiago</au><au>Gehrke, Arthur Felipe</au><au>Dedavid, Berenice Anina</au><au>Gehrke, Sergio Alexandre</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Stress distribution around dental implants, generated by six different ceramic materials for unitary restoration: An experimental photoelastic study</atitle><jtitle>Dental and medical problems</jtitle><addtitle>Dent Med Probl</addtitle><date>2021-10-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>453</spage><epage>461</epage><pages>453-461</pages><issn>1644-387X</issn><eissn>2300-9020</eissn><abstract>Various ceramic materials have been used for esthetic rehabilitation with implants, but the issues regarding the dissipation of masticatory loads are not well understood. This in vitro quasi-static study aimed to evaluate with the photoelasticity test the dissipation of stress around dental implants with regard to different rehabilitation materials. A photoelastic model was elaborated in resin, where a conical Morse-tapered implant was inserted. On the abutments (1 per crown), 6 single crowns were prepared using different materials to form 6 groups: feldspathic ceramic (G1); chrome-cobalt alloy covered with ceramic (G2); hybrid ceramic (G3); zirconia covered with ceramic (G4); zirconia (G5); and lithium disilicate (G6). Axial loads of 100 N (load 1) and 300 N (load 2) were applied in the center of the crowns, and photoelastic images were captured and analyzed. The total area of stress dissipation was measured for each group. Then, a computational program was developed to measure the number of pixels of the colors generated in each group. Two image sizes were analyzed - total image and crestal image. Counting the numbers of pixels of the colors in the total images showed that G6 &gt; G4 &gt; G5 &gt; G1 &gt; G2 &gt; G3 when load 1 was applied. When load 2 was applied, the sequence was G6 &gt; G4 &gt; G1 &gt; G3 &gt; G2 &gt; G5. In the evaluation of the crestal area, the obtained results were G4 &gt; G5 &gt; G1 &gt; G3 &gt; G2 &gt; G6 with load 1 and G5 &gt; G1 &gt; G2 &gt; G6 &gt; G4 &gt; G3 with load 2. Within the limitations of this in vitro quasi-static study, the findings indicate that the zirconia crown (G5) presented higher stress in the crestal images, while the lithium disilicate crown (G6) presented higher stress in the total images.</abstract><cop>Poland</cop><pmid>34962363</pmid><doi>10.17219/dmp/135997</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9057-2568</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8679-7951</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3480-1722</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5863-9101</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1644-387X
ispartof Dental and medical problems, 2021-10, Vol.58 (4), p.453-461
issn 1644-387X
2300-9020
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_17219_dmp_135997
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Ceramics
Crowns
Dental Implants
Dental Stress Analysis - methods
Esthetics, Dental
Humans
title Stress distribution around dental implants, generated by six different ceramic materials for unitary restoration: An experimental photoelastic study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T15%3A31%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Stress%20distribution%20around%20dental%20implants,%20generated%20by%20six%20different%20ceramic%20materials%20for%20unitary%20restoration:%20An%20experimental%20photoelastic%20study&rft.jtitle=Dental%20and%20medical%20problems&rft.au=Abarno,%20Santiago&rft.date=2021-10-01&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=453&rft.epage=461&rft.pages=453-461&rft.issn=1644-387X&rft.eissn=2300-9020&rft_id=info:doi/10.17219/dmp/135997&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E34962363%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/34962363&rfr_iscdi=true