Stress distribution around dental implants, generated by six different ceramic materials for unitary restoration: An experimental photoelastic study
Various ceramic materials have been used for esthetic rehabilitation with implants, but the issues regarding the dissipation of masticatory loads are not well understood. This in vitro quasi-static study aimed to evaluate with the photoelasticity test the dissipation of stress around dental implants...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Dental and medical problems 2021-10, Vol.58 (4), p.453-461 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 461 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 453 |
container_title | Dental and medical problems |
container_volume | 58 |
creator | Abarno, Santiago Gehrke, Arthur Felipe Dedavid, Berenice Anina Gehrke, Sergio Alexandre |
description | Various ceramic materials have been used for esthetic rehabilitation with implants, but the issues regarding the dissipation of masticatory loads are not well understood.
This in vitro quasi-static study aimed to evaluate with the photoelasticity test the dissipation of stress around dental implants with regard to different rehabilitation materials.
A photoelastic model was elaborated in resin, where a conical Morse-tapered implant was inserted. On the abutments (1 per crown), 6 single crowns were prepared using different materials to form 6 groups: feldspathic ceramic (G1); chrome-cobalt alloy covered with ceramic (G2); hybrid ceramic (G3); zirconia covered with ceramic (G4); zirconia (G5); and lithium disilicate (G6). Axial loads of 100 N (load 1) and 300 N (load 2) were applied in the center of the crowns, and photoelastic images were captured and analyzed. The total area of stress dissipation was measured for each group. Then, a computational program was developed to measure the number of pixels of the colors generated in each group. Two image sizes were analyzed - total image and crestal image.
Counting the numbers of pixels of the colors in the total images showed that G6 > G4 > G5 > G1 > G2 > G3 when load 1 was applied. When load 2 was applied, the sequence was G6 > G4 > G1 > G3 > G2 > G5. In the evaluation of the crestal area, the obtained results were G4 > G5 > G1 > G3 > G2 > G6 with load 1 and G5 > G1 > G2 > G6 > G4 > G3 with load 2.
Within the limitations of this in vitro quasi-static study, the findings indicate that the zirconia crown (G5) presented higher stress in the crestal images, while the lithium disilicate crown (G6) presented higher stress in the total images. |
doi_str_mv | 10.17219/dmp/135997 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_17219_dmp_135997</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>34962363</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-4bb9ee2b567e29e10479b160204a4ab2500f7fd0e2dd5e8120e9e7b2eae6b49c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kMtOwzAQRS0EolXpij3yHkL9SlKzqypeUiUWgMQusuMJBOUl25Ha_-CDGRFgNrOYc-_MXELOObvmueB65dphxWWqdX5E5kIylmgm2DGZ80ypRK7ztxlZhvDJsBTjWotTMpNKZ0Jmck6-nqOHEKirQ_S1HWPdd9T4fuwcddBF09C6HRrTxXBF36EDbyI4ag801HtUVRV4xGiJg7YuaYtjX5sm0Kr3dOzqaPyB4orYoxLNb-imo7AfkGon_-Gjjz00JkTUhzi6wxk5qdAClr99QV7vbl-2D8nu6f5xu9klpRRZTJS1GkDYNMtBaOBM5dryDN9XRhkrUsaqvHIMhHMprLlgoCG3AgxkVulSLsjl5Fv6PgQPVTHgVXhwwVnxE2-B8RZTvEhfTPQw2hbcP_sXpvwGSUB61A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Stress distribution around dental implants, generated by six different ceramic materials for unitary restoration: An experimental photoelastic study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Abarno, Santiago ; Gehrke, Arthur Felipe ; Dedavid, Berenice Anina ; Gehrke, Sergio Alexandre</creator><creatorcontrib>Abarno, Santiago ; Gehrke, Arthur Felipe ; Dedavid, Berenice Anina ; Gehrke, Sergio Alexandre</creatorcontrib><description>Various ceramic materials have been used for esthetic rehabilitation with implants, but the issues regarding the dissipation of masticatory loads are not well understood.
This in vitro quasi-static study aimed to evaluate with the photoelasticity test the dissipation of stress around dental implants with regard to different rehabilitation materials.
A photoelastic model was elaborated in resin, where a conical Morse-tapered implant was inserted. On the abutments (1 per crown), 6 single crowns were prepared using different materials to form 6 groups: feldspathic ceramic (G1); chrome-cobalt alloy covered with ceramic (G2); hybrid ceramic (G3); zirconia covered with ceramic (G4); zirconia (G5); and lithium disilicate (G6). Axial loads of 100 N (load 1) and 300 N (load 2) were applied in the center of the crowns, and photoelastic images were captured and analyzed. The total area of stress dissipation was measured for each group. Then, a computational program was developed to measure the number of pixels of the colors generated in each group. Two image sizes were analyzed - total image and crestal image.
