“MINERALS”, “PETROLEUM” AND “OPERATIONS” IN THE MINERAL AND PETROLEUM RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT ACT 28 OF 2002: A GEOLOGIST AS DEVIL’S ADVOCATE FOR A CHANGE?

This article examines the meaning of “minerals”, petroleum, “operations” and activities in relation to such substances to determine the ambit of the application of the Minerals and Petroleum Resources Development Act 28 of 2002, the type of rights necessary for such operations and activities and the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Obiter 2022-04, Vol.29 (1)
Hauptverfasser: PJ Badenhorst, RW Shone
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page
container_title Obiter
container_volume 29
creator PJ Badenhorst
RW Shone
description This article examines the meaning of “minerals”, petroleum, “operations” and activities in relation to such substances to determine the ambit of the application of the Minerals and Petroleum Resources Development Act 28 of 2002, the type of rights necessary for such operations and activities and the ambit of these rights. The examination of the meaning of these concepts takes place with reference to prior definitions in statutes and also from a natural science and geology perspective. An attempt is made to show that the legal definitions do no always correspond with the geological meanings and the meanings on the ground. It is questioned whether inrecent legislation why more reliance is not placed on input from geologists in the field.
doi_str_mv 10.17159/obiter.v29i1.13265
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_17159_obiter_v29i1_13265</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_17159_obiter_v29i1_13265</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c895-4be9b8b2776085c6e91cd7b6a0b5f2aa9ae4eed60b9890a8ee2a670f6195a623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kNFKwzAUhoMoOOaewJvzAHYm6ZIm3kjosq3QNaPthncl7TKYKJNWBO_2GoJe-157ErtueHU4__n-_8CP0C3BQxIQJu935fbd1cMPKrdkSHzK2QXq0QBLjzH2dIl6hAvqMcH8azRommeMMRWMixHrod_D_nseJTpVcXbY_9xBuy90nppYL-etACoZHzWzaJE8MsmRgiiBfKbhbOyYfxOkOjPLNNQZjPVKx2Yx10kOKsyBCjAToO37B1Aw1SY20yhrbx0axYf9VwZqvDKhyjVMTNpS4UwlU_14g6429qVxg_Pso2yi83DmHSNCFXuVkMwblU6WoqRBwLFgFXeSVOug5BaXbEOtldaNnFtzXEohsRXOUcsDvOFEMsup30f-KbWqd01Tu03xVm9fbf1ZEFx0ZRensouu7KIr2_8DKk9wGQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>“MINERALS”, “PETROLEUM” AND “OPERATIONS” IN THE MINERAL AND PETROLEUM RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT ACT 28 OF 2002: A GEOLOGIST AS DEVIL’S ADVOCATE FOR A CHANGE?</title><source>Directory of Open Access Journals</source><creator>PJ Badenhorst ; RW Shone</creator><creatorcontrib>PJ Badenhorst ; RW Shone</creatorcontrib><description>This article examines the meaning of “minerals”, petroleum, “operations” and activities in relation to such substances to determine the ambit of the application of the Minerals and Petroleum Resources Development Act 28 of 2002, the type of rights necessary for such operations and activities and the ambit of these rights. The examination of the meaning of these concepts takes place with reference to prior definitions in statutes and also from a natural science and geology perspective. An attempt is made to show that the legal definitions do no always correspond with the geological meanings and the meanings on the ground. It is questioned whether inrecent legislation why more reliance is not placed on input from geologists in the field.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1682-5853</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2709-555X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.17159/obiter.v29i1.13265</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Obiter, 2022-04, Vol.29 (1)</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>PJ Badenhorst</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RW Shone</creatorcontrib><title>“MINERALS”, “PETROLEUM” AND “OPERATIONS” IN THE MINERAL AND PETROLEUM RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT ACT 28 OF 2002: A GEOLOGIST AS DEVIL’S ADVOCATE FOR A CHANGE?