Counting the numbers of pixels of the colors in the total images showed that G6 > G4 > G5 > G1 > G2 > G3 when load 1 was applied. When load 2 was applied, the sequence was G6 > G4 > G1 > G3 > G2 > G5. In the evaluation of the crestal area, the obtained results were G4 > G5 > G1 > G3 > G2 > G6 with load 1 and G5 > G1 > G2 > G6 > G4 > G3 with load 2.
Within the limitations of this in vitro quasi-static study, the findings indicate that the zirconia crown (G5) presented higher stress in the crestal images, while the lithium disilicate crown (G6) presented higher stress in the total images.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1644-387X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2300-9020</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.17219/dmp/135997</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34962363</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Poland</publisher><subject>Ceramics ; Crowns ; Dental Implants ; Dental Stress Analysis - methods ; Esthetics, Dental ; Humans</subject><ispartof>Dental and medical problems, 2021-10, Vol.58 (4), p.453-461</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-4bb9ee2b567e29e10479b160204a4ab2500f7fd0e2dd5e8120e9e7b2eae6b49c3</citedby><orcidid>0000-0002-9057-2568 ; 0000-0001-8679-7951 ; 0000-0003-3480-1722 ; 0000-0002-5863-9101</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34962363$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Abarno, Santiago</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gehrke, Arthur Felipe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dedavid, Berenice Anina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gehrke, Sergio Alexandre</creatorcontrib><title>Stress distribution around dental implants, generated by six different ceramic materials for unitary restoration: An experimental photoelastic study</title><title>Dental and medical problems</title><addtitle>Dent Med Probl</addtitle><description>Various ceramic materials have been used for esthetic rehabilitation with implants, but the issues regarding the dissipation of masticatory loads are not well understood.
This in vitro quasi-static study aimed to evaluate with the photoelasticity test the dissipation of stress around dental implants with regard to different rehabilitation materials.
A photoelastic model was elaborated in resin, where a conical Morse-tapered implant was inserted. On the abutments (1 per crown), 6 single crowns were prepared using different materials to form 6 groups: feldspathic ceramic (G1); chrome-cobalt alloy covered with ceramic (G2); hybrid ceramic (G3); zirconia covered with ceramic (G4); zirconia (G5); and lithium disilicate (G6). Axial loads of 100 N (load 1) and 300 N (load 2) were applied in the center of the crowns, and photoelastic images were captured and analyzed. The total area of stress dissipation was measured for each group. Then, a computational program was developed to measure the number of pixels of the colors generated in each group. Two image sizes were analyzed - total image and crestal image.
Counting the numbers of pixels of the colors in the total images showed that G6 > G4 > G5 > G1 > G2 > G3 when load 1 was applied. When load 2 was applied, the sequence was G6 > G4 > G1 > G3 > G2 > G5. In the evaluation of the crestal area, the obtained results were G4 > G5 > G1 > G3 > G2 > G6 with load 1 and G5 > G1 > G2 > G6 > G4 > G3 with load 2.