</title><title>Obiter</title><description>This article examines the meaning of “minerals”, petroleum, “operations” and activities in relation to such substances to determine the ambit of the application of the Minerals and Petroleum Resources Development Act 28 of 2002, the type of rights necessary for such operations and activities and the ambit of these rights. The examination of the meaning of these concepts takes place with reference to prior definitions in statutes and also from a natural science and geology perspective. An attempt is made to show that the legal definitions do no always correspond with the geological meanings and the meanings on the ground. It is questioned whether inrecent legislation why more reliance is not placed on input from geologists in the field.</description><issn>1682-5853</issn><issn>2709-555X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kNFKwzAUhoMoOOaewJvzAHYm6ZIm3kjosq3QNaPthncl7TKYKJNWBO_2GoJe-157ErtueHU4__n-_8CP0C3BQxIQJu935fbd1cMPKrdkSHzK2QXq0QBLjzH2dIl6hAvqMcH8azRommeMMRWMixHrod_D_nseJTpVcXbY_9xBuy90nppYL-etACoZHzWzaJE8MsmRgiiBfKbhbOyYfxOkOjPLNNQZjPVKx2Yx10kOKsyBCjAToO37B1Aw1SY20yhrbx0axYf9VwZqvDKhyjVMTNpS4UwlU_14g6429qVxg_Pso2yi83DmHSNCFXuVkMwblU6WoqRBwLFgFXeSVOug5BaXbEOtldaNnFtzXEohsRXOUcsDvOFEMsup30f-KbWqd01Tu03xVm9fbf1ZEFx0ZRensouu7KIr2_8DKk9wGQ</recordid><startdate>20220419</startdate><enddate>20220419</enddate><creator>PJ Badenhorst</creator><creator>RW Shone</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220419</creationdate><title>“MINERALS”, “PETROLEUM” AND “OPERATIONS” IN THE MINERAL AND PETROLEUM RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT ACT 28 OF 2002: A GEOLOGIST AS DEVIL’S ADVOCATE FOR A CHANGE?</title><author>PJ Badenhorst ; RW Shone</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c895-4be9b8b2776085c6e91cd7b6a0b5f2aa9ae4eed60b9890a8ee2a670f6195a623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>PJ Badenhorst</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RW Shone</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Obiter</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>PJ Badenhorst</au><au>RW Shone</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>“MINERALS”, “PETROLEUM” AND “OPERATIONS” IN THE MINERAL AND PETROLEUM RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT ACT 28 OF 2002: A GEOLOGIST AS DEVIL’S ADVOCATE FOR A CHANGE?</atitle><jtitle>Obiter</jtitle><date>2022-04-19</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>1</issue><issn>1682-5853</issn><eissn>2709-555X</eissn><abstract>This article examines the meaning of “minerals”, petroleum, “operations” and activities in relation to such substances to determine the ambit of the application of the Minerals and Petroleum Resources Development Act 28 of 2002, the type of rights necessary for such operations and activities and the ambit of these rights. The examination of the meaning of these concepts takes place with reference to prior definitions in statutes and also from a natural science and geology perspective. An attempt is made to show that the legal definitions do no always correspond with the geological meanings and the meanings on the ground. It is questioned whether inrecent legislation why more reliance is not placed on input from geologists in the field.</abstract><doi>10.17159/obiter.v29i1.13265</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1682-5853
ispartof Obiter, 2022-04, Vol.29 (1)
issn 1682-5853
2709-555X
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_17159_obiter_v29i1_13265
source Directory of Open Access Journals
title “MINERALS”, “PETROLEUM” AND “OPERATIONS” IN THE MINERAL AND PETROLEUM RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT ACT 28 OF 2002: A GEOLOGIST AS DEVIL’S ADVOCATE FOR A CHANGE?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T09%3A30%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E2%80%9CMINERALS%E2%80%9D,%20%E2%80%9CPETROLEUM%E2%80%9D%20AND%20%E2%80%9COPERATIONS%E2%80%9D%20IN%20THE%20MINERAL%20AND%20PETROLEUM%20RESOURCES%20DEVELOPMENT%20ACT%2028%20OF%202002:%20A%20GEOLOGIST%20AS%20DEVIL%E2%80%99S%20ADVOCATE%20FOR%20A%20CHANGE?&rft.jtitle=Obiter&rft.au=PJ%20Badenhorst&rft.date=2022-04-19&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=1&rft.issn=1682-5853&rft.eissn=2709-555X&rft_id=info:doi/10.17159/obiter.v29i1.13265&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_17159_obiter_v29i1_13265%3C/crossref%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true