Within the limitations of this in vitro quasi-static study, the findings indicate that the zirconia crown (G5) presented higher stress in the crestal images, while the lithium disilicate crown (G6) presented higher stress in the total images.</description><subject>Ceramics</subject><subject>Crowns</subject><subject>Dental Implants</subject><subject>Dental Stress Analysis - methods</subject><subject>Esthetics, Dental</subject><subject>Humans</subject><issn>1644-387X</issn><issn>2300-9020</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kMtOwzAQRS0EolXpij3yHkL9SlKzqypeUiUWgMQusuMJBOUl25Ha_-CDGRFgNrOYc-_MXELOObvmueB65dphxWWqdX5E5kIylmgm2DGZ80ypRK7ztxlZhvDJsBTjWotTMpNKZ0Jmck6-nqOHEKirQ_S1HWPdd9T4fuwcddBF09C6HRrTxXBF36EDbyI4ag801HtUVRV4xGiJg7YuaYtjX5sm0Kr3dOzqaPyB4orYoxLNb-imo7AfkGon_-Gjjz00JkTUhzi6wxk5qdAClr99QV7vbl-2D8nu6f5xu9klpRRZTJS1GkDYNMtBaOBM5dryDN9XRhkrUsaqvHIMhHMprLlgoCG3AgxkVulSLsjl5Fv6PgQPVTHgVXhwwVnxE2-B8RZTvEhfTPQw2hbcP_sXpvwGSUB61A</recordid><startdate>20211001</startdate><enddate>20211001</enddate><creator>Abarno, Santiago</creator><creator>Gehrke, Arthur Felipe</creator><creator>Dedavid, Berenice Anina</creator><creator>Gehrke, Sergio Alexandre</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9057-2568</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8679-7951</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3480-1722</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5863-9101</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211001</creationdate><title>Stress distribution around dental implants, generated by six different ceramic materials for unitary restoration: An experimental photoelastic study</title><author>Abarno, Santiago ; Gehrke, Arthur Felipe ; Dedavid, Berenice Anina ; Gehrke, Sergio Alexandre</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-4bb9ee2b567e29e10479b160204a4ab2500f7fd0e2dd5e8120e9e7b2eae6b49c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Ceramics</topic><topic>Crowns</topic><topic>Dental Implants</topic><topic>Dental Stress Analysis - methods</topic><topic>Esthetics, Dental</topic><topic>Humans</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Abarno, Santiago</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gehrke, Arthur Felipe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dedavid, Berenice Anina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gehrke, Sergio Alexandre</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Dental and medical problems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Abarno, Santiago</au><au>Gehrke, Arthur Felipe</au><au>Dedavid, Berenice Anina</au><au>Gehrke, Sergio Alexandre</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Stress distribution around dental implants, generated by six different ceramic materials for unitary restoration: An experimental photoelastic study</atitle><jtitle>Dental and medical problems</jtitle><addtitle>Dent Med Probl</addtitle><date>2021-10-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>453</spage><epage>461</epage><pages>453-461</pages><issn>1644-387X</issn><eissn>2300-9020</eissn><abstract>Various ceramic materials have been used for esthetic rehabilitation with implants, but the issues regarding the dissipation of masticatory loads are not well understood.
This in vitro quasi-static study aimed to evaluate with the photoelasticity test the dissipation of stress around dental implants with regard to different rehabilitation materials.
A photoelastic model was elaborated in resin, where a conical Morse-tapered implant was inserted. On the abutments (1 per crown), 6 single crowns were prepared using different materials to form 6 groups: feldspathic ceramic (G1); chrome-cobalt alloy covered with ceramic (G2); hybrid ceramic (G3); zirconia covered with ceramic (G4); zirconia (G5); and lithium disilicate (G6). Axial loads of 100 N (load 1) and 300 N (load 2) were applied in the center of the crowns, and photoelastic images were captured and analyzed. The total area of stress dissipation was measured for each group. Then, a computational program was developed to measure the number of pixels of the colors generated in each group. Two image sizes were analyzed - total image and crestal image.
Counting the numbers of pixels of the colors in the total images showed that G6 > G4 > G5 > G1 > G2 > G3 when load 1 was applied. When load 2 was applied, the sequence was G6 > G4 > G1 > G3 > G2 > G5. In the evaluation of the crestal area, the obtained results were G4 > G5 > G1 > G3 > G2 > G6 with load 1 and G5 > G1 > G2 > G6 > G4 > G3 with load 2.
Within the limitations of this in vitro quasi-static study, the findings indicate that the zirconia crown (G5) presented higher stress in the crestal images, while the lithium disilicate crown (G6) presented higher stress in the total images.</abstract><cop>Poland</cop><pmid>34962363</pmid><doi>10.17219/dmp/135997</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9057-2568</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8679-7951</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3480-1722</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5863-9101</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1644-387X |
ispartof | Dental and medical problems, 2021-10, Vol.58 (4), p.453-461 |
issn | 1644-387X 2300-9020 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_17219_dmp_135997 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Ceramics Crowns Dental Implants Dental Stress Analysis - methods Esthetics, Dental Humans |
title | Stress distribution around dental implants, generated by six different ceramic materials for unitary restoration: An experimental photoelastic study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T15%3A31%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Stress%20distribution%20around%20dental%20implants,%20generated%20by%20six%20different%20ceramic%20materials%20for%20unitary%20restoration:%20An%20experimental%20photoelastic%20study&rft.jtitle=Dental%20and%20medical%20problems&rft.au=Abarno,%20Santiago&rft.date=2021-10-01&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=453&rft.epage=461&rft.pages=453-461&rft.issn=1644-387X&rft.eissn=2300-9020&rft_id=info:doi/10.17219/dmp/135997&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E34962363%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/34962363&rfr_iscdi=true |